A Strong Clue If A San Diego Court Is Going To Screw You ~ They Don’t Publish A Tentative Ruling!

Update, 4;35 PM, Dec 6th.  Bruce Kelman did not even file an opposition to the motion.  The undisputed, direct evidence is that the sole foundational document to this case, the judgment from the prior case, is fraudulent and void.  Yet the Court did not issue a Tentative Ruling.  http://freepdfhosting.com/9b892bea40.pdf
Begin original post from earilier today:
Corruption. Judge Chris Hensen
FYI  Folks,
Tomorrow, Friday December 7, 2012, at 1:30 PM in Department 29 in Vista, CA, Judge Robert Dahlquist is either going to dismiss the case of Bruce J. Kelman v. Sharon Kramer, Case No. 37-2010-0061530-CU-DF-NC for indisputable lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which will blow the whole thing wide open of over seven years of harassment of a whistle blower of science fraud in public health policy aided to continue by compromised officers of the court
–  OR –
There is a chance I will be sent back to jail for my refusal to publish a false confession of being guilty of libel on the AIHA LINKED IN chatboard, for a sentence I never even wrote!
The courts have been trying to conceal over seven years of some very bad behavior by the plaintiffs, officers of the court and their clerks for the purpose of defrauding the public of billions of dollars over environmental illnesses.  They want me to publish a false confession of libel on the Net to conceal how their framing me for libel over a 2005 writing of mine has aided the fraud to continue, nationwide. 
I will have a good indication of the court’s intent by 4PM today. If they don’t publish a Tentative Ruling, past experience tells me that is a strong indication they are going to do something unlawful at the next day motion hearing. They do this little trick while trying to keep unlawful actions under the radar by not putting it in writing and not giving one a fighting chance to respond to their intended unlawful rulings.  I’m not the only one who is aware of this type of behavior in the San Diego courts.
By 4PM today, I will have a strong indication of Judge Dahlquist’s intent.  Wish me luck!  Regardless of what happens, I not shutting up. Too many lives at stake.

About Sharon Kramer

Hi, I'm an advocate for integrity in health marketing and in the courts.
This entry was posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to A Strong Clue If A San Diego Court Is Going To Screw You ~ They Don’t Publish A Tentative Ruling!

  1. katy says:


    The information of what is occurring in CA impacts those ill from mold nationwide. We would suggest you join two discussion groups on Yahoo to confir with those who know of illness, building science and politics over this issue. One “Yahoo Group” is called “Sickbuildings” and the other is “IEQuality” Best of luck to you.

  2. is this only for people ill from toxic molds in california? i am having trouble clicking… (bought a condo in arlington, va./ill 12 + years toxic molds)….

  3. katy says:

    Thanks, You All. We shall see what tomorrow brings.!

  4. Dana says:

    All my luck to you, Sharon!

  5. heatherplude says:

    Good luck, Sharon! My prayers are with you!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s