San Diego Families call for FBI Investigation ~ RICO in the Local Courts

February 3, 2014                       
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer  760-746-8026
By FAX and MAIL to individual recipients:
U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) & Eric Haren, Esq. U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee
U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) & General Counsel Betina Poirier, Esq.
U.S. Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) Chair Congressional Gov’t Oversight & Reform
U.S Senator Tom Harkin Chair (D-IA) & Pam Smith Director of Majority Senate HELP
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (D) (by mail) “The USDOJ is contracting with criminals as toxic tort expert defense witnesses”.  Attachments sent to Eric Holder.
California Governor Edmund G. Brown (D-CA)
Members of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors (in person on February 4, 2014) [Added to this post on 02.05.14   1.) Attachments the Supervisors were given on 02.03.14;   2.) what the Supervisors already knew as of 01.07.14 VIDEO of the recent  threats of bodily harm I am receiving;  3.) VIDEO of February 4, 2014 of a plea for help at the Supervisor’s meeting; 4.) The Supervisors stating to go to the Attorney General re: Sheriff Gore, DA Dumanis, local court officers, and federal contractors, et. al. for racketeering and stalking.]
RE:  Please support the California Coalition for Families and Children (CCFC) to stop racketeering in the San Diego Courts abetted by California’s ill-legal system.
Honorable [NAME] Government Official and [NAME] Legislative Assistant,
I am writing to urge you to support families’ needs for the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney General to investigate and prosecute for systemically incestuous, criminal acts which are occurring in the San Diego Courts under the color of law. 
 In February of 2013, I flew to Washington, D.C. to request that action be taken to stop racketeering and harassment of me by officers of San Diego Civil and Appellate Courts.   I met with Mr. Haren, Mr. Cope; Mr. Garofano; and Dr. Linik and Ms. Laird — Legislative Assistants to Senator Feinstein; Senator Boxer; Congressman Issa; and the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pension Committee (HELP), respectively.   The racketeering is harming the U.S. public over the mold issue.  It, and the terrorizing harassment of me, continues.[1] 
All were provided direct evidence of case fixing a Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP) in the San Diego Superior and Appellate Courts aiding and abetting the continuance of scientific fraud and fraud upon courts throughout the United States. This scheme involves the U.S. Chambers of Commerce and toxic tort expert defense witnesses for the U.S. Department of Justice as plaintiffs in California SLAPP[2][3][4]. It should have been stopped by federal, state, or local intervention long ago.  People are dying.[5]
[1] 2014 VIDEO San Diego Board of Supervisors Meeting
[2] 2003 U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold” with forgery of physician co-authorship by plaintiffs in the fixed San Deigo, CA SLAPP  
[3] 2006 Listed U.S. CHAMBER  ILR co-author ANDREW SAXON, MD of UCLA stating he did not co-author  “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold”
[4] 2008, SLAPP plaintiff, USDOJ toxic tort expert, paid forger & real “Scientific View” author, BRUCE J.  KELMAN, stating under oath that it was written to influence courts.
[5] 2014 “Whoever said CA was an environmental leader hasn’t see this” _____________________________________________________________________          
Page 2
In addition to concealment of SLAPP case fixing and falsifications of material court documents in San Diego, California’s Civil and Appellate Courts (2005 to present)[6]; the fraud was aided by HELP in February 2007, by deleting the following from a Government Accountability Office audit, ordered by the late Senator Edward Kennedy in October 2006, at my insistent urging:
“What medical and scientific standards are used in determining the admissibility of evidence of both acute and persistent health consequences resulting from exposure to mold?  Which individuals and organizations have promulgated these standards and what, if any, conflicts of interest exist regarding these standards?”    
Dr. Emad Tadros is a member of CCFC. He also flew to Washington D.C. in 2013 and met with the Legislative Assistants, with me.  I witnessed Dr. Tadros provide direct evidence of fraudulent documents being used in San Diego Family Courts, in an additional racketeering scheme involving compromised local court officers and ancillary agencies, under the color of law.
The Family Court scheme is causing families to be victimized by divorce enterprises. They thrive by collusively dishonest services which abet child custody disputes and longer divorces. Retaliation occurs by hands of court officers for any parent who dares to expose it as an income generating fraud.  As a result of no government intervention to date to stop the collusion to defraud; CCFC has been forced to file suit for the San Diego Family Court racketeering.
Many of the same California court officers, clerks, and employees of legal system ancillary agencies; have committed criminal acts in both the Family Court and the Civil Court frauds. (See fn. 9) I will soon be following CCFC by filing suit over the San Diego Civil and Appellate Court officers’ case fixing SLAPP, coram non judice, in retaliation for my exposing fraud — while abetting the continuance of racketeering over the mold issue in U.S. policies and U.S. courts, nationwide.[7] 
According to Weightier Matters’ blog of CCFC seeking help to stop fraudsters[8]:
“…on January 31, 2014, CCFC delivered letters to United States representatives requesting assistance in the investigation and arrest of San Diego Divorce Industry professionals accused of illegally defrauding California Families.  The letters delivered to Senators Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, Congresswoman Susan Davis, and Congressman Duncan Hunter, Juan Vargas, Scott Peters, and Darrell Issa detail the ongoing criminal violations of federal civil rights and racketeering laws among the San Diego divorce industry. 
[6] Material fraudulent SLAPP documents known to be frauds by CANTIL-SAKAUYE and the  COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, et. al.,
[7] January 28, 2014 Katy’s Exposure, Exposing Environmental Health Threats & Those Responsible: “People are dying from Toxic Mold…and the beat goes on!”
[8] January 31, 2014 Weightier Matters: “CCFC Delivers Letters to U.S. Representatives Requesting  Assistance in Combating Family Court Fraud and Abuse”


Page 3 
From the CCFC letters to government officials:  
“I [CCFC member, Colbern C. Stuart] enclose herewith a letter and enclosures recently delivered to Ms. Daphne Hearn, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Ms. Laura Duffy, United States Attorney for the Southern District of California.  The letter and attachments detail extensive fraudulent and extortionate activity occurring within the State of California’s Family Law industry in violation of numerous state and federal laws.
We’re asking for your help to alert federal law enforcement officers to our efforts and evidence.  As detailed in the complaint, our approach to state officials has gone ignored.  Even worse, the officials directly responsible for organizing and implementing the family law community policies and laws have actively oppressed our efforts at reform, amounting to a systemic and invidious obstruction of justice.  They have teamed with the San Diego County Bar Association’s Family Law Community to manufacture criminal prosecution against our leaders and members to thwart our reform.  
They have deployed state and local law enforcement against our members without legal process to oppress our members’ freedom of speech and association to promote reform for ourselves.  The acts detailed in the complaint are nothing short of a pattern and policy of heinous and despicable disregard of law, and the interests of parents and children entitled to protection and relief thereunder.
California Coalition for Families and Children has filed suit in United States District Court for the Southern District of California to redress the grievances of thousands of California families and children, yet those harms continue while the lawsuit is pending.  Our opponents are a nationwide divorce industry that has grown wildly out of control, deploying their enormous resources to fund dozens of lawyers in just this small case.  Those lawyers have themselves resorted to illegal and oppressive tactics to defend a divorce industry that few would doubt poses enormous dangers to unsophisticated, vulnerable families throughout California.  
We are so abundantly out-numbered and over-matched that even with a foothold in District Court our cause remains at peril with each step. We anticipate that the District Court will ultimately provide relief on our claims, yet the invidiously discriminatory activity we have uncovered and present to you today goes far deeper than our one case.  The practices of the divorce industry have become entrenched as statewide informal policy among lawyers, social workers, bureaucrats, and judges acting outside of state law to enrich a ravenous divorce industry at the price of our children’s futures, and our citizens’ welfare.
We would be grateful for your attention to this ongoing illegal activity.  We have delivered these materials to the United States Attorney and Special Agent in Charge for the Federal Bureau of Investigation for this District.  Should you agree with us that our families and children deserve at least the same protections under federal law as any other citizen enjoys, your communication of your concurrence to Ms. Duffy and Ms. Hearn would be greatly appreciated by thousands of California families.” 
Page 4
I respectfully urge each of you to support CCFC’s and my pleas that local, state and federal officials encourage Ms. Hearn and Ms. Duffy to investigate and arrest those who have committed criminal acts under the color of law in California’s ill-legal system. See underlined names below for those involved, to date, in both racketeering schemes.[9] 
Thank you for your attention to this matter.  I look forward to your response to me of how you intend to proceed to help right the San Diego and California courts, and ancillary agencies.
                                                                                  Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer
 Cc: Ms. Hearn; Ms. Duffy; & Mr. Michael Rod, FBI Field Officer, Carlsbad, CA (by mail) Attachments given to Hearn, Duffy and Rod including County Supervisors directing me to the Attorney General. 
 [9]  January 30, 2014 DEMAND LETTER to Ms. HEARN of the FBI and Amended COMPLAINT: CALIFORNIA COALITION FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN., a Delaware Public Benefit Corporation, and COLBERN C. STUART, an individual, Plaintiffs, vs. SAN DIEGO COUNTY [STATE] BAR ASSOCIATION, a California Corporation; WILLIAM D. GORE, an individual, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipal entity; SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, a municipal entity; ROBERT J. TRENTACOSTA, an individual; MICHAEL RODDY, an individual; JUDICIAL COUNCIL, a municipal entity; STEVEN JAHR, an individual; ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS, a municipal entity; TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE, an individual; COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, a municipal entity; LAWRENCE J. SIMI, an individual; BRAD BATSON, an individual; NATIONAL FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ALLIANCE, a California Corporation; LISA SCHALL, an individual; LORNA ALKSNE, an individual; OFF DUTY OFFICERS, INC., a business entity of unknown form; CHRISTINE GOLDSMITH, an individual; JEANNIE LOWE, an individual; WILLIAM MCADAM, an individual; EDLENE MCKENZIE, an individual; JOEL WOHLFEIL, an individual; MICHAEL GROCH, an individual; EMILY GARSON, an individual; JAN GOLDSMITH, an individual; CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipal entity; CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES, a corporation; KRISTINE P. NESTHUS, an individual; BRIAN WATKINS, an individual; KEN SMITH, an individual MARILOU MARCQ, an individual; CSB-INVESTIGATIONS, an entity of unknown form; CAROLE BALDWIN, an individual; LAURY BALDWIN, an individual; BALDWIN AND BALDIWN, a California professional corporation; LARRY CORRIGAN, an individual; WILLIAM HARGRAEVES, an individual; HARGRAEVES & TAYLOR, PC, a California Professional Corporation; TERRY CHUCAS, an individual; MERIDITH LEVIN, an individual; ALLEN SLATTERY, INC., a California Corporation, a Corporation; JANIS STOCKS, an individual; STOCKS & COLBURN, a California professional corporation; DR. STEPHEN DOYNE, an individual; DR. STEPHEN DOYNE, INC., a professional corporation; SUSAN GRIFFIN, an individual; DR. LORI LOVE, an individual; LOVE AND ALVAREZ PSYCHOLOGY, INC., a California corporation; ROBERT A. SIMON, PH.D, an individual; AMERICAN COLLEGE OF FORENSIC EXAMINERS INSTITUTE, a business entity of unknown form; ROBERT O’BLOCK, an individual; LORI CLARK VIVIANO, an individual; LAW OFFICES OF LORI CLARK VIVIANO, a business entity of unknown form; SHARON BLANCHET, an individual; ASHWORTH, BLANCHET, KRISTENSEN, & KALEMENKARIAN, a California Professional Corporation; MARILYN BIERER, an individual; BIERER AND ASSOCIATES, a California Professional Corporation; JEFFREY FRITZ, an individual; BASIE AND FRITZ, a professional corporation, and DOE Defendants herein enumerated, Defendants.
February 3, 2014 
Ms. Daphne Hearn, Special Agent in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 9797 Aero Dr, San Diego, CA 92123
Ms. Laura Duffy, U.S. Attorney Southern District of California, Federal Office Building, 880 Front Street, 6293 San Diego, California 92101-8893
Mr. Michael Rod, Field Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation, 5950 LaPlace Court, Suite 201,
Carlsbad, CA92008
RE: Report of Violations of Federal Law in the San Diego Civil Courts; and the U.S. Department of Justice Employment of Criminals as Expert Witnesses in Federal Toxic Tort Litigations
Dear Ms. Hearn, Ms. Duffy and Mr. Rod,
         I write to you today in support of California Coalition of Families and Children (CCFC) and their January 30, 2014, plea for federal investigation of illegal activity occurring under the color of law in this district.  CCFC has filed federal suit involving a particularly heinous retaliatory act in Family Court, against one of their members who is an attorney; along with numerous other violations of state and federal laws. The federal suit is California Coalition for Families and Children et al. v. San Diego County Bar Association et al., United States District Court, Southern District of California Case No. 3:13-cv-1944 CAB (BLM).
        As Mr. Rod is aware, court officers have also been harassing me for now nine years under the color of law in the local Civil Courts.  They are concealing their role in aiding and abetting a massive fraud being played on the public over the mold issue. In 2005, I wrote of how it became a false concept in U.S. public health policies that it was proven microbial toxins in water damaged buildings could never reach a level to harm. 
          Not one, but two, Strategic Litigations Against Public Participation (SLAPP) were fixed by the local court officers to make the false finding of libel with actual malice, over the words, “altered his under oath statements” in the writing. This was to cast doubt on the evidence of fraud which was exposed in my 2005 writing while aiding and abetting it to continue in U.S. policies and U.S. courts.
         The cases are Bruce. J. Kelman and GlobalTox, Inc., v. Sharon Kramer Case. No. GIN044539 North San Diego County Superior Court (2005-2010); and Bruce J. Kelman v. Sharon Kramer  Case No. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC. (2010-2013)  GlobalTox is now Veritox, Inc.
         What is particularly heinous about this matter, is that the plaintiffs in SLAPP, Veritox, serve as expert defense witnesses for the United States Department of Justice in mold litigations throughout the county; and are the authors of the fraudulent proof of lack of causation of illness for the U.S Chamber of Commerce and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM). How these two organizations were connected by mutual relationship of having Mr. Bruce J. Kelman and Mr. Bryan D. Hardin of Veritox, Inc., author fraudulent position statements to mass market scientific fraud harmful to the public, was the subject of my 2005 writing.
           If the case fixings of the SLAPP suits were acknowledged, the USDOJ and others would no longer be able to employee Veritox as expert witnesses against sick military families and other federal employees.  They would be legally recognized as dishonest experts, for their illegal and criminal acts when plaintiffs in SLAPP.  
          I will soon be following CCFC’s lead and will be filing a federal lawsuit for the racketeering occurring in this district.  Mr. Michael Rod of the Carlsbad FBI office already has much of the evidence of the concealed plaintiff perjury; court officer and clerk material document falsifications; and even of my false imprisonment in 2012, for refusing to be coerced to sign a false confession of being guilty of libel – by order of a judge whose court had no subject matter jurisdiction.  
         While unlawfully jailed and caused bodily harm, I was given a false criminal FBI record by the San Diego County Sheriff Department, for alleged civil contempt of court.  They refused to remove the false federal record for six months, claiming their computer system would not allow it.         
          Please consider CCFC’s request pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1512(d)(3) to investigate and arrest each Defendant named in their First Amended Complaint in connection with the federal offenses identified therein. Several are the same individuals and entities involved in the case fixings, and concealment of case fixings, in the matters of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer and Kelman v. Kramer. You may contact me directly with any questions.
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer
1. Recent collusive libeling and threatening cyberstalking by a.) Ms. Coreen Robbins, co-owner of Veritox, Inc. and toxic tort expert witness of the USDOJ; b.) an associate of Ms. Robbins, Scott Armour, aiding to stop the extrinsic fraud which is causing the fleecing of the U.S. public from coming to light; and c.) the “Court Group” with threats of permanently silencing me by hands of compromised San Diego courts officers and the San Diego County Sheriff Department.
2. February 3, 2014, Letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, seeking FBI and U.S. Attorney General intervention for the case fixing in Civil Court SLAPP involving federal contractors, Veritox, Inc.
3. January 30, 2014, CCFC letter to Special Agent Ms. Hearn, seeking FBI intervention for federal violations in the county’s  Family Courts

About Sharon Kramer

Hi, I'm an advocate for integrity in health marketing and in the courts.
This entry was posted in Health - Medical - Science and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to San Diego Families call for FBI Investigation ~ RICO in the Local Courts

  1. ADAM SCOTT BRAM says:

    Sadly, the divorce racketeers are statewide. I had been fighting my own battle for 3 years. 11 months, before I learned of California Coalition for Families and Children et al. A copy of my recent letters and files in my LA struggles follow:

    “February 3, 2014

    Director Robert S. Mueller, III
    Assistant Director Bill L. Lewis
    Special Agent in Charge Timothy J. Delaney

    Los Angeles Field Office
    11000 Wilshire Boulevard
    Suite 1700
    Los Angeles, CA 90024

    Richard Robinson, Assistant United States Attorney
    Section Chief
    The United States Attorney’s Office
    Central District of California
    Criminal Division
    Attn: Major Frauds Section
    312 North Spring Street
    Los Angeles, California 90012

    Lawrence Middleton, Assistant United States Attorney
    Section Chief
    The United States Attorney’s Office
    Central District of California
    Criminal Division
    Attn: Public Corruption and Civil Rights Section

    Re: Adam S. Bram, Esq.; Re: Report of Violations of Federal Law; 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 371, 372, 666, 1341, 1503, 1505, 1512, 1513, 1581, 1584, 1589, 1590, 1591, 1594-1596, 1962, 1964; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, et seq.
    Adam S. Bram, Esq.;, LLC; Re: Sherman Antitrust Act (July 2, 1890) and Clayton Antitrust Act (1914) Violations Constituting Restraints on Competition, Unlawful Barriers to Entry and Other Anti-Competitive Artifices.
    Superior Court and Court of Appeals Case Nos.: BD521248; SC 111468; SC 117253; B244629; and B245554;
    Los Angeles Superior Court, Case Nos. BD521248; SC 111468; FOLLOWING APPEAL OF A JUDGMENT of the Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, Hon. Michelle Court, Dept. 67, Hon. Mark Juhas, Dept. 64 (formerly Dept. 67); PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE, SUPERSEDEAS, PROHIBITION AND/OR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS & AUTHORITIES FOLLOWING ORDER STRIKING PETITIONER’S C.C.P. 170.1, dated August 7, 2012; and FOLLOWING ABANDONMENT BY HON. MARK JUHAS’ OF CIVIL REFERENCE, dated August 8, 2012; of the matter, Adam S. Bram v. Mark Vincent Kaplan, Kaplan & Simon, et al., LASC Case No. SC 117253 (“Civil Fraud Action II”, July 1, 2012) Court of Appeal Case No. B245554.
    Judicial Misuse, Abuse, and Neglect; Public, Quasi-Public and Private RICO Enterprises Re Divorce Racketeering Syndicates; in Confirmation of Patterns and Practices Alleged in this Complainant’s Association with Colbern C. Stuart III, in Colbern C. Stuart III and California Coalition of Families and Children, et al. v. San Diego County Bar, et al., USDC Case No.: 3:13-cv-1944 CAB (BLM).

    Dear Director, Assistant Director, and Special Agent in Charge:

    I write to alert you to ongoing illegal activity within your Central District jurisdiction which suggests that the complaint recently reported to the Southern District of California U.S. District Court, and the Southern District Regional Offices of the FBI, and the U.S. Attorney, and styled, “Colbern C. Stuart III and California Coalition of Families and Children, et al. v. San Diego County Bar, et al., USDC Case No.: 3:13-cv-1944,” is a statewide criminal enterprise. During my 4 year struggle in divorce court, I have withstood abundant hardship resulting from the current practices of what is generally described as the “Family Law Community.”

    I submit that I’ve been the victim of a the LA divorce racketeering organization, demonstrating the state-wide collusive anti-trust claims, as regionally asserted by Plaintiff Colbern C. Stuart III in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 3:13-cv-1944 CAB BLM, currently before the Hon. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo. The victims and devastation call for aggressive investigation and enforcement of the Federal laws recently bolstered by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania’s case, Belanger v. Ciavarella 3:10-cv-1405, and those asserted by Plaintiffs Stanley D. Cannon, Patricia R. Cannon, and Cheryl Bullock in its class-action complaint Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), Wells Fargo Insurance, Inc. (“WFI”), and American Security Insurance Company (“ASIC”), US District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 3:12-cv-01376-EMC.

    The individuals and entities which I contend have harmed me and are currently engaged in the ongoing illegal activity below include, without limitation:

    Judicial Counsel, a municipal entity;
    Administrative Office of the Courts;
    Commission on Judicial Performance;
    National Coalition of State Courts, an NPO;
    Judge Mark Juhas;
    Judge Michelle Court;
    Bailiff to Judge Michelle Court;
    Other Los Angeles Superior Court Family Law Division personnel, employees, agents, etc.
    Mark Vincent Kaplan, Esq.;
    Nicole Vafeades, Esq.;
    Other Kaplan & Simon, LLP principles, employees, agents, etc.;
    LAC CSSD-Encino, CA — Irene Leedy;
    Other California Department of Child Social Service personnel, employees, agents, etc.;
    California State Bar-Support Enforcement Division;

    Shelley Lewis Albaum;
    Mark Gross;
    Other Brot & Gross principles, employees, agents, etc.;
    Peter M. Fonda, Esq.;
    Christopher L. Smith;
    Other Fonda & Fraser, LLP principles, employees, agents, etc.;
    Jack Zuckerman CPA, ABV, JD;
    Other White, Zuckerman, Warsavsky Luna & Hunt, L.L.P., principles, employees, agents, etc.;

    Henry Stewart (Professional Monitoring Service); and

    [I suspect that a thorough investigation of these charges will identify additional legally actionable perpetrators.]

    My injuries and insults include the misappropriation of property without due process, the impotent protection of rights, the institutionalized culture of deliberate indifference to—indeed contempt for—“clearly-established” liberties; extortion, robbery, and abuse founded upon such illegal color of law crime, delivered at the hands of eager institutional operators within the Family Law Community; and, most devastating to me, the assault and deprivation of my autonomy and dignity as a parent, as well as my daughter, Penelope Joe Bram (“PJ”), born September 10, 2008.

    Despite spending most of the $1 million eventually ascertained to have been misappropriated by petitioner before marriage, despite following each and every recommendation of my counsel, and objecting, but adhering, to the random rules of the court, all for my sole goal of sustaining primary parental caretaker status, I haven’t laid my eyes on Penelope Joe, since December 2, 2012.

    If the Federal Government concludes to the contrary, I only request the findings and reasons to help me become a father entitled to these basic human rights. Although the court has been made aware of their erroneous rulings and the inappropriate legal standard applied by the trial court to the physical and legal custody issues, it refuses to acknowledge its judicial obligation to self-correct in my daughter’s best interest. Instead, it revels in indifference.

    My daughter and I have and are suffering within a larger system characterized by a widespread institutional failure of the rule of law. I, as a duly admitted attorney with 25 years good standing, had endeavored to approach my divorce proceeding in the same general way I’ve tried dozens of cases, argued countless motions and conducted endless discovery. I didn’t realize until it was too late that the present family law system ignores the supremacy of the Constitution and the laws of the United States in depriving U.S. Citizens within California of rights, privileges, and immunities under United States law.

    There exists, and my case so demonstrates, a joint enterprise forum in which widespread “family practice” exceptions to the rule of law are not only tolerated, but increasingly encouraged. Professional behavior that would only a few years ago be recognized as unethical, illegal, or otherwise intolerable by American legal, psychological, law enforcement, or social work professionals has increasingly achieved acceptance—indeed applause—from institutional interests which benefit from a joint enterprise enforcing the wisdom of “who you know is more important than what you know.”

    In my case, I have endured what is considered such lawless behavior’s most crass infestation, California Superior Court Family Division judges are regularly heard to announce, in open court, “I am the law” and proceed to act accordingly with impunity, indifference, and without shame. More shocking to me, as an officer of the court and member of the State Bar, was the court’s willingness to falsify minute orders, protect unethical attorneys and punish me solely for my unwillingness to “play by the rules of divorce court” and tenacious refusal to rescind my belief that the Constitution is the guiding light of justice.

    From the filing of the petition on March 8, 2010, until August 7, 2012, my case was before Judge Mark Juhas. First, as intimidation, then retaliation, Judge Juhas, a member of the noted and neutered Elkins Committee, regularly and intentionally infringed upon my property and personal rights in an effort to make me compliant with haphazard decisions and clearance rates before due process.

    After Judge Juhas refused to recuse himself for bias and prejudice, Judge Juhas re-assigned the case to Judge Michelle Court, and from August 8, 2012, through and including the present, Judge Court has presided over the child custody tragedy and, in retaliation for my efforts to protect my parental and civil rights, has knowingly and willfully prevented me from any contact with my daughter since December 2, 2012 and, before that, continued to unconstitutionally enforce restrictions and limitations on what little custody I once had in order to and with the effect of supporting its own financial self-interest as well as that of their divorce industry co-conspirators. Astonishingly, the Civil Case Summary of the December 3, 2012 custody review hearing, to this day, reads “Held-Unspecified Result.” That cannot be grounds to deprive me of my daughter in this proud and free Nation.

    Judge Juhas’ animosity and antagonism started soon after the consolidation of the Civil Fraud Action, my insistence upon the rights of any civil litigant as required, and then the prospect of having to empanel his first jury to hear the evidence on the civil issues; which resolution was prioritized by Judge Juhas’ bifurcation and coordination order of October 5, 2012. Judge Juhas resolve never to try a jury case was made clear by his observation to Kaplan & Simon counsel that “it doesn’t really matter what’s the big deal.”

    More egregious and irreparable harm was set in motion after I objected to a tentative, proposed settlement; which was both unconscionable and unconstitutional as memorialized. After I sought to disqualify Judge Juhas, following the August 1, 2012 hearing, Judge Juhas not only improperly struck the disqualification motion, not only breached judicial obligations spelled out in the proposed settlement, but also committed the serious criminal act of preparing a fraudulent minute order purporting to set forth the terms of the settlement agreed to on April 6, 2012.

    Judge Juhas then immediately transferred the case to Judge Michelle Court, who hastily and perfunctorily entered judgment under 664.6, specified the terms of the settlement and judgment, and ruled on the disqualification of opposing counsel. And, although basing denial on counsel’s precedent withdrawal, Judge Court has knowingly and intentionally aided and abetted counsel in continuing to represent my ex-wife, from whom they are receiving no payment, and after releasing my ex of some $500,000 in past due fees owed.

    The court of appeals, although visibly disturbed by my allegations and evidence, as well as the family court’s failures, has nevertheless displayed no compassion and, in fact, has acted in the same antagonistic and disinterested manner as the family court. The court of appeals stated on the record to me, as an attempt to minimize the significance of my struggle, “That’s the way things happen in family court, sometimes.”

    The court of appeals, despite the incomprehensible and inexplicable violation of my Constitutional rights, has sat on my case, fully briefed and submitted since November 18, 2013, while it has issued opinions on virtually all its 2013 cases, and most of its January 2014 cases. The court of appeals should take immediate action in ordering the family court to summarily strike the unconstitutional orders. They should want to promptly reunite me and my child. So, after four (4) years, I fear this will not end today.

    Also beyond dispute is the fact that the family court judges have, to this day, failed and refused, despite repeated motions and appeals, and having acknowledged their past errors, nevertheless, continue to let stand a temporary, stipulated evaluative custody order which has enabled my ex-wife, to refuse me any visitation or custody, to this very day. They have done this despite the utter absence of credible evidence, without a single supportive finding of the fact. As such, I believe that I’ve been deprived the procedural and substantive due process rights afforded every American, including an attorney, in good standing for 25 years without a single complaint, and no criminal record.

    In February 2010, my ex-wife, Sarah Kitch (“petitioner”) left without notice, deprived me my only child, took with her all my separate property savings and all our community funds, and hired her first in a series of “family” law firms who, through the overt acts and intentional omissions of Judges Juhas and Court violated the ATROS by using ATROS-restrained funds to pay her lawyers without first obtaining any fee award. The Writ I filed demanded immediate relief and predicted that its denial would doom me to that very outcome for which no reparation would/could be expected.

    Despite spending most of the $1 million eventually ascertained to have been misappropriated by my ex before marriage, despite following each and every recommendation of my counsel, and objecting, but adhering, to the random rules of the court, all for my sole goal of sustaining primary parental caretaker status, I haven’t been able to lay eyes on Penelope Joe, now 5, since December 2, 2012.

    There is no explanation supported by fact or law other than that alleged herein. I have previously reported these very allegations to several state agencies. The court made no findings of fact and conducted no formal evidentiary inquiry into the statutory standards so its decision is obviously not for the best interests of the child. Put simply, justice has been delayed, and denied as to every moment lost I will never recapture. The family courts must disengage from any further interference in my life, and be deterred similar such conduct in the future.

    The prevalence of ambivalence and personal exploitation is also evidenced by the utter lack of interest from any of the dozen responsible agencies/elected officials/Federal Judges, to which I, as Chief Executive Officer of Divorce JustUs, LLC, have repeatedly offered a perpetual, royalty free license in exchange for participation in developing and launching the Internet platform. “” (“DJU”) will:

    • Allow Divorcing Couples the ability to Monetize and Barter their own Data to Vendors in Exchange for Generous Savings on Highly Relevant and Precisely Tailored Products and Services.

    • Provide Interoperable In-Bound Marketing and Sales Opportunities for Vendors Targeting the Product and Service Needs of Divorcing Couples.

    • Provide Privately-Funded Assistance to Reduce Governmental Burdens, and to Enhance Its Efficient Distribution of Divorce Services.

    The value proposition of the DJU platform is providing in-bound marketing and sales support to vendors of products and services which are in unique and predictable demand by couples separating and/or considering divorce. In short, DJU places divorcing couples and vendors at the right place, at the right time with the right offers custom tailored to the needs and requests of divorcing couples.

    Despite proofs of concept, private funding and investment and industry insider involvement, I have received no substantive response from a single governmental agency and, although we have received some private investment funds, investors are genuinely concerned that the current system and shortcomings pose a risk of anti-competitive elements, influences and effects. The failure to act to entertain and implement multi-billion dollar annual savings solutions further evidence the conspiracy and claims addressed above.

    ….Should someone or some collective seek further interest in the DJU solution, I would be happy to coordinate a meeting to demonstrate that the DJU concept, in the current chaos of the family justice system, is a viable, virtually risk-free and undeniably positive step in the direction of restoring dignity to the practice of family law…..

    Today is the supposed deadline for the Second District Court of Appeals to issue its opinion in a matter by which I have been unlawfully deprived my parental rights as hereinabove stated. I must say that the lack of compassion demonstrated by the court through such obviously intentional delay, under the circumstances of my four (4) year struggle, gives me little hope that this struggle will soon end or that I will imminently be reunited with my only child.

    All I wanted was my daughter. Nothing can compensate me for all the time I’ve lost with her. But, something must be done to prevent such abuse in the future.

    Please consider this a plea for help and a request pursuant to 18 U.S.C. to arrest each defendant named in the complaint for violations of federal laws identified therein

    Adam S. Bram, Esq.”

    Get this: Despite an expedited oral argument, and a supposed February 3, 2014 “deadline” to issue its opinion, the Court of Appeals has failed to do so to this very date. And, this date: February 10, 2014 marks the FOUR YEAR anniversary of the dissolution (devastation) of a 23 MONTH marriage.

    I have so much more to say. Please advise me on how to do so in the most effective way for our common cause to protect our children from judges and parents too unenlightened to follow the Child-Centered Path.

    More to follow…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s