Courts Back Down, No Posts Coming Down

Boxing Coloring pagesJanuary 10, 2012. In the ongoing saga of KELMAN v. KRAMER, the courts backed down today….kind of.  Sharon Kramer was adament that posts regarding how it became a false concept in public health policy that moldly buildings do not harm and how it has remained there just enough to sell doubt of causation in claims handling practices and in US courts because of actions of courts involved in this matter,  are not coming off the Net.

Sickbuildings support group owner, KEVIN CARSTENS and Katy’s Exposure owner, CRYSTAL STUCKEY, are refusing to remove truthful posts as it would be harmful for the health and safety of thousands to have this valuable information removed from public view. 

The Court blinked today when Sharon Kramer said send me to jail for refusing silence.  The posts are not coming down. NOW the Court want Sharon to issue an apology to Kelman that she did not accuse him of perjury when testifying in Oregon. 

That is not going to happen, UNLESS Kelman’s attorney issues an apology for making Sharon’s writing look like she accused Kelman of lying about being paid to author the ACOEM Mold Statement in briefs he submitted to the courts. AND the courts issue an apology to all of us who have been harmed by the mold issue for their making Sharon’s writing of 2005 look like a lie over five little words, while knowing they were making it look like Sharon was a liar about the bogusness of US Chamber’s and ACOEM’s mold position statements.

So now, they want an apology to Kelman by March 2nd or Sharon is going to jail.  After speaking with Kelman and his attorney for about 10 minutes, Sharon asked that the judge come back out from his chambers and just send her to jail today.  The Court wouldn’t do it. 

Afte the judge had left the courtroom, Kelman’s attorney, Scheuer, stated with the baliff, clerk, attorney for the courts  – Tracey Sang, Kramer and three other people present, that Kramer was rewriting the history of the case Sharon had just  stated that false hearsay emails got into the jury room causing the verdict for Kelman. (the emails by ex-Veritox employee, Dr. Daniel Sudakin calling Sharon a cyberstalker for something she never said and one by Dr. Michael Holland got into the jury room which caused a verdict for Kelman in August of 2008).  

The DECLARATION of juror Shelby Stutz proves that is exactly what happened. It also proves Kelman’s attorney has no problem making known false statements of what occurred in the case that he, Kelman and the courts would like to keep from coming to greater public light.  

There will be no apology to Kelman or anyone else forthcoming.- for being framed for libel over a matter of public health.  The Fourth District Division Appellate Court justice in San Diego, are going to have undo the harm they have done to thousands of us by making the first public writing of how it became a fraud in policy that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm, look like a lie – while they suppressed the evidence that the plaintiff committed perjury to establish needed reason for malice and MANY other misdeeds by the courts themselves. 

The ONLY way this will end is when they acknowledge they have been practicing politics from the bench – not law – to the point that they would threaten to incarcerate and honest US citizen to conceal their misdeeds.

Balls in their Court. (pun intended)

PS.  Confused?  Listen to this IAQ RADIO Interview to understand the games that have been playing out in the CA courts – while the lives of thousands hang in the balance.

About Sharon Kramer

Hi, I'm an advocate for integrity in health marketing and in the courts.
This entry was posted in Health - Medical - Science. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Courts Back Down, No Posts Coming Down

  1. katy says:

    The court is well aware of Dr. Shoemaker’s work and how Mrs. Kramer helped to remove the false science of Bruce Kelman from Federal policy. That’s what they are afraid will come to light. They have aided a falsehood to remain in policy and in courts by by framing Kramer for libel for the words, “altered his under oath statements” to make all her truthful words regarding the fraud in scienc by Kelman, ACOEM and the US Chamber, look like there were found to be a lie by the courts. They know that Kramer is credited in Shoemaker’s book for causing the federal GAO audit of the issue. Shoemaker submitted an amicus letter early on in this case on Kramer’s behalf. The court KNOWS it is aiding to harm thousands, while concealing all prior courts have, too. It would be nothing short of criminal blocking of movement to incarcerate a US citizen to silence her of what they have done and continue to do to thousands by aiding malicious litigation carried out by criminal means.

  2. Linda Angel says:

    They need to get Ritchie Showmaker, MD to testify….buy the book and learn how deadly MOLD exposure is…..

    The “karma” this judge will have will be horrific….I would venture to say that the court house he is sitting in is more than likely FULL OF MOLD and mycotoxins…..I would suggest he have his prostate checked yearly……This judge needs to be stripped of his duties…what a GOOBER!!

  3. katy says:

    Stephanie, thanks for asking how people can help get the truth to where it needs to go. We’ll be posting information of that within the week.

  4. thank you Sharon. i try to do more here, how can people dispute was is TRUE! God Bless!

  5. Jeanine Moseley says:

    A apologoy from the courts would be a start but it’s not going to make up for all the suffering
    we have had to go through because of one bogus rat study and all the lies and deceit surrounding it. thank God there are still people in the world that stand up and fight for truth and justice exspecially when our court system seems to have lost that value.
    Sharon Kramer does not owe anyone a apology!

  6. katy says:


    Yes. We sure do want an apology. And who we want it from is Justice Judith McConnell, Chair of the California Commission on Judicial Performance and Presiding Justice of the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court. And what we want that apology to be, is in the form of a reversal of an anti-SLAPP opinion she rendered in November of 2006. With the assistance of Kelman’s attorney, Keith Scheuer, she framed me for malicious libel to make my truthful writing look false. This was the first public writing of how it became a fraud in policy that it was scientifically proven moldy building do not harm – while she suppressed the evidence that the author of the fraud in policy, Bruce Kelman, committed criminal perjury to establish needed reason for malice. She knows she is the one who is going to have to undo it and all the misery her actions have caused for thousands.

  7. Linda says:

    Yes we want an apology for all the stress it has caused Sharon and our internet community. Linda

  8. Cyndi says:

    We might as well say we are a communist country, speechless, deaf, and blind. If we have no voice, our judicial system is a senseless as a day on earth. Morals and character are made by ones ability to see and feel what is good or bad in our lives. It is often that one stands up for righteousness … not fowl play. Responsibility is in many hands not just our lawmakers. Its time to take such as a duty of moral importance. Sharon may God bless you, your words, your going forward for so many.

  9. Jonathan Wright says:

    And yes, kudos to KC and Crystal here too. Since there have not been any legal proceedings against them that I am aware of yet, the commitment of the court has to be called into question.

  10. This is fantastic… I am so happy that Sharon has not had to spend any time in jail for this… yet! Still, asking for a written apology for telling the truth is out of line. I won’t hold my breath for an apology from the courts!

  11. Jonathan Wright says:

    Sharon Kramer has some of the biggest balls ever, they did not count on this. I’ve known her for years, she has never batted an eye. I think they are beginning to get a sense of what will happen if she actually goes to jail, and it’s what they have been trying to suppress — public scrutiny of this issue.

  12. Good luck Sharon and all you other fighters for justice in the US

  13. Dana Toliver says:

    …I meant to say ‘on behalf’ not behald….

  14. Dana Toliver says:

    A sigh of relief, for now. I’m just so glad sharon is not in jail! Baby steps are better than no steps at all! Thanks Sharon, Kevin & Crystal for standing your ground on behald of all of us!

  15. marie moore says:

    What Hero’s !!! Right on, Sharron Kramer, Kevin Carstens and Crystal Stuckey. WE Stand with you !!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s