Fax to Assemblyman MIKE FEUER ~ Please Vote “YES” on AB1208

Stop Indefinite Coercive Incarceration Of Mrs. Kramer For Placing A Letter To YOU On The Internet Re: Court Misuse of CCMS

Member Mike Feuer

Assemblyman Mike Feuer                            
California State Capitol
Sacramento, CA 94249-0042
Tel: (916) 319-2042 Fax: (916) 319-2142   Assemblymember.Feuer@assembly.ca.gov

RE: Please vote “YES” on Assembly Bill 1208

Honorable Assemblyman Feuer,

      This FAX and documents referenced in the fax may be read online at Katy’s Exposure Blog under the post title of, “Fax To Assemblyman Mike Feuer ~ Please Vote ‘Yes’ on AB1208 ~ Stop Indefinite Coercive Incarceration Of Mrs. Kramer For Placing A Letter To YOU On The Internet Re: Misuse of CCMS” Some of the linked legal documents may take several seconds to open. 

     On September 11, 2011, I sent a LETTER to you, Senator Noreen Evans, Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke, AOC Director Ron Overholt, Justice Miller and OTHER Judicial Council members as well as the Chair of the California Commission on Judicial Performance, Justice MCCONNELL. Although I received no reply from you, Senator Evans or several others, I did receive some interesting responses to my request that the Judicial Council audit a case for branch accountability with broad implications for public health policy and numerous evidenced ethics violations in the judicial branch among its leaders.   

      This fax is to inform you that I am scheduled to be INCARCERATED on February 10, 2012 for the letter I sent to you and the others seeking help, if the letter is not taken off of the Internet by February 6, 2012.The charge is CIVIL Contempt of Court for seeking your HELP while I evidenced ethics breaches in the judicial branch & misuse of CCMS along with the harm it has caused to me and to the public. 

    In order to seek your help, I had to violate a COURT ORDER that precludes me from using words for which the courts framed me for libel with actual malice in one case and then gagged me from writing of their actions in another.  I would write the five words here as I again seek your help.  However if I do, that could be five more days in jail for me and several thousands of dollars more in sanctions.    

     In reply to my LETTERS to court clerks seeking help, I also received a PHONE CALL from a judicial council member informing me that the courts would deem me to be a vexatious litigant should I attempt to pursue legal action for the clerk of the court, Government Code 6200 violations that I evidenced for you in the letters.

    Hardly a vexatious person, I have only filed one lawsuit in my life. That was nearly 10 years ago when I could still afford an attorney and long before this fiasco drained our finances for my daring to speak of a fraud in public health policy aided by a highly political judicial system. A system that is clearly evidenced to be compromised at its highest levels with this becoming clearer by the day. 

     The post with the link to my September 11, 2011 letter to you and for which I am scheduled to be incarcerated is titled, “Is The California Court Case Management System (CCMS) Being Misused For Politics In Policy & Litigation…..And The Fleecing Of The California Taxpayer Over The Mold Issue?.  It may be read at Katy’s Exposure Blog and at Sickbuilidngs@YahooGroups.Com.

     The September 2011 letter I sent to you and other members of the Judicial Council seeking help while evidencing court cronyism, aka “Speak With One Voice“,  will not be taken off the Internet before my looming incarceration date. It is not in my control to do so.  I do not own the websites. Regardless, I am still anticipating coercive incarceration by the courts for not doing something that is not even in my power to do.

     The website owners are refusing to remove the posts and the evidence of very serious problems at the helm of California’s judicial branch.  As I informed you in my letter when seeking your help, CCMS misuse along with the courts practicing politics from the bench –but not law – has proven to be devastatingly HARMFUL  to not only me, but also to California and US citizens, workers and taxpayers. The website owners have dedicated years to assist these people by the sharing of my truthful words and those of many others. They will not be removing the evidence from their websites of California courts FIXING OPINIONS which continues to harm the public.

    If you prefer to listen rather than read about my impending incarceration because I came to you for help to stop court harassment while having to violate an unlawful court order to do so; I gave a one hour INTERVIEW of the matter on IAQ Radio, January 20, 2012.  IAQ RADIO is the voice of the indoor air quality industry.  Frequent guests on the program are physicians, scientists and federal policy setters.

     You may LISTEN (and I hope you do) to me describe my impending incarceration, the serious problems of the judicial branch, misuse of tax dollars, CCMS, harm to the public and the resultant dire need for the passage of AB1208 to restore balance & integrity in the California  judicial branch.  I start speaking about specific courts, CCMS and AB1208 at approximately 10 minutes into the interview.

    To reiterate. I am a whistle blower of how it became a fraud in policy over the mold issue that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm. My efforts caused a federal Government Accountability Office Report, 2008, titled, “Indoor Mold, Better Coordination of Research on the Health Effects and More Consistent Guidance Would Improve Federal Efforts”. 

         To refresh your memory, my letter to you was seeking your and other Judicial Council members’ help to STOP harassment for my exposing how and why the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court justices framed a defendant (me) for libel, suppressed the evidence that a plaintiff committed perjury to establish false theme for malice; and falsified CCMS entries to make a FICTIONAL historical record of the case in which the wrong party is deemed to be the PREVAILING PARTY . (among other wrongs.)

     After that, in a second lawsuit they gagged the defendant by court order from writing the exact words for which the prior courts framed her for libel with actual malice in the first. As evidenced by what has happened to me because of the letter I sent to you, this makes it impossible to seek help and expose judicial corruption without being held in Contempt of Court and sent to jail.

    One cannot explain how and why they were framed for libel without being able to state the words for which they were framed. My impending incarceration is supposedly for repeating only five words (as I evidenced for you how I was framed for libel with actual malice for these words.) These illicit threats, collusion and intimidation tactics by esteemed leaders of California’s judicial branch are of a caliber that would do the Mafia proud. 

      The plaintiff, who the courts suppressed the evidence committed PERJURY to establish needed reason for malice for six years, is the author of mold policy for the US Chamber of Commerce, 2003.  Titled, “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold”, the policy paper professes that it has been proven all claims of illness from “Toxic Mold” are only a result of “trial lawyers, media, and Junk Science”. The paper was specifically written and paid to be written with the target market being judges.

      Additionally, the plaintiff authored a mold position paper for the AmericanCollegeof Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) 2002. Titled, “Adverse Human Health Effects Of Mold In The Indoor Environment”, it was endorsed into California’s workers comp policy by the ex-Governor Schwarzenegger in 2005, one month after the first court denied my anti-SLAPP Motion. It promotes the false scientific concept that toxicology models can scientifically be used by themselves to deny causation of individual environmental illnesses in claims handling practices and litigation.

    How these two papers were connected to mass market misinformation to the courts was the subject of my writing for which the courts framed me for libel with actual malice. 

    As evidenced for you and the Judicial Council, in 2006 the Appellate Court made it appear I made a maliciously false accusation of think-tank money exchanging hands for the authorship of the medical association, ACOEM’s, mold position statement.. Then in 2010, they concealed what they had done in 2006.  My writing accurately states the exchange of think-tank money was for the US Chamber’s mold statement.   The California Supreme Court refused to review the unpublished Appellate opinions both times.

      Any judicial system that is so broken that it would incarcerate a never impeached US citizen for evidencing on the Internet that the Chief Justice, branch leaders and legislators know the branch inner circle has severe ethics problems — needs to have control of the money and thus control of justice removed from the hands of the compromised, elite few.  I, personally, am fearful I will be incarcerated forever if the people who currently control the purse strings of the California judicial branch are permitted to keep this control over the trial courts and thus control over justice itself.

     Assemblyman Feuer, please do not ignore my plea for help this time.  I am very scared for my future physical safety and for the future of the Constitution in California because of the current critical condition of our judicial branch. Please vote “Yes” on AB1208 to restore balance of power for the good of the people of California and for the good of the people of the United States.

Sincerely,

Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer

Enclosure: September 11, 2011 Letter to Assemblyman Feuer

Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Does the US Chamber of Commerce have a choke hold over California’s judicial branch?

“Speak With One Voice” is the mantra of the leadership of California’s courts.  But whose one voice is it that is being heard? And what influence does this one voice have over justice in the trial courts?

Listen to a January 20, 2012 INTERVIEW about going to jail without even being charged with a crime for exposing the unlawful & unconstitutional union between California court leaders & US Chamber and with every lower court trying to suppress the evidence of the prior courts’ unlawful actions.

Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Leave a comment

Interview Regarding Being Jailed For Exposing Unholy Union Of US Chamber & Cal Court Leaders, On Internet

IAQ RADIO INTERVIEW OF SHARON KRAMER, 

JANUARY 20, 2012 

Website owners are refusing to remove the evidence from their sites of how the California courts have gone out of their way to frame a US citizen for libel as they suppressed the evidence the plaintiff committed perjury to establish needed reason for malice over a writing impacting public health policy – and then gagged the citizen from being able to write and evidence what the courts have done. 

When the citizen, Sharon Kramer, refused to be silenced by unlawful court order and placed the evidence on the Internet of what the courts have been doing – and know they have been doing, the courts then held her in Contempt of Court and sentenced her to jail if the evidence of court corruption, “Speak With One Voice” , is not removed from the Internet by February 6, 2012.

The plaintiff in the case, Bruce Kelman, is an author of fraudulent medico-legal policy for the US Chamber of Commerce (2003) over the mold issue. Mrs. Kramer is the catalyst for a Federal GAO Report (2008) which removed the Chamber’s false science from federal policy.

The uncontroverted evidence in the court record of Kelman v. Kramer, Case No. 37-2010-0006-1530, North San Diego Superior Court is that the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, in the prior related case, FIXED their opinions (2006 & 2010) to falsely find Kramer guilty of libel and suppressed the evidence Kelman committed perjury to establish libel law needed reason for malice.

As a result of the website owners refusing to remove the evidence of the California judicial branch leaders colluding to defraud the public by aiding Kelman with malicious litigations against Kramer; a never impeached US citizen is going to go to jail for daring to speak and evidence the truth on the Internet.

IAQ RADIO INTERVIEW

OF SHARON KRAMER, 

JANUARY 20, 2012 

Show’s Promotion: “Sharon Noonan Kramer has been found to be in contempt of court and will spend at least five days in jail this February. This week we will talk to Sharon and ask her to explain how things got to this point. According to Sharon her goal continues to be ‘to remove the false concept from policy; state & federal agencies and physicians’ offices that it has been scientifically proven Water Damaged Buildings do not cause illness beyond the respiratory system in prior healthy people’.  How did her passion for this cause lead to facing prison? Join us and find out.”

Alliance For California Judges Quote: “We are loyal to the laws of the United States and to the laws of California and to the public. Our oath of office is not to an individual or to a judicial organization. The failure to understand this basic concept has caused much mischief.”

Bruce Kelman wants Sharon Kramer jailed for five days if Katy’s Exposure blog owner (who is not Kramer) does not remove a December 2011 POST of US citizens, scientists and physicans requesting that OSHA and the EPA CIAQ issue a public health advisory over the mold issue. This citizen request was also a suggested action by the Federal GAO audit of the mold issue.

Posted in Civil Justice, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Politics, US Chamber of Commerce | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

MOLD ISSUE: Scientists, Physicians & Citizens Request Joint US Federal Agency Public Health Advisory

UPDATE Jan 2012, Bruce J. Kelman, President of VeriTox, Inc., and author of medico-legal policy for the US Chamber of Commerce over the mold issue along with his California licensed attorney, Keith Scheuer, want the Superior Court in the case of Kelman v. Kramer, North San Diego County, to sentence Sharon Kramer to five days in jail for the following post. The  post is of US citizens requesting OSHA & CIAQ put out a Federal advisory over the mold issue to health departments.  Kelman’s COMPLAINT, (See pdf page 16 for exhibit of why Sharon should be jailed).  Scheuer’s BRIEF stating Sharon be made to spend 40 days in jail. (See pdf page 8)

Read Letters Sent To EPA & OSHA HERE From Concerned Citizens of the United States         

(They were also emailed the link to this blog.  If you want them to hear what YOU have to say, enter a comment below)

December 9, 2011

Mr. Phillip Jalbert, EPA, Executive Director, CIAQ, Federal Interagency Committee On Indoor Air Quality, U.S.EPA Indoor Environments, Washington, DC 20210

Ms. Laura Kolb & Ms. Sarany Singer, EPA, Federal Interagency Mold Work Group (MWG), U.S.EPA Indoor Environments Division, Washington, DC 20210 

Dr. David Michaels, OSHA  Assistant Secretary, US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration, Washington, DC

Re: Mold Issue, Citizen Request for Federal Interagency Public Health Advisory

Dear Mr. Jalbert, Ms. Kolb, Ms. Singer and Dr. Michaels, 

     We, the Undersigned Citizens of the United States are requesting that in the year of 2012, the United States Federal Interagency Committee on Indoor Air Quality (CIAQ) Mold Work Group (MWG) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) take three actions to assure public and worker protection from illnesses caused by exposure to biological contaminants that are found in water-damaged buildings (WDB).

Action Is Recommended By GAO

     In September of 2008 the Federal Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report titled, “Indoor Mold: Better Coordination of Research on Health Effects and More Consistent Guidance Would Improve Federal Efforts”. The GAO report made two recommendations to improve US public health policies and US public advisories regarding potential adverse health effects from mold exposure/poor indoor air quality when homes, schools and work environments are damaged by leaks, floods or construction defects.

The Two GAO Recommendations State

     Recommendation #1 “The Administrator, EPA, should use the Federal Interagency Committee on Indoor Air Quality to help articulate and guide research priorities on indoor mold across relevant federal agencies, coordinate information sharing on ongoing and planned research activities among agencies, and provide information to the public on ongoing research activities to better ensure that federal research on the health effects of exposure to indoor mold is effectively addressing research needs and efficiently using scarce federal resources.”…

    Recommendation #2: “The Administrator, EPA, should use the Federal Interagency Committee on Indoor Air Quality to help relevant agencies review their existing guidance to the public on indoor mold–considering the audience and purpose of the guidance documents–to better ensure that it sufficiently alerts the public, especially vulnerable populations, about the potential adverse health effects of exposure to indoor mold and educates them on how to minimize exposure in homes. The reviews should take into account the best available information and ensure that the guidance does not conflict among agencies.”

Action Request  #1   

     As such, we urge the CIAQ MWG to compose and issue a public advisory regarding the potential adverse health effects caused by exposure to mold and other biological contaminants that are known to be present in water-damaged US homes, schools and work environments. This includes the known potential for respiratory and pulmonary illness, infection, irritant reaction, perturbing of the immune system and chronic organ inflammation caused or worsened by the biological contaminants. Some of these contaminants are known to be infectious agents. Some are known to have toxic properties.

Action Request  #2 

     Because of the potential adverse impact on occupational safety and adverse impact on the economy as a whole when injured workers are denied compensation for on-the-job injury; we, the Undersigned Citizens of the United States (and England & Canada), are also requesting that OSHA designate a member to the CIAQ MWG to contribute to the writing and distributing of the federal interagency public health advisory in 2012.  

Action Request  #3   

     Upon completion of the federal interagency public health advisory in 2012; we, the Undersigned Citizens of theUnited States, request that the advisory be distributed to all state and federal health agencies and to all US private sector medical associations. This, with the understanding theses agencies and their associations will make the CIAQ MWG public health advisory readily available to US physicians and to the general public.

Action Is Needed For Public & Worker Safety   

     This federal interagency public health advisory is needed because state health departments and private sector medical associations are sending mixed and inconsistent information to the general public, to physicians, to employers and to insurers.  The mixed messaging is contributing to the confusion and lack of a protection for public and worker safety and health. This is contributing to those injured by exposure to contaminants found in WDB to be unable to receive appropriate medical treatments. Their physicians are misinformed or uninformed. Further, it is contributing to lack of an awareness of the importance to properly maintain and repair occupied structures.

Conclusion   

     In the three short years since the group’s formation, the CIAQ MWG has done a stellar job of making sure that US federal agencies are exchanging accurate, consistent information among themselves regarding illnesses caused by WDB exposures (Recommendation #1). However, the information is not reaching state agencies, private sector physicians and the general public. An advisory composed jointly by the federal agencies represented by the CIAQ MWG and distributed to health agencies and private sector physician organizations would rectify this problem. (Recommendation #2).

     We thank you in advance for your attention to this important public health matter. We thank you for your past, present and future efforts to protect the safety of the the American worker and the general public.

Sincerely, 

The Undersigned Citizens of theUnited States

Nancy Abler, Houston, Texas  I endorse and request Federal and State integration in the education and transmission of scientific information regarding mold caused illnesses.  The Insurance Industry’s controversial science bickering is sabotaging the truth about toxic mold caused illness.   Profit before honest science is immoral.  

James C. Baker, Ph.D. I have recently retired as an Environmental Toxicologist.  As such, I have participated in numerous wet building problems.  The absence of regulatory support was consistently an obstacle in providing citizens with sufficient information in their search for the solution health problems often associated with mold in their environment. It is important that defensible information be available.
Respectfully submitted

Barbara Backus, Ft Thomas, KY  Please add my name to Request for Health Advisory on Mold. 

Jean M. Bixley, Cambridge, MN  I fully support the letters to the CIAQ, MWG and OSHA.  Not only do mold victims suffer because they have become ill living in a water-damaged building, but then they face discrimination and persecution from the medical community and government agencies because there is a lack of acceptance of the serious health consequences caused by these environments.  We either cannot get the help that we need or the wrong help is forced upon us, causing even more harm.  We need more doctors who are knowledgeable about the health effects of water-damaged buildings and we need the insurance coverage to support the treatments that have been shown to be effective in helping us regain our lives.  This can only happen if the actions outlined in these letters are taken.  It is the first step in helping those who are already ill and will have a direct influence on keeping others from becoming victims.

Deborah Daniels Davitt, Louisiana  To Whom It May Concern, I unreservedly endorse the letter to CIAQ and OSHA. This is not the proper venue for me to tell my story about what mold and other indoor air contaminants in leased residential dwellings took from me for it goes far beyond the immediate physiological health problems into the realm of walking, blind, into the medical and legal maze of conflicts of interest while losing personal relationships, socioeconomic status, homes, jobs, faith and trust in my fellow human being.  Sharon Kramer has helped restore some of the latter due to her tireless effort against the tidal wave of deceit and obfuscation of this issue while facing   retaliation from those at the heart of the concerted effort to confuse the matter.

RaDonna and Larry Freeman, Golden, CO  We support the need for this advisory

Jeff Charlton,  Beckenham, Kent, Great Britain  I support the letter to CIAQ, MWG and OSHA

KC (Kevin Carstens) Cornelia, Ga. Owner/Moderator of:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/sickbuildings
 I, Kevin Carstens am endorsing the letter to the Federal Interagency Committee on Indoor Air Quality (CIAQ), the Federal Interagency Mold Work Group (MWG) and the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA). 

Robert C. Brandys, PhD, MPH, PE, CIH, CSP,  There are mold exposure and standards in or by the following governments and organizations. Why can these countries set exposure standards or guidelines while theUScan not? What is it that the public health experts and toxicologists in these countries know and theUSdoes not?  A. CULTURABLE MOLD SPORE EXPOSURE STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS  

GOVERNMENTAL BODIES

1.BRAZIL 

2.CANADAMORTGAGE AND HOUSING CORP. (CMHC) AND MANITOBA DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR  

3.CHINA(PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF)  

4. COMMISSION OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (CEC)  

5.CZECH REPUBLIC 

6.FINLAND 

7.GERMANY 

8.HONG KONG 

9.KOREA 

10.NETHERLANDS(RESEARCH INSTITUTE)  

11. NORDIC COUNCIL

12. POLAND INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH  

13.PORTUGAL 

14.SINGAPORE 

15. WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO) 

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS

16.  EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES (AECMA) 

17.  INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF INDOOR AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE (ISIAQC)  

B. TOTAL MOLD SPORE EXPOSURE STANDARDS

18.RUSSIAN FEDERATIONSTANDARDS FOR INDIVIDUAL FUNGAL   SPECIES

Timothy A Hack, La Mesa, CA  I urge you to use your national appointed positions and send a clear health message that reflects the true dangers of mold.  The cost of treating people and property will be greatly reduced with proper education.  The current system is having adverse health effects on people both physically and mentally.

Iris and Thomas Brooks, Augusta, GA  We support the need for a joint US Federal agency advisory reaching the private sector regarding illnesses caused by exposure to biological contaminants found in water damaged buildings.  Having been poisoned in a water-damaged building, my husband and I have faced life-threatening and irreversible injuries to our health, as well as great personal losses. It is critical that people know the dangers of these biological agents.

As victims of toxic mold poisoning, we know firsthand the true dangers and adverse health effects.  We fully support all recommendations to the CIAQ, MWG and OSHA.  Had it not been for some in the medical profession who reached out to help us, we would not be alive today.  Finding doctors who would listen was almost impossible.  Thus physicians as well as the general public needs to be educated.  The science of toxic mold illness resulting from water damaged buildings is not even in question. 

As an advocate for education, we have personally seen hundreds who have become victims to this killer, sadly many are children.  We’ve lived much of our lives, by the grace of God, but when I see innocent little children suffering the pain that we deal with on a daily basis, someone has to have the courage to speak the truth.

Harold Hyams, Attorney, Tucson, Arizona  I join in my colleagues request because mold has far reaching consequences to which too little attention is paid until it gets out of control.  It has been estimated that biological contaminant damage from mold and other biologics due to damp conditions in home or work results in significant economic and health consequences for our country.  Other countries are far more sensitive to these issues e.g. Finland,Canada and Germanyand are actively engaged in managing this problem. 

Here in the United States we are facing an economic crisis where homes are being abandoned and become havens for biological contaminants due to lack of maintenance.  There must be an active organized move to prevent the disrepair and destruction of our living environments which will make it untenable for our generation and future generations to inhabit these structures. Respectfully submitted

John P. Lapotaire, CIEC, Microshield Environmental Services, LLC; Florida State License Mold Assessor MRSA #4; Council-certified Indoor Environmental Consultant ACAC CIEC #0711048; Council-certified Environmental Thermography Consultant ACAC CETC #1005013; Accreditation by Council for Engineering and Scientific Specialty Boards CESB    Please add my name in support.

Mrs. Linda Delp, Newark, DE  I fully endorse the attached letter. It is vital that our Federal Government make a statement to all the necessary agencies and the private sector that serious illness is caused by biological contaminants and toxins in Water Damaged Buildings. Over 12 years ago I had the Health Dept come to my home and they discovered water damage and indoor mold in the walls in the basement.  The air system was making me sick and the Health Dept told us to keep all the windows closed. We would close all the windows, but I would get sicker.

The Health Dept should have known in a WDB that we needed outside air since the inside air system was contaminated. Most of the doctors didn’t know what to do. I went into a serious allergic reaction, then had to have sinus surgery, and then developed Reactive Airways Disease. The landlords only made matters worse by removing wallpaper and painting for over a month. Had all these people known the dangers of WDB my family could have moved on with our lives.

Last year my husband had quadruple bypass surgery and was recovering fine and this summer there was a fire in his office at work. They had to continue to work while the water damage was removed and replaced in very high humidity and temperatures reaching over 100 without any air conditioning for several days.  When my husband missed some days because he was feeling ill, he was fired even though he usually worked over 44 hours extra a month.

There have been so many schools, fire stations, police stations, families, air traffic controllers, court houses, etc. dealing with this issue all these years, and  usually there is such confusion as how to deal with the  WDB or where to go for medical help . There needs to be consistent info not only for these type cases but for floods and hurricanes– so people have a chance to get the medical help needed and proper remediation.

This problem is only getting worse as the years go by while the sick fall through the cracks waiting for leadership from our the Government Agencies  we count on so much in times of need.  I appreciate  the work the CIAQ MWG have done the past few years but we need to take it a step further and make sure that everyone is educated and alerted to this seriousness of these issues.

Dennis Mudloff  I support the letters to CIAQ, MWG and OSHA. I was made ill by a work related neuro toxin. I have learned of many people who have been made ill by mold which has some symptoms similar to mine and which can be extremely debilitating. It is time to face facts; this issue will not go away on its own. People must be warned of the hazards and contaminated areas must be properly re mediated.

Paul Fitzgerald, Los Angeles, CA  As a mold victim myself I fully support this motion. I’m a former property manager who got sick from mold while living in a building owned by a very well known personal injury attorney. I’m also the founder of the National Toxic Mold Registry, http://www.toxicmoldregistry.org. As the founder of the Toxic Mold Registry I would like to see better treatment for the mold exposed victim, stricter encouragement to prevent mold and it’s immediate removal AND would like to see this open financial wound in the leg of our Government finally healed. We’re wasting our personal money while they Government wastes theirs for no real reason at all.

I can’t help but see how much money the Government is spending in it’s efforts to “care” for the public but only on a “non-mold” level. Even if that care is long term when it could be treated if understood. Even so some of the people who suffer mold end up on federal support only to be given subsidised housing in mold filled apartments. So the amount of money we see being spent is mind blowing when you compare that to the actual cost of proper treatment including the most critical which is the authorization needed to break the lease which keeps many mold victims exposed for up to a year after first symptoms.

When the sick become unable to work they can qualify for Section 8 (HUD) housing which pays 66% of their rent. So now we’ve just taken the $10,000 and jacked that up another $8712.00. Now this individual has all their medical expenses covered as they’re on state support. well, now everytime they go to a doctor for yet ANOTHER MISDIAGNOSIS, the state pays for that. This would be approximately 12 to 20 doctor visits per year because of the wealth of symptoms mold has caused. Typical doctor visits run a cost of about $300 an hour, thus another $6K the government is willing to spend just in reacting to mold sickness but refusing to address mold sickness.

For those with mold sickness rest assured you’re not invaluable as you once thought. Instead you’re someone the Government is willing to spend millions on even though it won’t make you better.

Dodd B. Fisher, Attorney and Adjunct Law Professor, Michigan  I wholeheartedly endorse the letter on Katy’s Exposure website to CIAQ and OSHA. 

Mary Mulvey Jacobson,  Jamaica Plain, MA  Please add my name supporting the effort to ask that the CIAQ put out a public statement on the current health effects of WDB (*Ms. Jacobson was a driving force that caused the Federal GAO audit, which aided to cause the formation of the MWG) 

Deborah A. Helregel, Lexington, Kentucky  I endorse the letters to the CIAQ, MWG and OSHA.  I became ill over six years ago from working in water damaged building.  Since that time I have lost my health, my career, the ability to support myself and pay taxes, and my home.  Thank you Sharon, for everything you’ve done to further the cause of bringing truthful science to the forefront on this issue.  Had I been correctly diagnosed in an earlier stage of the illness, I would not now have a permanently damaged immune system.  I would be working and paying taxes.  I would have a home and a ‘normal’ life.  Though it’s too late for me, this illness must be stopped of robbing people of their quality of lives.

Haley Mack  I support.

Marcie McGovern,  Ft. Worth, TX  I support the letter and hope this brings attention to the serious problems to the public’s health regarding illnesses caused by WDB’s. If I knew what I know today about toxic molds and biological contaminants that were in my work building…I would not be literally fighting for my life today. It is inexcusable for the fraud to continue on this issue. Help save other’s lives….and let the truth be told. *this corruption in our courts, whether it be Civil Court, Criminal Court, Federal Court or Workers Compensation Court, needs to be stopped. I plead that all of you do the right thing and help get the ‘Truth’ out and stop this harm to those whom are injured from Toxic buildings. I pray that I live long enough to see this change.

Connie Morbach, M.S., CHMM, CIE, Sanit-Air, Inc.  Please add my name to the list requesting that the CIAQ issue a report on health effects from WDB. Thank you for taking on this important issue.  I would be glad to help in any way.

Jeanine Moseley,  Sedalia, Mo. I support this endeavor.

Crystal Stuckey, Owner of Katy’s Exposure Blog, Katy, Texas  I support the letter hosted on Katy’sExposure. wordpress.com, to encourage our government take swift action and promote accurate medical science regarding illnesses caused by water damaged buildings.  

M.C. Hudson, Barrister  I am and have been a supporter of Sharon Kramer’s efforts to let some truth and light into the sham “debate” created by the insurance industry and their paid witnesses concerning the well-documented health effects of exposure to water damaged buildings. My own business was closed by me to prevent further exposure of my (already) ill employees (including my son and myself) and the public who traveled through the ramshackle building to board our cruise ferry. This decision by me cost my family a business which was shown in sworn testimony to be worth well in excess of $40 million.

My employees are still seeking recourse for Workman’s Compensation. This after 6 years – due entirely to witnesses paid to mislead. This industry wide effort to obfuscate is led by Veritox, Inc., (formerly known as GlobalTox, Inc.) who are mainly responsible for this business model – a model which their founding principal knows well from his days testifying for the tobacco companies.

The aforesaid (closed) business created several hundred million dollars of travel and tourism based economic activity each year inMaineandNova Scotia. These losses are continuing today and all so that insurers can welch on their bets. When will government realize that truth is not best found by an adversarial system in which individuals using their own tax paid dollars are pitted against a cabal of giant corporations using pre-tax OPM (other people’s money) – to the end that those corporations and thus their executives make more money and reap larger bonuses.

On a personal note – as a barrister and solicitor I was so disappointed in the American “dispute resolution” system (think Sharon Kramer, think Ted Stevens and how he was treated by the “Justice” Dept.) to return my Green Card and depart America after a total of some 25 years leaving behind family and friends.

Angela Miles Moore,  Byron, Ill,  I have been very sick from Mold exposure for 3 years from the building I work in. I had to quit my job as nobody will do anything about the Mold in the building.  I and several others that worked in this building have visually seen Mold .This is a very serious matter and something needs to be done .It is unfair to all the ones of us who have been sickened byWaterDamagedBuildingsand or Homes. Thank You!!!

Maurice Henry Van Strickland, M.D., F.A.A.A.A.I., F.A.C.A.A.I., F.A.C.P., F.A.A.P., Wichita Kansas  Please add my name in support of this effort

Kevin Shipp,  Florida  To whom it may concern, I fully support the need for a joint US Federal agency advisory reaching the private sector regarding illnesses caused by exposure to biological contaminants found in water damaged buildings.

Elizabeth M.T. O’Nan, Director, Protect All Children’s Environment, Marion, NC  Education of all physicians in the diagnosis and treatment of mycotic diseases, particularly those derived from water damaged buildings, “ought” not be impeded due to the potential for monetary losses.  Health victims are well aware of this ploy as it continues to be used to hide the medical suffering and liability as a result of chemical injuries and poorly regulated toxic chemicals.  Propaganda and dumbing down the medical profession will not make these injuries abate, nor sufferers well.  Physicians with their heads in the sand will not stop the multigenerational damages that occur from ignoring and denying these injuries

Had any of my doctors ever been accurately informed of the true nature of this devastating health hazard, I could avoided the long-term exposure which led to my near death in Feb 2011, my subsequent breast tumors, uterine tumors, and lung growths, in addition to my now likely permanent brain, vision, kidney, and neurological damage. Not to mention the financial devastation that now accompanies my physical injuries. IN LIGHT OF THE EVER-INCREASING NUMBERS OF TOXIC INJURIES AND DEATHS OCCURING AS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE CURRENT LACK OF PUBLIC AWARENESS, I URGE YOU TO TAKE THIS MATTER VERY SERIOUSLY.

It is your duty and obligation to protect the citizens of this country by putting human lives above corporate profits and those paid to protect insurance industry assets. It is time to put an end to the injustice that has been perpetrated by the dissemination of FALSE information (authored by paid defense witnesses), which currently prevents seriously ill and injured victims from receiving proper medical care, financial assistance, and the ability to recover legal damages from those whose negligent actions are responsible for their injuries.

Judy O’Reilly, San Diego, CA  I support.

William Nybo, Galena, Illinois, Please add me to the growing list of people concerned about Toxic Molds and their harmful effect on both human and animal cell properties. In this effort to move this subject out of the shadows of today’s somewhat restricted, yet acceptable, medical practice and into the subjective forefront of investigative research and development, I strongly urge the collaboration of experts from the scientific and medical communities, charged with a clear mandate, to advance a finding of fact and transparent conclusion necessary in this still unexplained, devastating attack on humanity.

Tonya Oberhaus, Fernandino Beach, FL  I support.

Marjorie Rosenfeld, Carlsbad, CA  I am writing to endorse the letter “Mold Issue, Citizen Request for Federal Interagency Public Health Advisory”

I am a California citizen who had a mold issue in a house I purchased in 1994. Mold was in the peripheral walls and under my bedroom floor tiles and could be smelled coming up from the grout between the bedroom tiles. The mold turned out to be due to a construction defect, although City Inspectors had signed off on the house. The weep screed, metal stripping which should have covered the crack between the slab and the “plate” (the first piece of lumber installed on top of the slab) had been installed incorrectly so that it was above the crack rather than covering it, thus allowing rainwater and water from power hosing to run down the outer walls of the house and roll into the walls through that crack. Getting rid of the mold required an extensive $11,000 repair, $8,000 of which I paid for myself.

My ceilings had to be buttressed, and the walls all along the outside periphery of my house had to be cut out, both outside and inside, to a height of about 2 feet up from the slab and the plate removed so that the slab could be scrubbed with a Clorox solution. Fortunately, it was summer and the slab dried quickly in the sun and fresh air. Then new plate and other lumber and dry wall were installed and painted. In my bedroom, the entire tile floor had to be removed and the slab scrubbed and then specially sealed and new tile and grout put down. This was quite something for a no-longer-young retired lady to go through, although I did end up with a clean, safe house. Mold is toxic, and, had it been allowed to stay and grow, my health would have been severely affected as I am hypersensitive to many different kinds of mold.

Lori Tondini, Author, areyoumoldy.com  I support the need for a joint US Federal agency advisory reaching the private sector regarding illnesses caused by exposure to biological contaminants found in water damaged buildings. This should have been done a long time ago–would have possibly saved many people from DYING of mold exposure.

Gail  Shephard, Norwalk, CA  I give my full endorsement for and to the letter going out to CIAQ, MWG and OSHA  Re: Mold Issue, Citizen Request Federal Interagency Public Health Advisory

It is long over due that everyone in the Medical Field and especially MD’s, RNP’s and PA’s be properly educated in the field of Mycology.

It is absolutely imperative that correct information be distributed in recognizing symptoms and are also given the protocols of treatment for illnesses that are related to and stemming from the contaminants that are associated with Water Damaged Buildings, (WDB). Respectfully yours

Joseph Salowitz, Brooklyn, NY  I fully support this letter. We are falling so far behind other countries in researching the terrible effects of toxic mold exposure, we are becoming an embarrassment to the international medical community. For Gods sake, why doesn’t our government just “GOOGLE” this health issue and disregard the American “experts” who are being paid off by the health insurance industry and the liability insurance industry. There’s a big world out there. Has America become so isolationist, that we can not learn from the rest of the world?

John Shapiro, PACE Regional Director, Santa Fe NM Dear Sir/Madame: I am the regional Director for PACE, Protect all Children’s  Environment,  in that capacity I have seen first hand the devastating  effect Mold can have on both Civilian Families as well as Military Families and service members.  I have addressed these issues through National Radio shows, articles and testimony in front of theNew Mexicolegislation. 

Please allow this letter to serve as a request for your organization to address the rising levels of illness which have been linked to Mold in water contaminated buildings.  The overwhelming majority of our clients have been initially misdiagnosed, always with tragic results.

Mold illness has now been proven.  I have enclosed a few studies. The rising cost to society in ill health and resulting Medicare and Medicaid cost and Social Security Disability Benefits and Veterans Benefits,  to say nothing of the devastating cost to individuals and families and  children threatens the economic security of the United States.. 

Prevention, early and accurate diagnosis  and early intervention are still the most cost efficient method of addressing this growing problem, with avoidance and proper treatment many individuals often maintain Health, Career and Economic  independence.

Pati Tomsits, Irvine, CA  Dear Sir/Madam: I support & endorse the urgent need for a reliable joint US Federal agency advisory to reach the private sector regarding illnesses caused by exposure[s] to biological contaminants found in water-damaged buildings to assure accurate scientific information is reaching US private sector physicians & their organizations, ALL health departments, & the general public to protect the health, safety, & welfare of the American people.

Dana Toliver, Pasadena, CA  Toxic mold can and does make many people sick & not just those who are immunocompromised! Doctors need to be better educated about the effects of toxic mold exposure. Chronic low level exposure and/or high level exposure cause chronic health problems.

Jack Dwayne Thrasher, Ph.D.
Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist 
I fully endorse and support this effort.

Michael Varada, Roselle, IL I am emailing you supporting the letters to the CIAQ, MWG & OSHA. I have been sick for almost 3 years and the public, especially the government and the medical community, needs to be aware of the dangers of mold. Thank you for your efforts.

Bill Vanderbilt  There are many things in the world that have a negative effect on human life but few things have the impact that toxic mold has.. Many thousands of lives are destroyed each year because of exposure to toxic mold and most of this problem goes unnoticed. There are many things in this world that are negatively impacted by politics and greed too.. This may be the case with mold..Nobody wants to face the liability for mold and it is obvious that those with a vested interest are being protected by politicians and corporate sponsored research. The independent research tells a much different story about mold and it’s effects on human health. In fact,, independent research is very much in line with what was know about mold in the days of the bible. Leviticus,,Chap 14 shows clearly that there was an understanding of mold even back then.. What has happened to that knowledge over these generations.. Perhaps that can be explained by politics and greed.. The real science hasn’t really changed all that much.

Sherry Wied, Bill Wied, Sleepy Hollow, IL  We fully endorse the aforementioned letter to the CIAQ, MWG & OSHA requesting assistance to assure public and worker protection from illnesses caused by exposure to biological contaminants found in water damaged buildings.

Victoria R. Ward, Santa Barbara, CA  I became very sick from mold exposure in two consecutive homes.  I could not parallel park or pick up coins or make change for a significant period.  My fingers still do not work properly.  I leave aside many other symptoms.  My animals were affected severely, leading to the deaths of two dogs and two cats, at least.  It took time to understand what was wrong with me and time to move, twice.  Although I am still an invalid to some extent, and don’t get out much, I have still run into many people who have had debilitating problems or know those who have. I am enthusiastically in support of the request for consistency and wide dissemination of a truthful public advisory on mold.

Jonathan Lee Wright, Former Director, Fungal Disease Resource Center, Inc, A Colorado 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation, Estes Park, Colorado  Sirs and Madams –The letter being presented by the public health advocate group Katy’s Exposure to you and your representative agencies has my full endorsement and support. The history and political dynamic that has created the current crises surrounding “Toxic Mold” has been thoroughly analyzed and is completely understood.  This is now a matter of public record, as are the persons and entities involved.  

You have been charged with a Public Trust in your respective appointments to address this issue, and I caution you in the strongest possible terms to consider the ramifications of your future actions in regards to it. 

Greg Weatherman, CMC, aerobioLogical Solutions, Inc. Arlington VA  To whom it concerns, I fully support the letter on website for Katie’s Exposure titled: MOLD ISSUE: Please Join Us in Request for US Federal, Public Health Advisory

I have been working with people who suffer enormous health and financial problems from indoor mold growth that could be greatly minimized if better public health education efforts were made by the Federal government. Courts can not make good rulings with unclear public policy. This creates more litigation and personal financial ruin. The road to controlling litigation is paved by clear government policy supported by science rather than special interest supported by junk science.

C. T. Weber, California  I endorse

Jamie Jameson, Pleasant Hill, CA  I support

Michael A. Pinto, CSP, CMP, Wonder Makers Environmental, Michigan  I am the author of the first textbook on mold remediation and instructor for numerous classes related to mold contamination investigation and remediation. I support the need for a federal interagency health advisory.  

Sharon Kramer, San Diego, CA The newly released Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, Third Edition, states, “Models are idealized mathematical expressions of the relationship between two or more variables. They are usually derived from basic physical and chemical principles that are well established under idealized circumstances, but may not be validated under actual field conditions. Models thus cannot generate completely accurate predictions of chemical concentrations in the environment.” 

In this issue, it has been prevalent since 2002 for some toxicologists to serve as expert witnesses for insurers, employers and other financial stakeholders of WDB, while making the claim that serious toxicological illnesses are scientifically proven “Could not be” caused by WDB. This flawed science has permeated private sector policy, medical associations and many courtrooms. It is based solely on extrapolations applied to data taken from a single rodent study, i.e., a modeling theory.  This modeling theory has been used extensively in this issue to sell doubt of causation in the courtroom and to deny/delay settlement of claims; while aiding to confuseUS public health policy, US physicians and US courts.

It needs to be firmly established in federal policy over the “Mold Issue” that while toxicological risk assessment models may be helpful in some situations to set general exposure guidelines; it is not valid science to state that it has been proven individual illnesses “Could not be” caused by the contaminants in WDB based solely on a risk assessment model.

A CIAQ MWG advisory in conjunction with OSHA and stating such would aid tremendously to curtail the delaying and denying of private entity, financial responsibility for causation of illness. It would save the taxpayers many dollars from sick people no longer needing to turn to social services for survival because of false “scientific proof” of lack of causation of their illness. It would help to raise physician and public awareness that these serious illnesses caused or worsened by WDB contaminants are indeed, plausibly occurring — thereby alerting occupants and workers of the potential for illness prior to their becoming extremely sick and/or permanently disabled from continued exposure to the unknown danger.

Phil, Laura, Sarany and Dr. Michaels, please make it happen.  You hold the key to saving thousands from financial ruin and a lifetime of unnecessary misery and illness.  One brief public statement coming collectively from multiple US federal agencies and acknowledging that these serious illnesses are plausibly occurring will change the world for many.

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Politics, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce | 17 Comments

Texas Judge Won’t Be Charged With “Beating Into Submission” To Stop Internet Use. Will California’s Leading Judiciaries Ever Be Charged For Collectively Trying To Do The Same To Whistle Blowing Bloggers?

     According to today’s Huffington Post, Judge William Adams, a Family Court judge in Texas, will not be charged for abuse that was caught on video tape by his daughter seven years ago, with the video going viral on the Internet this week.

     The Huffington Post article states, “Hillary Adams said she waited so long to expose her father because she was terrified at what might have happened had she done so while still living under his roof. She said the outpouring of support and encouragement she’s received since posting the clip is tempered by the sadness that it’s her father repeatedly lashing her with a belt and threatening to beat her ‘into submission.”

    We at Katy’s Exposure are not sixteen year old girls.  We are women in our fifties. As hard as they may try, there is no way in Hell the compromised judicial leaders of the State of California are going to beat us into submission.  We are not terrified of the threat of jail and more litigation for refusing to be silenced on the Internet of what the compromised leaders of California’s judicial system have done to collude with the US Chamber, ACOEM and Veritox, Inc., (formerly known as GlobalTox) to defraud the public.

    In prior posts, we have publicly shown much of what the compromised courts of California have done to aid a malicious litigation carried out by criminal means that aids fraud to continue in the courtrooms of America over the mold issue. This, on behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber. We have publicly evidenced that they are now threatening Contempt of Court, criminal records, jail time and more litigation if we don’t stop evidencing on the Internet that they KNOW what they have done — and are trying to beat us into submission so no one else knows how many lives have been devastated by their actions and how much money they have saved the affiliates of the US Chamber of Commerce by deceptive means.

    The courts are trying to stop us from republishing the phrase, “altered his under oath statements”. We can write all day long of the insurer cost shifting scheme/scientific fraud endorsed into California’s workers’ comp policy over the mold issue by Governor Schwarzenegger in 2005 without repeating that phrase. But what we cannot do without repeating that phrase is evidence how the courts framed an environmental advocate, Sharon Kramer, for libel as they suppressed the evidence that an environmental policy author for the US Chamber of Commerce/ACOEM, Bruce Kelman, committed criminal perjury to establish needed reason for malice while Strategically Litigating Against Public Participation & suppressed the evidence that Kelman’s “legal” counsel repeatedly suborned the criminal perjury.

    What we cannot do without republishing that phrase, is write about and publish what happened in a libel case that is a matter of public record, which this one is, without being able to write what words were claimed to be libelous. That’s why the courts, Kelman and his “legal” counsel, are  trying to gag us and are threatening us not to “republish” the following sentence,

“Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand’ while he testified as a witness in an Oregon lawsuit.”

    By precluding us from writing the phrase “altered his under oath statements”, the words that are the sole cause of action of the case; the courts are essentially taking a case that is a matter of public record and deceptively making it a sealed case where we cannot write of how the courts framed a US citizen for libel while aiding a multi-billion dollar fraud to continue in public health and workers’ comp policies. We cannot publicly evidence what the courts did to frame a US citizen for libel and are now harassing and threatening to block the citizen’s movement (incarceration for Contempt of Court) to keep their misdeeds from coming to greater public light.

    The above sentence, “Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand’ while he testified as a witness in an Oregon lawsuit.” is not even the sentence that is found within Sharon Kramer’s the purportedly libelous Internet writing of March 2005 in which she used the phrase, “altered his under oath statements”. (see link “Internet writing”). The actual sentence is,

“Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand.” 

     In both the 2006 anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion and the “reviewing” 2010 Appellate Opinion, they omitted  14 key lines from the middle of the transcript of Bruce Kelman’s Oregon testimony in question.  The 14 lines that were omitted by the Appellate justices in their opinions illustrate that Kelman and the defense attorney were trying to shut down the line of questioning by invoking the rule of completeness. This,  so Kelman would not have to discuss how the US Chamber’s Mold Statement was so closely linked to that of ACOEM’s when setting public health policy. 

     Had the plaintiff attorney not had the transcript of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona in its entirety, the line of questioning would have been stopped. Once forced to discuss the two papers together, Dr. Kelman was attempting to say the two papers were not connected, calling them “seperate works“; while simultaneously having to admit they were connected –with the US Chamber’s being a “lay translation” of ACOEM’s –as was stated in his prior testimony from the prior bench trial in Arizona. Thus, as the actual sentence in Sharon’s March 2005 writing accurately states,

“Upon viewing documents presented by the Hayne’s attorney of Kelman’s prior testimony from a case in Arizona, Dr. Kelman altered his under oath statements on the witness stand.”

    To acknowledge the close connection to the US Chamber of Commerce dimmishes the value as a weapon against the sick in court of holding the ACOEM Mold Statement our as unbiased science supported by seven thousand occupational physicians.

        In six years time, there was no evidence in the libel case presented that refuted Sharon’s belief in the validity of her words that Dr. Kelman was altering his under oath statements in an attempt to hide the marketing trail of how it became a scientific fraudulent concept in policy that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm.  

    By deleting those 14 key lines from the middle of Kelman’s testimony that illustrate the defense was trying to stop the line of questioning, the courts changed the color of what actually occurred as they framed a never impeached US citizen for libel over a matter of public health; thereby aiding the scientific fraud to continue to be used in many courts and many claims.

   The courts framed Sharon in their 2006 Appellate Opinion to make it appear that she had falsely accused Kelman of getting caught lying on a witness stand about being paid to make edits to ACOEM’s Mold Statement.  They then concealed this framing in their “reviewing” 2010 Appellate Opinion.  As stated in the 2006 anti-Appellate Opinion written by the current Chair of the California Commission on Judicial Performance:

This testimony supports a conclusion Kelman did not deny he had been paid by the Manhattan Institute to write a paper, but only denied being paid by the Manhattan Institute to make revisions in the paper issued by ACOEM. He admitted being paid by the Manhattan Institute to write a lay translation. The fact that Kelman did not clarify that he received payment from the Manhattan Institute until after being confronted with the Kilian deposition testimony could be viewed by a reasonable jury as resulting from the poor phrasing of the question rather from an attempt to deny payment. In sum, Kelman and GlobalTox presented sufficient evidence to satisfy a prima facie showing that the statement in the press release was false.”

    The March 2005 writing speaks for itself.  It does not state money exchanged hands for edits to ACOEM’s Mold Statement. It accurately states there were two papers, the exchange of money between the Manhattan Institute and GlobalTox was for the paper dissiminated by the US Chamber, and that ACOEM’s was “a version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece.”  As evidenced as accurately stated in the March 2005 writing:

“He [Kelman] admitted the Manhattan Institute, a national political think-tank, paid GlobalTox $40,000 to write a position paper regarding the potential health risks of toxic mold exposure…..In 2003, with the involvement of the US Chamber of Commerce and ex-developer, US Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA), the GlobalTox paper was disseminated to the real estate, mortgage and building industries’ associations. A version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece may also be found as a position statementon the website of a United States medical policy-writing body, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.”

     Uncontroverted evidence that was suppressed in both Appellate opinions, Sharon’s March 2005 writing was the first that exposed that there were many entities involved and were connected together in mass marketing a fraudulent concept in public health policy that it was scienfically proven moldy buildings do not harm.  In the March 2005 writing, she named names of those involved in the mass marketing of the scientific fraud:

Bruce Kelman, GlobalTox, Inc., the Manhattan Institute think-tank, US Congressman Gary Miller (R-Ca), the US Chamber of Commerce and the medical policy writing body, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM).

    AND THAT is what this more than six years worth of litigation over the word, “altered”, is really all about, while costing Sharon Kramer all she owns to defend the truth of her words for the public good from compromised judiciaries.  I.e., Keeping bogus science in the courtrooms of America on behalf of the interests of industry.  And now, attempting to suppress the ability to write of the case, that is a matter of public record, which evidences what the compromised judiciaries did and continue to do to aid to keep the bogus science in the courtrooms on behalf of industry….while threatening to incarcerate a never impeached US citizen to keep the fraud going.

    Now, we want to show one more piece of just how abusive the courts have been in this matter before they lock us up and throw away the key (since we refuse to be beaten into submission for using the Internet to expose judicial fraud).  

    On September 13, 2010, an Appellate Opinion was rendered by Justices Patricia Benke, Richard Huffman and Joann Irion, in the Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, San Diego, California in the case of Kelman & Globaltox v. Kramer, App. Case No. D054496.  Justice Huffman is the ex-Chair of the Executive Committee of the Judicial Council. He sat in this position of controlling all California courts for fourteen years.

     On Page One of the 2010 Appellate Opinion it states:

“The jury found that Kramer did not libel GlobalTox and judgment against GlobalTox was entered. The trial court awarded Kramer $2,545.28 in costs against GlobalTox.”

     Really?  There was a judgment entered stating that? Then why does Sharon Kramer just now have a Tentative Ruling Minute Order from October 28, 2011 (which is just this past week) that states,

“The clerk is directed to alter the 9/24/11[sic 9/24/08] judgment to include the statement that: ‘Defendant Kramer is the prevailing party as to Plaintiff Globaltox, Inc. The judgment is hereby amended to include costs of $2,545.28 in favor of Defendant Kramer and as against Plaintiff Globaltox, Inc.”.

   After the Remittitur was issued from the Appellate Court back to the lower court on December 20, 2010, the lower court CCMS was falsified on December 23, 2010 to state:

10/23/10  Judgment was entered as follows: Judgment entered for GLOBALTOX, INC.; KELMAN, BRUCE J. and against KRAMER, SHARON

     The Appellate Court was evidenced before and after they rendered the double-speak opinion trying to CYA five years worth of judicial abuse on behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber of Commerce and in the name of Schwarzenegger’s “Workers’ Comp Reform”, that there was never a judgment entered acknowledging SharonKramer as prevailing party over GlobalTox/VeriTox, Inc., only a minute order to that effect. See pdf Page 29  of Petition for Rehearing. to see they knew there was no such judgment entered. (pdf takes a few seconds to open) 

      As evidenced by the Petition for Rehearing, they knew EXACTLY what they were doing with the 2010 Appellate Opinion, why they were doing it and the continued defrauding of the public because of it. The California Supreme Court was evidenced of the same. It was one of Ronald George’s final acts as Chief Justice of the State of California, December 2010, to deny to review this fiasco in which the plaintiff was evidenced to have committed perjury to establish a false theme for malice and the defendant was never impeached as to the belief in their words.  

     We have no reason at this time to question the intentions or integrity of Judge Earl Mass III, who wrote the October 2011 Tentative Ruling acknowledging the judgment document from the case of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer needs to be amended to accurately reflect Sharon Kramer as a prevailing party entitled to costs incurred.  However, we are not anticipating the judgment document will actually ever will be amended as it should be to show Sharon Kramer was a prevailing party entitled to costs.

    This is because the Fake Judgment Document from the case of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer in its current form is the sole legal document upon which the case of Kelman v. Kramer, is founded.  The courts’ case of trying to beat us into submission would collapse if it was recognized the judgment document upon which it is founded is fraudulent.

     It is the sole document used as the foundation to gag Sharon Kramer from writing of what the courts have done, and now threaten her with a criminal record for Contempt of Court and jail time  for refusing to be gagged of court corruption, thereby being forced into colluding to defraud the public by forced silenced.  The Fake Judgment Document (that will probably not be properly amended) was mailed, interstate, to the owner of Katy’s Exposure to try to beat her into submission and not use the Internet to evidence judicial fraud in a case that is a matter of public record.

Since when can a US citizen be threatened with a criminal record and jail time for writing  and evidencing of what occcurred in a case they were involved in that is a matter of public record?

Since when can a US citizen who is a blog owner be threatened with litigation via the US Postal Service, interstate, for putting legal documents from a case that is a matter of public record on the Internet?

   Sue us all you like. Threaten us with jail time all you like. Use the US Postal Service to mail us threats, interstate, based on fake legal documents that originated from your courts, California.  We are not vulnerable sixteen year old girls. We are grown women and mothers of grown women.   

ARE YOU INSANE??? WE ARE NOT SHUTTING UP!!!

    We can back up every thing we are writing and putting on the Internet with evidence from your own Court files.  And we are not going to be beaten into submission for using the Internet to expose how you have colluded to defraud the public with the US Chamber et. al., over illnesses caused by exposure in moldy, water damaged buildings for now over SIX YEARS.   

Clean up you act, Judicial Branch of California!!!!! 

     We are all sick you trying to beat people, many people, into submission for exposing your ineptitude and rampant cronyism as you ruin the lives of  citizens, workers and children you are charged with protecting.  Below is evidence of more damage from your rampant corruption and ineptitude:

http://www.youtube.com/user/althepal55?feature=mhee#p/a/u/0/no3is56RRoQ

BOTTOM LINE: Its time for several leaders of California’s judicial branch to step down off the bench and out of leadership roles of our courts.   

Governor Brown and the Legislative Branch of California,

PLEASE DO SOMETHING ABOUT THESE OUT OF CONTROL EGO-MANIACS THAT ARE CURRENTLY RUNNING THE COURTS IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WHILE RUINING LIVES IN CALIFORNIA AND NATIONWIDE

Signed, grown women and mothers who will not be beaten into submission by abusive judicuaries.

UPDATE 4:00 PM November 4, 2011.  Just spoke to the Governor’s Office about a half an hour ago.  At their suggestion, I sent an urgent email and fax.

November 4, 2011 FAX TO GOVERNOR BROWN

Supplemental Declaration Received Today From Bruce J. Kelman’s & VeriTox’s Attorney, Keith Scheuer, California State Bar # 82797, evidencing for Judge Thomas Nugent that I need to be silenced because we are evidencing on NET the Courts colluding to defraud the public and threatening criminal records and incarceration to silence and intimidate us. 

Updated November 5, 2011,

Second Fax Sent To Governor Brown requesting he intercede to stop harassment by the courts and stop threats to block movement (incarcerate) for writing and evidencing on the Internet what the leaders of California’s judicial branch have done, in a case that is a matter of public record, to aid a scientific fraud to remain in public health and workers’ comp policies to the benefit of the affiliates of the US Chamber of Commerce.

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment