KEEHN/SCHALL Race for San Diego Jurist Seat 20 Kicks Into High Gear

Posted on May 7, 2014 by Sharon Kramer
by Sharon Noonan Kramer, Advocate for integrity in health marketing and U.S. courts.
FINALLY!!! Someone is going to do something about the bombastic, compromised and inept Judge Lisa Schall!!
From the Campaign website of Schall’s challenger to Jurist Seat 20, Carla Keehn:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 7, 2014
Contact: 
Jeff Powers
Email: jpowers@tomshepard.com
“No One Is Above The Law, Not Even Judges.”
SAN DIEGO – Four billboards are posted around San Diego alerting the public to the illegal conduct of Superior Court Judge Lisa Schall. 
BILLBOARD LOCATIONS: I-5 @ Balboa, I-5 @ Beardsley, Washington & 1st Ave,    I-5 @ Kalmia 

       Keehn billboards

In 2007, Judge Schall was arrested for driving drunk the wrong way down Centre City Parkway.  She was publicly admonished for her DUI in 2008, but the public was not aware of her conduct prior to her re-election filing deadline in March 2008.
Schall was privately admonished in 1995 as she became embroiled in a juvenile dependency case.   And in 1999 she was publicly admonished for her abuse of the contempt power.  Ninety nine percent of judges are never admonished over the course of their careers.  Lisa Schall has been admonished 3 times.
Running against Lisa Schall is Carla Keehn.
Carla has devoted her life to public service.
She was a captain in the U.S. Army and protected the community of Los Angeles during the LA Riots.
For the last 18 years Keehn has served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney.
Keehn graduated cum laude from Princeton University and also has a JD from Hastings College of Law.  Her opponent Lisa Schall has a degree from Western State, which at the time she graduated, was unaccredited.
*Carla Keehn is available for interviews. 
**Verified court documents supporting these facts available on request”
Or one can read the verified court documents HERE in the voter questions posed to Lisa Schall that she declined to answer in March of this year.

Scan of Schall Envelop

Why we want Judge Schall removed from office, and so should you!
Our questions posed to Schall, that she refused to answer, are below.  Concealment of her unethical conduct and concealment of her falsification of court documents in a Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP), by many of the “all 125 Superior Court judges” now endorsing Schall for re-election; along with concealment by the local Appellate Court justices and the Commission on Judicial Performance, are abetting the continued fleecing of the United States public via insurer fraud over the mold issue.
In other words, Judge Lisa Schall fixed a SLAPP suit and falsified the judgment in 2008 to the financial benefit of the insurance industry and other affiliates of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.  All local jurists did a CYA for her felonious court document falsifications while aiding the insurer fraud to continue in courts and claims handling practices, all across the United States to this very day.  (See toxic tort expert defense witnesses & SLAPP plaintiffs, Veritox, Inc. website. Then compare it to the linked evidence below of how the SLAPP was fixed to fleece the public.)
“(Questions 20-22 are from Sharon Kramer)
20.      If a juror’s declaration was submitted to you as direct evidence that prejudicial hearsay documents not discussed in a trial, somehow entered and were read aloud in a jury room of your court; would your response be to refuse to even hear the harmed party’s oral arguments for a new trial?
[Declaration of Juror #5, Shelby Stuntz, Esq, describing (false) hearsay documents, not discussed in the Schall court trial of August 2008; somehow making their way past Schall’s clerk and into the jury room while causing a verdict for Mr. Kelman. Schall refuse to even hear oral argument for a motion made for a new trial:  http://freepdfhosting.com/96e00ed077.pdf ]
21.     If you were provided no less than twenty pieces of evidence proving that a plaintiff committed material perjury to manufacture a reason for a defendant’s malice in a libel litigation over a writing impacting environmental public health policy nationwide; would your response be that you would “not be drawn into that kind of petty behavior” to make the plaintiff attorney explain himself regarding the material perjury and his repeated suborning of it?
[Bruce Kelman committed criminal perjury in SLAPP to manufacture a needed reason for Sharon Kramer’s alleged malicious reason for exposing Kelman’s scientific fraud upon U.S. courts. Schall refused to be “drawn into that kind of petty behavior” of acknowledging the direct evidence of the perjury. The Fourth District Division One Appellate Court justices and the Commission on Judicial Performance concealed it in 2010 — while knowing they were abetting toxic tort expert defense witnesses to fleece the public with scientific fraud by getting away with committing criminal acts when plaintiffs in SLAPP.  http://freepdfhosting.com/246e6ad4b3.pdf ]
22.      As you know, several of your fellow sitting jurists who are now endorsing your re-election, have conclusively committed criminal acts, coram non judice, by continued usage of a void judgment issued from your court in 2008 in the matter of Bruce J. Kelman & GlobalTox, Inc. v. Sharon Kramer Case No. GIN044539
[Schall’s 2008 void judgment as amended three years later in 2011, after the Appellate Justices concealed it was fraudulent and void, and not to be used for any purpose in their 2010 opinion — as several San Diego jurists continued to use it. http://freepdfhosting.com/1f449984f8.pdf
a.) As a judicial officer of the court, candidate for re-election to public office, and member of society; what do you intend to do to mitigate the continuing damage caused by your fellow sitting judges using the void judgment that was falsified in your court?
[In 2013 Justice Judith McConnell and Justice Patricia Benke concealed that they had falsified court documents, coram non judice, while relying upon the 2008 voided Schall judgment to feign subject matter jurisdiction from 2008 to present. http://freepdfhosting.com/6dcb2f89ba.pdf  ]  
[The lives that continue to be ruined by Schall’s fraud upon the court and concealment/continued usage of her falsified of court documents by her jurist peers. http://wp.me/PlYPz-3AJ ]
b.) As a judge whose decisions impact the lives of many, do you feel it is prudent to admit error when error is proven to exist?”
OBVIOUSLY, Judge Lisa Schall’s answer is NO!  She only cares about staying on the bench by dubious means while aided by dubious friends, who are also officers the courts.
For more on the subject of what colluding local jurists have been willing to do to fix an election for their compromised judicial peer, Lisa Schall, please see:
February 24, 2014 Union Tribune “Judge candidate feels gaveled down” 
February 28, 2014 San Diego Free Press “Thou Shalt Not Challenge a Sitting Judge” 
March 6, 2014 California Court Monitor “Judicial Intimidation On Display in San Diego”   
March 25th  Why is DA Dumanis’ name now missing from Judge Lisa Schall’s endorsers?
March 19th San Diego Democrats Vote to Endorse Carla Keehn for Jurist Seat 20 
March 14th  Complaint to San Diego Presiding Judge for Subordinate Jurists’ Election Tampering
March 13th  Voter Questions Posed to San Diego Judicial Candidate Lisa Schall
March 10th  San Diego Sitting Judges’ Election Tampering Gains Statewide Media Attention
March 8th  San Diego Superior Court Judge Lisa Schall Offers to Answer Your Questions
March 2nd  What’s the difference between a Governor Brown appointed San Diego Judge and a Koch brother? UPDATED
February 27th  San Diego Union Tribune~Conflict seen in race for judge’s post~by Sharon Kramer
February 25th  San Diego LGBT Judges Attempt to Fix a Judicial Election Against an LGBT Candidate
And from our sister blog, “Just Answer the Damn Question, District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis” February 27th

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Voice of San Diego ~ Should Lisa Schall Win the Race for Worst Judge in Town?

Posted on May 3, 2014 by Sharon Kramer
by Sharon Noonan Kramer, Advocate for integrity in health marketing and the courts.
On May 1st, the Voice of San Diego published an article titled, “San Diego’s Post-Kreep Judicial Landscape: A Reader’s Guide”  The article is regarding the upcoming June 3rd San Diego County judicial elections.  But the real gist of the article appears to be about an entirely different race:
Who is currently the Worst Judge in San Diego County?
It would appear that the Voice’s vote for Worst Judge might just well go to incumbent Judge Lisa Schall.  She is running for re-election to Jurist Seat 20 against challenger, Federal prosecutor Carla Keehn. To our knowledge, 2014 is the first year that the voters have had the opportunity to vote Schall out of office, since no one has ever run against her in her nearly thirty years on the bench.
To quote from the Voice of San Diego:
“This time around, San Diego will have to settle for a candidate who’s…an incumbent with a drunk-driving conviction who was also admonished by a state commission for incorrectly putting a woman in custody for five days….Meanwhile, the Bar Association ranked three of the four incumbent judges as “Well Qualified” and the last, Stern, as “Qualified.” Of those four, Schall – ranked as “Well Qualified” – is the only one who has been called out (and not in a good way) by the state Commission on Judicial Performance. Schall was first appointed by Gov. George Deukmejian in the 1980s and says she is facing her first contested race. According to court records, Schall received a private admonishment in 1995 related to her involvement in a juvenile dependency case. Then in 1999, she was admonished for “an abuse of the contempt power” after incorrectly ordering a woman into custody for five days, according to a copy of the admonishment.
And about a decade later, Schall was again admonished by the commission after she was arrested and found guilty of drunk driving. According to a copy of that admonishment, Schall had a blood alcohol level of approximately 0.09 percent after she drove on the wrong side of an Escondido highway….’Ninety-nine percent of all judges get through their entire careers with nothing and that’s how it should be,” Keehn said. “This is the first election to hold Judge Schall accountable not just for her three judicial admonishments, but her criminal conviction.”
We at Katy’s agree with Keehn’s assessment.  We happen to know first hand that Schall is a felon and that she is a “Well Qualified” candidate in the race for Worst Judge in San Diego — maybe even the United States.  In 2008, a judgement document was falsified in her court over a matter impacting U.S. public health and safety.  Continued usage of the frauduelnt and void legal document by Schall’s fellow jurists, coram non judice, is aiding in the continuance of the fleecing of the US public by toxic tort expert defense witnesses of the U.S Department of Justice — Veritox, Inc. formerly known as GlobalTox, Inc.
The collusive concealment of the Schall felony judgment falsification continues to harm the lives of thousands.  See 2007 International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, LaDou, Kramer et.al. regarding the owners of Veritox and the mass marketing of their scientific fraud upon U.S. courts by “non-profit” US medical associations, the US Chamber of Commerce and by the misuse of the imprimatur of the University of California.
Its billions of dollars in fraud (that’s “billions” with a “b”) that continues because other San Diego judges and justices, who also appear to be strong contenders of Schall’s in the race to the bottom, have and continue to cover up for Schall’s fraud upon the court by falsifying even more court documents . This, with their courts having no jurisdiction and they not being concerned one iota of prosecution for their felonies.
The local jurists’ lack of concern of punishment for their felonious document falsfications, appears to be justified.
This is  because if a race for Worst San Diego County Government Official included the District Attorney race; candidate for re-election, DA Bonnie Dumanis, would be a strong contender.  She and her deputies have repeatedly refused to prosecute Schall and local jurists for felony court document falsifications, even though Dumanis knows they’ve been doing it for years in the Veritox matter, while acting without subject matter jurisdiction and thus having no judicial immunity from prosecution…..but only if the local DA wasn’t heavily involved in “political prostitution” while they all aid Veritox and cohorts to continue to fleece the United States public.
On March 7th, Schall sent out an eblast offering to answer voter and potential endorser questions. We, as strong endorsers of her candidacy as San Diego’s Worst Judge, took her up on her offer. We asked voters their questions and then sent over 20 of them to Schall on the voters’ behalves.  Her response: “Return to Sender“.
So…on June 3rd, if you would like to vote for Judge Lisa Schall as the Worst Judge in San Diego County, then put a check mark next to the name Carla Keehn on your voter ballot for Jurist Seat 20.
If you’d like to cast a vote for Bonnie Dumanis as the most politically compromised DA in the history of San Diego County, then put a check mark on your ballot next to the names Bob Brewer or Terri Wyatt for San Diego District Attorney.
For a greater understanding of Schall’s viable contenders in the race for Worst Judge in the county, please read the following articles:
February 24, 2014 Union Tribune “Judge candidate feels gaveled down”
February 28, 2014 San Diego Free Press “Thou Shalt Not Challenge a Sitting Judge”
March 6, 2014 California Court Monitor “Judicial Intimidation On Display in San Diego”
For directions of how not to make financial contributions to Dumanis’ bid for re-election as San Diego County’s  compromised District Attorney, please contact your local FBI office.
If you would like to just pretend that you are helping to take a bite out of fraud in US public health policies and courts; then just sit back and continue to say nothing of what you know of the SCHALL and VERITOX falsified court documents; concealed as being fraudulent and void by several court officers and other complicit politicos including District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis.

 

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, US Chamber of Commerce | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More Scrutiny for UCLA’s School of Medicine. Governor Brown asked to independently investigate himself.

Posted on April 27, 2014 by Sharon Kramer
On April 25, 2014 the Los Angeles Times published an article titled. “More Scrutiny for UCLA’s School of Medicine”. The gist of the article is of how industry is having far too much financial influence when selling garbage science to the public via the use of the prestige of the University of California (UC) imprimatur.
It seems a pinhole of light might be shining through the thick door behind which an inferno of industry funded UC frauds have been burning for years. The LA Times article states, “…the $10-million, mid-trial settlement this week between the UC system and the former head of orthopedic surgery at UCLA [Dr. Robert Perdowitz] has prompted a consumer group to seek an independent investigation by California Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris or Gov. Jerry Brown.”
Sounds good, but I happen to know that calling for an “independent investigation” of the UC system by Governor Brown and Atty General Harris would be like calling for an “independent investigation” of the recently sunk South Korean ferry by the ship’s captain and his first mate. That disaster, too, appears to have been caused by financially motivated bad practices which put the safety of the public as a secondary consideration.  Modifications to add 117 more passenger cabins to the ship raised the ferry’s center of gravity.
The center of gravity in the UC system lays in the California governor’s office. The Governor of California is always the President of the UC Regents. That would currently be Regent-Governor Brown. The Regents oversee entire UC system.  A long-term regent is Richard Blum.  He is the husband of U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein.
If one reports scientific fraud involving industry and the UC system and retaliation by hand of California government employees for exposing it;  Harris will blow you off as the fraud and relentless retaliation plays on by her friends and political allies.  (See Kamala Harris endorses Bonnie Dumanis for re-election as San Diego County District Attorney, March 14, 2014)
I personally know that Governor Brown and Kamala Harris already know of UCLA and UC Regents generating income while defrauding the public on behalf of the interests of industry; and of retaliations against California whistleblowers to cover up the frauds and fraudsters. I’ve been living the nightmare for daring to expose a massive UC and US Chamber of Commerce joint fraud, for now nine years. 
In 2003, the UC imprimatur was forged on a US Chamber of Commerce medico-legal policy paper. Two toxicologist who have never been affiliated with the UC were paid by a think-tank to write it. This was for the purpose of lending undue credibility via the prestige of the UC imprimatur on the publication, when selling scientific fraud in U.S. courts over the mold issue.  Since 2004, every government official I have encountered from coast to coast, while trying to stop the fraud, the damage to the public and the relentless retaliation I have experienced for daring to tell the truth of it, passes the buck, including Brown and Harris. (See Truth Out, Sharon Kramer letter to Dr. Andrew Saxon of UCLA, April 2010. It’s not light reading!)
In February of this year I was directed by the San Diego County Board of Supervisors to file a complaint with Harris against San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis and Sheriff William Gore. I had complained of the two to the Supervisors in January for their aiding and abetting fraud by local court officials  to conclusively cover up scientific fraud via the UC imprimatur being forged on a US Chamber publication by expert defense witnesses for the USDOJ, two owners of Veritox, Inc. 
Local jurists, including the former chair of the CA Commission on Judicial Performance Justice Judith McConnell and former chair of the CA Judicial Council Executive Committee Richard Huffman, fixed a SLAPP suit brought by those who forged the UC name on the US Chamber medico-legal policy paper, Veritox owners Bruce Kelman and Bryan Hardin.  Hardin is a retired US Assistant Surgeon General and Deputy Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
San Diego court officers, including six local justices and their clerks, falsified court docs, concealed parties to the malicious litigation (Hardin, retired US Asst Surgeon General) and plaintiff perjury (Kelman’s to make up a needed reason for my alleged malice while exposing his fraud) to make me appear to be a liar for exposing the fraud — while aiding the fraud and UC profits from it to continue) (See Governor (Regent) Schwarzenegger picks Tani Cantil-Sakauye for California’s Chief Justice, July 2010, for the politics behind the politics)
I’m a 58 year old wife of 31 years — who happens to have a degree in marketing and can spot a spin a mile away  In March of 2012, I went to jail for two days in San Diego, California, by order of a court with no subject matter jurisdiction (Judge Thomas Nugent’s) for refusing to sign a piece of paper saying I’m lying about the massive fraud and the relentless retaliation I have experience by CRIMINAL MEANS of officers of the Cal courts.
While falsely imprisoned for two days by felonious directive of Nugent, I was given a false criminal FBI record by subordinates of Sheriff William Gore for alleged civil contempt of court. (alleged civil contempt is not criminal — even when a court has jurisdiction – which this one didn’t because of prior falsified court docs in Judge Lisa Schall’s court in 2008). For six months, I was told by Gore’s subordinate, Deborah Duncan, that the San Diego Sheriff Department computer system would not allow for the removal of my false criminal record.
The additional felonious act of libeling a US citizen with a false federal criminal record by the local Sheriff, was to cover-up for MANY San Diego black robed fraudsters covering up for the UC white coated fraudsters, covering up for US Chamber affiliated white collared fraudsters — who have been covered for by compromised politicians from coast to coast — as the UC Regents have profited handsomely.
DA Dumanis will not prosecute Sheriff Gore or the local corrupt jurists who committed felonies with no subject matter jurisdiction and thus no judicial immunity. Gore, who Dumanis will not prosecute, has contributed to Dumanis’ re-election campaign for DA and has publicly endorsed her. (And you thought only Mexican nationals have reasons to pay to see Dumanis stay in political office?)
Dumanis endorsed Judge Schall for re-election in February of this year. Schall was the trial judge who falsified the 2008 judgment in the SLAPP suit by the forgers of the UC name on the US Chamber medico-legal publication.  Dumanis un-endorsed Schall in March of this year when media attention on Schall’s less than stellar judicial career and the unethical campaign tactics by her local jurist peers on her behalf, began to surface. (See “What’s the Difference Between a Governor Brown Appointed San Diego Judge and a Koch Brother?”)
Harris, who is also running for re-election, just like Regent Governor Brown, will not investigate Dumanis who will not investigate Gore, nor Schall, nor the Appellate Justices for falsifying legal documents while conspiring to defraud with the US Chamber et.al. — as the UC Regents profit handsomely.  Its like these “public servants” think they live in their own little world and have no concerns about laws and the thousands of little people harmed when they cover-up for each other aiding industry to fleece the public — with use of the little people’s tax dollars. 
What’s been going on within the UC system for years and covered up by politicians and judges on behalf of the interests of industry is literally a criminal conspiracy to defraud. When are high paid prostitutes within the UC system going to be made to stop killing people for money?  The deception is intricately systematic, runs deep and impacts the lives of all U.S. citizens.  It is well oiled machine which is funded with federal money.  Much of it occurs by directive coming from Washington, DC, with the input from industry lobbyists and their private sector medical proponents. (See the above link for the road map of how industry’s interests make their way into the UC system and other universities with the use of federal money)
I wrote the following several months ago. Open the links below. They are the direct evidence of the UC Regents, UCLA, US Chamber, et.al., colluding to defraud and the retaliation, character assassination, and harassment of me to keep the fraud going via falsified court docs in the San Diego SLAPP suits — while the Regents profit handsomely.
USDOJ’s witness Veritox took Manhattan Institute’s  bribe. They forged UCLA doctor authorship as the US Chamber lied.  Feds, Politicians, Regents, Cal Court leaders came along for the ride, and mass silence as defense can’t conceal it.
Veritox’s extrapolations alone are not scientific proof.  Expert witnessing that they are, causes cost-shifting by spoof.  Falsifying court docs in Cal SLAPP puts culpability through the roof!! The admission of the document frauds will seal it.
Needless to say, I seriously doubt that Regent Governor Brown and his first mate Harris, will be calling for the “independent investigation” of anyone associated with this latest UCLA debacle.  But at least a pinhole of light is beginning to shine through because of a brave whistleblower, Dr. Robert Pertowitz, refusing to remain silent.  Now where’s my ten million dollars for doing the same?
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer, Advocate for Integrity in Health Marketing
Next Post coming tomorrow: Complaint to the Commission on Judicial Performance against San Diego sitting judges, including a Governor Brown appointed one, for colluding to attempt to fix an election for incumbent Judge Lisa Schall — while the Regents profit handsomely.

 

 

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, US Chamber of Commerce | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

San Diego Superior Court Judicial Candidate Lisa Schall’s Answer to Voters’ Questions

Posted on April 18, 2014 by Sharon Kramer
by Sharon Noonan Kramer
On March 7, 2014, while fundraiser for re-election to San Diego Superior Court seat 20, incumbent Judge Lisa Schall sent an e-blast asking people to forward her fundraising email and offering to answer any questions. As directed, the email was forwarded to others.
On March 13, 2014, over twenty voters’ questions were compiled for Judge Schall to answer.  They were emailed to her on the 13th to the return email address she provided. On the 14th, the questions were snail mailed to her home address.
Here is Candidate for Public Office Judge Lisa Schall’s answer to the Voters’ questions:

Scan of Schall Envelop

 Additionally on March 14th a COMPLAINT was filed with San Diego Presiding Judge David Danielson. It is regarding the unethical campaign tactics being used by Schall’s jurist peers on her behalf.  Several media outlets* have written of the local sitting judges conspiring to intimidate the challenger to Schall’s public office, Carla Keehn, and to coerce Keehn’s endorsers to un-endorse her. This includes coercing a local bar association, a.k.a. lawyers, to alter their organization’s election policies after-the fact as a non-sensical excuse to rescind a valid endorsement.
In violation of California Rules of the Court, Rule 10.703(f)(3) no written acknowledgment of the March 14th COMPLAINT has been received from the office of the Superior Court Presiding Judge Danielson.  Rule 10.703(f)(3) states, “The presiding judge must give written notice of receipt of the complaint to the complainant.”
In the meantime, San Diego County’s chief law enforcement officer, District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis, was previously advertised on Schall’s website as her #1 Endorser.  Dumanis’ name and title have now disappeared from Schall’s website. 
Dumanis herself is running for re-election as San Diego County District Attorney. This is under calls for her investigation, more calls for her investigation, and even some of her local government endorsers directing how to call for her investigation. (Yea right! By Dumanis’ state government endorser, Kamala Harris, who seems to think one needs an attorney to report crimes by government officials and that those one complains of should be in charge of investigating themselves).  
The June elections are now just forty-five days away.  There is no indication that the local jurists will be admonished by the San Diego Superior Court for their conclusively unethical election tampering while violating the rights of a challenger candidate and the rights of voters. It’s highly unlikely that Dumanis endorser, Harris — who is herself running for re-election — will do any investigating of any politician in the near future.   
Should Judge Schall win re-election from lack of the voting public’s knowledge of the unethical politics playing out in San Diego County that are in violation of Rules of the Court and Canons of Judicial Ethics; it will be a hollow victory. Voters will have the legal right to call for a recall of jurist seat 20.  
Personally, I think I will be voting for anyone who is NOT ENDORSED by any San Diego County or California state elected or appointed official.  Too much cess-pooling of mucked-up water under the bridge!
* February 24, 2014 Union Tribune “Judge candidate feels gaveled down” February 28, 2014 San Diego Free Press “Thou Shalt Not Challenge a Sitting Judge”  March 6, 2014 California Court Monitor “Judicial Intimidation On Display in San Diego”  
____________
Preview of upcoming post on Monday, April 21st:
COMPLAINT to the California Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP)                                                              
             COMPLAINT No.1 against SUPERIOR COURT Presiding Judge David (DANIELSON) Allegation: Violating California Rules of the Court, Rule 10.703(f)(3)and Code of Judicial Ethics Canon 3(C)(4) by failing to timely address subordinate judges’ ethics breeches to unduly influence the outcome of the upcoming San Diego County (SUPERIOR COURT) jurist seat 20 election.
             COMPLAINT No. 2 against SUPERIOR COURT judges Paula (ROSENSTEIN), David (RUBIN), and Lisa (SCHALL) filed in accordance with Court Rule 10.703(l)(2)(B). Allegation: Violation of Canons of Judicial Ethics 2, 2B(2) and 5 by giving the clear appearance of abuse of prestige of judicial office and judicial title to threaten, coerce and tamper with the outcome of the June 2, 2014 jurist seat 20 election
            COMPLAINT No. 3 against SCHALL. Allegation: Violation of Canon 4(A)(2) by falsely advertising the endorsement of government employees on her re-election campaign website for jurist seat 20.            
            COMPLAINT No. 4 against SCHALL. Allegation: Habitual Judicial Code of Ethics and Oath of Office violator; and long-term CJP and San Diego County District Attorney shielded menace to public health, safety, and welfare.  (See “Return to Sender” and “Refused” Voter Questions of Candidate Judge Schall)
_____________
Prior posts on the subject:
March 25th  Why is DA Dumanis’ name now missing from Judge Lisa Schall’s endorsers?
March 19th San Diego Democrats Vote to Endorse Carla Keehn for Jurist Seat 20 
March 14th  Complaint to San Diego Presiding Judge for Subordinate Jurists’ Election Tampering
March 13th  Voter Questions Posed to San Diego Judicial Candidate Lisa Schall
March 10th  San Diego Sitting Judges’ Election Tampering Gains Statewide Media Attention
March 8th  San Diego Superior Court Judge Lisa Schall Offers to Answer Your Questions
March 2nd  What’s the difference between a Governor Brown appointed San Diego Judge and a Koch brother? UPDATED
February 27th  San Diego Union Tribune~Conflict seen in race for judge’s post~by Sharon Kramer
February 25th  San Diego LGBT Judges Attempt to Fix a Judicial Election Against an LGBT Candidate
And from our sister blog, “Just Answer the Damn Question, Bonnie” February 27th
Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

So what’s the answer? Why did DA Dumanis un-endorse Judge Schall?

Posted on March 26, 2014 by Sharon Kramer
We received several responses to yesterday’s post, “Why is DA Dumanis’ name now missing from Judge Lisa Schall’s endorsers?“
No one seemed to have the definitive answer of why San Diego’s District Attorney, who is herself running for re-election, would suddenly un-endorse a San Diego County Superior Court sitting judge’s bid for re-election. One Katy’s reader had a possible answer for Dumanis trying to distance herself from Schall: 
“Because she’s a Mexican national in trouble with the FBI for illegal campaigning?” 
We’re pretty sure that Judge Schall is a U.S. citizen.  Also, we happen to know that the local FBI is just as bad as the local DA when it comes to turning a blind eye to the corruption in the local courts. So that explanation doesn’t seem plausible to us.
 A whistleblower, who is alleging corruption in the local family courts involving Judge Schall along with some of her endorsers and some of Dumanis’s endorsers, sent us this:
“Thanks for keeping an eye out on this–I can use every bit of your work product….you’re a star.  Please keep it up!”
Another local whistleblower of judicial corruption — this one in the San Diego County civil courts and also shielded by DA Dumanis and the local FBI — sent us a link to the Washington Examiner March 21st article, “A Whistleblowers Worst Nightmare”  To quote from the article:
“The LA District Attorney and the Sheriff’s Department refused to follow up on evidence that Countrywide witnesses, including founder Angelo Mozilo, had blatantly committed perjury on the stand. Some court watchers speak of the, “unholy alliance” between big corporations and the justice system in California. Winston, who says he spent $600,000 on legal fees, further depleted his savings by appealing to the California Supreme Court. That court refused to hear his case…It’s almost unheard of for a top-tier executive turning whistleblower, but that’s what Winston became after he noticed many of his staff were sickened by noxious air in their Simi Valley, California, office. When the company failed to fix the problem, Winston picked up the phone and called Cal-OSHA to investigate. Retaliation was immediate.” (SEE THIS LINK for what happened to Katy’s Exposure Blog when we blogged of local fraud upon the court fleecing the US public and involving Schall, Dumanis, et.al.   Someone in the United States Department of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) quietly altered a federal publication to aid to conceal the fraud!)
And whistleblower of LA county judges’ double-dipping incomes causing conflicts of interest in court rulings, Dr. Richard Fine, sent us the following.  For those who don’t know, while in his 70’s, Dr. Fine spent eighteen months in a LA county jail without ever being charged with a crime — let alone found guilty of one.  The charge was alleged civil contempt (of an uncivil judge who was receiving the double-dipping income).  Sound familiar of anyone we know who abuses contempt of court powers? Hint: DA Dumanis no longer endorses her for judicial re-election.  Dr. Fine’s message:
Dear Sharon:
THE BEST THING YOU CAN DO IN THE 2014 ELECTIONS: VOTE FOR CANDIDATES PLEDGED TO END JUDICIAL CORRUPTION  Requiring candidates to take the Campaign for Judicial Integrity’s Pledge to Eradicate Judicial Corruption, voting for only candidates that take the Pledge and holding them to the Pledge once elected will solve the problem.  Please spread the word to form groups to require every candidate to take the pledge and vote for only candidates who take the Pledge. We can and will end judicial corruption. Thank you for all your good work.  Richard I. Fine
 
DA
 
Dumanis “un-endorsing” a local judge, who she is proven to know is involved with several local jurists in massive frauds upon the court along with some of both of their re-election endorsers, appears to us to be nothing more than a public disassociation. Seems to us  that several compromised politicians want to skate through to re-election without being asked the tough questions of whose interests they really represent. 
 
 
So what’s the answer? 
Why did DA/candidate Bonnie Dumanis publicly un-endorse Judge/candidate Lisa Schall?
We think we just might know the answer.  From our sister blog, Just answer the Damn Question, Please! on February 27th: “Today’s Damn Questions go to San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis:
1. In 2013, did Tom Homann LGBT Law Association (THLA) endorse Carla Keehn for any Superior Court seat  – OR — In 2014, did THLA rewrite Policy #2 while lying to conceal their prior multi-seat endorsement of Keehn? 
2. Is this ADDITIONAL RACKETEERING (see RICO docs by CCFC) by a Judicial Council member; a Gov. Brown judicial appointee; and an alleged “non-profit” civil rights group that is a fundraiser for Dumanis, so that people can’t vote corrupt judge Lisa Schall out of office?  
3. San Diego County District Attorney Dumanis, are you going to investigate and prosecute your fund-raisers and county judges for colluding to fix a County election on behalf of a corrupt judge who you have a history of protecting  from prosecution?

Just answer the Damn Questions, Please!  Thank you!”

Publicly unendorsing is not even close to prosecuting those involved in numerous frauds upon the court!
Related posts: 
March 25th  Why is DA Dumanis’ name now missing from Judge Lisa Schall’s endorsers?
March 19th San Diego Democrats Vote to Endorse Carla Keehn for Jurist Seat 20 
March 14th  Complaint to San Diego Presiding Judge for Subordinate Jurists’ Election Tampering
March 13th  Voter Questions Posed to San Diego Judicial Candidate Lisa Schall
March 10th  San Diego Sitting Judges’ Election Tampering Gains Statewide Media Attention
March 8th  San Diego Superior Court Judge Lisa Schall Offers to Answer Your Questions
March 2nd  What’s the difference between a Governor Brown appointed San Diego Judge and a Koch brother? UPDATED
February 27th  San Diego Union Tribune~Conflict seen in race for judge’s post~by Sharon Kramer
February 25th  San Diego LGBT Judges Attempt to Fix a Judicial Election Against an LGBT Candidate
And from our sister blog, “Just Answer the Damn Question” February 27th
Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, Health - Medical - Science, Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment