“The past was erased, the erasure forgotten, and the lie became the truth.” George Orwell
This document may be read HERE in its entirety along with the initial DEMAND to HHS Secretary Becerra and Vice President Harris. To the best of my knowledge, it is all correct. If anyone sees a material error, please shoot me an email. If appropriate I will correct it and note the change.
PUBLIC HEALTH ALERT!
CDC Quietly Erased Its Webpage Claiming “Mold Not Proven to Cause Memory Loss”.
(The Soundbites are Still Used to Swindle Families Crippled by Toxic Mold in Military Housing)
by Sharon Noonan Kramer, BBA Marketing; Advocate, Integrity in HHS Health Marketing
January 17, 2025, SharonKramer@KatysExposure.Com
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are agencies governed by the United States Department of Health and Human Service (HHS). CDC is a primary source of authority for those who preach, practice, and insure medical treatments by use of evidence-based medicine (EBM).
Stachybotrys chartarum is a mold with toxic properties via its secondary metabolites, mycotoxins. It is a Toxic Mold in the stew of microbial toxins in water damaged buildings (WDB). CDC has yet to warn the public or teach physicians that Toxic Mold in WDB can damage the human brain.
At the end of May 2024, with no announcements before or since, CDC quietly erased the two-decade old webpage “Basic Facts About Mold and Dampness”. The webpage was corrupted in 2019. It was the CDC webpage used from December 2019 to May 2024 to mass market the below false soundbites as allegedly EBM advice and directive from the federal health authority:
“A link between other adverse health effects, such as acute idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage among infants, memory loss, or lethargy, and molds, including the mold Stachybotrys chartarum [Toxic Mold] has not been proven. There is no blood test for mold.”
Also disappeared is the CDC webpage “Pulmonary Hemorrhage/Hemosiderosis Among Infants” This page told the history (1999-2004) of the “outside panel of experts” who worked to discredit CDC employees who found it probable that mycotoxins in WDB can cause infant lung bleeds.
The lack of public announcement of the 2024 CDC webpage erasures causes broad continuing problems. It abets the folly that two HHS affiliated toxicologists proved in 2002 that mycotoxins can never reach a level in WDB to cause any adverse health effects. Their unscientific risk model is the “Veritox Theory.” Their names are Bryan Hardin, Ph.D. and Bruce Kelman, Ph.D. They are known for being policy deforming mold-litigation expert defense witnesses. (Read Fn. 11)
Using Navy & Marine Corps Public Health Centers (NMCPHC) as example: Part of their job is to advise military physicians to determine if Toxic Mold in military housing should be considered as a cause of new onset memory loss and additional adverse health effects among soldiers and military families. Their online advisory “Mold Information and Resources” cites to the now erased and broken-link CDC “Basic Facts About Mold….” as a source for their medical understanding.
So, NMCPHC had been learning from CDC to teach physicians not to consider Toxic Mold in military housing as a possible source of new onset memory loss or any symptoms. But the CDC soundbites used to teach this to many, have vanished without a trace.
How would NMCPHC or anyone know not to believe that anymore without HHS directly informing them? NMCPHC’s new Guidelines mention nothing about memory loss. The truth is: CDC erasing duplicitous soundbites about symptoms from Toxic Mold in WDB without informing of the erasures, does not erase the harm from the soundbites’ self-perpetuations.
WHO corrupted the “Basic Facts” webpage in 2019? Who authorized the stealth erasures in 2024? WHY does HHS continue to conceal its agencies are used for litigation defense arguments re: Toxic Mold?
As of 12//31/2024 Non-working link to the CDC “Basic Facts..” webpage https://www.cdc.gov/mold/faqs.htm
CDC “Basic Facts” webpage before 2024 erasure (with false soundbites that were added in late Dec 2019)
https://web.archive.org/web/20191230213158/https://www.cdc.gov/mold/faqs.htm
12/2024 Non-working link to “Pulmonary Hemorrhage” page https://www.cdc.gov/mold/hemorrhage_infants.htm
CDC “Pulmonary Hemorrhaging” page before 2024 erasure with history of “outside panel of experts” beginning in 1999. https://web.archive.org/web/20170519173351/https://www.cdc.gov/mold/hemorrhage_infants.htm
Fake-EBM Veritox Theory & proof it’s uses are fraudulent via National Academy of Sciences, Engineer, and Medicine (NASEM) & GAO. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/veritox-theory-discredited.pdf
NMCPHC https://www.med.navy.mil/Navy-and-Marine-Corps-Force-Health-Protection-Command/Environmental-Health/Industrial-Hygiene/Mold-Information-and-Resources/ (CDC link goes nowhere)
11/18/2024 NMCPHC Guidelines for physicians re: patients sickened by moldy housing. No mention of brain injury. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2024-nmcphu-clinicianguidance-moldanddampness2024_rev2.pdf
“The past will not be erased or forgotten to the benefit of a Racket.” Sharon N. Kramer
I. This is a “Demand” that Xavier Becerra & Kamala Harris Cause Prosecutions for the Cover Up of HHS as the Buried-Root of the Lie That It is Allegedly Proven Toxic Mold Harms No One.
It is not in the public’s best interest that in 2024, CDC erased their misinformation claiming “no proof” Toxic Mold harms brains and “There is no blood test for mold”. What that accomplishes is to hide that HHS has been the root of the two headed lie since the turn of the century: I.e. 1.) there is no evidence that mycotoxins in WDB may cause symptoms: and 2.) there is proof that it “Could not be”.
If HHS does not inform those who have cited the defunct “Basic Facts About Mold and Dampness” as EBM, that memory loss and pediatric pulmonary hemorrhage (PPH) have not been established to be caused and/or contributed to by Toxic Mold in WDB; then they will keep spreading the disinformation.
This will cause those with brain injuries and other afflictions from Toxic Mold in WDB to continue to experience discrimination and to be unable to obtain insured, educated medical care, along with restitution for negligent causation of injury. This includes sick and swindled military families.
Erasing, instead of disclosing mistakes, leaves HHS agencies vulnerable for use as unscientific litigation defense arguments, instead of evidence based public health protectors. Burying errors also stonewalls facts about health effects of Toxic Mold from reaching policies, and thus from reaching the public, physicians, insurers, and courts.
HHS practices regarding Toxic Mold is a cunning “Racket”. It has ensnared conflicted souls for over twenty years.
7/2/2024 Email to HHS General Counsel Samuel Bagenstos, Esq. re: the 2024 CDC stealth erasure & Becerra’s conflicts of interest (COI) https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/email-18-2024.7.02.pdf
2/18/2005 Court transcript, Haynes v. Adair Homes. Kelman falsely claimed that his & Hardin’s Fake EBM Veritox Theory establishes that neurocognitive problems in children “Could not be.” caused by mycotoxins in WDB. Pg 29: line 24 https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/0001-02-haynes-trns.pdf
Racket – A dishonest or illegal activity that makes money. This one is founded upon the Fake EBM from HHS.
1/10/2007 Wall Street Journal re: the Racket “Court of Opinion: Amid Suits Over Mold, Experts Wear Two Hats, Authors of Science Paper Often Cited by Defense” (This is based on my 3/2005 writing that is framed as libelous). https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/09.-amid-suits-over-mold-experts-wear-two-hats-02.07.pdf
II. Becerra is HHS Secretary. Purposes of this Demand are to Cause Him & Harris to Promptly Cause:
1. release of a public statement of the recent erasure of the misinformation on CDC “Basic Facts..” (partially repeated on the new 2024 webpage “Fact about Stachybotrys chatarum”); and
2. a simple Daubert litmus test (Fn 5) stating in writing that the Fake-EBM Veritox Theory, that was created by HHS affiliated toxicologists in 2002, does not prove that mycotoxins (Toxic Mold) cannot reach a big enough dose in WDB to cause adverse human health effects; and
3. calls for publicly made retractions of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM), American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI), American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), and U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) Mold Position Statements from journals and websites. They are vehicles used to transport the Fake EBM Veritox Theory with HHS and associates in and out of policies & courts; and
4. a GAO audit of the conflicts of interest (COI) that drive the Racket. The late Senator Kennedy stated in writing in October 2006, that COI would be investigated by GAO ; and
5. deliver a signed guarantees to me by February 15, 2025, that Becerra’s February 9, 2017, filmed pledge for investigation of HHS’s Racket, Racketeers , and Cover Up will be honored; and
6. I demand a written apology from Becerra by noon on January 20, 2025, prior to Harris leaving the White House Cabinet, for his joking with California judges on the record, that the Cover Up is “harmless error”.
This Alert to swindled military families, et.al., describes poor choices that caused and that keep HHS and the courts weaponized for mass insurer fraud re: Toxic Mold injuries, disabilities and deaths.
8/2024 new CDC page “Facts About Stachybotrys chartarum” repeating the no proof of PPH possibility, erased the “memory loss” “no blood tests” errors. https://www.cdc.gov/mold-health/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
10/20/2006 Original GAO audit request by Senator Kennedy. It would have ended the Racket but investigating for COI was erased from the scope in 2/07. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/gao-deletion.pdf
Racketeers – People who intentionally engage in dishonest and fraudulent business practices.
Cover Up – Abuse of California courts since 2005, to frame me for libel for my exposing the Racket & Racketeers
There is nothing funny about this matter. The Racket, Racketeers, and Cover Up are aided and abetted by not erased nor forgotten former California attorneys general, Xavier Becerra and Kamala Harris, both choosing not to prosecute California jurists who commit willful legal errors that are purposed to cause the wrong party to prevail in strategic litigation against public participation. (“SLAPP Fixing”)
The HHS affiliated Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators have been the case-fixed SLAPP plaintiffs since 2005. I am the framed whistleblower of their science being fraud and of those who mass market their Fake EBM as Gospel of Science proof that Toxic Mold in WDB is harming no one.
The two case-fixed SLAPP matters that serve as criminal Cover Up of the Veritox Theory being the Fake EBM at the heart of HHS and associates’ Racket are: Bruce J. Kelman & GlobalTox, Inc. v. Sharon Kramer (May 2005) and Bruce J. Kelman v. Sharon Kramer (November 2010). They are hereafter referred to as SLAPP I and SLAPP II.
The 2024 stealth erasures of the widely cited CDC webpages, while concealing HHS is the source of the fraud, is the just the tip of the multi-billion-dollar Racket and Cover Up with multiple misuses of multiple federal, state, and county assets that has been ongoing for over twenty years.
The, thus far, lack of prosecutions of California SLAPP-fixing-jurists is the direct cause of the Big Lies criminally thriving that it is allegedly proven by HHS associates (who are the case-fixed SLAPP plaintiffs and expert defense witnesses) that Toxic Mold in WDB harms no one.
3/9/2005, PRWeb “Jury Finds Toxic Mold Harms Oregon Family. Arbitration Clause Not Binding” My accurate writing that California courts have been used to frame one true sentence in it as a libelous lie for nineteen years. Racketeers dislike that I understand their marketing with misuse of government and private sector assets (HHS, U.S. Chamber, etc). I write of how to beat the scam in court, and lobby government decision makers to shut down the Racket. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2.-press-release-of-haynes-case-march-05-2.pdf
The case-fixed SLAPP matters are Bruce J. Kelman & GlobalTox, Inc. v. Sharon Kramer, North San Diego Superior Court, Case No. GIN044539 (May 2005) and Bruce J. Kelman v. Sharon Kramer, Case No. 337-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC (Nov 2010). SLAPP I is fixed to frame me for libel with actual malice for my exposing the Racket and how to beat it in court. SLAPP II is to try to stop me from telling of the judicial SLAPP fixing by unenforceable permanent injunction. Plaintiff Kelman was president of Plaintiff GlobalTox. Kelman and HHS’s Hardin have co-owned GlobalTox together and with others since 2004. GlobalTox was rebranded to Veritox, Inc. in 2005. It was acquired by JS Held LLC in 2019. The two are now JS Held principals. Kelman still works as a dishonest toxicologist. Hardin recently retired. They were represented by Keith Scheuer, Esq. (2005-2017) and William Litvak, Esq. (2018). I was represented by William Brown III, Esq (2005-2007), Lincoln Bandlow, Esq. & David Arnoff, Esq. (2007-2008), in Pro Per (since 9/15/2008). HHS is a concealed SLAPP party via incomplete Certificates of Interested Parties (2006 & 2009). “GlobalTox”, “Veritox” & “JS Held” are used interchangeably to mean Kelman’s and Hardin’s company
U.S. Congress and Senate members who will not speak of HHS’s material role in the Toxic Mold military housing debacle, including in mold litigations, also serve as silently consenting partners.
Not since the following was erased from the scope of a federal GAO audit that the late Senator Edward Kennedy ordered at my urging in October of 2006, has any politician or attorneys general been willing to act to cause the ending of the quid pro quo relationships between corruption in the courts and corruption in HHS and associates’ directives, advisories, and policies re: Toxic Mold.
“What medical and scientific standards are used in determining the admissibility of evidence of both acute and persistent health consequences resulting from exposure to mold? Which individuals and organizations have promulgated these standards and what, if any, conflicts of interest exist regarding these standards?”
Additionally, lucrative misuses of the state-owned University of California (UC) brand name since 2002 to lend undue credibility to the HHS promoted science fraud in the Racket, are also materially needed for the insidious insurer fraud scam to thrive.
So is misuse of medical journals and websites of NGO medical associations. Think tank and industry lobbying dollars are used to sell the Fake EBM Veritox Theory to judges and everyone else.
The Racket is a workcomp, property-casualty, errors & omissions, and healthcare insurer fraud scam with scientific fraud promoted by HHS, et.al. at its heart. It also works for government building stakeholders to avoid liability for negligent causation of Toxic Mold injuries and deaths.
The self-perpetuating precepts of the erased CDC soundbites, the HHS Fake EBM Veritox Theory, and the yet to be prosecuted SLAPP Fixing Cover Up continue to be used together by military landlords, their insurers, their defense attorneys, and dishonest defensors to swindle military personnel and families, who are crippled by Toxic Mold in housing and barracks.
The crime is so simple to track and prove, that it is grotesque that it is still growing in 2025. It is based on three proven false precepts:
1.) HHS & associates have proven that there is no proof that Toxic Mold in WDB can harm anyone (1999 -2025); and 2.) HHS and associates have proven that there is proof that Toxic Mold in WDB cannot harm anyone (2002-2025); and 3.) hilarious “extremely harmless errors” cause California jurists to be enabled to use obstructed from being vacated fraudulent court documents to frame me as libeling the Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators (2005 -2025).
A score and counting of intertwined acts to block accountability for the HHS-and-associate co-created scientific fraud about Toxic Mold are still used to cheat military personnel, families, workers, and countless others of access to insured real EBM healthcare and of restitution for negligent causation of disabilities & deaths from Toxic Mold in WDB.
Acts of speech-chilling retaliation coupled with willful blindness, deliberate indifference, and silent consent keep the Racket, Racketeers, and Cover Up thriving. It is reprehensible that Becerra and Harris are leaving the White House Cabinet together with the crime being swept under the rug.
Investigating the COI was deleted from the GAO audit scope by someone at Senate HELP in 2/2007. Dr. David Bowen was HELP Director. A few months ago, he told me that it has been so long ago that he does not remember who did it. As a result, the 2008 GAO Report “Indoor Mold: Better Coordination of Research on Health Effects and More Consistent Guidance Would Improve Federal Efforts” provides no directive for ending the quid pro quo COI of HHS and courts.
“Insurer Fraud” intentional acts to mislead & deceive to aid wrongful denials of payment due for insured matters.
“Defensor” is short for medico-legal expert defense witness in mold litigations. Many, not all, are defense whores.
III. We ARE Going Back! for a Future of Integrity in Policies, Science, Medicine & Justice
It is imperative that the 25th United States Secretary of Health and Human Services promptly begin honoring his February 9, 2017, filmed pledge he made to me for Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations of the Racket, the Racketeers, and Cover Up.
Otherwise, the swindle will continue to ensnare those who do not have the historical knowledge of the ongoing criminal matter that he and the 49th Vice President of the United States have.
I demand a written apology from Secretary Becerra for making “harmless error” jokes with California jurists when I first brought this crime to his attention in 2017. I want it written on HHS stationery while Secretary Becerra still can, on or before, noon on January 20, 2025.
This preliminary Crime Report and preliminary Demand have been sent to the General Counsel of HHS, Samuel Bagenstos, via email, to be forward to Secretary Becerra and Vice President Harris.
Mr. Bagenstos is aware that it is online, in large part because it makes me feel safer to have this matter in the public light. I have been sending him S.O.S. emails about this criminal matter since April 2023.
He knows that since no one made the important public announcement about the stealth 2024 CDC erred soundbite erasures of “there is no proof mold causes memory loss”, that I would do it.
More details of the crime will be mailed to Secretary Becerra and Vice President Harris once I have the initial apology for the deadly “harmless error” joke. I describe how lies became facts, real facts are buried, and the swindling insurer fraud Racket remains viable with their, thus far, personal consents.
It is my intent to cause them to cause the completion of the jobs that they should have done as California Attorneys General, U.S. Senator, U.S. Vice President, and HHS Secretary; or they will choose to ensnare Governor Gavin Newsome and Attorney General Rob Bonta in the Cover Up and Racket with enabled Racketeers.
IV. Toxic Mold in WDB Cause Disabling Brain Injuries (CIRS). HHS’s Veritox Theory is Blatant Fraud Used to Swindle Soldiers and their Families, et.al.
1. Multiple researchers, physicians, patients, attorneys, and even a non-HHS federal department, know that mold and microbial toxins (Toxic Mold) in poorly maintained WDB can be scientifically and legally established as the most probable cause of brain injuries. The matter of Air Traffic Controller Robert Haeffner v. US Department of Labor, March 2009 serves as one example:
“… your case is accepted for chronic inflammatory illness due to mold exposure in the Detroit Airport Tower … In a letter from Dr. Chiodo to Dr Shoemaker dated 11/19/08 he begins by noting you have been medically disqualified from your Air Traffic Controller position and summarizes your history of short-term memory problems, chronic headaches, inability to multi-task. He outlines the history of your exposure to mold from January 2005 to February 2008.”
2. The constellation of symptoms is commonly referred to as chronic inflammatory response syndrome (CIRS). When triggered by WDB exposures like Mr. Haeffner, Toxic Molds are present as causative and/or predominant contributing factors. Symptoms manifest in varying degrees of severity and duration. Some are:
“Issues with Memory, Concentration, Word Assimilation, Confusion, Disorientation, Mood Swings, Fatigue or Weakness, Headaches, Muscle Cramps, Electrical or Icepick Pain(s), Itching, Swelling, Light Sensitivity, Red Eyes, Blurring, Tearing, Dilated Pupils, Shortness of Breath, Cough, Sinus Issues, Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea, Bile Acid Reflux, Joint Pain, Stiffness, Appetite Swings, Sweats, Temperature Dysregulation, Static Shocks, Numbness, Tingling, Taste Abnormalities, Vertigo, Tremors, Ear Ringing, and Sicker-Quicker with Re-exposures.
3. When WDB are not adequately remediated there are multiple biocontaminants that grow. They can have individual and/or synergist effects which cause and/or contribute to CIRS-WDB. They are:
various types of Molds, Mycotoxins, Bacteria, Actinomycetes, Mycobacteria, Endotoxins, Inflammagens, Beta Glucans, Hemolysins, and Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). For this Alert-Report-Demand they are collectively hereafter referred to as “Toxic Mold”.
4. There is no permissible exposure limit (PEL) or known minimum “demonstrated threshold” for Toxic Mold exposure in WDB before symptoms occur. Due to varying dispositions, doses and durations of exposures via all routes simultaneously (inhalation, dermal, and ingestion) to Toxic Mold’s components in WDB, symptom manifestation is non-linear. They must be considered on a case-by-case basis to confirm or rule out WDB as the most probable location of causation or predominant contributing factor. No risk model can determine a standard lethal dose LD 50.
5. For over twenty years, CDC and affiliates have set policies, physician education, and public advisories based on the blatantly false precept (meaning a general rule intended to regulate behavior or thought) that it is “current accepted science” that mycotoxins in WDB can never reach a level to harm humans. Based on that false precept, HHS and associates promote that all Toxic Mold in WDB can never cause symptom indicative of CIRS. HHS serves as a non-EBM litigation defense argument for negligent WDB stakeholders and associates via intertwined marketing ploys.
6. See Fn. “Fake-EBM Veritox Theory” for proof that it is folly to claim proof that mycotoxins in WDB harm no one. The claim began in 2002. It has been proven as folly since 2004 via National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) Institute of Medicine (IOM) “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health” Report. NASEM establishes that HHS uses Fake-EBM for the Racket.
7. In addition to HHS agencies’ material roles in the Racket, the Fake EBM Veritox Theory by HHS’s Hardin and his business partner Kelman, is mass marketed as legitimate science via Position Statements of three medical associations: ACOEM, AAAAI, ACMT; along with lobbyists for commerce/fake legal reformers, who are the U.S. Chamber Institute of Legal Reform (ILR) and Manhattan Institute Center for Legal Policy (CLP) in their litigation defense argument Position Paper.
8. As example of the continuing devastating and discriminatory harm from the continuing HHS, et.al. folly, in 2024, the defense counsel for Liberty Military Housing (LMH) used the Veritox Theory of the case-fixed SLAPP plaintiffs (HHS Hardin and his business partner Kelman) to swindle a military family who had acquired CIRS from their negligently maintained toxic military housing.
9. The bamboozled Federal Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi took LMH’s defense counsel’s bogus argument as scientific. She cited the Fake EBM Veritox Theory via citing the ACOEM and AAAAI Mold Statements as the sources of authority. In doing so, she furthered the swindle of the CIRS crippled military family and discrimination against CIRS-injured everywhere. She wrote on February 8, 2024.
“In any event, defendants argue that CIRS is not a generally accepted diagnosis in the medical community. They cite to two papers, including one by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine [ACOEM] and one by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology [AAAAI], which discuss that mold exposure has been found to impact human health through three mechanisms—namely, allergy and other hypersensitivity reactions, infection, and toxicity. See Dkt. No. 54-1, Ex. B (Hardin, et al., ‘Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Molds in the Indoor Environment,’ Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 5, May 2003); id., Ex. C (Bush, et al. ‘The medical effects of mold exposure,’ Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 11 7, No. 2, 2006”
(Crime Report to Becerra and Harris shows the same swindle by LMH in a San Diego federal matter, Case No. 3:21-cv-01514-DMS-MMP, in 2023-24)
10. The above shows the exact same Racket that was detailed in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ), January 10, 2007. (Read Fn. 10). I have begged both Harris and Becerra to end the Racket via prosecuting San Diego jurists for SLAPP fixing with the Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators as case-fixed SLAPP plaintiffs. The still unprosecuted jurists’ case-fixing serves as Cover Up because I exposed the Racket first in 2005. I publicly showed how to beat it in trial via trapping defensors to talk about the money from CLP for authoring the unscientific position paper for the lobbyist from ILR, and how it is the same garbage science that is marketed by allegedly unbiased medical association position statements.
11. It is not possible to stop the fruits of the nationally occurring Racket while pretending that unprosecuted judicial crime is not still occurring in San Diego SLAPP. It is dangerous and averse to public interest to leave the White House Cabinet and HHS while enabling the swindle of Toxic Mold crippled soldiers and families with Fake EMB still being promoted as legitimate science by HHS, et.al.
Haeffner v. Department of Labor matter https://www.survivingmold.com/docs/Resources/Court%20Decisions/Haefner_OWCP_approval_2009.pdf
CIRS Symptoms https://www.nutritionwithjudy.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/cirs-symptoms.png
Fake-EBM Veritox Theory & proof it is fraud according to NASEM and GAO https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/veritox-theory-discredited.pdf
The four primary policy papers co-authored by dishonest defensors that transport the Fake EMB Veritox Theory in
out of policies, medical journals, physician miseducation, insurer claims denials, and mold litigations are:
1.) 2003 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) Position Statement “Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Mold in the Indoor Environment” (written by Hardin, Kelman, and Andrew Saxon, M.D. contains the Fake EMB Veritox Theory as source of authority re: toxicity)
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2003-acoem-mold-statement-1.pdf
2.) 2006 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI) Position Statement “The Medical Effects of Mold Exposure” (also co-authored by Saxon, cites ACOEM as its source of authority re: toxicity)
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2006-aaaai-mold-statement-shows-sunsetting.pdf
3.) 2006 American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) “[A critique of] Institute of Medicine Damp Indoor Spaces & Health” Position Statement (co-authored by Veritox affiliate and defensor Daniel Sudakin, M.D. cites ACOEM, AAAAI & Veritox as sources of authority re: toxicity) https://www.acmt.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/PS_060101_Institute-of-Medicine-Report-on-Damp-Indoor-Spaces-and-Health.pdf
4.) 2003 US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (IRL) & Manhattan Institute Center for Legal Policy (CLP) Position Paper “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold” (by Hardin & Kelman, contains the Veritox Theory & cites ACOEM that is also authored by Hardin and Kelman as its source of authority re: toxicity)
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2003-us-chamber-mold-statement.pdf
2/8/2024 “Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Testimony of Board Certified Neurologist David Ross, M.D.” https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/dr.ross-leakas-1.pdf
3/9/2005 PRWeb “Jury Finds Toxic Mold Harms Oregon Family. Arbitration Clause Not Binding”
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2.-press-release-of-haynes-case-march-05-2.pdf
9/26/2002 In an email by Dr. Johnathan Borak, overseeing of ACOEM’s Scientific Review Committee, he describes that he knew Hardin’s, Kelman’s and Saxon’s science would have been found to be “garbage” if the ACOEM BOD did not turn it into the ACOEM Mold Position Statement. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2002-borak-email-to-acoem-bod.pdf
V. The Time is Now! for Mea Culpas from Secretary Becerra & Vice President Harris
Time is running short for White House Cabinet authority for Becerra and Harris; and there is no risk that Harris will be Commander in Chief over sick and defrauded military families.
I personally feel no safer. The duo and several of their associates have motives to see me forever harassed by fraudsters in the California courts and falsely deemed a malicious liar about the Racket, Racketeers, and the aiding and abetting judicial SLAPP Fixing Cover Up in California.
This is because Harris and Becerra both chose not to prosecute those involved in the SLAPP fixing via written falsely stated pretenses, when I first brought the collusive crime to their attention as state attorneys general. They had prosecutorial jurisdiction when they ran from their duties to protect the public from corrupt California jurists, attorneys, clerks & HHS policy deforming defensors as case-fixed California SLAPP plaintiffs. And thus, they ran from ending the Racket.
Harris committed her first material legal error that enables the Racket, Racketeers, and Cover Up in 2011. I was sent a letter by her subordinate falsely stating she did not have jurisdiction to prosecute.
Becerra committed his initial acts of ensnarement in 2017. Secretary Becerra has been aware since 2017, that I was jailed in 2012 for refusing to be coerced by San Diego Superior Court Judge Thomas Nugent to lie.
Nugent wanted me to state in writing that I do not believe that SLAPP I & II are fixed for the plaintiff-Veritox Theory creators, the Racket and the Cover Up. I believe they are fixed — because the court documents prove it. (See Chapter “The Weaponized Void Judgment that Keeps the Racket Thriving” in the Crime Report to Becerra and Harris.)
What I do not believe is that Harris and Becerra have spent their careers plotting how to cripple the U.S. military, how to swindle military families, how to cause mass insurer fraud in courts and in healthcare, and how to jeopardize my safety via covering up judicial SLAPP fixing for HHS policy deforming defensors as case-fixed California SLAPP plaintiffs.
The duo appears to be products of the standard tainted practice in the United States of attorneys general and district attorneys refusing to lawfully prosecute jurists who willfully case fix; and are then rewarded for active and passive consent for unprosecuted judicial crimes in legal proceedings.
Harris and Becerra serve as extreme examples of systemic corruption caused by attorneys general refusing to prosecute case-fixing jurists. They jointly rose to the White House Cabinet to oversee the ongoing Racket with quashed evidence of their enabling of the ongoing criminal Cover Up.
Choosing to remain mum about their errors causes others like Mr. Bagenstos, legislative assistants, and political colleagues to be ensnared with at best, silent consent.
This in turn, causes Racketeers to continue to reap more ill-gotten fruits from their own and that of the unprosecuted judge crimes.
I have been sounding the alarm about Racket to government decision makers since 2004. The retaliatory Cover Up via SLAPP fixing has been ongoing since 2005. It is time-consuming and continues to cost me tremendously. I am always aware that enabled retaliation may increase in brutality for my continuing to tell the ugly facts to bootless decision makers’ faces.
As such, it is remarkably fortuitous for all who are swindled and egregiously harmed by the Racket and Cover Up (including me) that there is proof of Harris and Becerra having superior knowledge of the crime; and that together, they can begin to cause it to come to an end before leaving the White House Cabinet, regardless of who has been ensnared in the past.
To release all from ensnarement now and in the future (except those who have committed crime in furtherance of the Cover Up and/or Racket) it is imperative that Secretary Becerra’s thus far, disingenuous below words that he was filmed saying on February 9, 2017, be promptly honored:
“If you’ll allow me to interject just for Mrs. Kramer’s sake that the department of justice is there, available. If she has some matter that she would like to bring to the attention of my office, we’ll certainly consider that. We always will. We always should.”
3/10/2011 I received a letter from C Hallihan of the CADOJ on behalf of Kamala D. Harris in response to my crime report and request for criminal investigation. It states: “Your complaint about judge(s) involved in this case should be directed to the Commission on Judicial Performance. The Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over judges…Your complaint about attorney(s) involved in this case should be directed to the State Bar. The Bar has exclusive jurisdiction over attorneys.” “We are unable to assist you because the Attorney General has no jurisdiction in matters before the court or in matters where courts have already rendered a decision.” FALSE Neither the CJP or State Bar have prosecutorial authority. Nor do they do not have “exclusive jurisdiction” over judges and attorneys. They would never be able to prosecute jurists, attorneys, clerks, and litigants for collusive case fixing in Cover Up for the Racket. By law prosecutors prosecute, not ethics oversight agencies. https://nocourtofficerisabovethelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/3.11-ag-harris-refusal-to-investigate-judicial-case-fixing.pdf (Harris’s excuse was six years before Becerra ran from his pledge to investigate the same crime).
5/27/2017 CADOJ Laura Stuber, Esq. sent me an email falsely claiming that Becerra’s 2/09/2017 filmed-pledged criminal investigation of California jurists, clerks, attorneys, and HHS affiliate Veritox Theory creators had taken place at the CADOJ Public Corruption Unit (PCU). She wrote “at this time, the office has found nothing to substantiate your claims and will not be pursuing this matter”…Should you have additional information please let us know”. I had a one-hour meeting with PCU investigator Clifford Zall, Esq. on March 9, 2017. I cannot get a return phone call, email, or meeting from Zall, Stuber or Becerra. Becerra hired Stuber as a “Special Assistant” at CADOJ 5/2017 after he made the pledge to investigate HHS, et.al. and after my PCU meeting. Stuber is a former HHS Senior Counsel appointed by Obama. Her disingenuous 2017 email, is the last I have ever heard from CADOJ: https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/17.05.22-email-from-stuber.pdf
3/14/2012 Court transcript of Nugent trying to coerce me to lie for a second time, while I was in handcuffs. I said, “This is a crime”. https:nocourtofficerisabovethelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/transcript-3-14.pdf
2/20/2019 Emails to and from US Senator Harris’s Legislative Assistant Spencer Perry re: several elements of the Racket, the Cover Up, and how they are used to swindle Toxic Mold crippled military families. I explained how then Attorney General Becerra was “following in her footsteps” via not prosecuting those who SLAPP fix for the Racket. Instead of acting to mitigate damages from Harris’s & Becerra’s mistakes, they went silent shortly after my D.C. meeting- thus silently consented. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2019-emails-harris.pdf
In September of 2004, I was a key organizer of a Mold Awareness Week & Congressional Mold Caucus sponsored by the late Congressman John Conyers. In January 2006, I moderated a US Senate Staff Briefing Re: “The Health Effects of Mold and Mycotoxins” sponsored by the late Senators Edward Kennedy and James Jeffords. Neither effort ended HHS’s malicious disinformation machine that is still used for mass insurer fraud and swindling. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2006-senate-staff-briefing.pdf
5/13/2005 Original Complaint from SLAPP I for my accurate use of the words “altered his under oath statements”. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1.-original-complaint-kelman-case.pdf
2/09/2017 VIDEO CLIPS of the Commission on Judicial Appointments (COJA) hearing where I first met Becerra. https://youtu.be/SoA05Rc60YY He pledged to investigate SLAPP fixing jurists. Then he made “harmless error” jokes about the fraudulent court documents that they use to harass and frame me as libeling the Veritox Theory creators and he voted to appoint San Diego Superior Court Judge William Dato to be an appellate justice. I had just explained orally and in writing that Dato not being held accountable for unrepentant falsification of court documents in case-fixed SLAPP is material to the Cover Up, and thus material to causing the ongoing Racket.
VI. I Demand an Apology from Becerra for Joking with Judges that this Crime is ‘Harmless”
The COJA Hearing was held in the Fourth District Division One Court of Appeals in San Diego. After Becerra made the above pledge, he made “harmless error” jokes about California jurists using fraudulent court documents to frame me as libeling the Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators.
Believing there was a possibility that Becerra might become a man of his word, I brushed off his discriminatory comments and poor decisions. I took a road trip based on his pledge. It ended at the gas lit dead-end street at the CADOJ PCU in Sacramento on 3/9/2017 for a one-hour meeting. No one from CADOJ, including Becerra, responds to me since Ms. Stuber’s lie-laden email of 5/27/17.
About the Not Funny or Harmless 2/9/2017 COJA Hearing and Material Mean-Spirited Joking
There is nothing funny or harmless about a gaggle of California jurists, clerks, attorneys, and HHS affiliated Fake EBM creators getting away with co-case-fixing SLAPPs for the lucrative Racket.
California’s chief law enforcement officer cracking jokes about it and then welching on his pledged investigations of his fellow jokesters only to become overseer of the Racket and their unprosecuted Cover Up; along with re-victimizing of Toxic Mold Disabled (TMD) with jokes is also not funny.
The jokes by Becerra, et.al. on February 9, 2017, cut me like a knife. I had to sit there and watch a room filled with jurists, clerks and local government employees laugh — while knowing countless people are being crippled, swindled, and some die from the yet to be prosecuted and not even close to funny or harmless SLAPP fixing for the Racket (that is anchored in old, buried errors at HHS).
It is a massive insurer scam founded upon unscientific toxicological risk models, twisted misquoting of others’ research, and ignorant bias coming from HHS and outside associates. It makes me want to cry, not laugh. The VIDEO CLIPS Fn. shows a covey of above-the-law jurists.
The VIDEO CLIPS show that on February 9, 2017, SLAPP fixer San Diego Superior Court Judge Pressman spoke before I did. He told a story about his good friend, fellow SLAPP fixer San Diego Superior Court Judge William Dato, and him. The story was about a time when they both had difficult cases. They thought it was funny that Dato said they should put arrows in each other’s office windows so unreasonably disgruntled litigants would take a shot at the other one’s chamber.
Pressman finished his clever presentation with “And I’ll conclude with these words I trust you will remember – harmless error”. The room roared at the joke. I did not laugh. I got that I was the butt of the joke to sell doubt that what I was about to say was the truth, before I said a word.
Former California Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakayue has been aware of the collusive SLAPP fixing since 2011. I asked her to intercede and stop the judge crime to spoil the fruits of it, many times.
She chose to join in with Pressman’s “harmless error” joke. She said “Thank you, Judge Pressman. Wise words.” She, too, got big laughs. I rolled my eyes.
When I spoke, Cantil-Sakayue cut me off when I was about to describe exactly what Dato did to assist in keeping the fraudulent Void Judgment from SLAPP I usable in violation of Civil and Penal Codes. I said, “On April 3, 2009, in violation of Civil….” Cantil-Sakayue stopped me from talking. She said I had thirty seconds more to speak.
So, I cut to the chase and stated my ultimate purpose of being there. It was to force California Attorney General to have to personally read and personally hear about the Racket, Racketeers, and Cover Up; and to cause him to lawfully commence criminal investigations of the SLAPP fixing jurists, clerks, attorneys, and HHS affiliated Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators as case-fixed SLAPP plaintiffs – to end the disgusting Racket.
Below is Some of What I Said to Becerra, et.al. at the COJA Hearing on February 9, 2017:
(This is not verbatim, but close. See VIDEO CLIPS) “I object to Judge Dato’s appointment to the Fourth/First on the grounds of honest services fraud with Judge [Joel] Pressman, Justice [Judith] McConnell, Justice [Richard] Huffman, Justice [Patricia] Benke, Justice [Joanne] Irion, [Justice Cynthia Aaron] and several San Diego judges and clerks. I submitted documents. See exhibit five for Judge Pressman’s use of a Void Judgment.
I have a degree in marketing and am a medical journal published author regarding misconduct when setting policies over disabilities caused by water damaged buildings. I’m one of the people who worked very hard to cause the CJP [Commission on Judicial Performance] audit because of court crimes going unpunished. The crime in which Judge Dato is unfortunately involved is this:
There’s a scientifically void risk assessment model. It’s called the Veritox Theory. It was created by the toxicologist owners of Veritox, Inc. What it does is falsely claim to prove that Toxic Mold can never reach a level to disable or kill.
In 2005, I published a writing. It exposed how the Veritox Theory was being mass marketed into policies by joined unclean hands of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a think tank, a U.S. congressman, a medical association, and the owners of Veritox, Inc. who are toxic tort expert defense witnesses for the United States Department of Justice, other government agencies, and insurers.
Veritox relies on fraud remaining in policies to lend undue credibility to their bogus testimonies when serving as toxic, um, basically cheating toxic mold disabled people in litigation and in claims handling practices.
In 2005, Veritox and their president, Bruce Kelman, sued me for libel for the words “altered his under-oath statements” in the writing. With all due respect, Chief Justice, your courts have spent twelve years harassing me and framing me for libel for those words by the creation and continued usages of void judgments, fraudulent liens and fraud concealing remittiturs…
Judge Dato violated Penal Code 134 by leaving the void judgement in effect. Justice McConnell has been obstructing its vacating. Um, what I really came here to ask is for the Attorney General of the State of California to investigate these unpunished crimes, CJP unpunished crimes, because it’s harming a lot of people across the United States. Will you do that?”
Cantil-Sakayue shielded Becerra from answering my “Yes” or “No” question. She said,
“…Thank you… That is the end of your presentation….”
After commenters spoke and it came time to vote, Secretary Becerra made a speech and said:
“..If you’ll allow me to interject just for Mrs. Kramer’s sake that the department of justice is there, available. If she has some matter that she would like to bring to the attention of my office, we’ll certainly consider that. We always will. We always should…
But your [Dato’s] stock went up when Judge Pressman said you eat cheap tacos. So, I think Judge Pressman was talking to us when he talked about harmless error…
And so my questions, Madam Chief Justice, are very few. [as in NONE].
Because I suspect we’re in the room of extremely harmless errors and we look forward to the opportunity to elevate Judge Dato to the Fourth District… Aye.”
I demand an apology in writing from Secretary Becerra for making “harmless error” jokes about the subject Cover Up and Racket that has continued to swindle disabled and dying people under his watch of HHS. I want it on HHS letter head before he leaves office. He can email it to me.
2/09/2017 (partial) Brochure of the COJA Hearing. Governor Jerry Brown’s nominee for appointment was Dato. Speakers in favor of the appointment were Leonard Simon, Esq., San Diego Superior Court Judge Joel Pressman, and California Appellate Justice Howard Wiener (ret). Speaker opposed was Sharon Noonan Kramer. COJA panelists were California Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakayue, Senior Appellate Justice Manuel Ramires, and Attorney General Becerra. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2017-brochure-re-appt.pdf
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 61 states. “Harmless Error. Unless justice requires otherwise, no error in admitting or excluding evidence—or any other error by the court or a party—is ground for granting a new trial, for setting aside a verdict, or for vacating, modifying, or otherwise disturbing a judgment or order. At every stage of the proceeding, the court must disregard all errors and defects that do not affect any party’s substantial rights.” The jurists do not deny that obstructed-from-being-vacated fraudulent court documents and suppressed evidence are used to frame me. They pretend that framing me is harmless & has nothing to do with their covering up & enabling a massive Racket.
9/13/2011 Katy’s Exposure “Is the California Court Case Management System (CCMS) Being Misused For Politics In Policy & Litigation…And The Fleecing Of The California Taxpayer Over The Mold Issue?” It has been online since 2011 that I asked Cantil-Sakayue to intercede while showing how jurists, clerks, Scheuer & Kelman have been committing crimes while framing me for libel and that they know it. (This does even include motions I have made to the Supreme Court) https://katysexposure.com/2011/09/13/is-the-california-court-case-management-system-ccms-being-misused-for-politics-in-policy-litigation-and-the-fleecing-of-the-california-taxpayer/
VOID JUDGEMENT from SLAPP I – This is the fraudulent court document that keeps the entire Racket thriving by criminal means. It does not state by decree that the 2008 jury found I did not libel SLAPP plaintiff GlobalTox. Nor does it have my cost award on its face. It is not possible to frame someone for libel while awarding their costs as a trial prevailing party by judgment. This was written by Hardin’s and Kelman’s attorney Scheuer 9/2008. Judge Lisa Schall signed it on 9/24/2008. No one noticed me and nothing was entered into the electronic case record (Register of Action ROA) by Schall’s clerk, Michael Garland. So, I could not see what they were collusively doing. It is not possible this was “harmless error”. https://veritoxmeanstruthpoison.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/3-9-24-08-void-judgment-as-used-to-harass-kramer.pdf
My Documents That Becerra was Charged to Personally Read Prior to the COJA Hearing
In writing, I asked Governor Brown to withdraw his nomination of Dato to serve as an associate appellate justice in the Fourth/First. I also provided evidence of the judicial SLAPP fixing and harassment with fraudulent court documents, etc. I asked COJA panelists to vote ‘no” to the Dato-appellate appointment, because of his material role in the Cover Up, and thus in the Racket.
It was demeaning for me, and short-sighted for Becerra to join in with the jurists’ running “harmless error” joke, without even asking me a single question. I had just explained the Racket and Cover Up, orally and how it harms people across the U.S. I also explained it in writing.
California’s former “chief law enforcement officer” and allegedly vetting before voting COJA panelist, Becerra, was charged with reading what I wrote prior to the hearing and making decisions.
He had several days prior to the vetting-COJA hearing to read and prepare questions. If he did not understand what I told him, at the very least he should have said, “I abstain from voting”. Dato would have had the two judge-votes that were needed for appointment; and HHS Secretary Becerra would have avoided his initial step into ensnarement of the Cover Up and Racket.
In the past twenty years, I have met several people who became ensnared by doing favors for associates who are already ensnared. Below is from my request to Brown to withdraw the nomination of Dato to protect Becerra from ensnarement (now eight years ago). (See pg. 6)
“So for six years, Governor Brown, your office-staff have been telling me that you do not have the capability to thwart deadly cronyism in the California courts. But today, I know that is not the case. Please act today on behalf of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens and workers of California and the United States; and on behalf of assuring integrity and autonomy to our courts.
Please rescind your nomination of William S. DATO to serve as a justice in the 4th/1st with
his equally compromised judicial peers of Justices Judith McConnell, Patricia Benke, Richard
Huffman, Cynthia Aaron, and Joanne Irion.
Instead of placing your new Attorney General Xavior Becerra in a compromised position by asking him to appoint Judge DATO to the 4th/1st in the interest of justice; could you please instead in the interest of justice, ask AG Becerra to prosecute Judge DATO and over half of the justices of the 4th/1st?
The direct evidence is undeniable. They are criminally involved in twelve years of unrepentant SLAPP-fixing to defraud the citizens of California and the United States. To date, no one will punish them.”
I have been in the clutches of the ensnared jurists for twenty years as they systematically frame me for libel for a true sentence to benefit the Racket with Veritox owners and their attorneys. The jurists make jokes because they know that they can, with no fear of ever being prosecuted.
The jurists know that if they ever stopped pretending that what they do to me is lawful and harmless via lawfully recalling remittiturs and vacating void judgments, it would spotlight that they have been SLAPP fixing as lynchpins to the Racket since 2005. As such, they will never stop doing it.
I know why the jurists do what they do. I still do not know what possessed an intelligent man like HHS Secretary Becerra, to choose to be filmed ignorantly promoting that I am a moron who wastes my time complaining about laughable “harmless errors”. I watched him get owned by the Racket.
The below jpeg is from page 2 of my request that Brown withdraw his nomination of Dato. Becerra was charged to read the below as vetting-before-voting COJA panelist in February 2017, prior to joining in with the jurists’ running “harmless error” joke and saying “Aye”. The bad decisions were made by California’s chief law enforcement officer, while foolishly dismissing my warnings of them being averse to the public’s interest, while a camera was rolling.
2/3/2017 COJA panelists and Dato received my filed documents from COJA Secretary AhMoi Kim via email.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2017.02.03-email-ahmoi-kim.pdf
2/2/2017 Request of Brown to withdraw nomination. COJA panelists and Dato read why I asked. https://veritoxmeanstruthpoison.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/17-02-02-final-to-brown-re-dato-appt.pdf
2/2/2017 Request to COJA panelists to vote “no”. They saw how the Void Judgment came to be, who obstructs its vacating, how it is used to frame and harass me; along with Dato’s role material role in SLAPP I to keep it usable. https://veritoxmeanstruthpoison.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/17-02-02-final-to-comm-jud-app-re-dato.pdf
Re: the poor quality of my Video Clips of the February 9, 2017 COJA hearing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iq_7P3CgIyk I do not have a complete video of the hearing because Cantil-Sakayue would not permit for me to be given a copy. I had to make an appointment with her Executive Secretary AhMoi Kim, travel to the California Supreme Court in San Francisco, sit in a room with a clerk playing it on a laptop with a deputy sheriff sitting behind me, and record what I could with my cell phone. Many COJA hearings are viewable online. This one is not. August 2017 emails with Ms. Kim re: her scheduling of my appt at the CA Supreme Court: https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/8.2017-emails-with-ahmoi-kim.pdf
Flat earther — one who chose to join in the fun of cleverly parroting his new homies’ mean-spirited and maligning jokes about one who had just sounded alarm to him of institutionalized collusive corruption in their courts abetting scientific fraud in HHS policies & insurer fraud re: Toxic Mold disabilities and deaths — while a camera was rolling.
VII. Motto of the Racket Used for Mass Discrimination, Hardships, Deaths & Insurer Frauds
I do not know why anyone would find the above to be funny or harmless. This is particularly true if he did not even ask questions before making flat-eartherish “harmless error” jokes about it with California jurists — who he was just shown the direct evidence are lynch-pin SLAPP fixers for a Racket involving HHS, EPA, USDOJ, US Chamber of Commerce, insurers, defensors, and scientific fraud to swindle people, who are crippled by Toxic Mold out of healthcare and restitution for injury.
Below is the motto and theme of the not even close to funny or harmless Racket.
“Thus, the notion Toxic Mold is an insidious secret killer as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim, is Junk Science unsupported by actual scientific study.”
The above theme of the Racket is purposed to profit via mass marketing scientific fraud, to assist others to cheat to avoid liability for negligent causation of disabilities and deaths caused by Toxic Mold in WDB. It is the motto of the multifaceted insurer fraud scam of epic proportion.
The motto is a soundbite to make it appear that it is scientifically proven that all who say that disabilities and deaths from Toxic Mold in WDB are real, are people who should be belittled by folie a plusieurs flat earthers, who think themselves to be clever and witty.
The motto is purposed to instill hatred and discrimination of the sick and dying as liars and fakers, to make and save money. Ignorant group think furthers the hatred of the TMD and those who advocate for them.
It is meant to portray that mold plaintiff attorneys and treating physicians as charlatans and quacks; and that anyone who writes of injuries and death from Toxic Mold are deceptive people who make up unscientific stories for hype and attention.
The above is the motto of the multi-billion-dollar Racket that HHS Secretary Becerra has been overseeing since 2021; because he did not prosecute for its not funny Cover Up via judicial SLAPP fixing in California when he had prosecutorial authority. Neither did Harris before him.
Commerce’s & Defensors’ Profitable Unscientific View of the Health Effects of Toxic Mold
The disgusting motto began to be propagated in 2003. Fake legal reformers from the US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) and Manhattan Institute Center for Legal Policy (CLP) paid the Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators, Hardin and Kelman, to pen the discriminatory and blatantly false theme of the Racket.
The white paper that serves as the position statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, that the motto of the Racket is written in, is “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold” (pdf pgs 48-74). It is commonly referred to as the “US Chamber Mold Statement”. Its stated authors are Hardin, Kelman, and Coreen Robbins of GlobalTox, along with Andrew Saxon of UCLA. (pdf pgs 72-73)
It carries the falsely legitimizing federal CDC NIOSH and Public Health Services Commission Corps (PHSCC) imprimaturs via its co-author Hardin (pdf pg. 72) and the falsely legitimizing University of California imprimatur via stated author Andrew Saxon, MD. of UCLA. (pdf pg. 72).
The deceptive soundbite motto of the Racket is the concluding sentence of the US Chamber Mold Statement (pdf page 71). The Fake EBM Veritox Theory is in it as its primary source of authority used as false proof that mycotoxins in WDB can never reach a level to harm. (pgs 67-69).
The US Chamber Mold Statement cites the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) as a source of authority on the subject, via citing the 2003 version of the article “Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Mold in the Indoor Environment” by Hardin, Kelman, and Saxon. (pdf. pg. 65). Chamber says: “See Hardin, B.D. et al., Adverse human health effects associated with molds in the indoor environment, J. OCCUP. ENVIRON. MED.
45(5):470-78 (2003)”
This article is commonly known as the “ACOEM Mold Statement” as published in ACOEM’s Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (JOEM) in 2003.
There is another version of the ACOEM Mold Statement. It was published on their website (not in their journal) on October 27, 2002. It was edited by anonymous ACOEM members in 2011. It was erased without a trace from ACOEM’s website in 2015. The 2002 version states the authorship while tooting the authors’ HHS, UC, and Veritox affiliated credentials, like the US Chamber did:
The 2002 version of the ACOEM Mold Statement as published on their website until 2011, stated:
“This ACOEM statement was prepared by Bryan D. Hardin, PhD, Bruce J. Kelman, PhD, DABT, and Andrew Saxon, MD, under the auspices of the ACOEM Council on Scientific Affairs. It was peer-reviewed by the Council and its committees and was approved by the ACOEM Board of Directors on October 27, 2002. Dr. Hardin is the former Deputy Director of NIOSH, Assistant Surgeon General (Retired), and Senior Consultant to Global Tox, Inc, where Dr. Kelman is a Principal. Dr. Saxon is Professor of Medicine at the School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles.”
The 2011 version of the ACOEM Mold Statement (published on their website until 2015) erased stating the authors’ affiliation with HHS, UC, and Veritox. Without stating who at ACOEM edited it, it states:
“This revised ACOEM position statement was prepared under the auspices of the Council of Scientific Advisors and approved by the ACOEM Board of Directors on February 14, 2011. This revised statement updates the previous (2002) position statement which was prepared by Bryan D. Hardin, PhD; Bruce J. Kelman, PhD, DABT; and Andrew Saxon, MD; under the auspices of the ACOEM Council on Scientific Affairs.”
The purportedly unbiased medical association of ACOEM and the fake legal reformers from CLP and IRL used Hardin’s affiliation with HHS and Saxon’s with UCLA to give an air of credibility to the Fake EBM Veritox Theory that was created by SLAPP plaintiffs Hardin and Kelman.
Thus, they used and still use the state and federal assets to lend credibility to the hatred and bias instilling precept of “Thus, the notion Toxic Mold is an insidious secret killer as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim, is Junk Science unsupported by actual scientific study”.
Secretary Becerra seems to think this is funny and harmless; and that they get away with the lucrative discrimination of the disabled and dying via criminal use of government assets, i.e. the unprosecuted judicial SLAPP fixing in California.
White paper is a guide that concisely informs about a complex issue and presents the issuing body’s philosophy.
Position statement is a document that carries weight because it represents an organizations’ stances on a subject.
7/17/2003 US Chamber ILR “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold” (US Chamber Mold Statement) It begins on pdf page 48 of the following pdf: https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/hardin_a-scientific-view-of-the-health-effects-of-mold_2003_naysayer.pdf
5/2003 ACOEM’s JOEM version of the ACOEM Mold Statement, states co-authors Hardin, Kelman, and Saxon. No mention of HHS, UC or Veritox affiliations: “This ACOEM statement was prepared by Bryan D. Hardin, PhD, Bruce J. Kelman, PhD, DABT, and Andrew Saxon, MD, under the auspices of the ACOEM Council on Scientific Affairs. It was peer-reviewed by the council and its committees, and was approved by the ACOEM Board of Directors on October 27, 2002” The erased 2002 website version on the ACOEM Mold Statement, states the affiliation with HHS, UC, and Veritox. (See pdf pgs 2, 4, 5) for the difference in the 2002, 2003, & 2011 versions of stated authorship. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ilovepdf_merged-5_merged.pdf
VIII. Facts Confirmed by Under Oath Statements of SLAPP Plaintiff Kelman & Andrew Saxon of UCLA, along with Billing Records for the US Chamber Mold Statement
1. According to Kelman in SLAPP I (2007) either he or Hardin wrote the motto for the Racket of: “Thus, the notion Toxic Mold is an insidious secret killer as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim, is Junk Science unsupported by actual scientific study.” He said could not remember which of the two SLAPP plaintiffs wrote the bias-instilling and blatantly false sentence.
2. According to Kelman in SLAPP I (2007) CLP paid them to write the US Chamber Mold Statement, including its motto, because they wanted something that judges can understand.
3. According to Kelman in Kari Kilian v. Equity Residential Trust, (2004) , the US Chamber Mold Statement (including its motto) that the Manhattan Institute CLP paid them $40,000.00 to write, is a “lay translation” of the ACOEM Mold Statement with the meaning of both being the same.
4. In Kilian, Kelman also stated that they created the Veritox Theory via applying extrapolations to data taken from one rodent study. (See above Fn)
5. According to Kelman in Haynes v. Adair Homes (2005) , the Manhattan Institute CLP never would have hired and paid them $40,000 to author the US Chamber Mold Statement in 2003, if they had not authored the ACOEM Mold Statement (with the same disgusting meaning and same fake EBM). He also stated that they authored the US Chamber Mold Statement as a “group” without stating who was in the group.
6. According to under oath statements of alleged US Chamber Mold Statement co-author, Andrew Saxon, M.D. of UCLA in Hake v. Coleman Homes (2006); he did not co-author the US Chamber Mold Statement, did not know he was listed as co-author, and had not even read it three years after publication.
7. Coreen Robbins, Ph.D./CIH is also a co-owner of SLAPP plaintiff GlobalTox and a stated co-author of the US Chamber Mold Statement. However, via request for production of documents in SLAPP I, the billing records for the US Chamber Mold Statement were provided to me. Only Veritox (aka GlobalTox) owners who are the toxicologists Hardin and Kelman billed hours for the authorship. No hours were billed for Veritox owner CIH Robbins’ alleged co-authorship.
8. Via SLAPP I, I also received the contract and the cancelled checks from CLP to Veritox for authorship of the US Chamber Mold Statement. Supposedly it was a complete record of the amount paid to Veritox. The checks total $25,000 and match with the time billed by Hardin and Kelman. (So, no time was billed by Robbins and no payment for Robbins’ alleged co-authorship)
9. In SLAPP I, Kelman stated that he must have “misremembered” that Veritox was paid $40,000 to author the US Chamber Mold Statement (while turning over only $25.000 in cancelled checks).
10. Kelman also stated in SLAPP I (2007) that Saxon was not paid and he could not remember if Saxon was a listed co-author of the US Chamber Mold Statement.
11. In SLAPP I (2008) Kelman remembered that Saxon was listed as a co-author of the US Chamber Mold Statement, and that they asked Saxon and he gave Kelman permission to list him as a co-author.
12. Kelman’s testimony in SLAPP I is in direct conflict with Saxon in Hake. In Hake, Saxon stated he did not know that he was listed as a co-author of the US Chamber Mold Statement. If true, he could not have given permission for the legitimizing UC imprimatur being on it via listing him as a co-author.
Somebody is Lying About How the Credibility Lending University of California brand name got on the US Chamber Mold Statement via its stated authorship. Is it Kelman or Saxon?
Robbins did not co-author the US Chamber Mold Statement. Billing records show that she billed no time for the endeavor. Saxon claims that did not co-author. Nor was he paid and he claims he had not even read it three years after publication.
So, who was the “group” that authored the US Chamber Mold Statement and what happened to the other $15,000 that did not go to Veritox for the endeavor?
12/20/2007 Kelman in SLAPP I, stated that he or Hardin wrote the disgusting soundbite motto of the Racket. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2007-kelman-said-he-or-hardin-wrote-the-sentence.pdf
12/20/2007 Kelman in SLAPP I, stated that he knew they were hired and paid by the CLP to author the US Chamber Mold Statement (including its motto) with judges being the target audience of the paid for hire endeavor.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2007.12.20-kelman-deposition-in-slapp.pdf
4/22/2004 Kelman in the bench trial of Kari Kilian v. Equity Residential Trust, Case No. CIV 02-1272-PHX-FJM, Phoenix, Arizona, discussed the money from the Manhattan Institute CLP was for a “lay translation” of the ACOEM Mold Statement and the meaning of the ACOEM & US Chamber Mold Statements are the same. pg. 904-906 https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2004-kelman-in-kilian.pdf
3/18/2005 Kelman in Haynes v. Adair Homes, Case No. CCV0211573. Kelman described that CLP never would have paid them $40,000 for the “lay translation” (US Chamber Mold Statement) — if they had not already authored the ACOEM Mold Statement. This was after Kilian was allowed into the Haynes trial, after Kelman shouted “That’s ridiculous!” when asked about CLP money for authorship & the defense counsel tried to stop the line of questioning, to no avail. He described that the US Chamber Mold Statement was authored by a “group” without stating who was in the group. (pgs 53-58) https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1.-testimony-in-question-bruce-j.-kelman-haynes-case-oregon-march-05.pdf
11/28/2006 Saxon in Hake v. Coleman et al, Case No. A496174 8th District, Nevada stating he did not co-author the US Chamber Mold Statement and had not even read it three years after publication.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2006-saxon-in-hake-1.pdf
Hours that Veritox billed CLP for authoring the US Chamber Mold Statement. No hours were billed by Robbins.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2003-mi-billabe-hours-merged.pdf
4/19/2003 Contract between CLP and Veritox. $25,000 of canceled checks for the US Chamber Mold Statement matching the hours billed by Hardin & Kelman only. Contract: https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2003-mi-contract.pdf Cancelled checks from CLP to Veritox 6/1/2003 to 9/1/2003 for $25K https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2003-canceled-checks.pdf
Kelman in SLAPP I stated that he “misremembered” that Veritox was paid $40K https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/kelman-misremembered-40k-1.pdf
Kelman in SLAPP I (2007) stated Saxon was not paid & could not remember if the UCLA physician was a stated a co-author with the three Veritox co-owners of Hardin, Kelman and Robbins. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2007-kelman-said-he-or-hardin-wrote-the-sentence.pdf
Kelman in SLAPP I (2008) he remembered that Saxon was listed as a co-author and that he gave his permission to be listed as a co-author of the US Chamber Mold Statement. This is in conflict with Saxon stating in Hake that he did not author it and did not know he was listed as a co-author of the US Chamber Mold Statement.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2008-kelman-says-got-saxon-permission.pdf
A Few Facts about “the group” who were cited as sources of authority for the US Chamber Mold Statement by HHS’s Hardin and his business partner Kelman.
1. On May 13 and 14, 2002 there was a conference hosted by notorious defensor Ronald Gots M.D. at George Washington University. Defensors were presenters along with CDC employees.
2. The Gots conference was disingenuously titled “Mold Medicine & Mold Science; Its Practical Application for Patient Care, Remediation and Claims”. I find no trace of it on the Internet. I still have the evidence that it happened and its list of presenters/presentation in my Racket files.
3. How this conference has continued to influence HHS policies to this day is described in detail in the Crime Report to Becerra and Harris. For now, I am just showing two more defensors who Becerra and Harris are ensnared with until Becerra honors his pledge.
a.) Paul Lees-Haley, Ph.D, Neuropsychology Consultant, Health Education Services from Huntsville, Alabama. Article presented “Mold Neurotoxicity: Validity, Reliability and Baloney”
1. According to Source Watch and billing documents, Lees-Haley was a recruiter of white coat team players on behalf of the Big Tobacco front group, Washington Technical Information Group, Inc.
2. Below are two excerpts from the 2008 Wall Street Journal article linked in the Fn. about Lees-Haley and what he charges as a defensor for his work for insurers when aiding denial of liability for brain injury-causation. He does it with baloney that he calls the “Fake Bad Scale”.
“Virtually everyone is a malingering according to this scale’, saying leading critic James Butcher a retired psychologist from the University of Minnesota, who has published research faulting the Fake Bad Scale. ‘This is great for the insurance companies, but not great for people’
…Working for litigants is Dr. Lees-Haley’s main source of income. He has said in court cases that 95% is for the defense. He charges $3500 to evaluate a claimant and $600 per hour for depositions and court appearance, his fee schedule says.”
Please read the links in the Fn about Lees-Haley. His work remains extremely relevant to the instilled physician and court discrimination of those with brain injuries from Toxic Mold in WDB.
5/13-14/2002 HHS Employees & Defensor at the Gots Mold Conference in D.C. (or had their work presented)
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2002.03-gots-mold-conference.pdf
Paul Lees-Haley: Prior to becoming an instant expert about Toxic Mold, brain injuries, and “baloney”; in 1991 Lees-Haley invented the Fake Bad Scale. It became part of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) test in 2007. It is (was?) used extensively via defense-ordered neuropsych exams of plaintiffs, including but not limited to in mold litigations. It was known to be so slanted for the defense that WSJ published an article of how nearly every plaintiff with brain injuries in litigation was deemed a malinger via its use. 3/5/2008 WSJ “Malingerer Test Roils Personal-Injury Law ‘Fake Bad Scale’ Bars Real Victims, Its Critics Contend”
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2008-wsj-lees-haley-fake-bad-scale.pdf
There is key article that melds Hardin’s and Kelman’s Veritox Theory, Lees-Haley’s Fake Bad Scale, Bardana’s, Page’s and Trout’s articles about the alleged non-health effects of mycotoxins in WDB, and how to use them for Defense Medical Exams (DME). Six Toxic Mold injured workers were subjected to DME at UC Irvine in 2004-05 (Not sure all were at UCI) In 2005, Clinical Neuropsychologist then published a hatefully discriminatory article when selling doubt of WDB causation of brain injury. “Has the rolling uterus finally gathered moss? Somatization and malingering of cognitive deficit in six cases of ‘toxic mold’ exposure” by psychologizers David Stone, Kyle Boone & Ira Lesser of UCLA Harbor & Carla Back-Madruga USC. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/has-the-rolling-uterus.pdf
In 2007 and 2008, NIOSH was partially funding conferences at UCI where the “Rolling Uterus” concept was being taught by defensors affiliated with UCI and UCLA (and also with ACOEM and AOEC). Dr. Phillip Harber, who was a peer reviewer when ACOEM created its Mold Statement in 2002, was involved. In 2007 and 2008, they were doing mock mold trials and giving CLE credits while training an army of medico-legal expert defense witnesses via the use of State of California owned University of California, the baloney from the Gots conference, and the Veritox Theory.
Source Watch history of Weinberg Group. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Weinberg_Group
b.). Ronald Gots, M.D. Ph.D. Conference Host & Principal, International Center for Toxicology & Medicine (ICTM). Presentations included: Mold Hype vs. Mold Science; Correcting Mold Misinformation, Investigating Health Complaints, Mold Claims, Mold and Mold Toxins; The Newest Toxic Tort, Indoor Health Problems: A Sound Process for Resolution, Mold & Health Tips
1. Via Gots being the host of this conference with HHS employees, it is not hard to see that HHS took a nosedive on the wrong side of science and justice to the benefit of WDB stakeholders and their insurers at the turn of the century.
2. According to Source Watch “The National Environmental Development Association [the TIEQ] was created in 1992. It is generally known as NEDA/TIEQ. RJ Reynolds Tobacco is an original corporate founder and member, and E. Bruce Harrison, a public relations firm who represents RJ Reynolds, created it with funding from Reynolds.” Tobacco legacy documents show that Gots was a key member of NEDA/TIEQ performing services and making plans for the RJ Renolds Tobacco Company via the funded E. Bruce Harrison Company.
3. Below is the synopsis of the Dateline “The Paper Chase” explaining why it won a Peabody Award in 2000 for exposing that Gots has a shady past when helping insurers deny liability for insured injuries. (Who decided he would host a conference with CDC employees two years later?)
4. One may watch the Dateline “Paper Chase” expose’ via the above link in the Fn. about Gots. After the expose’ publicly aired and won a Peabody in 2000; two years later, Gots was able to serve as host for influential environmental policy setters from HHS and other defensors? WHY?
5. Synopsis about the 2000 Dateline Peabody Award:
“In 1993, one woman filed for medical accident coverage resulting from an auto accident claim. Her auto insurance company, State Farm, substantially reduced her medical claims after subjecting them to a “paper review,” the practice of sending only medical files and accident reports, not claimants themselves, to an independent firm for a second opinion. Her situation let to a 15-month investigation of this process by executive producer Neal Shapiro, senior producer Allan Maraynes, producer Lynne Dale, correspondent John Larson, reporter Andy Lehren, and associate producer Mable Chan. They examined medical claims from accidents sent to the nation’s largest insurance company, State Farm, and two of the paper review firms the company employed at the time.”
6. According to Dateline, Gots’s company was Medical Claims Review Services (MCRS). It was one of the two paper reviewers they investigated. Dateline reported of how Gots’s company cut insured care, in the 3rd video of the series. In the 4th video they reported of a MCRS victim, Cindy Robinson, winning $10M from State Farm. They quoted the judge as writing in his findings that Gots’ MCRS was a “completely bogus operation” “writing cookie cutter reports”. MCRS went out of business in 1995, one year after Robinson filed suit, according to Dateline.
“In their analysis, the producers and reporters inspected more than seventy thousand pages of documents, searched computer court files in more than one hundred courthouses in a dozen states, and examined the two companies, which were supposed to provided independent, objective medical review for State Farm. Their investigation found strong evidence alleging some medical reports were slanted toward denial or reduction of claims, while others were allegedly written by people with no medical training and reportedly used to deny or cut back medical claims. Since this report aired, Dateline NBC reported that State Farm has reviewed the credentials of all of its paper review companies inspected almost 4,900 files subject earlier to review, and paid nearly 500 of them in full. This thorough, illuminating 15-month investigation examining denied medical accident claims led to changes in policy and vividly brought the paper review process to viewers’ attention, and, for so doing, a Peabody Award goes to Dateline NBC for The Paper Chase.”
Prior to becoming an “expert” on mold and toxicity, who somehow gained close access to HHS with other Big Tobacco scientists & professional insurer liability deniers; Gots almost always caused claims to be denied with dishonest paper reviews. See episode 3 & 4 of Dateline expose: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_J7gpWu0Zw
Source Watch https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Total_Indoor_Environmental_Quality
Video of the 2000 Peabody Awards for Dateline exposing that HHS associates’ soon to be 2002 conference host, Gots, has a shady past. https://peabodyawards.com/award-profile/dateline-nbc-the-paper-chase/
To be clear: The Fake EBM ACOEM Mold Statement by Hardin, Kelman and Saxon contains the same Fake EBM Veritox Theory as the Fake EBM US Chamber Mold Statement by Hardin, Kelman and “the group”. Both were co-created by the SLAPP plaintiff co-owners of Veritox. One of the co-owners is Hardin from HHS.
These HHS affiliated “scientists” and defense attorneys who hire them are still able to claim that they proved:
“Thus, the notion Toxic Mold is an insidious secret killer as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim, is Junk Science unsupported by actual scientific study” WHY?
IX. The Past was Erased, The Erasure Forgotten, and the Lie became the Truth at ACOEM
In addition to the ACOEM Mold Statement that remains published in JOEM, there are two versions that are erased without a trace. The first was published on ACOEM’s website beginning on October 27, 2002. It was replaced with an edited version by anonymous editors in 2011.
The edited version was quietly removed from the ACOEM website in 2015. But the fraud remains viable in the unretracted and unedited 2003 version of the ACOEM Mold Statement in their journal, JOEM.
That version is still used by defense counsel for Liberty Military Housing and others as alleged EBM, when swindling military families with CIRS out of restitution for negligent causation of their brain injuries and additional symptoms.
Vanishing from ACOEM’s website in 2015 with no public statement, is the 2011 version. I am the one who notified the public and physicians with the help of WorkCompCentral.
“ACOEM Takes Down Position Paper Commonly Used to Defend Against Mold Claims” The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine appears to have retired a
controversial position statement on mold that critics say has been used to deny workers’
compensation claims for more than a decade… ACOEM representatives did not respond to multiple requests for comment… “It was a litigation defense argument right from the get-go,” she [Kramer] said.”
The 2003 unedited JOEM version, that hides its HHS and UC affiliations, is still used in litigations because ACOEM never retracted it from its journal, JOEM, after they erased it from their website.
The 2003 version hides behind a paywall at JOEM. It is read by judges via defense attorney brief-exhibits as an enclosed so-called “evidence-based statement” including in 2023-24.
Why was the ACOEM Mold Statement not retracted from JOEM when it was edited on their website in 2011? Why was it not retracted when it was stealthily erased from ACOEM’s website in 2015? Why is the unedited version still used in litigations by defense attorneys to influence judges?
Why did ACOEM erase the past on their website, while enabling the lie to continue to be sold as the truth in courts via their journal, i.e. that it is allegedly proven by the ACOEM and US Chamber Mold Statement defensor-authors from HHS, the University of California and Veritox:
“Thus, the notion Toxic Mold is an insidious secret killer as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim, is Junk Science unsupported by actual scientific study”?
3/9/2015 WCC “ACOEM Takes Down Position Paper Commonly Used to Defend Against Mold Claims” https://www.wondermakers.com/Portals/0/ACOEM%20Abandons%20Mold%20Position%20Paper.pdf
59. JOEM, one cannot read the ACOEM Mold Statement and Veritox Theory in it, without buying it from ACOEM
https://journals.lww.com/joem/citation/2003/05000/adverse_human_health_effects_associated_with_molds.6.aspx
10/2023 Exhibit E in defense counsel’s brief for defendant Liberty Military Housing, is the unretracted 2003 version of the ACOEM Mold Statement from JOEM claiming it is an ‘Evidence Based Statement”. The AAAAI Mold Statement is also part of Exhibit E. with the words erased from the bottom showing it was sunset in 2011 and is “not to be considered to reflect current AAAAI standards”.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/23.09.29-acoem-aaaai-statements-23.09.29-2.-gr-ross-exclude.pdf
X. The Past was Erased, The Erasure Forgotten, and the Lie Became the Truth at AAAAI
The American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI) published their mold position statement on their website and in their journal, the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (JACI) in February of 2006. It is titled “The Medical Effects of Mold Exposure” and is commonly referred to as the AAAAI Mold Statement. It, too, was co-authored by prolific defensor, Andrew Saxon, M.D. of UCLA.
With regard to toxicity, the AAAAI Mold Statement states on page 4, paragraph 4:
“Thus we agree with the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine evidence-based statement and the Institute of Medicine draft, which conclude that the evidence does not support the contention that mycotoxin-mediated disease (mycotoxicosis) occurs through inhalation in nonoccupational settings.”
I have no idea what any “draft” of the IOM Report said. But the final published product discredits the ACOEM Mold Statement containing the Fake EBM Veritox Theory as being allegedly evidence based. See Fn. 4 “The Fake EBM Veritox Theory” for an easy Daubert Challenge. NASEM IOM states:
“Except for a few studies on cancer, toxicologic studies of mycotoxins are acute or short-term studies that use high exposure concentrations to reveal immediate effects in small populations of animals. Chronic studies that use lower exposure concentrations and approximate human exposure more closely have not been done except for a small number of cancer studies.” p.125
“Toxicologic studies, which examine such responses using animal or cellular models, cannot be used by themselves to draw conclusion about human health effects.” p.7
In the archives of JACI, one will see that the bottom of every page of the AAAAI Mold Statement it states:
“AAAAI Position Statements and Work Group Reports are not to be considered to reflect current AAAAI standards or policy after five years from the date of publication. For reference only. February 2006”
Yet, that past has been erased in the online version of the AAAAI Mold Statement at JACI. The above disclosure was removed. It still shows AAAAI is promoting as alleged current accepted science:
“Thus we agree with the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine evidence-based statement and the Institute of Medicine draft, which conclude that the evidence does not support the contention that mycotoxin-mediated disease (mycotoxicosis) occurs through inhalation in nonoccupational settings.” like that is scientific and ethical.
I remember it being the disclosure being at JACI website for several years after 2011. I do not know who erased it. The version with the disclosure erased was submitted into a 2023 LMH litigation with the ACOEM Mold Statement as “evidence based”. See Exhibit E.
According to prolific defensor, Saxon in Hake , the ACOEM and AAAAI Mold Position Statements are the only articles he has ever authored on the subject of mold. (He does not acknowledge that he authored the US Chamber Mold Statement. Did he?)
Yet, via his name being on the ACOEM, AAAAI, and US Chamber Mold Statements as co-author causes, the University of California imprimatur is on the influential position statement while lending false credibility the Fake EBM Veritox Theory.
The American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) has a Mold Position Statement titled “[A Critique of the] ‘Institute of Medicine Damp Indoor Spaces & Health”. The spins of science when promoting the Fake EBM Veritox Theory with ACOEM, AAAAI, and the US Chamber are diabolical. It too was authored by defensors. Their names are Daniel Sudakin, M.D. and Thomas Kurt, M.D. It is too much information for this preliminary Crime Report.
AAAAI Mold Statement. At the bottom of every page it states “AAAAI Position Statements and Work Group Reports are not to be considered to reflect current AAAAI standards or policy after five years from the date of publication. For reference only. February 2006” https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2006-aaaai-mold-statement-shows-sunsetting.pdf
JACI webpage of “Medical Effects of Mold Exposure” https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(05)02591-1/fulltext If one opens the pdf of the article from the active link, they will see the sunsetting disclosure has been erased. https://www.jacionline.org/action/showPdf?pii=S0091-6749%2805%2902591-1
11/2006 Saxon’s Hake deposition. On pg 4, line 7-8, Saxon acknowledges the ACOEM & AAAAI Mold Statements are the only articles he has published on the subject of mold in WDB.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2006-saxon-in-hake-1.pdf
2006 American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) “[A critique of] Institute of Medicine Damp Indoor Spaces & Health” Position Statement (co-authored by Veritox affiliate and defensor Daniel Sudakin, M.D. cites ACOEM, AAAAI & Veritox as sources of authority re: toxicity) https://www.acmt.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/PS_060101_Institute-of-Medicine-Report-on-Damp-Indoor-Spaces-and-Health.pdf
XI. The Growing Hazards of Becerra & Harris Not Prosecuting the Veritox Owners & SLAPP Fixing California Jurists.
The US Chamber Mold Statement, containing the disgusting motto of the Racket, was rolled out in a fanfare event in Washington, DC on July 17, 2003. It was titled “The Growing Hazard of Mold Litigations ”. US Congressman Gary Miller (R-Ca) was the keynote speaker. SLAPP plaintiff Hardin from HHS, was also a speaker. To quote from the Executive Summary:
“The insurance industry has reported ‘toxic’ mold claims in the billions of dollars. Insurance companies in Texas alone paid $1.2 billion in mold claims in 2001. Is mold the next asbestos? The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, partnering with the Center for Legal Policy of the Manhattan Institute, commissioned two papers that take a close look at mold litigation and the science of mold. The first, by Cliff Hutchinson and Robert Powell, two experienced litigators with Hughes and Luce in Dallas and Austin, provides a legal perspective on mold claims. The second, written by a team of scientists led by Dr. Bryan Hardin, former Deputy Director of NIOSH and former Assistant Surgeon General in the Public Health Service, addresses the scientific evidence – or lack thereof – that forms the foundation of these claims.”
A companion white paper to the US Chamber Mold Statement was authored by Texas defense attorneys from Hughes & Luce LLP, Hutchinson and Powell. Their white paper is titled “A New Plague – Mold Litigation: How Junk Science and Hysteria Built an Industry” Again, to quote from the Executive Summary:
In ‘A New Plague – Mold Litigation: How Junk Science and Hysteria Built an Industry,’ Hutchinson and Powell explain the phenomenon of mold litigation by opening with an overview of litigation over Alar and plastics, both based on a media-generated fear of alleged health hazards – fear without scientific support. It segues into a discussion of the 1980s media reports of an emerging illness – “sick building syndrome.”
Although this new health hazard resulted in buildings being shut down and in some cases abandoned, clear-eyed scientists have shown the threat to be highly exaggerated – more due to psycho-social factors than to any disease entity. Nonetheless, litigation over alleged health effects from indoor air quality has endured. Against this backdrop of public suspicion of indoor air and media generated fear of phantom toxics, mold claims emerged in the mid-1990s and quickly grew.
In November 1994, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) task force looked for possible causes of a rare bleeding lung disorder in eight babies in Cleveland. The CDC explored the possibility that molds could be at fault and concluded there could be a link. The Cleveland study generated a spate of publicity, so much publicity that the CDC convened a working group to reevaluate the findings. The second working group published a report in June 1999 contradicting the Cleveland study. It was about as negative as possible in rejecting the evidence of any association between mold and infant pulmonary hemorrhage.
Despite a further CDC report in 2000 also refuting the Cleveland study, ‘the juggernaut of media frenzy, tort lawyers, and newly-coined [mold] remediators was rolling too fast to be slowed by mere science.”
The key science spins in the defense attorneys’ white paper are in two articles by CDC NIOSH employees. They are misused together to falsely claim proof of a negative, i.e. mycotoxins in WDB can never reach a level to harm humans. (Pdf pg.38)
The CDC NIOSH employees are Hardin, Ph.D., Elana Page, M.D. and Douglas Trout, M.D. Their articles are listed as the following references together in the defense attorneys’ 2003 white paper — with no links provided to read the articles or about the authors’ affiliations with HHS:
“137 B. D. Hardin, et al., Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Molds in the Indoor Environment (OCT. 27, 2002). [This is the erased ACOEM website version]
138 E. H. Page and D. B. Trout, The Role of Stachybotrys Mycotoxins in Building Related Illness, 62 AM. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASS’N J.644, 647 (Sept./Oct. 2001)”
Other than the creation of the Fake EBM Veritox Theory, neither of the above articles is original research. They are controversial literature reviews and opinion pieces based on the articles that the authors chose to cite for reference. Hardin and Page are notorious naysayers of the plausibility of Toxic Mold in WDB harming people, with the old “group” of naysayers from HHS and defensors who came to the mold issue at the turn of the century from the Big Tobacco RICO (Kelman, et.al). (See Crime Report)
Even though neither Hardin or Page have worked at HHS for many years, they are still able to influence HHS policies. Page was cited as a source of authority for the newest 2024 HHS folly. She was also part of “the group” who was there and/or had her work cited at the defensor’s conference in 2002.
(See the section below re: the new CDC “Stachybotrys” webpage. I easily discredit it as flawed public health policy and an ongoing bogus litigation defense argument via CDC-marketing burying newer and real research of CDC NIOSH employees about the plausibility of health effects from Stachy; and citing an old and questionable Page article as authority)
7/17/2003 Press Release of “The Growing Hazard of Mold Litigation” D.C. conference. There was a video of Miller’s and Hardin’s presentations posted on the US Chamber website for years. It has been removed with no trace. https://web.archive.org/web/20100712195136/http://library.uschamber.com/reports/growing-hazard-mold-litigation
The US Chamber’s D.C. event white papers “A New Plague – Mold Litigation: How Junk Science and Hysteria Built an Industry” & “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold” https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/hardin_a-scientific-view-of-the-health-effects-of-mold_2003_naysayer.pdf
XII. The Other Growing Hazard of Becerra & Harris Not Prosecuting the Veritox Owners & SLAPP Fixing California Jurists.
There is nothing funny or harmless about this matter. It does not require a great deal of critical thinking to understand that if you frame the whistleblower of the marketing of the Racket for libel, the Racket will continue to grow with each decision maker whose silence consents to the framing.
An additional “growing hazard” to erase the past so lies can always be the truth: I am somewhat concerned that I may soon experience an “accidental” early demise for refusing to be silenced if Becerra and Harris do not mitigate the harm from their not prosecuting SLAPP fixing California jurists and Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators, prior to leaving the White House Cabinet together.
To reiterate: this is a multi-billion-dollar insurer Racket and I have already been jailed once for refusing to bullied into silent consent by not funny or harmless California jurists. Both Harris and Becerra misstated reasons of why they did not prosecute, as California attorneys general.
I have been tracking and writing about the Racket for over twenty years. I keep track of related political climates. I have learned to surmise when acts of retaliation for telling the truth about key spin in the Toxic Mold issue are most likely to occur, because of political bartering and jockeying for endorsements for future positions – while hiding many intertwined ensnarements, for years.
For good cause, I am on High Alert right now! The lack of prosecutions for criminal acts meant to chill my speech are precisely what causes the Racket to continue. I am not getting good feelings from the stealth erasures of CDC errors and replacements with more misstatements of fact that I saw in 2024, under Secretary Becerra’s watch of HHS.
I felt relatively safe while Harris and Becerra were in the Cabinet. I knew those not funny judges and even less funny Veritox owners would not dare commit more criminal acts when trying to silence me — with two non-prosecutors overseeing the Racket from the highest office in the land.
That thin veil of twisted protection from retaliation was lost when Harris lost the White House with no one ending the insidious spinning of science or causing the needed prosecutions.
***There are questions that need to be answered about the yet-to-be prosecuted brutal SLAPP fixing, the related recent disingenuous changes in CDC health marketing, and how they abet the ongoing swindle of Toxic Mold crippled military families, et.al. in the ongoing insurer fraud Racket****
For many reasons, I DEMAND that error-correcting plans of action be implemented prior to Becerra and Harris leaving the White House Cabinet together. The crime they did not prosecute is growing worse and more dangerous for myself and others who know and can articulate many truths of the matter. I want a prompt written apology for the “harmless error” jokes as an insurance policy for my safety.
At this point in time, do not think Secretary Becerra is funny or harmless. Nor is the past, present, and future harm caused by his and Vice President Harris’s not yet mitigated errors. The below questions should have been answered long ago and would have been if prosecutors did their jobs.
XIII. Why Did McConnell Conceal HHS’s Hardin is a SLAPP-Plaintiff GlobalTox Co-Owner?
Judith McConnell is the Administrative Presiding Justice of the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court (Fourth/First) Since June of 2006, she has been burying evidence that Fake EBM Veritox Theory co-creator Hardin of HHS, is also co-owner of SLAPP plaintiff GlobalTox.
Whenever asked to take judicial notice of the glaringly relevant omission that shows HHS’s interests in seeing me framed as a malicious liar; the facts showing concealment of HHS Hardin are ignored by the appellate justices and their clerks like the requests were not even been made.
California Rules of Court stipulate one document is always submitted in appellate courts prior to any briefs being accepted by any party. It is called the “Certificate of Interested Entities or Persons”.
It states: “This form is used to list interested entities or persons who have either (1) an ownership interest of 10 percent or more in the party if it is an entity; or (2) a financial or other interest in the outcome of the proceeding that the justices should consider in determining whether to disqualify themselves.”
The two below jpegs, together, serve as one of several examples of suppression of HHS’s interest in the SLAPPs being fixed. The below Supplemental Certificate was filed in McConnell’s appellate court by Veritox’s attorney, Keith Scheuer, on July 10, 2006.
This was eleven days after my attorney, William Brown, Esq’s, filed a request to take judicial notice on June 29, 2006, of Hardin being a concealed plaintiff-GlobalTox co-owner on the 1st Certificate submitted to the appellate court by Scheuer.
Administrative Presiding Justice McConnell accepted an incomplete Certificate as a legitimate disclosure of interest parties, for a second time. Hardin’s name is missing from the below:
The above hides that Hardin from HHS is the sixth co-owner of SLAPP plaintiff GlobalTox. The SLAPP began in May 2005. Below is from Fake EBM Veritox Theory co-creator Hardin’s curriculum vitae. It serves as direct evidence that he is proven to have been a co-owner of SLAPP plaintiff GlobalTox since 2004.
WHO told McConnell to conceal that HHS has interest in SLAPPs being fixed for the Racket? McConnell also wrote the November 2006 Anti-SLAPP Opinion.
There is no mention of Hardin’s name, of it missing as a plaintiff-GlobalTox co-owner, or any requests to the appellate court to take notice of the pertinent non-disclosure. WHO told her to fix the SLAPPs?
There is also no mention in McConnell’s November 2006 Anti-SLAPP appellate opinion, that in my writing that they frame me for, I wrote that the money from the Manhattan Institute CLP to GlobalTox, was for the US Chamber Mold Statement. The US Chamber, HHS Hardin, and Congress were not mentioned at all in McConnell’s 2006 Anti-SLAPP opinion. WHY?
Below is the last paragraph of my 2005 accurate article that they frame as a malicious lie. No mention in the 2006 Anti-SLAPP Opinion of it, or who I exposed was intertwined in the Racket:
“In 2003, with the involvement of the US Chamber of Commerce and ex-developer, US Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA), the GlobalTox paper [Veritox Theory by HHS’s Hardin] was disseminated to the real estate, mortgage and building industries’ associations. A version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece may also be found as a position statement on the website of a United States medical policy-writing body, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine” [ACOEM].
62. 6/29/2006 APPLICATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER THAT THE COURT OF APPEAL TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE; DECLARATION OF WILLIAM J. BROWN III; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; PROPOSED ORDER https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/16.-app-refursed-judicial-notice-documents-1.pdf To quote: “3. Trial transcript of Bryan Hardin (additional Veritox principal, shareholder and party to this litigation undisclosed to this court) dated August 11, 2005 from the Oregon case entitled O’Hara v David Blain Construction, Inc., County of Lane Case number 160417923 at pages 136 and 154. 4. Trial transcript of Bruce J. Kelman dated April 14, 2006 from the Arizona case entitled ABAD v. Creekside Place Holdings, case number C-2002 4299, P. 31-32, P. 67-68, describing Kelman and five additional principals of Veritox.”
63. 11/16/2006 Anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion (SLAPP I) Appellate Case No. D047785 by McConnell with Cynthia Aaron and the late Alex MacDonald concurring. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/11.16.2006-anti-slapp-opinion.pdf
XIV. Why Did McConnell Choose to Frame My True Sentence as a Malicious Lie?
For twenty years, I have been maliciously harassed and framed for libel in California to keep the Racket thriving and ensnaring conflicted souls from coast to coast.
I HAVE ZERO INTENT to go to my grave being smeared by McConnell, HHS associates, et.al. as an allegedly legally proven malicious liar –while knowing people are being swindled and are dying from the unprosecuted framing.
They frame me for libel for a true sentence in my accurate March 9, 2005 writing. The sentence that they frame as a malicious lie was undeniably true the day that I wrote it, and it still is today.
Too be clear: As long as I am framed for libel for the below true sentence, the fruits of the Cover Up and Racket will continue to grow and ensnare many others. HHS will remain full of shyster spins of science naysaying the plausibility of Toxic Mold in WDB disabling and killing people. I wrote the truth:
“Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s [Haynes’] attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under-oath statements on the witness stand.”
As of July 2, 2012, there is an unenforceable permanent injunction created in SLAPP II by Judge Thomas Nugent (the same judge who jailed me for refusing to lie) and Veritox’s attorney, Scheuer.
I am enjoined to not republish a sentence that I never published.
It is materially different from the above sentence that I actually did publish. I am enjoined from republishing the below sentence, that I never published:
“Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand’ when he testified in an Oregon trial.”
I ignore the fraudulent permanent injunction. No one involved in the SLAPPs ever questions why I know that I lawfully can. It is just one more piece of evidence that shows that they know they have been framing me for libel for a true sentence in Cover Up of the Racket since 2005.
I can ignore the order because the above sentence does not include anything about the changes in Kelman’s testimony in Haynes (Oregon) occurring after another testimony of his from Kilian (Arizona) was allowed into the Haynes. Changes after Kilian were the subject of my real sentence.
In the 2006 Anti-SLAPP opinion, McConnell also wrote of Kelman changing his testimony in Haynes after the Kilian matter from Arizona was allowed into the Haynes trial. She wrote:
“The fact that Kelman did not clarify that he received payment from the Manhattan Institute until after being confronted with the Kilian deposition testimony [bench trial] could be viewed by a reasonable jury as resulting from poor phrasing of the question”
McConnell deemed Kelman’s change in Haynes as “clarified” after he was confronted with prior testimony from Kilian. I called Kelman’s changes in Haynes “altered” after being confronted with his prior testimony from Kilian. That hardly makes me a legally proven malicious liar. When the spins are spotlighted, McConnell’s 2006 Anti-SLAPP Opinion proves that I wrote the truth.
McConnell’s 2006 Anti-SLAPP opinion is dripping with judicial bias for the benefit of Racket. She constricted the scope of the SLAPP. As she framed me for libel for a true sentence, she wrote:
“Initially we note that this lawsuit is not about conspiracy. This lawsuit was filed by Kelman and GlobalTox alleging one statement is a press release is libelous. Thus, conspiracy issues are not relevant.”
She took every truth that I wrote in my declarations explaining why they were desperate to chill my speech about how Racketeers use HHS, ACOEM, US Chamber, Manhattan Institute, etc. to market the Fake EBM Veritox Theory as legitimate science; and she spun the truth into a falsehood of me writing lies because I supposedly had personal malice for SLAPP plaintiffs Kelman and GlobalTox. McConnell wrote:
“Kramer’s declarations are full of language deriding the positions of Kelman, GlobalTox, ACOEM, and the Manhattan Institute. For example, Kramer states ‘people were physically damaged by the ACOEM statement itself and that the ACOEM statement is a document of scant scientific foundation; authored by expert defense witnesses and legitimized by the inner circle of an influential medical association whose members often times evaluate mold victims on behalf of insurers and employers; and promoted by stakeholder industries for the purpose of financial gain at the expense of lives of others.” (Nov 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion Pg 13-14)
The above became the theme of SLAPP. No matter how much direct evidence we provided to refute it, all jurists stuck with McConnell’s theme as they buried the truth deeper each step of the way. I have had to live with the knowledge since 2005, that as long as I am framed for libel for a true sentence, many will continue to be swindled, and some will die from the Cover Up and Racket.
In the 2008 trial we were not permitted by trial Judge Lisa Schall to discuss the science or Kelman’s dishonest expert defense witnessing enterprise. McConnell assigned the matter to Fourth/First Appellate Justices Richard Huffman, Patricia Benke, and Joanne Irion, when I appealed in 2009.
In 2010, the three appellate justices (Huffman, Benke, and Irion) suppressed that three of my prior attorneys, my expert witness who was not permitted to testify in trial, and two jurors (one who is an attorney and one who was the jury foreman) submitted affidavits on my behalf after the kangaroo August 2008 trial.
The appellate justices suppressed all evidence proving the SLAPP fixing is criminal and is for the Racket to thrive. I prevailed over SLAPP plaintiff GlobalTox in trial. The judgment does not show that by decree.
The appellate justices had the nerve write in the September 2010 After Trial Appellate Opinion:
“Thus any disagreement we might entertain with respect to our prior disposition [the November 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion by McConnell] would be no more than that: a disagreement. Given that circumstance and the fact that only nomimal damages were awarded against Kramer, the value of promoting stability in decision making far outweighs the value of any reevaluation of the merits of our prior disposition.”
They also left the Void Judgement from SLAPP I undisturbed.
It fraudulently does not state by decree that the August 2008 jury found that I did not libel plaintiff, GlobalTox (co-owned by undisclosed Hardin from HHS). The fraudulent legal instrument does not show my cost award as a trial prevailing party over GlobalTox. It is not possible to frame someone for libel while also awarding them their costs by judgment as a trial prevailing party.
The Void Judgment from SLAPP I is the fraudulent legal instrument used by Scheuer and jurists to feign court subject matter jurisdiction in SLAPP II that began in November 2010. They used it to feign court subject matter jurisdiction, to try stop me from sounding the alarm about the Racket, Racketeers, and their Cover Up via fixing SLAPP I (and not funny non-prosecutors).
****To reiterate for the umpteenth time: The obstructed from being vacated Void Judgment from SLAPP I, is the fraudulent court document that keeps the entire Racket thriving by criminal means, because it is the primary fraudulent legal instrument used to frame me as libeling the Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators.*****
At the time that the After Trial Appellate Opinion issued in 2010, McConnell was Chair of the CJP. Huffman had been Chair of the Executive & Planning Committee of the Judicial Council (JC) for thirteen years. That is the most powerful position in the entire California judicial branch. The JC bills itself as the “rule making” body of the branch and the Chief Justice is always the Chair.
11/16/2006 Anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion (SLAPP I) Appellate Case No. D047785 by McConnell with Cynthia Aaron and the late Alex MacDonald concurring. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/11.16.2006-anti-slapp-opinion.pdf
3/9/2005 PRWeb, My writing exposing the Racket and how to beat it court via making defensors talk about the money for the marketing of the Fake EBM Veritox Theory (GlobalTox paper) and how the players are connected. “Jury Finds Toxic Mold Harms Oregon Family. Arbitration Clause Not Binding”
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2.-press-release-of-haynes-case-march-05-2.pdf
5/13/2005 Original Complaint Bruce J. Kelman & GlobalTox, Inc. v Sharon Kramer, San Diego County Courts (SLAPP I) for the words “altered his under oath statements” in my above noted true sentence in my accurate 3/9/2005 writing. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/1.-original-complaint-kelman-case.pdf
7/2/2012 (SLAPP II) The unenforceable permanent injunction issued by Judge Nugent. I am gagged from publishing a sentence that I never published to hide that McConnell is getting away with systematically framing me for libel for a true sentence, and all of her judicial peers have chosen to become ensnared with her. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/void-permanent-injunction.pdf
11/16/2006 Anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion (SLAPP I) Appellate Case No. D047785 by McConnell with Cynthia Aaron and the late Alex MacDonald concurring. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/11.16.2006-anti-slapp-opinion.pdf
9/14/2010 After Trial Appellate Opinion Case No. D054496, McConnell assigned it to Huffman, Benke, and Irion. This is the court document that caused me to start filing criminal complaints against McConnell, et.al. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/10.09.14-appellate-opinion-kelman-v-kramer.pdf
VOID JUDGMENT — the fraudulent court document that keeps the entire Cover Up and Racket thriving by criminal means. It does not state by decree that I prevailed over GlobalTox in trial. It also does not have my cost award as a trial prevailing party. Judge (now Justice) Dato awarded me my costs by ruling only on April 3, 2009. He failed to change the Judgment to reflect that I was a trial prevailing party who had been awarded my costs. The “harmless error” that Becerra thought was funny when he said the word “Aye” on February 9, 2017. https://veritoxmeanstruthpoison.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/3-9-24-08-void-judgment-as-used-to-harass-kramer.pdf
Justice McConnell career history. https://appellate.courts.ca.gov/district-courts/4dca/bio/judith-mcconnell
Justice Huffman career history. https://appellate.courts.ca.gov/district-courts/4dca/bio/richard-d-huffman
XV. Who Told McConnell to Make Up a Reason for Me to Have Malice for Kelman, as She Suppressed the Evidence that He Committed Perjury When Making Up his Own?
Beginning in 2005, Kelman committed perjury to make up a reason for me to have personal malice for him. The direct evidence of Kelman’s concealed perjury in declarations, and suborning of it in Scheuer’s briefs to make up a reason for me to have malice for Kelman, and how it was used to frame me as a malicious liar is also detailed in the enclosed Crime Report. The Chapter is “The Weaponized Void Judgement to Keep the Racket Thriving”. To just touch on how they did it:
McConnell wrote as a footnote on pg. 7, in the November 2006 Anti-SLAPP Opinion:
“Kramer asked us to take judicial notice of additional documents, including the complaint and an except of Kelman’s deposition in her lawsuit against her insurer. We decline to do so as does not appear these items were presented in the trial court.”
Then she wrote on page 12:
“Additionally, there was other evidence that could support a finding that Kramer had a certain animosity against Kelman. Kelman gave an expert opinion in her lawsuit against her insurance company seeking damages caused by the presence of mold in her home. Kelman stated there did not appear to be a greatly increased level of risk of mold inside the home compared to the levels outside. While the Kramer family eventually settled and recovered damages from their insurer a reasonable jury could infer that Kramer harbored some animosity for Kelman for providing expert services for the insurance company and not supporting her position.”
The above is not what Kelman and Scheuer were claiming in their declarations and briefs in SLAPP I of why I would have malice for Kelman. They were falsely claiming that I was furious at Kelman because I could not get my house remodeled based on his testimony that he never even gave in Mercury.
The fact that we received a sizeable settlement in our matter with our homeowner insurer, Mercury, was in my declarations and in my attorney’s briefs. McConnell spun the fact that we received a sizable settlement into a nonsensical and fictional reason for me to harbor malice for Kelman.
Kelman really did state in a 2002 report to Mercury’s attorneys that the test results he saw of our home appeared to him to be an increased risk for our daughter with Cystic Fibrosis and that a physician should be consulted as to the safety of the home for our daughter. That information was attached to my September 21, 2005 declaration to refute the perjury in his September 17, 2005 declaration and in Scheuer’s brief. I truthfully wrote in my declaration and even attached an exhibit to prove it:
“Kelman was hired for the insurance company in our case as an environmental risk consultant long before litigation began. He had sent a letter in 2002, before litigation even began, stating that he could not say whether our house was safe or not for our daughter and we should consult our physician. Kelman is a toxicologist. He is self-described as not an expert in immunology. We never made a claim of toxicity. What Kelman’s involvement was in our personal case, was minimal. We did not go to trial. But had we, I am not even certain Kelman would have been allowed to testify since his specialty of toxicity was not an aspect of our case. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is the July 23, 2002 letter from GlobalTox to Stone & Hiles, LLP.”
To quote verbatim from Kelman’s July 23, 2002 letter to Mercury’s defense counsel re: our housing appearing to be an increased risk for our daughter with Cystic Fibrosis, and that a physician should be consulted. NOTE TO SELF, pull doc from storage.
I wrote the above in my declaration because in his declarations in SLAPP I, Kelman claimed to have given a testimony in Mercury, that in reality, he never gave. Never once did they provide any evidence in SLAPP I or SLAPP II to support it – because there was none. Below is Kelman’s rewarded perjury to make up a reason for my alleged malice for him. Kelman’s perjury:
“I first learned of Defendant Sharon Kramer in mid-2003, when I was retained as an expert in a lawsuit between her, her homeowner’s insure and other parties regarding alleged mold contamination in her house. She apparently felt that the remediation work had been inadequately done, and that she and her daughter had suffered life-threatening diseases as a result. I testified that the type and amount of mold in the Kramer house could not have caused the life-threatening illnesses that she claimed.”
Below is Scheuer’s first suborning of Kelman’s above perjury to manufacture a fictional reason for me to harbor personal malice for Kelman, September 17, 2005. Contrary to McConnell’s 2006 Anti-SLAPP Opinion that “the Kramer family eventually settled and recovered damages from their insurer”, Scheuer falsely promoted that we did not get settlement, and I was furious at Kelman because I could not get my house remodeled because his testimony in Mercury (that he never gave). Scheuer’s suborning of Kelman’s perjury:
“Dr. Kelman testified the types and amounts of mold in the Kramer house could not have caused the life threatening illnesses she claimed. Apparently furious that the science conflicted with her dreams of a remodeled house, Kramer launched into an obsessive campaign to destroy the reputations of Dr. Kelman and GlobalTox.”
They kept stating the above over and over again in declarations and briefs. We kept telling the jurists and showing direct evidence that the above is perjury and suborning of perjury while strategically litigating over a matter impacting public health.
The above is blatant perjury and suborning of perjury by Kelman and Scheuer. Contrary to McConnell’s spinning in the 2006 Anti-SLAPP opinion when making up her own reason for me to have malice for Kelman while suppress that his reason was perjury; my receiving a sizable settlement would hardly be a reason for me to have malice for Kelman. The jurists were Hell bent to frame me as a malicious liar, no matter what the facts of the case prove.
Direct Evidence that the SLAPPs are Criminally Fixed by the Jurists
1. Kelman was deposed once in Mercury. It was on October 3, 2003. The transcript of his testimony may be read in its entirety. Nowhere will one find that he testified that the types and amounts of mold in our house could not have caused the life-threatening disease that I allegedly claimed. (I never even claimed that the house caused life threatening disease. My daughter has always had one and the house was unsafe for her after the botched remediation.)
2. In depositions in SLAPP I, Kelman could never remember what he said in Mercury because it was so long ago. But he and Scheuer kept submitting the perjury in declarations and briefs before and after depositions. In his July 2008 deposition he also stated that in Mercury he had said the levels inside my house were the same as the levels outside. This, too, was perjury. See his July 2002 letter to Mercury’s attorneys at Hiles and Stone confirming this fact. One may watch the perjury in Kelman’s own words from the Video of his July 2008 deposition in SLAPP I.
3. Dr. Harriet Ammann was my expert witness who was not permitted to testify in the 2008 SLAPP trial, because we were not permitted to discuss the science or Kelman’s work as an expert witness. She submitted the below Declaration about being unable to testify in the 2008 SLAPP trial to confirm that Kelman committed perjury in SLAPP re: the testimony that he never gave in Mercury.
4. My trial attorney, Lincoln Bandlow, submitted a Declaration on my behalf after the trial when I was in Propera Persona. He, too, accurately stated we could not discuss Kelman’s science in trial. He also stated that prejudicial emails from the group calling me a “cyberstalker somehow got into the jury room.
5. Juror Shelby Stutz, Esq. also submitted a Declaration on my behalf confirming this. She said it changed some votes in Kelman’s favor after it was read out loud in the jury room.
6. The following is from my Errata Opening Brief of July 29, 2009. It shows that the appellate justices had the above documentation and much more proving SLAPP plaintiff Kelman’s perjury on the issue of malice and his attorney, Scheuer, repeatedly suborning it. To quote from my Errata Opening Appellate Brief:
“Ammann provided a declaration to the court that was submitted on October 31, 2008, regarding her inability to testify on behalf of Appellant. She is the author of the chapters on the toxic components of mold (mycotoxins) in books published by National Academy of Science, Institute of Medicine, (IOM Report) and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA). (Vol.IV App.880)… As is evidence by the declaration of Appellant’s expert witness who was not permitted to testify, Dr. Harriet Ammann, Respondent could not have possibly given the testimony he claimed to have given in Mercury. (Vol.IV App.880)…
As directly evidenced by its absence in the transcript of Respondent’s actual deposition testimony in Mercury, no such malice causing testimony as claimed of “I testified the types and amounts of mold in the Kramer house could not have caused the life threatening illnesses she claimed” was ever given by Respondent in Appellant’s Mercury case. (VolI. App.1-114) & (Vol.V App.1168-1210) (Vol.5 RT.479)
As evidenced by the exhibits that were attached to Appellant’s post trial motions, Supplemental Objection To Costs submitted on September 19, 2008, the courts were informed of how many times Respondent had presented this false declaration and told again, that no such testimony was ever given.(Vol.2 App.404-517)” [That is 113 pages of evidence of Kelman’s rewarded criminal perjury while strategically litigating and does not even include many of the declarations of others submitted on my behalf to the Appellate Court].
On appeal in 2009-10, I provided mass amounts of uncontroverted and direct evidence proving the above was material perjury to make up a false reason for me to have malice for Kelman. The appellate justices had the nerve to state that they did not follow the law and did not do an independent review on the issue of malice. September 2010 After Trial Appellate Opinion states:
“We recognize that with respect to malice ‘courts are required to independently examine the record to determine whether it provides clear and convincing proof thereof.’ (McCoy v. Hearst Corp. (1991) 227 Cal.App.3d 1657, 1664.) However, in Kelman v. Kramer I [citing McConnell’s corrupted 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion] we expressly rejected Kramer’s argument that such independent review entitled her to judgment. Rather, we found that such review had taken place in the trial court and following our own detailed analysis of the evidence of Kramer’s hostility towards Kelman, we left the trial court’s determination undisturbed.”
Double speak: “that such review had taken place in the trial court” and “our own detailed analysis of the evidence of Kramer’s hostility towards Kelman” — while not doing the required “independently examine the record to determine whether it provides clear and convincing proof thereof.” One cannot determine what took place or do a “detailed analysis” while also not doing an independent review of the record for clear and convincing evidence.
These are not “harmless errors”. These are willful acts of judicial SLAPP fixing by criminal means for the Racket. Six months later, in March 2011, Harris provided the unlawful excuse of why she would not prosecute, falsely claiming CJP has “exclusive jurisdiction over judges” and State Bar over attorneys.
No matter how hard everyone tries, it is not possible to erase the direct evidence of the past, for the future of the Cover Up and Racket. The below is rewarded criminal perjury and rewarded suborning of criminal perjury by Bruce Kelman, Ph.D. and his attorney, Keith Scheuer, Esq, while strategically litigating to shut me up.
6/29/2006 APPLICATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER THAT THE COURT OF APPEAL TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE; DECLARATION OF WILLIAM J. BROWN III; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; PROPOSED ORDER https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/16.-app-refursed-judicial-notice-documents-1.pdf To quote: “1. The deposition transcript of Bruce Kelman from the Mercury v Kramer action, case number GIN024147 at pages 45:20-25, 46: 8-12, 102, 103 and 107. 2. Settlement documents from the Court file of the Mercury v Kramer action dated October, 2003 and indicating court recorded $450,000 settlement to the Kramers. Honorable Judge Michael P. Orfield presiding…. 1. The deposition testimony of Bruce Kelman in the Mercury v. Kramer case reveals that he could not testify about health effects of mold exposure regarding Erin Kramer, Defendant’s daughter. 2. The settlement documents in the same case show that there was a substantial settlement which occurred on October of 2003, thus impeaching Plaintiffs’ thesis of a bitter sour grapes litigant, and impeaching Bruce Kelman’s declaration in opposition to the 425.16 motion.”
9/21/2005 Kramer Declaration in Opposition to Plaintiff Motion to Strike CCP 425
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/9.-kelmanrepdeclskramer.pdf To quote from page 9
“Kelman was hired for the insurance company in our case as an environmental risk consultant long before litigation began. He had sent a letter in 2002, before litigation even began, stating that he could not say whether our house was safe or not for our daughter and we should consult our physician. Kelman is a toxicologist. He is self-described as not an expert in immunology. We never made a claim of toxicity. What Kelman’s involvement was in our personal case, was minimal. We did not go to trial. But had we, I am not even certain Kelman would have been allowed to testify since his specialty of toxicity was not an aspect of our case. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is the July 23, 2002 letter from GlobalTox to Stone & Hiles, LLP.”
NOTE TO SELF Pull doc from storage 7/23/2002 Kelman told Mercury’s defense counsel that our house appeared to be an increased risk for our daughter with Cystic Fibrosis and that a physician with knowledge of our child should be consulted.
9/17/2005 Scheuer’s Reply Brief. Motion to Strike CCP 425. Pg 7-8 Shows Kelman’s perjury re: testimony he never gave in Mercury & Scheuer using the perjury to inflame the court that I was a sour grapes litigant.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/6.-reply-brief-kelman.pdf
10/03/2003 Transcript of Kelman’s deposition testimony in Mercury v. Kramer (our insurer sued us in 2002 because we would not accept $30K in settlements after the botched remediation. We had to counter sue to receive restitution) https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/10.03.2003-kelman-deposition-mercury-v-kramer.pdf
7/28/2008 Kelman SLAPP I VIDEO deposition re: perjury in his SLAPP declarations and deposition about his testimony that he never gave in Mercury. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS_KVnAJ3qM
10/21/2008 Declaration Harriet Ammann, Ph.D. re: she could not testify in trial.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/10.21.08-declaration-harriet-ammann.pdf
10/30/2008 Declaration of Lincoln Bandlow, Esq. re: we could not discuss the corrupted science in trial, and prejudicial emails not discussed in trial somehow got attached to a trial exhibit.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ldbdeclaration.pdf
10/25/2008 Declaration of Juror Shelby Stuntz, Esq.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/10.25.08-final-declaration-of-shelby-stuntz-1.pdf
7/27/2009 Kramer Appellant Errata Opening Brief after August 2008 trial in Kelman & GlobalTox v Kramer. How Kelman’s perjury was extensively used throughout the case is discussed in detail.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/07.27.09-appellants-errata-opening-brief-sans-proof-of-service-etc.pdf
3/10/2011 Letter from C Hallihan on behalf of California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris falsely claiming no jurisdiction to prosecute. https://nocourtofficerisabovethelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/3.11-ag-harris-refusal-to-investigate-judicial-case-fixing.pdf
XVI. Why Was I Jailed in 2012 for Refusing to State in Writing “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury?” WHO was and still is being protected from accountability?
A year after Harris ran from prosecuting her fellow former California officers of the courts; in SLAPP II in 2012, I was sitting in a jail cell because I refused to be coerced by Judge Nugent to sign a document containing the false sentence “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury.” The document was written by Scheuer.
And five years after that, HHS Secretary Becerra was cracking “harmless error” jokes with a gaggle of SLAPP fixing jurists – after I had just explained that the Racket and the Cover Up with fraudulent court documents in SLAPP is “harming a lot of people across the United States”.
To quote myself again at the February 9, 2017 COJA Hearing:
Judge Dato violated Penal Code 134 by leaving a void judgment in effect. Justice McConnell has been obstructing its vacating. What I really came here to ask is for the Attorney General of the State of California to investigate these unpunished crimes, CJP unpunished crimes. Because its harming a lot of people across the United States. Will you do that?
84. 3/1/2012 The document written by Hardin’s and Kelman’s attorney Scheuer that they wanted me to sign, containing the false sentence “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury.” In SLAPP II they were trying to scare me into lying about the criminal fixing of both SLAPP I & II under threat of incarceration. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/12.02.10-proposed-fraudulent-apology.pdf
85. 3/9/2012 Minute Order, SLAPP II Nugent sentenced me to jail for refusing to sign the fraudulent court document written by Scheuer. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/12.03.09-minute-order.pdf
86. 3/14/2012 Nugent had me brought before him in prison garb and handcuffs and tried to coerce me to sign the document containing the false sentence “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury”, again. Scheuer was there, too. 3/14/2012 Court transcript of Nugent trying to coerce me to lie for a second time, while I was in handcuffs. I said, “This is a crime”. https://nocourtofficerisabovethelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/transcript-3-14.pdf
87. Penal Code 134 states “Every person guilty of preparing any false or ante-dated book, paper, record, instrument in writing, or other matter or thing, with intent to produce it, or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, authorized by law, is guilty of felony.”
XVII. Why Did The Court Records Department Backdate a Fraudulent Entry into the Electronic Record in SLAPP I in 2018, to Facilitate the Renewal of the Void Judgment?
In 2017, Becerra pledged to investigate Judge Dato, et.al. and how the 2008 obstructed from being vacated Void Judgment (that is used to frame me for libel in SLAPP I and II) is also used for “harming a lot people across the United States”.
He welched on his pledge, and a year later on February 23, 2018, Cantil-Sakayue and the California Supreme Court justices appointed Appellate Justice Dato to be a CJP Commissioner. Dato has been a CJP Commissioner the entire time that Becerra has been HHS Secretary.
Three days before Dato’s CJP appointment, on February 20, 2018, Kelman tried to renew the Void Judgment without an attorney. He could not do it because it was not supported by the electronic case file, the Register of Action (ROA).
By this time, Scheuer had surrendered his license. So Kelman hired attorney William Litvak, Esq, to renew the Void Judgment to remain in effect and accrue interest by criminal means – while continuing to use it to frame me for libel. The fraudulent lien recorded via the criminal renewal, accrues interest until 2028. It is up to about $20.000.
When I caught what they were doing to falsify more records to harass me, I asked the records dept clerks why they did it. Supervisor of the North San Diego County Records Department, Tina Kidd, told me that they were directed to backdate ROA Entry #300 as occurring on September 24, 2008.
I got the impression from Tina that their boss, San Diego Superior Court Clerk CEO Mike Roddy, is who told them to do it. This was not the first time that Roddy knew his deputy clerks were falsifying the records to create the Void Judgment and keep it viable.
See above and below. Entry #300 should be dated after the above Entry #294 that was made in February 2018. Instead, Entry #300 is backdated as occurring on 9/24/2008 and is in the ROA between Entry # 179 and #180.
The Void Judgment was renewed by act of Judge Earl Maas III, court clerks, Kelman and Litvak. over my motioned objections and by use of the newly backdated Entry #300 in the ROA . It was then sent to the Country Recorder. The lien holder is now JS Held, LLC, according to oral communication with JS Held attorney, Stephen Messena. I could do nothing to stop it.
Erased Without a Trace
There is no longer an Entry #300 in the ROA of SLAPP I, that was needed to be in the ROA in 2018 to facilitate the criminal renewal of the Void Judgment, in yet another Penal Code 134 violation.
WHY is Entry #300 now erased from the ROA, if “they” did not know that it was criminal to add in 2018? WHO erased it?
See Fn below for what Secretary Becerra has known since February 2017 about how the Void Judgment came to be via fraud upon the court, and how hard the jurists, their clerks, and attorneys work to keep it viable to frame me as they continue to be enabled to “harm a lot of people across the United States”.
In the summer of 2018, I did reach out to the CADOJ to try to stop the ongoing judicial, clerk, attorney, and plaintiff criminal harassment with the Void Judgment from SLAPP I. Not Stuber, not Zall, and not Becerra would return my phone calls.
Again, they chose to enable the Cover Up of the Racket to continue by criminal means. I received no reply to the below email:
From: Sharon Noonan Kramer <snk1955@aol.com>
To: “cliff.zall@doj.ca.gov” <cliff.zall@doj.ca.gov>; “laura.stuber@doj.ca.gov” <laura.stuber@doj.ca.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 06:16:03 AM PDT
Subject: court renewed void judgement, corrupted ROA to do it
Dear Mr. Zall and Ms. Stuber,
On February 7, [9] 2017, Attorney General Becerra told me in front of a room filled with case-fixing judges and justices that his CADOJ would investigate my evidence of an epic CJP unpunished judicial crime — where a void judgment is the lynch pin document that keeps it all hinged together.
Well, I wanted to let you know, that your lack of effort to follow up on that pledge in earnest is causing the crime to continue — while thousands continue to be harmed from it and the courts continue to retaliate against me for refusing silence.
On July 17, 2018, Judge Earl Maas III ruled that the void judgment could be renewed. They had to backdate a fraudulent entry into the electronic case file to do it. What they are renewing is a void judgment which fails to state that I prevailed over GlobalTox (Veritox) in a 2008 trial. They are policy setters, federal contractors, and prolific expert defense witnesses in toxic torts.
The courts are also going to deem me to be a vexatious litigant so I can’t fight back. They made another fraudulent entry into the Register of Action to accommodate that one, too. [I was able to stop that one by going directly to the person who keeps the vexatious litigant registry, and showing what those not funny jurists, clerks, attorneys, and Kelman were doing.]
I filed a complaint with San Diego Superior Court CEO Mike Roddy and SD Presiding Judge Deddeh, yesterday for the corruption of the electronic case file to accommodate fraudulent judicial rulings.
On my complaint I put that I was noticing AG Becerra via emails to the two of you. This is why I am sending this email to you. (Not because I think you would actually do anything to protect the public from corrupt judges — You’ve made it pretty clear that you won’t).
See attached for the direct evidence of the relentless case-fixing to defraud the public with the void judgment (that fails to state I prevailed over GlobalTox/Veritox in trial) and the corruption of the electronic case-file to accommodate it.
Sharon
P.S. I got a shout out yesterday in a City Watch article “How Corrupt Judges are Destroying our Society” To quote: “A false judgment can take years to correct – if the victim can ever obtain justice. The matter of Sharon Noon Kramer is one example how the courts attack decent people.”
Over the years, I have motioned many times for McConnell to recall and rescind the fraud concealing appellate remittiturs and to direct lower courts to vacate all void judgments created by fraud upon the court. She repeatedly has refused to lawfully stop harassing and framing me as libeling the Fake EBM Veritox Theory by criminal means. I have even asked her in writing to “Grow a Conscience”.
For the upteenth time, the Void Judgment from SLAPP I is the fraudulent court document that keeps the entire Racket thriving. (See Chapter the “Weaponized Void Judgment…in the Crime Report)
2/23/2018 California Court News Room “The California Supreme Court today appointed Justice William S. Dato, of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One (San Diego) as a member of the Commission on Judicial Performance.” https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/supreme-court-makes-appointment-commission-judicial-performance-0
5/31/2018 a.) Application to renew the Void Judgment filed by Livak and recorded by San Diego County on 8/14/2018; b.) original recording of the fraudulent lien submitted by Scheuer on 12/31/2008; c.) Oct 11, 2024 certification from the County Recorder showing the renewed lien against my property will remain until 2028.
https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/scan_20241014_merged.pdf
9/13/2011 Katy’s Exposure “Is the California Court Case Management System (CCMS) Being Misused For Politics In Policy & Litigation…And The Fleecing Of The California Taxpayer Over The Mold Issue?” It has been online since 2011 that I asked Roddy, Cantil Sakayue, McConnell and many others to stop harassing me via SLAPP fixing. One can see many falsified court records in this document. https://katysexposure.com/2011/09/13/is-the-california-court-case-management-system-ccms-being-misused-for-politics-in-policy-litigation-and-the-fleecing-of-the-california-taxpayer/
June 21, 2018 my “MOTION MADE UNDER DURESS to Vacate/Stop the Renewal of the Void Judgment”.
https://veritoxmeanstruthpoison.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/18-07-13-final-final-pleadings-file-stamped.pdf
10/15/2024 printout of ROA, erased entry #300 is not anywhere in the ROA. Why? https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/10.15.2024-roa-printout-1.pdf
2018 ROA from Records Dept shows entry #300 backdated to September 24, 2008 (pdf pg 31). Kelman’s failed attempt to renew on February 20, 2018 entry #294 (pdf pg 49) Also see entry #268 from December 23,2010 for false entry that GlobalTox was prevailing party in SLAPP (pdf pg 45). https://veritoxmeanstruthpoison.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/5-roa-from-gin044539-e2809cslappe2809d.pdf
2/02/2017 Objection to the Appointment of Dato to the Fourth/First submitted to COJA panelists, including Becerra https://veritoxmeanstruthpoison.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/17-02-02-final-to-comm-jud-app-re-dato.pdf
11/11/2015 Letter to McConnell stating “Justice Judith McConnell grow a conscience. People are dying from your fraud upon your court” https://katysexposure.com/2015/11/11/justice-judith-mcconnell-grow-a-conscience-people-are-dying-from-your-fraud-upon-your-court/
XVIII. The Above are the Key Elements of the Criminal Cover Up of the Racket
The above describes the key elements of the SLAPP fixing to keep the insurer fraud Racket viable at HHS, in military housing litigation, and everywhere else based on the mass marketed lie that Hardin and Kelman have scientifically proven:
“Thus, the notion Toxic Mold is an insidious secret killer as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim, is Junk Science unsupported by actual scientific study”
1. Concealment of HHS’s interest in the SLAPPs being fixed since 2005 for the Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators, including Hardin from HHS.
2. Framed me for libel for an accurate sentence to make all that I say appear to be a lie and me a malicious liar since 2005.
3. Suppressed the evidence of SLAPP plaintiff/Fake EBM co-creator Kelman’s material perjury to make up a fictious reason for me to harbor for personal malice for him beginning in 2005.
4. Created a Void Judgment because they could not frame me as libeling both plaintiffs in trial. (Kelman and GlobalTox).
5. Tried to unlawfully enjoin me from telling that they frame me for libel for a true sentence on behalf of Racketeers and the Racket.
6. Jailed me because I refused to say in writing that the SLAPPs are not criminally fixed to keep public health policies corrupted, and that “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury”.
7. Have done everything they possibly can under the charade of law try to shut me up as the Cover Up and Racket continue to swindle people who are being crippled by Toxic Mold, including military families.
8. Lying and joking about why no jurists, clerks, attorneys, and SLAPP plaintiffs have been prosecuted for the criminality of the Cover Up, and thus for the Racket.
9. All of the criminal harassment that I continue endure is because government decisions keep doing favors for those already ensnared. No one wants to admit that I exposed how HHS got owned at the turn the century for the Racket, and how to beat it in mold trials via making defensors talk about the money from commerce’s lobbyists in exchange for the ownership of public health policies re: Toxic Mold in WDB.
10. About the September 2011 Post on Katy’s “Is the California Court Case Management System (CCMS) Being Misused For Politics In Policy & Litigation…And The Fleecing Of The California Taxpayer Over The Mold Issue?”
It has been online since 2011 because the owner of Katy’s Exposure, Crystal Stuckey, and the owner of Sickbuilding@Yahoogroups.Com, Kevin Carstens, told the court (Nugent and Scheuer) to pound sand. It was not coming down from the Internet.
The post shows that they know that they (McConnell, Huffman, Roddy, et.al.) have been getting away with collusively falsifying court documents, electronic court records, and concealment/rewarding Kelman’s and Scheuer’s perjury. It also shows that Cantil-Sakayue was aware of the crime involving Dato when she joined in with the “harmless error” joke on February 9, 2017, and said the word “Aye”.
Scheuer had been threatening Stuckey to stop making the SLAPP fixing for the Racket available for public view, even before the September 2011 post that details the SLAPP fixing.
In 2012, I was sanctioned over $19,000 and deemed in contempt of court by Nugent and Scheuer. It was for the website owners putting my letters and pleas to stop the SLAPP fixing to the fraudsters on the Internet, and the website owners refusing to take them down. That is when the fraudsters decided to jail me when trying to scare me into complicit silent consent.
Pound sand. The evidence of the criminal Cover Up is still on the Net and it is not coming down until the Racket and Cover Up that swindles our Toxic Mold crippled soldiers, their families, and everyone else is ended. (All of the evidence on Katy’s is also downloaded in a safe place.)
11. New on the Net with this post, is the fact that Scheuer took the 2012 contempt of court sanction-judgment issued by Nugent, and he recorded a second fraudulent lien on my property on behalf of the Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators/case-fixed SLAPP plaintiffs. This one is currently up to about $40,000. Somehow it is still active and accruing interest without the required 10 year renewal.
12. In case some are not able to read between the lines: I’m afraid Becerra and Harris are going to get me killed for their taking the unprosecuted Cover Up into the Cabinet with them and silently consenting to the resultant multi-billion-dollar insurer Racket that is growing with more garbage science at HHS, as they walk out the door together. I am anticipating that more retaliation is about to come swiftly since Harris lost the White House, with no resolution achieved to this criminal problem.
9/2011 Post on Katy’s “Is the California Court Case Management System (CCMS) Being Misused For Politics In Policy & Litigation…And The Fleecing Of The California Taxpayer Over The Mold Issue?” https://katysexposure.com/2011/09/13/is-the-california-court-case-management-system-ccms-being-misused-for-politics-in-policy-litigation-and-the-fleecing-of-the-california-taxpayer/
97. 2/5/2012 Declarations of Kevin Carstens & Chrystal Stuckey telling Nugent that the evidence of the SLAPP fixing will not be removed from their blog and chatboard. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/12.02.10-stuckey-carstens-declarations.pdf
4/3/2009 Dato ruled that I should be recognized as a prevailing party entitled to cost. Then he left the Void Judgment in effect that did not state by decree that I prevailed and did not have my cost award on its face. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/4.03.2009.pdf When I questioned why the judgment was not corrected, Dato’s clerk, Lynn San Nichols sent me a “yellow post it” notice of the uncorrected judgment. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/15-10-29-exhibit-5.pdf The “harmless error” jokes were not even close to funny. CCP 664.5(b) “Promptly upon entry of judgment in a contested action or special proceeding in which a prevailing party is not represented by counsel, the clerk of the court shall serve notice of entry of judgment to all parties who have appeared in the action or special proceeding and shall execute a certificate of service and place it in the court’s file in the cause.”
2/15/2012 County Recorder lien for $19,343.95, Lien holder Bruce Kelman, Veritox, recorded by Scheuer. I do not know how they do it and I am afraid to ask. The lien is still active without the required 10 year renewal. See pdf pg 4 for Recorder Certification dated 10/11/2024 https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/fraud-lien-kelman-v.-kramer-1.pdf
3/14/2012 Court Transcript, Nugent had me brought before him in handcuffs and “strongly urged” again that I sign fraudulent document penned by Scheuer. Nugent knew that I am a policy reformer. https://nocourtofficerisabovethelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/transcript-3-14.pdf
13. Regardless of my fear of more retaliation in Cover Up of the Cover Up, I still know the truth about the Racket: HHS remains a public health threat and a duplicitous litigation defense argument re: true symptoms that are proven in many courts and physicians’ offices to be caused and/or contributed to by WDB exposures.
Erasing erred soundbites from compromised CDC webpages does not change that. Who did this in 2019? Who authorized it?
“A link between other adverse health effects, such as acute idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage among infants, memory loss, or lethargy, and molds, including the mold Stachybotrys chartarum has not been proven. There is no blood test for mold.”
People with brain injuries from WDB still cannot get treatment from CDC misinformed physicians. They still have a difficult time receiving restitution from negligent WDB stakeholders and their insurers. Erasing errors, instead of publicly retracting, just buries where the misinformation originates.
The new NMCPHC Guidelines cite to the new CDC Mold webpage for a source of authority. The new CDC webpage is still claiming that the only symptoms proven to be possibly caused by WDB are.
“Possible health effects
Exposure to damp and moldy environments may cause a variety of health effects, or none at all.
For some people, mold can cause a stuffy nose, sore throat, coughing or wheezing, burning eyes, or skin rash. People with asthma or who are allergic to mold may have severe reactions. Immune-compromised people and people with chronic lung disease may get infections in their lungs from mold. For people who are sensitive to molds exposure to molds can lead to symptoms such as stuffy nose, wheezing, and red or itchy eyes, or skin. Severe reactions, such as fever or shortness of breath, may occur among workers exposed to large amounts of molds in occupational settings, such as farmers working around moldy hay…upper respiratory tract symptoms, cough, and wheeze in otherwise healthy people; with asthma symptoms in people with asthma; and with hypersensitivity pneumonitis in individuals susceptible to that immune-mediated condition….Other recent studies have suggested a potential link of early mold exposure to development of asthma in some children, particularly among children who may be genetically susceptible to asthma development, and that selected interventions that improve housing conditions can reduce morbidity from asthma and respiratory allergies.”
The new CDC Mold webpage has a link at the top to the new Stachybotrys webpage. The new Stachybotrys webpage states the same old garbage about no proof of WDB plausibly being associated to lungs hemorrhaging (including but not limited to infant lung bleeds.)
“To date, a possible association between acute idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage among infants and Stachybotrys chartarum has not been proven. Further studies are needed to determine what causes acute idiopathic hemorrhage….Stachybotrys chartarum and other molds may cause health symptoms that are nonspecific. ”
What the above says is, consider any possible cause other than WDB if infant lungs begin to bleed. Where is CDC’s acknowledgement of memory loss problems? Where is the apology for pulling it out of of thin air that there is no proof mold in WDB cause memory loss? Where is CDC’s acknowledgement that it found over 25 years ago that it was unwise to return babies hospitalized with PPH back to moldy home environments?
Acute Pulmonary Hemorrhage in Infants Associated with Exposure to Stachybotrys atra and Other Fungi Ruth A. Etzel, MD, PhD; Eduardo Montana, MD, MPH; W. G. Sorenson, PhD; Greg J. Kullman, CIH, PhD; Terrance M. Allan, MPH; Dorr G. Dearborn, PhD, MD Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:757-762
“Among the most striking features of this illness were its severity and its tendency to recur after hospital discharge. In 5 infants, acute hemoptysis necessitating readmission to the intensive care unit recurred within 1 day to 6 months of discharge. All infants’ hemorrhages were so severe that they required admission to the pediatric intensive care unit. All but one underwent intubation. One infant died. In a previous report from this investigation, infants with pulmonary hemorrhage and hemosiderosis were found to be 16 times more likely than control infants to live in a house with a history of water damage from roof or plumbing leaks or flooding.”
Does CDC Marketing even read newer research by CDC researchers that adds to the weight of the evidence of the possible association of Stachy in WDB with PPH? To quote from “Cultivation and aerosolization of Stachybotrys chartarum for modeling pulmonary inhalation exposure.” by nine CDC NIOSH researchers:
“Personal exposure to mycotoxin producing hydrophilic fungi, such as Stachybotrys chartarum, has generated community and public health concern in the United States over the last two decades (CDC 1994; Montana et al. 1997; Etzel et al. 1998)…. The extent of immune cell infiltration and inflammation was greater following exposure to strain IBT 9460 [a type of Stachybotrys], which produced more trichothecene [a type of mycotoxin] and more respirable fungal fragments upon aerosolization. These fragments accounted for up to half of the overall fungal count concentration observed following aerosolization by acoustical generation. Additionally, mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites were also detectable in the aerosol. Murine inhalation exposure to viable, but not heat-inactivated, S. chartarum bioaerosol resulted in airway inflammation as well as T and B cell infiltration. This hypothesis is supported by previous studies showing higher concentrations of fungal fragments in the homes of asthmatic children compared to homes of non-asthmatic children (Seo et al. 2014 ). These fragments and associated metabolites represent a contribution to the overall exposure that may influence adverse health effects following the inhalation of S. chartarum bioaerosols.”
It is unsound public health policies for CDC to not to inform the public and physicians of the “possible association” of these afflictions, and to instead of just keep repeating the old litigation defense arguments from the turn of the century. People get mad when the find out on their own that a WDB is the cause of new symptoms and CDC did not even have the courtesy to warn them of the possibility.
WHY do CDC and associates seem to have such a hard time admitting mistakes regarding illnesses caused by WDB. WHY do they try to erase them while leaving a lot of problems in their wake? WHO controls CDC health marketing? WHY are they so aggressive at Cover Up of mistakes while enabling the fruits of them to flourish, harm, and ensnare others?
CDC “Basic Facts” webpage before erasure (corruption that was added in December 2019 is at the top of pg 2) https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/24.05.16-cdc-basic-facts.pdf
2009 Haeffner v. Department of Labor based on the Detroit Air Tower being the most probable location of causation of disabling CIRS, including brain damage. https://www.survivingmold.com/docs/Resources/Court%20Decisions/Haefner_OWCP_approval_2009.pdf
2/8/2024 “Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Testimony of Board Certified Neurologist David Ross, M.D.” by use of the Fake EBM Veritox Theory in the ACOEM & AAAAI Mold Statements. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/dr.ross-leakas-1.pdf
11/18/2024 NMCPHC Guidelines for physicians re: patients sickened by moldy housing. No mention of brain injury. It cites to CDC for the symptoms. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2024-nmcphu-clinicianguidance-moldanddampness2024_rev2.pdf104.
CDC new “Mold” webpage https://www.cdc.gov/mold-health/about/index.html
CDC new Stachy webpage: https://www.cdc.gov/mold-health/data-research/facts-stats/index.html106. 12/24/2019
Journal of Inhalation Toxicity “Cultivation and aerosolization of Stachybotrys chartarum for modeling pulmonary inhalation exposure.” Lemons AR, Croston TL, Goldsmith WT, Barnes MA, Jaderson MA, Park JH, McKinney W, Beezhold DH, Green BJ. Inhal Toxicol. 2019 Nov-Dec;31(13-14):446-456. doi: 106. 10.1080/08958378.2019.1705939. It can be downloaded from the public access portal of CDC. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/85101
1/2024 Wayback Machine link to CDC’s now erased “Basic Facts” webpage with link to its “Pediatric Pulmonary Hemorrhage (PPH)” webpage as it source of authority. It’s five reports created by naysayers of PPH being caused/or contributed to by WDB exposure (1999 to 2004). https://web.archive.org/web/20240101164210/https://www.cdc.gov/mold/faqs.htm
3/14/2012 SLAPP II Court Transcript, Nugent had me brought before him in handcuffs and “strongly urged” again that I sign the fraudulent document. Why did the judges go along with this? “NUGENT: BUT YOU DID HEAR THE IMPORTANT THING FROM ME.” “MS. KRAMER: NO, I DID NOT HEAR THE IMPORTANT THING. I DIDN’T HEAR AN APOLOGY THAT THE COURT’S FRAMED ME FOR LIBEL SEVEN YEARS AGO. I’M SITTING HERE IN HANDCUFFS FOR SPEAKING THE TRUTH ABOUT A FRAUD AND POLICY”. https://nocourtofficerisabovethelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/transcript-3-14.pdf
XIX. My First Criminal Complaint was to the San Diego County District Attorney in 2010
The September 2010 After Trial Appellate Opinion by Huffman, Benke and Irion is the court document that caused me to start filing criminal complaints against McConnell, Huffman, et.al. The first place that I went was to the San Diego County District Attorney’s (SDCDA) Insurance Fraud Investigation Unit.
It was easy to get in. They knew me. At the request of Toxic Mold injured workers from a Poway, California business, I was already explaining the insurer fraud scam to the fraud unit investigators as of August 2010. The workers had asked me to go with them to the SDCDA. So, I did.
About the Toxic Mold injured workers of Poway, California
The successful business owner was in the process of receiving over three million dollars in Community Block Grant Funds because his buildings were a blight on the City of Poway. The workers were made sick from one of the buildings that was filthy, water damaged and moldy. They were being swindled out of restitution for their disabling injury and insured medical care.
There were four sick workers. The Toxic Mold, Stachybotrys, was found in the building. The business owner’s workcomp insurer hired an “independent medical examiner” (IME) physician.
Like many IME physicians, who are paid by workcomp insurers, this physician relied on the ACOEM Mold Statement (authored by the case-fixed SLAPP plaintiffs) as a source of authority to deny the insurer’s responsibility to the Toxic Mold injured workers.
When three or more employees claim workplace injury, they may call CDC NIOSH to investigate the matter. The Toxic Mold injured workers did contact CDC NIOSH.
As I recall they got the same run around that always occurs: NIOSH said “The building is moldy. It needs to be cleaned up. According to the sources of authority that we help to create, the WDB could not cause the symptoms claimed”. Poof! No workcomp insurer liability for the insurer’s client’s negligent causation of disability, with the help of HHS.
The DA’s office did nothing to stop the problem of workcomp insurer fraud with the use of the scientific fraud of the SLAPP plaintiffs. The Poway workers had to hire an attorney. My understanding is that they received a pittance of the settlements that they needed and deserved.
One was able to have the sinus surgery that they needed to remove and stop fungus growing in their sinuses. I do not know what happened to two. The fourth, whose symptoms were indicative of systemic chronic system inflammation, had to find physicians who do not adhere to CDC’s Fake EBM, to help them recover and had pay out of pocket for uninsured treatments.
It was the epitome of “deny, delay, defend” perversion of science in policies coupled for perversion of justice in claims handling practice and courts. I keep in touch with the fourth Poway worker.
My understanding is that they have physically recovered. But the cascading traumas caused by the crime and its motto causing them to be smeared as a liar and faker; while sick with brain fog, unable to fully breathe and unable work for a long time, has been life changing for them.
109. Documentation re: 2010 Toxic Mold injured workers in Poway, CA available upon request.
My Reporting of SLAPP Fixing for the Racket to the District Attorney’s Insurance Fraud Unit in 2010.
When I went to the Insurance Fraud Investigative Unit to report that the judicial SLAPP fixing was causing the swindle with the ACOEM Mold Statement to continue, I was crying while trying to talk. I know far too many people who are life-changing-swindled and crippled by the unprosecuted SLAPP fixing that keeps the Racket viable. And I know the details of how the heartbreaking insurer scam works.
It was a 3-hour recorded meeting. The lead investigator is still there. His name is James Korber, Esq. They were nice, but no help at prosecuting the SLAPP fixing jurists, et.al. to shut down the entire Racket.
Like the same bad habit of the CADOJ, in 2010 the SDCDA directed me to go to the CJP and the Bar to report judge and attorney crime in legal proceedings. Again, those agencies have no prosecutorial authority, and McConnell was CJP Chair at the time.
I did file CJP and Bar Complaints. I also tried to defend myself from the abuse in the courts via a motion to the California Supreme Court; and I filed a criminal complaint directly to District Attorney Dumanis.
Again, I let the UC Regents know that the UC brand name is being misused to promote science fraud in policies, physician education, insurer claims denials and courts.
Below is an email that I sent to Mr. Koerber, Mr. Hawkins, and Mr. Fusco of the SDCDA on October 27, 2010.
From:snk1955@aol.com
To:james.koerber@sdcda.org,virgil.hawkins@sdcda.org,Joseph.Fusco@sdcda.org
Cc:SNK1955@aol.com
Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:31 AM
Re: Filed Petition for Review & Mailed Requests To Investigate Yesterday
Dear Mr. Koerber, Mr. Hawkins and Mr. Fusco,
I wanted to let you know that I filed my Petition for Review to the California Supreme Court last Friday. Yesterday, I mailed my complaints and requests to investigate to:
DA Dumanis – for ten San Diego judges and justices aiding and abetting interstate (inter-county) insurer fraud, by their collective failure to stop a strategic litigation meant to silence a whistleblower of an insurer fraud scheme and carried out by criminal means by an author of “environmental” policy of the US Chamber of Commerce. This complaint includes Justice Judith McConnell who is currently running for re-election as the Presiding Justice of the San Diego Appellate Court. Aiding to shift the cost of work-related injury off of insurers and onto the San Diego county taxpayers by aiding with a successful strategic litigation carried out by criminal means.
The CA Commission on Judicial Performance – same ten judges and justices, bias in the courts against the environmental injured and their “crusading” advocates; Many Canon of Ethics Violations, aiding and abetting interstate and intrastate insurer fraud, with reckless disregard for public health and safety; failing to acknowledge that perjury is still criminal even if one is an author of policy for the US Chamber and even if the Regents of the UC profit from what is written by the perjury committing US Chamber author.
The State Bar – failure to stop strategic litigation carried out by criminal means by a licensed California attorney. Second request that they take action.
Regents of the UC & their General Counsel Mary MacDonald – Violation of the CA Constitution Article IX Section 9, permitting the UC name to be used for political and sectarian purposes, interstate and intrastate, on behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber of Commerce to instill bias in the courts favorable to the insurance industry. Profiting from aiding in shifting the cost of work related illness off of insurers and onto taxpayers, while using federal funds to mis-educate physicians on the science of mold favorable to the insurance industry.
Thank you all for your help, understanding and advice,
Sharon Kramer
I asked District Attorney Dumanis to intercede several times as the judicial harassment continued and became dangerous to my safety in SLAPP II.
After I was jailed in 2012, for my refusing to be coerced by Judge Nugent to lie — I tried to sound the alarm to her about the criminal judicial and attorney harassment enabling the insurer fraud Racket – and that I was afraid they would hurt me again.
I filed the below document in Judge Nugent’s court on June 22, 2012. One can see that his clerk, Alan Lum, accepted it. Then I added a handwritten note to Dumanis and hand delivered it to the SDCDA office in San Diego.
The Above in Plain Language
The Veritox Theory is a toxicological risk model. Toxicological risk models cannot be used by themselves as proof that the offending agent de jour is not causing symptoms in individual people. When challenged, the Veritox Theory does not pass Kelly-Frye or Daubert litmus tests. But it still gets used for insurer fraud.
Even though she was receiving five million dollars a year from the state to prosecute for crime that is purposed to commit fraud in workman’s compensation insurance, no response was received from San Diego County’s chief prosecutor, Dumanis.
Dumanis was useless at ending workcomp insurer fraud in San Diego County, and thus across the country, that is dependent on local jurists’ SLAPP fixing going unprosecuted.
58. State Bar License James Korber (I think he is still at the SDCDA) https://apps.calbar.ca.gov/attorney/Licensee/Detail/108015
63. 2006 Harris Martin Publishing re: Harold v Westmont Construction, Sacramento, CA. Judge Michael Kenny accurately called Veritox’s modeling theory a “huge leap” to use as proof of lack of causation when serving as expert defense witnesses in mold litigation. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/harris-martin-2006.pdf 5/2006 $2.3M Plaintiff Jury Verdict, Harold v. Westmont w/Veritox’s nonsense Kelly-Fryed. https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/562d25c6/files/uploaded/Saxon_Info-and-Special-Verdict-form-on-the-Harold-vs-California-Casualty-Insurance-case_Saxon-was-an-expert_2006_naysayer.pdf
XX. In 2014, I turned to San Diego County Board of Supervisors as the SLAPP Fixing Became More Frightening
They were not just harassing me in the courtroom for exposing the not funny San Diego jurists framing me for libel for true sentence. I was being cyber stalked by the “Courthouse Gang” on the Internet. I was (still am) sincerely afraid they were going to seriously hurt me if I do not shut up about the criminal SLAPP fixing enabling the entire Racket to continue.
See Video. I turned to the County Board of Supervisors for help in 2014. I explained that I am a whistleblower of corruption in public health policies and workman’s comp insurer fraud, aided by corruption in the local courts. I explained the scary harassment, and that neither Dumanis or Sheriff Bill Gore (or the FBI or Harris or USDOJ) would do anything about the harassment on the Internet and in the courts.
Supervisor Dianne Jacobs stated that they would give my written reported concerns to Dumanis and Gore. I was told by a supervisor’s clerk that they did speak to Dumanis.
1/7/2014 VIDEO of me explaining to the County Supervisors that I am a whistleblower of fraud in public health and workcomp policies; and begging them for help to cause Dumanis to act to protect my safety from Secretary Becerra’s and Vice President Harris’ not funny or harmless former fellow officers of the California courts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJqVpsiJCKw&t=220s
I was never informed if Dumanis did anything. The cyberstalking stopped. The judicial harassment in the legal proceedings raged on and continues to this day. So does the swindle that it causes.
Like all prosecutors to date, Dumanis was worthless at lawfully prosecuting the jurists, et.al. who are still getting away with SLAPP fixing for the thriving Racket that remains stealthily anchored at HHS, now under Secretary Becerra’s watch.
The current San Diego District Attorney has a personal Conflict of Interest (COI).
The current San Diego District Attorney is Summer Stephen. If I went to her for help, that would akin to asking for the local Courthouse Gang to swing into full-blown retaliation mode again. Her husband is the Hon. Judge Dana Sabraw. The Veritox Theory was allowed to be used in the local federal court in 2023-24 where a Toxic Mold crippled veteran Captain, was swindled out of restitution for injury with use of the SLAPP plaintiffs’ Fake EBM.
It is a matter where Liberty Military Housing (LMH) and their insurer were the defendant-beneficiaries of the swindle. It is one of the most diabolical swindles that I have ever seen. It relied on the plaintiff attorney to use the Fake EBM Veritox Theory to pull it off and swindle the sick Captain. (See Crime Report) I have not said a word about it to DA Stephan because I am afraid it would only result in me being hurt again.
XXI. Secretary Becerra is Aware that I Asked the USDOJ to Prosecute in 2015-16
I filed an extensive criminal complaint to USDOJ about the judicial SLAPP fixing for the Racket in October of 2015. It was sent to then US Attorney General Loretta Lynch. It was also sent to then HHS Secretary Silvia Burwell, and John Holden who was Director of the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP) at the time.
Secretary Becerra is aware that I sought the help of the USDOJ to no avail, before I turned to him for help in 2017. Below is from the documents that he read as a vetting COJA panelist and California Attorney General in February 2017. (pdf pg. 9)
“13) Pasted hereto is the USDOJ’s December 13, 2016, refusal to prosecute the ‘California Judiciary’ under the false pretense that the twelve years of SLAPP fixing is not causing continued discrimination of the environmentally disabled (by scientific fraud of DOJ’s toxic tort defense witnesses).”
I wanted USDOJ PCU to prosecute the jurists, clerks, attorneys and Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators as SLAPP plaintiffs – to shut down the Racket. I asked Harris, Becerra and Dumanis to do the same.
I never heard back from HHS Secretary Burwell or OSTP Director Holden. It is disturbing that Becerra and Harris became White House Cabinet members while the swindle continues because they chose not prosecute as California attorneys general.
In 2016, USDOJ flipped my criminal complaint over to the Civil Rights/Disability Rights Division. Then pretended like I asked them to represent me in a civil matter. NO! I asked the USDOJ to prosecute the crime of judicial SLAPP Fixing for the Racket, that is used to swindle many disabled people across the United States, including military families.
I went round and round with the USDOJ for over a year. They sent me the above letter in December 2016, telling me to go away. This was less than two months before I reached out to Secretary Becerra for help to stop the crime, as California Attorney General in February of 2017.
10/29/2015 USDOJ Complaint. HHS Secretary Burwell and OSTP Director Holder were also noticed. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/usdoj-letter-with-exhibits.pdf Body of Complaint https://katysexposure.com/nov-15-american-college-of-medical-toxicology-choose-wisely-to-sunset-your-mold-statement/
2/2/2017 Report to COJA panelists https://veritoxmeanstruthpoison.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/17-02-02-final-to-comm-jud-app-re-dato.pdf
Veritox are USDOJ’s expert defense witnesses in Toxic Mold military housing matters.
USDOJ is not just a useless non-prosecutor of the SLAPP fixers. They are quid pro quo end users of the aided and abetted ongoing Racket.
SLAPP plaintiff Kelman and additional GlobalTox owners have served as USDOJ medico-legal expert defense witnesses in toxic torts for many years, including military housing mold litigations.
They use the Fake EBM Veritox Theory in the (not yet retracted) JOEM version of ACOEM Mold Statement; and it being cited by reference in the (not yet retracted) American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI Mold Statement), against swindled Toxic Mold crippled military families.
Again, according to Kelman, the meaning of these not yet retracted bogus medical journal articles is the same as the unscientific US Chamber Mold Statement that was created by fake legal reformers paying the fake EBM creators, which is “Thus, the notion Toxic Mold is an insidious secret killer as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim, is Junk Science unsupported by actual scientific study”
SLAPP Plaintiff Kelman for the USDOJ in a Toxic Mold Military Housing Litigation in 2006.
On page 1 and 2 Kelman claimed that he:
“concludes with a reasonable degree of certainty…There could not have been sufficient amounts of mycotoxin present at the subject property to cause any injuries to occupants. The symptoms identified by the Mitchell family have many possible causes and cannot be attributed to mycotoxin exposure during their occupancy of the residence at 2063-N Evans Road.”
On page 5, he cited the same vehicles that are used to move the Fake EBM Veritox Theory in and out of policies and courts, that LMH used in 2023 & 2024 while also defrauding (ACOEM & AAAAI Mold Statements)
“Analysis of Toxicological Issues
Possible effects of mold exposure are allergies, infections, and toxicity. (Hardin,
B.D., B.J. Kelman, and A. Saxon. 2003. Adverse Human Health Effects Associated
with Molds in the Indoor Environment. Evidence-Based Statement, American
College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, J Occupation Environ Med.
45:470-478; American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Position
Paper. Environmental and occupational respiratory disorders. J Allergy Clin
Immunol 117(2):326-333).” The AAAAI Mold Statement is also authored by Saxon.
The Mitchells were a family of six in moldy military housing. Kelman claimed on page 9, 10:
“The plaintiffs must establish that mycotoxins are capable of causing the health effects
claimed to be caused by exposure to mycotoxins. The members of the Mitchell family
identified the following injuries: Breathing difficulty • Chest pain • Memory loss • Headaches • Dizziness • Nausea Aches • Bronchitis • Chest pains • Colds • Congestion • Depressed immune system • Dizziness • Fatigue • Eye irritation • Gastroenterological inflammation and “problems” • Headaches • Infections • Nausea • Pneumonia • Respiratory problems • Respiratory infections • Runny nose • Shortness of breath • Sinus infections • Soreness in the leg • Vomiting • Weakness
The above are the common symptoms that Kelman knows people experience over and over again from biocontaminated WDB exposures. He knows that, because he uses his Fake EBM Veritox Theory over and over again as false proof that the symptoms could not be caused and/or contributed to by mycotoxins (Toxic Mold) in WDB.
“The plaintiffs must establish that mycotoxins are capable of causing the health effects
claimed to be caused by exposure to mycotoxins.”
There is no known minimum dose of exposure to mycotoxins in WDB before they cause and/or contribute to new onset of symptoms for occupants and workers. Veritox owners know that their bogus risk model does not reflect real life exposure for humans.
Kelman and all other dishonest defensors would not be able use the Fake EBM Veritox Theory to harm anyone ever again, if the not harmless and not funny jurists in San Diego were prosecuted for SLAPP fixing for and with him, and thus for the Racket.
USDOJ has a quid pro quo interest in seeing the SLAPPs remaining fixed. So does everyone else who embarrassingly refused to prosecute the SLAPP fixing over the years to the benefit of the Racket. Now they are ensnared in the Racket with willful Racketeers. They cannot get out without admitting their and their peers’ not funny, nor harmless and not erased past errors.
62. 2/2006 Bruce Kelman for the defense USDOJ in a military housing matter. The family was experiencing memory loss, etc. https://katysexposure.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/kelman-for-usdoj.pdf
District Attorney Dumanis was at the COJA hearing on February 9, 2017. She saw Secretary Becerra pledge to investigate the same Racket and Cover Up in 2017, that she repeatedly refused to prosecute beginning in 2010. Harris also refused to prosecute in 2011 under the falsely stated pretense of the CADOJ having no authority or jurisdiction to prosecute. A year later in 2012, I was sitting in a jail cell for refusing to be coerced to say that I do not believe the SLAPPs are fixed.
I sat in the back of the room at the 2017 COJA hearing. I saw Dumanis laugh at the running “harmless error” jokes. I could see McConnell and others, who were sitting in the front row, also laughing and ready to welcome SLAPP fixer Dato to the Fourth/First via Secretary Becerra’s, Chief Justice Cantil-Sakayue’s, and Senior Appellate Justice Manuel Rameriz’s “Aye” votes.
XXII. Who Erased the Evidence that Governor Schwarzenegger Personally Endorsed the Fake EBM Veritox Theory into California Department of Public Health (CDPH) in 2005?
Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA) was Governor from November 2003 to January 2011. He was pro-business with a motto of stopping “job killers” with the California Chamber of Commerce.
Again, on March 9, 2005, I publicly exposed how people sickened by Toxic Mold could beat the Fake EBM Veritox Theory in trial. I did it via showing the connection of the ACOEM Mold Statement, the US Chamber Mold Statement, the money from the Manhattan Institute to the two position statements’ defensor-authors; and by forcing Kelman to talk about the connections front of juries to expose the COI. The Haynes jury got it. They awarded the family a half a million dollars.
SLAPP I began in May 2005 to frame me for libel for an accurate sentence in the March 2005 writing – to make all that I say and write about the Racket, Racketeers and Cover Up appear to be a lie. The first San Diego Superior Court judge to oversee the matter was the late Michael Orfield. He also oversaw Mercury and knew that we received close to a half a million dollars in settlements, because he signed three out of the four settlement agreements.
He was the first of many to suppress the direct evidence that Kelman and Scheuer were using perjury in declarations and briefs to make up a fictious reason for me to have malice for Kelman.
Within a month of Orfield erroneously ruling that this matter is not SLAPP; in October of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger endorsed the insurer fraud scam based on the Fake EBM of the SLAPP plaintiffs, into CDPH policies.
“Mold in Indoor Workplaces” endorsed by Schwarenegger in 2005
The endorsement was in a California policy paper titled “Molds in Indoor Workplaces”. Schwarzenegger unwittingly or maliciously endorsed the ACOEM Mold Statement as being legitimate EBM to be taught to California physicians. (Those are the only two choices.)
The policy paper has the date of November 2005 on its first page. It states on page four that the policy was endorsed by “Governor Schwarzenegger, Kimberly Belche Secretary of Health and Human Services, Sandra Shewry Director of Health Services and John Rea Acting Director of Industrial Relations”. It also used to contain the below soundbite on page four:
“Physicians can refer to the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) statement ‘Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Mold in the Indoor Environment http://www.acoem.org/guidelines/article.asp?ID-52” [ACOEM Mold Statement as published on their website, October 27, 2002, edited in 2011, erased without a trace in 2015]
It takes a tremendous amount of work on the part of many to thwart the harm from the insurer fraud scam when the past is repeatedly erased, the erasures are forgotten, and the lie remains the alleged truth. Below is the cause of CDPH no longer marketing the Fake EBM Veritox Theory.
At the end of 2014, with the diligent encouragement of the Medical Director of US OSHA, Dr. Michael Hodgson, ACOEM chose to sunset its Mold Position Statement. Dr. Hodson had been sounding the alarm about science fraud in that position statement even longer than I have.
Ten years to the day that I first publicly exposed how the beat the Racket on March 9, 2005; on March 9, 2015, I made the public announcement of the ACOEM Mold Statement sunsetting.
I did it with the help of WorkCompCentral (WCC). Dr. Hodson of OSHA could not speak to WCC without a handler. ACOEM would not make the important announcement to the public and physicians.
So, I am the one who made the public disclosure via WCC and I asked Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker to help explain how the ACOEM Mold Statement is used to commit fraud in policies, physician education, and courts.
After thirteen years of being a primary vehicle used to mass market the Fake EBM Veritox Theory in and out flawed government policies, physician miseducation, insurer claims denial and lying for the Racket in mold litigations — ACOEM outrageously chose to quietly erase their ACOEM Mold Statement from their website, while leaving it profitable and usable in the journal, JOEM.
3/9/2015 WCC “ACOEM Takes Down Position Paper Commonly Used to Defend Against Mold Claims” by Ben Miller
“The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine appears to have retired a controversial position statement on mold that critics say has been used to deny workers’
compensation claims for more than a decade.
The position paper, titled Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Molds in the Indoor
Environment, essentially stated that mold is not likely to cause many of the illnesses that
employees mark down as job- related on workers’ compensation forms, according to mold
activist Sharon Kramer.
The paper no longer appears on the organization’s website. A search for previous versions of
ACOEM’s policies and positions page using WayBack Machine – a website that takes snapshots of web pages and preserves them so users can compare changes later on – shows the paper appearing no later than Dec. 29.
ACOEM representatives did not respond to multiple requests for comment. But Kramer told
WorkCompCentral in an interview last week that Michael Hodgson, medical director for the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, received a statement from ACOEM’s
publications director [Marianne Dreger] last year that the organization would sunset the position paper in early 2015.
Kramer said the sunsetting that appears to have occurred takes away any weight the paper might hold as a defense against workers’ compensation claims where the claimant is seeking benefits for mold-related illness.’It’s sort of damning for anybody who tries to use that in court because they basically said, ‘Eh, this [is] no longer our understanding,’ Kramer said.
Kramer said the position statement was first published in 2002, then revised in 2011. Neither
paper, she said, acknowledged mounting evidence supporting that mold can cause respiratory
problems and inflammatory responses in the body. ‘It was a litigation defense argument right from the get-go,’ she said.
Ritchie Shoemaker, a mold researcher who has testified in more than 200 court cases related to mold illness, said the ACOEM paper was ubiquitous in litigation for many years. ‘After 2003, there were no cases that I participated in where defense did not quote ACOEM,’ he said. Mold inhalation causes reactions of varying degrees, depending on the individual, Shoemaker said, and can present itself in an array of symptoms – confusion, memory problems, numbness and tingling, tremors, respiratory problems and even joint problems that look like rheumatoid arthritis at first glance…’
Shoemaker said there are several ways to show that a patient has been exposed to the inhalation of mycotoxins, which mold produces. Blood samples, brain imaging and soon genetic tests can all be used to show a “fingerprint” that only mycotoxin inhalation produces, he said…He said he has submitted a journal article for publication on genetic testing. That paper shows that a person’s messenger ribonucleic acid can be analyzed to see which genes have been activated and which have been suppressed by mold inhalation…
Other workers’ compensation treatment guidelines don’t have much to say about mold. The
medical treatment guidelines available on the Washington state Department of Labor and
Industries website make no specific mention of mold. Colorado’s guidelines, which were among the first for workers’ compensation adopted in the country, also make no mention of mold.
‘We can’t cover everything and what we focus on are really the nine highest frequency and
highest cost conditions in Colorado, and (mold) is actually not on the list,’ said Daniel Sung,
manager of medical policy for Colorado’s Division of Workers’ Compensation. In mold cases, he said, Colorado stakeholders will have to instead look for the best evidence based medicine they can find. The online portal for the Official Disability Guidelines offers no entry in its ‘UR Advisor’ tool and points users to MedLineConnect, a government-run website which simply states that ‘inhaling or touching mold or mold spores may cause allergic reactions or asthma attacks in sensitive people…”
Governor Schwarzenegger and the Erased Evidence of His 2005 ACOEM Mold Statement Endorsement
I know many honest policy influencing physicians and researchers, whose work has been smeared by defensors for the sake of the highly lucrative Racket. Along with Dr. Ruth Etzel, formerly of the CDC, one of them is Dr. Dorr Dearborn of Rainbow Children’s Hospital in Cleveland (ret).
See 2024 erased CDC webpage Pulmonary Hemorrhage/Hemosiderosis Among Infants” for what was done by the “outside panel of experts” who became the anonymous “CDC Mold Work Group” (1999 -2004) to falsely make Dr. Etzel and Dr. Dearborn appear to be quack policy-shapers.
After the WCC article was published in 2015, I sent it to Dr. Dearborn. I asked if he knew anyone who could stop CDPH from marketing the Fake EBM of the SLAPP plaintiffs, that was carelessly endorsed into policy former Governor Schwarzenegger, et.al. in 2005.
Dr. Dearborn did know someone. His colleague at CDPH sent back an email to him on December 15, 2015, that said:
Ms Kramer-
Here is the response I received from my friend at CDPH.
Happy Holidays,
Dorr
‘Dorr – thanks for your email. It was good to chat in Washington. A few responses below –
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/IAQ/Documents/moldInMyWorkPlace.pdf
‘Molds in Indoor Workplaces Physicians can refer to the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) statement, Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Molds in the Indoor Environment. http://www.acoem.org/guidelines/article.asp?ID=52.”
I checked, and the webpage for the Occupational Health Branch, HESIS at CDPH still does refer to the ACOEM position paper, which I always thought was not a good document for various reasons. However, it seems that the link is dead and will not connect…”
CDPH then proceed to do the same thing that HHS does when caught promoting fake EBM re: injuries from Toxic Mold, and shielding politicians, et.al. from accountability. Instead of making a public statement about the key change in policies and advisories to physicians, they erased the soundbite from page four directing physicians to the ACOEM Mold Statement without dating or initialing the change to the policy paper.
Voila! This made it falsely appear that California Governor Schwarzenegger never endorsed the Fake EBM Veritox Theory in the CDPH policies in 2005 at the same time the California courts began to be used to frame me as libeling the Fake EBM Veritox Theory creators.
Using the Wayback Machine, one can see exactly what they did at CDPH to erase the past, with the erasure forgotten, and the lie becoming the truth, i.e. Schwarzenegger had nothing to do with the fake EBM being in California health policies and advisories for well over ten years.
If I did not know that it is important to check policy websites from time to time to see if stealth corrections have been made; even I would not have known about yet another stealth erasure. When I saw it, I made the public statement about the CDPH stealth erasure of the Schwarzenegger endorsement of fake EBM ACOEM Mold Statement/Veritox Theory.
To this day, there are still physicians who believe it. How would they know that CDPH no longer markets it when it quietly erased the soundbite?
10/18/2009 LA Business Journal re: CA Chamber of Commerce’s “job killer” political campaign in industry’s interests and Governor Schwarzenegger vetoing bills meant to protect worker rights, health and safety https://labusinessjournal.com/government/politics/schwarzenegger-lowers-boom-six-job-killers/
2003 Settlement agreements from Mercury, that were signed by the late Judge Michael Orfield are available upon request. There is a confidentiality agreement on one of them to not disclose the amount. As noted in Brown’s June 2006 request that McConnell take notice “Settlement documents from the Court file of the Mercury v Kramer action dated October, 2003 and indicating court recorded $450,000 settlement to the Kramers. Honorable Judge Michael P. Orfield presiding.”
11/2005 CDPH “Molds in Indoor Workplaces” See pg four for direction to the ACOEM Mold Statement as a source of authority for physicians and Schwarzenegger’s endorsement https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/california-mold-in-the-workplace/23550450
Current CDPH “Mold in Indoor Workplaces”. The soundbite directing physicians to ACOEM is erased.
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DEODC/OHB/HESIS/CDPH%20Document%20Library/molds.pdf
Sunset – when a position is no longer promoted as the understanding of an organization
WorkCompCentral’s Mission Statement “To provide access to information, high quality education, and unique collaboration opportunities which empower individuals to make a difference in workers’ compensation.”
1/2024 Wayback Machine link to CDC’s now erased “Basic Facts” webpage with link to its “Pediatric Pulmonary Hemorrhage (PPH)” webpage as it source of authority. The bashing of Etzel, Dearborn, etc. are in the PPH webpage links. https://web.archive.org/web/20240101164210/https://www.cdc.gov/mold/faqs.htm
5/12/2018 WayBack Machine, CDPH policy paper dated Nov 2005. The soundbite directing physicians to the ACOEM Mold Statement on pg 4 is erased. This buries that Schwarzenegger endorsed Veritox’s fake EBM into California health policy at the same time the Cal courts began to be used to frame me as libeling the Fake EBM, ACOEM Mold Statement authors. https://web.archive.org/web/20180512132724/https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DEODC/OHB/HESIS/CDPH%20Document%20Library/molds.pdf
7/25/2018 Katy’s Exposure “TOXIC MOLD: CA Dept of Health QUIETLY Stops Marketing Litigation Defense Argument” https://katysexposure.com/2018/07/25/toxic-mold-ca-dept-of-health-quietly-stops-marketing-litigation-defense-argument/
UC Regent Schwarzenegger and the US Chamber Mold Statement
On May 15, 2010, the “Action Committee on the Health Effects of Molds, Microbes and Indoor Contaminants (ACHEMMIC)” sent a polite letter to the UC Regents, including Regent-Governor Schwarzenegger. . The Regents were asked to cause the retraction of the 2003 US Chamber Mold Statement that has the legitimizing UC name brand on it via prolific defensor Saxon of UCLA.
Again, that is where the character assassination mantra founded upon the Veritox Theory is most blatantly stated as written by SLAPP plaintiffs Hardin and Kelman. I.e. “the notion that ‘toxic mold’ is an insidious, secret ‘killer,’ as so many media reports and trial lawyers would claim, is ‘junk science’ unsupported by actual scientific study.”
The May 2010 ACHEMMIC Request to the UC Regents stated:
“Honorable Governor Schwarzenegger, Chairman Gould and President Yudof,
The University of California is world renowned for its role in promoting and protecting public health by its outstanding physician education and the integrity of its medical teaching facilities.
The Action Committee on the Health Effects of Mold, Microbes and Indoor Contaminants
(ACHEMMIC) is comprised of volunteer physicians, scientists, researchers, indoor air quality experts, industrial hygienists, building engineers, teachers, advocates and others who work cohesively to promote integrity in U.S. public health policy with regard to the adverse health effects of mold, microbes and indoor contaminants that are frequently found in water damaged buildings.
ACHEMMIC has the following concerns:
1. The University of California name is apparently being used as an implied signatory of the
2003 U.S. Chamber of Commerce publication.
2. It appears that the name of the University of California is being used as an implied scientific
endorsement of the contents of said U.S. Chamber publication.3
3. It is our understanding that it is a violation of the California Constitution, Article IX, Section
9 (f) for the University of California name to be used to promote a document of political
and sectarian influence.
4. The contents of the document are contrary to recent scientific findings by national and
international experts, including some within the State of California.
The people who have been harmed by contaminants in water-damaged buildings and
erroneous public health policy over the mold issue come from all walks of life. They are white collar workers, blue collar workers, retirees, veterans, teachers, business owners, homeowners, tenants, children, parents and grandparents. They work or are schooled in newly constructed and older buildings. They reside in all parts of the United States and around the globe. They live in owned, mortgaged, or rented houses and apartments- large and small, new and old, grand and humble.
Some live in military housing, trailers or on reservations. Those affected by this issue are affluent, poor and middle class. They are able-bodied taxpayers and disabled citizens. They are the insured and uninsured by health, workers compensation and property casualty insurance companies. They represent the melting pot of citizens that make up this
great country of ours–the United States of America. They depend on integrity in medical
science within U.S. medical teaching universities and within the courts to protect their health and safety and the health and safety of their families.
We appreciate the University of California Regents’ prompt attention to this matter with
broad implications impacting mold toxic torts and public health policy as a whole if left
unaddressed by the Regents.
For your convenience, we have attached our membership roster and documents of specific concern. Should ACHEMMIC be of further assistance to the Regents of the U.C. over this matter, please do not hesitate to ask.”
Katy's Exposure 
