Blogger Facing Execution For Publishing Truth On Web

Accordng to AOL “Blogger Hamza Kashgari is currently facing possible execution in Saudi Arabia for expressing his personal religious views via Twitter. Not only are Saudi authorities prosecuting Kashgari far too harshly for a couple of nonviolent tweets, they are intruding on his human rights as an individual to voice his opinion.” Sign PETITION to end death calls for Saudi Blogger & Poet.      

      In the United States, in California,  Blogger Sharon Kramer is facing incarceraton, March 2, 2012, also for publishing the truth on the Web.  The actual five day sentence is for allegedly violating a lawful court order and for not removing the evidence from the Internet that the Chief Justice of California, Tani CANTIL-SAYAUKE knows her courts framed a whistle blower for libel while aiding a science fraud to contnue to carry legtimacy in US public health policy.

      The framing occurred over the first public writing of how it became a fraudulent concept in public health policy that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm.  Sharon was the author.  Those involved in mass marketing the science fraud are the ones who sued her in 2005, Bruce Kelman & VeriTox, Inc (formerly known as Globaltox).

      In a second case that began in 2010, the court then gagged Sharon from writing of what they did in the first case, how they did it, why they did it and the thousands of lives that continue to be devastated by the courts’ unlawful actions aiding the fraud in policy to continue. By gagging her in the second case from writing the five words for which she was framed for libel in the first, “altered his under oath statements”, they are trying to stop her and others  from shedding light on a massive ethics problem in California’s judicial branch coming from the top down.

      Sharon Kramer could be sentenced to five more days in jail just for these five words being republished in this post.  She is already sentenced to one day of incarceration for someone else, not her, posting the truth on the Internet that is a matter of public record of,

“repost and repost Lets post these words everywhere, on every facebook and blog site, over and over “In the matter of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Bruce Kelman and GlobalTox, Inc., sued Sharon Kramer for the words, Dr. Kelman `altered his under oath statements’ on the witness stand.”

      It is also a matter of public court records that in 2006 and 2010 the Fourth District Division One Appellate Justices in San Diego, California, crafted their opinions to make it falsely appear that the five words of Sharon’s were an accusation that  Bruce Kelman got caught lying on the witness stand about being paid by the Manhattan Institute think-tank to make edits the the mold position statement of the medicial association, American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM).  

       Sharon’s writing speaks for itself.  She accurately wrote that Kelman’s company, Veritox, was paid by the think-tank to author the mold position statement of the US Chamber of Commerce (that states it is scientifically proven all claims of illness and death from “toxic mold” are only being made because of “trial lawyers, media and Junk Science”). 

      Sharon accurately stated that ACOEM’s mold position statement was a “version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece” that Kelman and VeriTox co-owner, Bryan Hardin, were paid to pen for the US Chamber of Commerce.

       In May of 2011, North San Diego County Superior Court Judge Thomas Nugent unlawfully gagged her from writing the five words for which she was framed, aiding to conceal what they had done in the prior case. 

      Now they want to PUNISH her and intiminate others if anyone exposes the truth of what they have done to frame an honest citizen for libel and the continued harm to thousands of lives because of it. The threat of incarceration on March 2nd is looming because Sharon is refusing to be silenced of unlawful actions of the courts by more unlawful actions of the courts piled on more unlawful actions of the courts. Many others are refusing silence, too.

      BLOG and SUPPORT GROUP owners, Crystal Stuckey of Katy’s Exposure and Kevin Carstens of Sickbuildngs, are refusing to remove the direct evidence of the California courts colluding to defraud the US public by willingly participating in malicious, Strategic Litigations Against Public Participation against Sharon – and then further abusing their positions of authority to try to stop their unlawful actions from coming to public light.

   
      According to AOL, “It is extremely unlikely that Kashgari will receive a fair trial in Saudi Arabia, where religious scholars have already concluded that he is guilty and should be put to death. Don’t let this journalist be put to death for expressing his opinion!”  The same is true for Sharon in the USA of an inability to ever obtain a fair trial, where Judicial leaders in California have already concluded Sharon should falsely be deemed guilty of libel and put behind bars to conceal that they fixed appellate opinions! 
 

The Commission on Judicial Performance, established in 1960, is the independent state agency responsible for investigating complaints of judicial misconduct and judicial incapacity and for disciplining judges, pursuant to article VI, section 18 of the California Constitution.The Commission’s mandate is to protect the public, enforce rigorous standards of judicial conduct and maintain public confidence in the integrity and independence of the judicial system. …an effective method of disciplining judges who engage in misconduct is essential to the functioning of our judicial system. Commission proceedings provide a fair and appropriate mechanism to preserve the integrity of the judicial process.

The California COMMISSION on Judicial Performance is the independent state agency that is to police ethics in California’s judicial branch. 

Unfortunately the  Agency is chaired by the first appellate justice who framed Sharon for libel in 2006, JUSTICE JUDITH MCCONNELL  along with two other appellate court justices.                

Three more appellate court justices did the same in 2010, with  JUSTICE RICHARD HUFFMAN. being one of them involved  At the time, Justice Huffman was the Chair of the Executive Committee of the JUDICIAL COUNCIL.  This is the most powerful position for any judiciary to hold in the state of California.    

      Please sign the PETITION today to help keep a Saudi Blogger from being put to death for publishing the truth on the Interent. Tomorrow, please help us to tell the Commissioners on Judicial Performance to send a clear message to their Chair and judicial branch that  California is not Saudi Arabia. 

     The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees the right of US citizens to speak the truth for the public good without being harassed for years by the courts, bankrupted,  jailed… or executed by a judicial system that is clearly out of control.  Tomorrow, please help us tell the leaders of California’s judicial branch that they are not the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia. – and are subject to the same laws that govern crimnal behavior just like everyone else in the United States

      Tomorrow, a petition is forthcoming to the Commission on Judicial Performance to stop the California courts from harassing Sharon Kramer and threatenng to incarcerate her in an effort to conceal that Justice McConnell, Justice Huffman and several of their judciary peers are criminals.  

      Please sign up to follow the Facebook Group, JUSTICE FOR SHARON NOONAN KRAMER and share it with your friends.  Public sunlight is the only way to stop a judicial system that is severely compromised at its helm.

Please sign up to follow KATY’S EXPOSURE BLOG. We’ll keep you posted!

      For a greater understanding of why the California judicia system fears what Sharon has to say and the evidence she can provide that their unlawful actions have endangered and harmed the lives of thousands of US citizens, please listen to the

   IAQ RADIO INTERVIEW of Sharon Kramer,   January 20, 2012

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Politics, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Courts Back Down, No Posts Coming Down

Boxing Coloring pagesJanuary 10, 2012. In the ongoing saga of KELMAN v. KRAMER, the courts backed down today….kind of.  Sharon Kramer was adament that posts regarding how it became a false concept in public health policy that moldly buildings do not harm and how it has remained there just enough to sell doubt of causation in claims handling practices and in US courts because of actions of courts involved in this matter,  are not coming off the Net.

Sickbuildings support group owner, KEVIN CARSTENS and Katy’s Exposure owner, CRYSTAL STUCKEY, are refusing to remove truthful posts as it would be harmful for the health and safety of thousands to have this valuable information removed from public view. 

The Court blinked today when Sharon Kramer said send me to jail for refusing silence.  The posts are not coming down. NOW the Court want Sharon to issue an apology to Kelman that she did not accuse him of perjury when testifying in Oregon. 

That is not going to happen, UNLESS Kelman’s attorney issues an apology for making Sharon’s writing look like she accused Kelman of lying about being paid to author the ACOEM Mold Statement in briefs he submitted to the courts. AND the courts issue an apology to all of us who have been harmed by the mold issue for their making Sharon’s writing of 2005 look like a lie over five little words, while knowing they were making it look like Sharon was a liar about the bogusness of US Chamber’s and ACOEM’s mold position statements.

So now, they want an apology to Kelman by March 2nd or Sharon is going to jail.  After speaking with Kelman and his attorney for about 10 minutes, Sharon asked that the judge come back out from his chambers and just send her to jail today.  The Court wouldn’t do it. 

Afte the judge had left the courtroom, Kelman’s attorney, Scheuer, stated with the baliff, clerk, attorney for the courts  – Tracey Sang, Kramer and three other people present, that Kramer was rewriting the history of the case Sharon had just  stated that false hearsay emails got into the jury room causing the verdict for Kelman. (the emails by ex-Veritox employee, Dr. Daniel Sudakin calling Sharon a cyberstalker for something she never said and one by Dr. Michael Holland got into the jury room which caused a verdict for Kelman in August of 2008).  

The DECLARATION of juror Shelby Stutz proves that is exactly what happened. It also proves Kelman’s attorney has no problem making known false statements of what occurred in the case that he, Kelman and the courts would like to keep from coming to greater public light.  

There will be no apology to Kelman or anyone else forthcoming.- for being framed for libel over a matter of public health.  The Fourth District Division Appellate Court justice in San Diego, are going to have undo the harm they have done to thousands of us by making the first public writing of how it became a fraud in policy that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm, look like a lie – while they suppressed the evidence that the plaintiff committed perjury to establish needed reason for malice and MANY other misdeeds by the courts themselves. 

The ONLY way this will end is when they acknowledge they have been practicing politics from the bench – not law – to the point that they would threaten to incarcerate and honest US citizen to conceal their misdeeds.

Balls in their Court. (pun intended)

PS.  Confused?  Listen to this IAQ RADIO Interview to understand the games that have been playing out in the CA courts – while the lives of thousands hang in the balance.

Posted in Health - Medical - Science | 15 Comments

Sharon Kramer Notice To Court Of Inability To Adhere To Unlawful Contempt Order, Sentencing Feb 10th Kelman v. Kramer

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Justice For Aboriginal

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, NORTH DISTRICT

In the Matter of Bruce J. Kelman v. Sharon Kramer

The Honorable Thomas Nugent Presiding

Sentencing of Sharon Kramer for Civil Contempt of Court

February 10, 2012 1:30PM

SHARON KRAMER NOTICE TO COURT & DECLARATION

 in its Entirety

IV

KRAMER IS UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH UNLAWFUL COURT ORDER &  JUDGMENT

     1. Again, the ORDER states, “That the contemner is sentenced to spend a total of five days in the San Diego County jail pursuant to the C.C.P. section 1218(a), which shall be suspended upon the condition that, prior to February 6, 2012, contemner publish a retraction on the Katy’s Exposure website and on the Yahoo Group “Sickbuildings” chatroom of the defamatory statement set for in the preliminary injunction….”.
        

     2. C.C.P 1209(b)states, “A speech or publication reflecting upon or concerning a court or an officer thereof shall not be treated or punished as a contempt of the court unless made in the immediate presence of the court while in session and in such a manner as to actually interfere with its proceedings”

      3. Without being able to state there is anything untruthful or inaccurate in the posts, the three posts by KRAMER that the Court want removed from the Internet by Court order are titled:

“Is TheCaliforniaCourt Case Management System (CCMS) Being Misused For Politics In Policy & Litigation…..And The Fleecing Of TheCaliforniaTaxpayer Over The Mold Issue?” 

 “Texas judge abuses his child for Net usage. Cal Courts threaten Katy’s Bloggers with jail time for exposing by Net, many children abused by their actions” and

“Texas Judge Won’t Be Charged With “Beating Into Submission” To Stop Internet Use. WillCalifornia’s Leading Judiciaries Ever Be Charged For Collectively Trying To Do The Same To Whistle Blowing Bloggers?”

       4. The fourth post the Court wants removed by court order was not  made by KRAMER. It was made by Karen Dean and states states,

“repost and repost  Lets post these words everywhere, on every facebook and blog site, over and over “In the matter of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Bruce Kelman and GlobalTox, Inc., sued Sharon Kramer for the words, Dr. Kelman `altered his under oath statements on the witness stand”?

 5.  As proven by the Declarations of CARTENS, February 5, 2012 and STUCKEY, February 6, 2012, KRAMER does not have the ability to comply with the ORDER to avoid incarceration. C.C.P 1211.5. states, “At all stages of all proceedings, the affidavit or statement of facts, as the case may be, required by Section 1211 shall be construed, amended, and reviewed according to the followings rules: (b)…No order or judgment of conviction of contempt shall be set aside, nor new trial granted, for any error as to any matter of pleading in such affidavit or statement, unless, after an examination of the entire cause, including the evidence, the court shall be of the opinion that the error complained of has resulted in a miscarriage of justice.

       6. Civil Contempt of Court is the charge. The purpose of indirect civil contempt is to coerce compliance with an order by imprisoning the contemner until performance of an act he or she has the power to perform. CCP §1219(a) states. “The ‘coercive’ imprisonment must end when the contemner no longer has the power to comply.” …. 

DECLARATION OF SHARON KRAMER

     Honorable Thomas Nugent, please stop abusing your position of authority as a Constitutional officer of the courtWhat you are doing is unlawful harassment, intimidation and threat to block my movement to conceal unlawful and criminal actions by leaders of the Judicial Branch of California.

     You now have a pony in the race to see me incarcerated and silenced for exposing not only their actions, but your actions.  For nearly one year, you have willfully gagged me from writing the exact words for which you case file provides the direct evidence you know the prior courts framed me for libel with actual malice while they falsified court documents and CCMS computer records. 

     You have suppressed this evidence in this case including the fact that you know the continued adverse impact on public health causing harm to thousands directly because of your current unlawful actions.

     You must know by now I am not going to be silenced and neither are others whose numbers and understanding of this case for its impact on thousands, are growing by the day.

     With the passage of AB1208 in the Assembly, you must know by now that Speak With One Voice is rapidly leaving theCaliforniajudicial system for the sake of the preservation of the Constitution you are here to protect and uphold.

     I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and executed by me this 10th day of February in Escondido, California.

  Sharon Kramer                                                                                                      

Justice For Aboriginal

Exhibit 1, Mental Status Evaluation of Kramer by Dr. Lorna Swartz, January 12, 2012
 
Exhibit 2, Declaration of Crystal Stuckey, Owner of Katy’s Exposure, February 6, 2012
 
Exhibit 3, Declaration of Kevin Carstens, Owner of Sickbuildings 2800 Member Support Group February 5, 2012
 
IAQ RADIO Interview of SHARON Kramer, January 12, 2012
Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Declaration of Kevin Carstens, Owner of Sickbuildings Support Group Re: Kelman v. Kramer Sentencing of Sharon Kramer for Contempt Feb 10, 2012

Declaration of Kevin Carstens in entirety

Bruce J. Kelman v. Sharon Kramer

Case No. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC

Assn. For All Purposes To Hon. Thomas Nugent

Contempt of Court Sentencing Date For Sharon Kramer

February 10, 2012 1:30 PM

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, NORTH DISTRICT 

Department 30

   Life's Slippery Slopes

I, Kevin Carstens, hereby declare as follows:

         I am the owner and moderator of a twenty-eight hundred member online support group for those injured by biological contaminants found in water damaged buildings (WDB), “Sickbuildings”. The web address is: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sickbuildings/ I reside in Cornelia, Georgia and have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein. If sworn as a witness I could and would testify competently thereto….

        Many of our members have difficulty obtaining medical treatment for their injuries because of a marketing campaign by the US Chamber of Commerce that began in 2003 and in which it was mass promoted to US physicians, insurers and the courts that it had been scientifically proven all claims of illness and death from “toxic mold” were only being made because of “trial lawyers, media and Junk Science”…..

        I am aware and have the evidence posted on Sickbuildings that the plaintiff in this case, Bruce J. Kelman, along with his business partner in the corporation of Veritox, Inc., Bryan Hardin, are the authors of those words that were mass marketed by the US Chamber of Commerce to US physicians, insurers and to courts. I am aware that Veritox was formerly known as GlobalTox, Inc….  

        I am aware and have the evidence posted on Sickbuildings that the defendant in this case, Sharon Kramer, was the first to publicly write in March of 2005, how the US Chamber of Commerce, Bruce J. Kelman, his company, Veritox, the Manhattan Institute think-tank, US Congressman Gary Miller and the occupational medical trade association, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) were connected in mass marketing the false concept that it had been scientifically proven people claiming injury from WDB were only doing so because of “trial lawyers, media and Junk Science”……

         I am aware and have the evidence posted on Sickbuilding that Bruce Kelman and Veritox sued Sharon Kramer in May of 2005 for five words within the first public writing of how it became a false concept in US public health policy and in US courts that it was scientifically proven all claims of illness from WDB were only being made because of “trial lawyers, media and Junk Science”.  Those five words are “altered his under oath statements.”…..

       I am aware and have the direct evidence posted on Sickbuildings that the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court issued a second opinion in September of 2010 in which they concealed they had crafted their 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion to make the false finding that Sharon Kramer was guilty of libel with actual malice…..

       I am aware that if the court would acknowledge Sharon Kramer’s uncontroverted evidence in its case file that the prior courts framed her for libel, suppressed the evidence that Bruce Kelman (author of mold policy for ACOEM and the US Chamber) committed perjury to establish reason for malice, falsified court documents and then in a second case gagged her from being able to write of what they had done; the deceptive marketing campaign of the US Chamber of Commerce that all claims of illness from WDB are only being made because of “trial lawyers, media and Junk Science” would immediately vanish from policy and courtrooms throughout the United States……

         !!!!!If Bruce. Kelman would like to post the direct evidence corroborating the statements he made under penalty of perjury in declarations of why Sharon Kramer would have reason to harbor malice for him, I will share the post with the 2800 members of Sickbuildings!!!!!!……

     I am aware the sole cause of action words of the prior case and the purported reason Sharon Kramer is gagged from writing the sole cause of action words “altered his under oath statements” in this case, is because they were allegedly legally found to be a maliciously false accusation that Bruce Kelman committed perjury on the witness stand in Oregon. 

          If any judiciary involved in this matter, Mr. Kelman or Mr. Scheuer would like to post on Sickbuildings what Sharon Kramer falsely and maliciously accused Bruce Kelman of lying about by her use of that phrase, I will share the post with our 2800 members who have had a difficult time receiving medical treatment because of misinformation mass marketed over the mold issue. To date, I am not aware anyone has been able to state how Sharon Kramer’s phrase “altered his under oath statements” translates into maliciously false accusation of perjury – the sole cause of action words of the entire seven years worth of litigation and supposed sole words for Sharon Kramer’s impending incarceration…..

         If the Fourth District Division One Appellate justices would like to post an explanation to the 2800 members of Sickbuildings of why they crafted their Appellate opinions in 2006 and 2010 to make the false finding of libel with actual malice and suppressed the evidence that Bruce Kelman committed perjury to establish needed reason for malice, while knowing they were aiding the marketing campaign of the US Chamber of Commerce to remain in US policy and US courts, I will share the post with the 2800 members of Sickbuildings……

         If the clerks of the court would like to post an explanation to the 2800 members of Sickbuildings of why they falsified court documents and computer entries of judgments never entered and concealed who were the true parties to the litigation of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, I will share the post with our 2800 members……

        If Mr. Kelman’s attorney, Keith Scheuer, or the clerks of the court or judiciary would like to post an explanation of how and why Sharon Kramer has an interest accruing lien on her property for costs incurred by Mr. Scheuer’s trial losing client, Veritox, with interest accruing from a date of three weeks before he even submitted costs, I will share the post with our 2800 members……

         If this court would like to post an explanation of why it is sentencing Sharon Kramer to jail for republishing the phrase the prior courts are evidenced in this court’s case file to have framed her for libel with actual malice and with one post for which she is to be jailed not even being made by her, I will share the court’s post with the 2800 members of Sickbuildings……

         If the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, Tani Cantil-Sayauke, would like to post an explanation of why Sharon Kramer is to be incarcerated for placing the direct evidence on the Internet, September 13, 2011, November 2, 2011 and November 5, 2011 that the Chief Justice is aware of the illegalities of these two cases by officers of her courts and its continued adverse impact on the 2800 members of Sickbuildings, I will share the post with our members……

     Sharon Kramer does not have the capability to retract posts on Sickbuildings made by herself or others.  As the owner and moderator of Sickbuildings, only I and my assistant, have this ability……

     Until the California judicial system, Mr. Kelman and Mr. Scheuer provide an explanation of why the courts framed a defendant for libel, suppressed the evidence the plaintiff committed perjury, falsified court documents and computer entries, gagged the defendant from republishing the words for which she is evidenced to have been framed by the courts, and is now going to be incarcerate her for refusing silence of how the courts’ actions continue to harm the 2800 members of Sickbuildings; no posts of Sharon Kramer’s or any other member of Sickbuildings regarding this matter will be retracted……

       I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Georgia that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Declaration was executed by me on this 5th day of February, 2012 in Cornelia, Georgia.                                                  

                                                                                 KEVIN CARSTENS

Declaration of Crystal Stuckey, owner of Katy’s Exposure Blog

Please listen to the January 20, 2012 IAQ RADIO INTERVIEW of Sharon Kramer.  It is regarding how those who currently control the purse strings for CA’s judicial branch have abused their power to practice politics from the bench in a manner that is adverse to the public’s best interest.  Caught red handed by what they have been doing to Sharon, with Sharon refusing to be silenced – they are now going to incarcerate her to conceal crimes perpetrated by the LEADERS OF CALIFORNIA’s JUDICIAL BRANCH.

Posted in Health - Medical - Science | 20 Comments

Declaration of Crystal Stuckey, Owner of Katy’s Exposure Blog, In the matter of Kelman v. Kramer, Contempt of Court Sentencing Feb 10, 2012,

Origins of Our Constitution

Declaration of Crystal Stuckey in entirety

SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, NORTH DISTRICT

 BRUCE J. KELMAN,                                                               Plaintiff                                     v.SHARON KRAMER,                                                               Defendant  CASE NO. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC Declaration of Crystal Stuckey, Owner of Katy’s Exposure Blog [Assigned for All Purposes To Hon. Thomas Nugent]Contempt of Court Sentencing DateFebruary 10, 2012, 1:30PM

I, Crystal Stuckey, hereby declare as follows:

1.                   I am the owner of Katy’s Exposure Blog, Exposing Environmental Health Threats and Those Responsible. The web address is: https://katysexposure.wordpress.com/ I reside in Katy, Texas and have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein. If sworn as a witness I could and would testify competently thereto.

2.                   Many of our readers have difficulty obtaining medical treatment for their injuries caused by exposure to contaminants found in water damaged buildings (WDB) because of a marketing campaign by the US Chamber of Commerce that began in 2003 and in which it was mass promoted to US physicians, insurers and the courts that it had been scientifically proven all claims of illness and death from “toxic mold” were only being made because of “trial lawyers, media and Junk Science”.

 *******************************

8.                   I am aware and have the direct evidence posted on Katy’s Exposure that in 2006, the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court suppressed the evidence that Bruce Kelman submitted a false declaration statement under penalty of perjury in September of 2005 to establish a fictitious theme of why Sharon Kramer would harbor malice for him. Bruce Kelman falsely claimed under penalty of perjury to have given an expert defense opinion of a nature in 2003 in Sharon Kramer’s lawsuit with her homeowner insurer, Mercury Casualty, that caused her to be “apparently furious that the science conflicted with her dreams of a remodeled home. Kramer launch into an obsessive campaign to destroy the reputations of Dr. Kelman and GlobalTox.”

9.                  I am aware there is no evidence to corroborate that this testimony in the Mercury case was ever given by Bruce Kelman or that there is any evidence Sharon Kramer had reason to, or did, harbor personal ill will for Bruce Kelman stemming from his involvement in the Mercury case.

10.                  I am aware and have the direct evidence posted on Katy’s Exposure that the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court issued a second opinion in September of 2010 in which they concealed they had crafted their 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion to make the false finding that Sharon Kramer was guilty of libel with actual malice and that all lower courts followed their lead, including the trial court when framing the scope of the trial and in post trial rulings.

11.                  I am aware and have the direct evidence posted on Katy’s Exposure that numerous court documents and computer entries were falsified in the case of judgments that were never entered and concealing who were the actual parties to the litigation, with Bryan Hardin who is a retired Deputy Director of NIOSH and co-owner of Veritox being an undisclosed party to the litigation.

**************************

14.                  I am aware that this court is suppressing the uncontroverted evidence in its case file that Bruce Kelman committed perjury to establish malice and Keith Scheuer repeatedly suborned it.  I am aware and have the evidence on Katy’s Exposure that on July 15, 2011, this court deemed it “frivolous” that all prior courts suppressed the evidence of plaintiff’s perjury and threatened to sanction Sharon Kramer when she asked that the plaintiff attorney be made to corroborate reason given for malice in a libel litigation.

15.                  I am aware that if the court would acknowledge Sharon Kramer’s uncontroverted evidence in its case file that the prior courts framed her for libel for the words, “altered his under oath statements”, suppressed the evidence that Bruce Kelman (author of mold policy for ACOEM and the US Chamber) committed perjury to establish reason for malice, falsified court documents and computer entries; and then in a second case gagged her from being able to write the exact words for which she was framed; the deceptive marketing campaign of the US Chamber of Commerce that all claims of illness from WDB are only being made because of “trial lawyers, media and Junk Science” would immediately vanish from policy and courtrooms throughout the United States.

16.                  I have read the judgment for Contempt of Court, signed by Judge Thomas Nugent on January 19, 2012. It states in relevant part:

 “Comptemer, with full knowledge of the preliminary injunction, republished the defamatory statement [sic, “altered his under oath statements”] by posting it on the Internet (i) on the Katy’s Exposure website on September 13, 2011.…(ii.)…which linked to an article on Katy’s Exposure website dated November 3, 2011…(iii) on the Katy’s Exposure website dated November 4, 2011…(iv.) on the Yahoo Group “Sickbuildings” chatroom on November 5, 2011 which linked to an article, also dated November 5, 2011, on the Katy’s Exposure website  (c) That the contemner is sentenced to spend a total of five days in the San Diego County jail, pursuant to C.C.P. section 1218(a), which shall be suspended upon the condition that prior to February 6, 2012, contemner publish a retraction on the Katy’s Exposure website and on the Yahoo Group “Sickbuildings” chatroom of the defamatory statement set forth in the preliminary injunctions.  Further, pursuant to C.C.P. section 1218(a), contemner is ordered to pay to Plaintiff the attorney’s fees and costs incurred by Plaintiff in this action in the amount of $19, 343.95”

********************************

20.                  As the owner of Katy’s Exposure I do not give Sharon Kramer permission to retract the truthful and well evidenced post of September 13, 2011 from Katy’s Exposure, Is The California Court Case Management System (CCMS) Being Misused For Politics In Policy & Litigation…..And The Fleecing Of The California Taxpayer Over The Mold Issue?”  Based on the evidence I have posted on Katy’s Exposure, the answer appears to be a resounding “Yes”.

22.                  The posts of November 3 & 4 on Katy’s Exposure are titled respectively “Texas judge abuses his child for Net usage. Cal Courts threaten Katy’s Bloggers with jail time for exposing by Net, many children abused by their actions” and “Texas Judge Won’t Be Charged With “Beating Into Submission” To Stop Internet Use. Will California’s Leading Judiciaries Ever Be Charged For Collectively Trying To Do The Same To Whistle Blowing Bloggers?”

 *****************************

25.                  As the owner of Katy’s Exposure, I do not give Sharon Kramer permission to retract these truthful posts of November 3, 2011 and November 4, 2011 from my blog, Katy’s Exposure.  The posts provide direct evidence via linked legal documents of why the California courts want Sharon Kramer and I silenced of how they framed a defendant for libel with actual malice for a writing impacting public health.  Contrary to the courts’ attempting to deceptively stop public light on what occurred in the cases and continues to occur; these cases are a matter of public record as are the linked legal documents from the cases.

26.                  There is no post dated November 5, 2011 on Katy’s Exposure Blog to be retracted, nor was there ever.  The next post made after November 4, 2011, was made on December 9, 2011 and is titled, “MOLD ISSUE: Scientists, Physicians & Citizens Request Joint US Federal Agency Public Health Advisory” (Attached Hereto As Exhibit 2, is the November 2011 Achieve of Katy’s Exposure showing no post was made on November 5, 2011)

******************************

MESSAGE TO THE READERS OF KATY’S FROM CRYSTAL STUCKEY:

Dear Readers of Katy’s,

     I am proud to say I have done my best to help expose a science fraud in US public health policy that has harmed many who have been already made ill from contaminents in water damaged buildings, including me.  It is widely known the wrath Mrs. Kramer has suffered for daring to speak publicly against the interest of the US Chamber of Commerce over this issue.

     Few know of the retribution I have suffered. Since mid 2010, my privacy has been egregiously invaded to the point that I cannot even freely use the Internet from my own home or get direct access to the Web.

     It began with my Blackberry being hacked. From there it filtered into all my electronic communications. I am told that sometimes when I make phone calls my number shows in the caller ID – with another’s name. I am able to determine that my cellular and electronic accounts have been set up as re-routed through corporate servers and accounts. 

     What I have experienced is total ID theft and data mining. Any new services or equipment I have purchased have, to date, been unable to stop the invasion of my privacy and right to freedom of speech. This appears to be a personally targeted attack on me because I dared to start a blog that has been successful at “Exposing Environmental Health Threats and Those Responsible”.

     There is more than one way to jail someone to silence them. I, personally, have had my movements blocked for over a year by invasive hacking. I feel like I have already done and continue to do my time in prison for daring to speak the truth in America.

 Crystal Stuckey, Owner of Katy’s Exposure Blog

Posted in Civil Justice, Health - Medical - Science | Tagged , , , , , , , | 11 Comments