ODE TO TOXIC MOLD SUFFERERS & Notice of Intent to Sue CA’s Chief Justice et.al.

This ODE is part of a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE FEDERAL LAWSUIT against the Chief Justice of California and the Director of the Administrative Offices of the Courts (AOC), et. al.,  for conspiring with U.S. Department of Justice expert defense witnesses, the six owners of Veritox, Inc., to defraud the United States public with scientific fraud, that is used to deny that poisonings caused by biotoxins (TOXIC MOLD, etc.) are plausibly occurring.  Unfortunately, those who govern this country and control the courts, do not appear interested in stopping massive frauds involving their colleagues, unless they are publicly embarrassed to do so.  
Only a Loud Voice Petitioning Government for Redress of Grievance, will cause the defrauding to cease anytime soon, as federal lawsuits can take years. Please share the ODE  far and wide so many people understand the fleecing; and make your Loud Voice heard, to stop the fleecing of the public over TOXIC MOLD. 
Please tell the Chairwoman of the California Judicial Council (JC) Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke and the Director of the Administrative Offices of the Courts Judge Jahr, “TOXIC MOLD!  I want to know if the U.S. Public is Being Fleeced by Extrinsic Fraud” (link to 16 word MoveOn.Org Petition & White House email address)
by Sharon Noonan Kramer  
Sharon N. Kramer's photo.To those harmed by the US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform’s (ILR) & the Manhattan Institute Center for Legal Policy’s (CLP) “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold”; and by California Judicial Council (JC) members’ concealment of administrative court employee (AOC) falsified documents in Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP) to retaliate for exposing how and why it became a false concept in U.S. public health policy that mold toxins are proven not to harm;
And harmed by the Silence of All Those Who Know!  
If you’re poisoned by microbe toxins and no one will listen, think of the largest lobbyist and coins which glisten. Know why elected officials will not give them a di$$in’, as the fleeced public continues to feel it.
A retired Assistant Surgeon General took a think-tank’s bribe. His written words and true science do not jibe. They’re spewed in U.S. courts as false denial diatribe, and U.S. Senate HELPed to conceal it.                          
A Citizen exposed how policy fraud came to be. She named those involved as she blogged of the fee. Cal courts framed her for libel so no one would see, and repeatedly refused to repeal it.
They jailed her and hurt her and falsified docs. She was terrorized for example so no one else balks. Excuses abound of why no one talksCAUSING environmental injuries til a Loud Voice squeals it.
JC/AOC Heads seem political to the core. They shield court employee crimes hiding frauds of more. They may need to be shown the jailhouse door! and the Citizen knows how to reveal it:
USDOJ’s witness Veritox took Manhattan Institute’s  bribe. They forged UCLA doctor authorship as the US Chamber lied. Feds, Politicians, Regents, Cal Court leaders came along for the ride, and mass silence as defense can’t conceal it.
Veritox’s extrapolations alone are not scientific proof. Expert witnessing that they are, causes cost-shifting by spoof. Falsifying court docs in Cal SLAPP puts culpability through the roof!! The admission of AOC’s frauds will seal it.
Uncontradicted evidence are considered as truths. Feigning they’re not are lies, court fraud and abuse. JC/AOC Heads’ refuting evidence would prove its not ruse. Since there is none, Mea Culpa to the defrauded public must heal it!!! 
Please make your Loud Voice heard of “TOXIC MOLD! I Want to Know if Extrinsic Fraud is Fleecing the U.S. Public!”  by clickin on the “Loud Voice” link and adding your name to other Loud Voices. Please tell California Judicial Council Chair Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke and AOC Director Jahr that you want them to either produce the evidence that AOC employee document falsifications have not been concealed by Judicial Council members while aiding the Federal contractors, Veritox, Inc., to fleece the public over TOXIC MOLD – or – mitigate the massive damage they have caused when they unable to disprove the material court document falsifications.
Mailed on October 12, 2013 to 455 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA
To: Tani Cantil-Sayauke, Chair, California Judicial Council (JC);  Steven Jahr, Director, Administrative Offices of the Courts (AOC); Mary Roberts, Chief Counsel, Legal Services JC & AOC; Ira Kaufman, Chair, AOC/JC Litigation Management Committee;  and sent to Ninety-Nine Persons including the six owners of Federal Contractor of Veritox, Inc., Bruce J. Kelman, Bryan D. Hardin, Coreen Robbins, Loni Swenson, Robert Schreibe, Robert Clark; along with their California SLAPP Attorney, Keith Scheuer, Esq. 
RE: Kelman & Veritox v. Kramer, JC/AOC Legal Services letter 7/11/13, Kindly cease further obfuscation from addressing AOC employee felony document falsifications aiding federal contractors to defraud the U.S. public. 
Hon. Chairperson Cantil-Sayauke, Director Jahr, Justice Kaufman, & Counselor Roberts,
You hold the key to stop those responsible for much causation of U.S. environmental disabilities from being able to shift their liability costs onto Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI). To turn that key, you must admit that AOC employees falsified material documents in SLAPP; and that AOC supervisors, JC members, court officers and plaintiffs concealed the falsifications as they continued to use the legally invalid documents to harass me.
 As such, I was stunned when I received a form letter from JC/AOC Legal Services dated July 11, 2013.[1] It was in response to direct evidence that I sent on June 27, 2013[2] to the JC Chair and AOC Director. On June 12, 2013, a San Diego AOC employee mailed a document to me from a non-existent “The Court” [3] This, while abusing “The Court” to aid a judge to obfuscate from answering questions about misuse of prior AOC falsified documents, coram non judice.[4] A form reply to direct evidence of yet another AOC employee Penal Code 134 violation is not an acceptable response.   
Deflecting your responsibilities to address AOC employee document falsifications onto complicit San Diego Superior Court supervisors, must surely be an oversight. And as you know, contrary to your directive to me, the Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) does not discipline AOC employees and complicit AOC supervisors for AOC document falsifications. This key aspect of the sordid matter is the responsibility of AOC’s Director.            
If I have misstated fact that AOC employees have falsified material court documents, then why do you not just provide the direct evidence that they are valid? -or- In lieu of being able to prove me wrong; mitigate the damage for concealment of evidence and obstruction of justice while abetting scientific fraud to continue in U.S. policies to mislead U.S. courts? I.e. Federal contractor Veritox’s, scientifically void “proof” for the US Chamber that mold toxins cannot not kill or even harm people .[5][6] Their “Scientific View”, paid for by a think-tank, was the subject policy paper of my 2005 writing. [7] Court officers framed me for libel to hide I exposed a massive U.S. defrauding.[8
[In 2006, I became aware that not only is it scientific fraud; it is also academic fraud. The “Scientific View” has forged stated co-authorship of being written by a UCLA physician, Dr. Andrew Saxon. Dr. Saxon has stated under oath that he did not author it and had not even read it, three years after its publication. [9] The academic fraud of falsifying stated authorship on a “Scientific View” policy paper, is also substanciated by the fact that only Mr. Kelman and Mr. Hardin were paid for the deceptive endeavor, which has devastated the lives of thousands. Had Dr. Saxon actually co-authored the paper, then under the by-laws which govern University of California name usage for work performed by its employees, the Regents of the University of California would have been compensated for Dr. Saxon’s co-authorship of the U.S. Chamber’s “Scientific View” ]
Kindly correct the record to reflect truth and mitigate the ongoing damage. As the JC Chair and AOC Director, it is you who are ultimately responsible for AOC employee falsification of material court documents and concealment of them by JC members and AOC supervisors. The fact is, Chairperson Cantil-Sayauke, Director Jahr, Chief Counsel Roberts, and Justice Kaufmann, upon your personal acknowledgements of the AOC falsified documents in two SLAPP suits; the false concept that it has been scientifically proven by Veritox’s Mr. Bryan Hardin and Mr. Bruce Kelman that microbial toxins could never reach a level indoors to harm anyone, will cease to exist in public health policies, courts, medical schools, medical practices, and in workers’ comp, property/casualty insurer cost shifting schemes. U.S. physicians and policy setters will no longer be mislead to parrot fraudulently claimed proof of lack of causation of illness and death.   
The key to stopping Veritox’s scientific fraud lays with you [Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke,  AOC Director Jahr, AOC Chief Counsel Roberts,  and AOC/JC Litigation Mgmt Chair Kauffman] admitting to me and to the public, that AOC employee document falsifications have been concealed by AOC supervisors, court officers including Veritox’s attorney, and JC members, to aid Veritox with SLAPP over my writing exposing how their scientific fraud became policy – rather than U.S. environmentally injureds’ counsels needing to know how to discredit the scientific fraud, one mold case at a time, when it is used by expert defense witnesses as falsely claimed proof of lack of causation.” 
[See Judge Thomas Nugent & Mr. Kelman discussing that they don’t want Kelman & Veritox v. Kramer brought up in mold cases; and WHY they don’t want it brought up – because its been carried out based upon falsified court documents by judges with no subject matter jurisdiction to try to silence me of what they did to frame me for libel to defraud the public.]
Continued litigation usage and concealment of known material AOC employee falsified court documents are felonies. Penal Code 134 states, “Every person guilty of preparing any false or ante-dated book, paper, record, instrument in writing, or other matter or thing, with intent to produce it, or allow it to be produced for any fraudulent or deceitful purpose, as genuine or true, upon any trial, proceeding, or inquiry whatever, authorized by law, is guilty of felony.”…
The point is this, Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke, Judge Jahr, Justice Kaufman, and Counselor Roberts: You will be unable to prove that Judicial Council (JC) members, court officers and Administrative Offices of the Courts (AOC) supervisors did not commit felony concealment of AOC employee falsified material court documents in Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation; with the SLAPP suits being initiated by United States federal contractors and their California counsel against an advocate for truth in U.S. health marketing. Therefore under Penal Code 134, as JC/AOC governors, it is your legal responsibilities for you to not also commit felonies by concealment of subordinates’ concealments; and to mitigate the damage to the truth advocate and to the United States public for whom she advocates…..  
 Direct evidence cannot be erased by stalling and obfuscations. I cannot be silent or silenced of the felonies. I cannot unknow what I know, and neither can you. Far too many lives remain at stake for one to be willfully blind.
For the sake of public health, punish those involved for the frauds when you are unable to provide refuting evidence to my direct evidence that the following five documents are fraudulent and void. Please, no more delaying of addressing your responsibilities for the aiding to cause environmental injury of U.S. citizens and mass cost-shifting onto SSDI via concealment of document falsifications by those who work under your supervision of the California legal system.
1.          The December 2008 Void Judgment in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Case No. GIN044539, void on its face, it states a date of cost award not possible to have occurred to conceal it was ante-dated, twice. California Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke and Director of the Administrative Offices of the California Courts Judge Jahr, admitting that this one court document is fraudulent and void to be used for any purpose; will cause the fleecing of the public by Veritox, et.al, to immediately cease….
 The fraudulent Lien was recorded on 1/20/09. It is based on the false 12/31/08 Abstract of Judgment issued by an AOC employee, based on Mr. Scheuer submitting the known Void Judgment for abstract recording on 12/22/08, based on a dollar amount being added in mid 10/08 to the Void Judgment by AOC employee Mr. Garland without initialing or dating the change to the document signed by Judge Schall on 9/24/08 without legally noticing me under C.C.P.664.5(b). Noted in item #1 above, the Void Judgment with “mgarland 12/18/08 ” added next to the dollar amount on/after 12/22/08 when Mr. Scheuer submitted it for abstract recording, was also the same Void Judgment submitted by Mr. Scheuer and Mr. Kelman as the sole foundational document for the second litigation, Kelman v. Kramer Case No. 37-2010-0006-1530 CU-DF-NC, 11/04/10. The Void Judgment is contradictory to 1/20/09 Lien. The Lien and ROA both substantiate that “mgarland 12/18/08” is fraudulent and the Judgment is Void.
Corroborated by the case files, the felony Penal Code 134 violations by Mr. Kelman and Mr. Scheuer, establish by the discrepancy between the known fraudulent Lien they recorded and the face of the Void Judgment that Mr. Scheuer and Mr. Kelman knowingly submitted an AOC employee falsified, Void Judgment as the sole foundational document to the second harassing litigation, Kelman v. Kramer  Case No. 37-2010-00061530; and that they knowingly submitted an AOC employee falsified Abstract of Judgment to record a fraudulent Lien  on my property with the San Diego County Recorder.
Attachment: Three page 2008 AOC Employee ante-dated Void Judgment from Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer Case No. GIN044539, submitted in November 2010 by Mr. Kelman and Mr. Scheuer as the sole foundational document to Kelman v. Kramer Case No. 37-2010-00061530-CU-DF-NC (take special note of page 3); the ROA establishing that “mgarland 12/28/08” was not added to the Void Judgment on 12/18/08; and contradictory 2008 AOC Employee issued Abstract of Judgment & 1/20/09 Fraudulent Lien also recorded by Mr. Kelman and Mr. Scheuer. The ROA and the Abstract/Lien substanciate that the 2008 Judgment is Void.  All court officers know that a Void Judgment cannot be used for any purpose, yet multiple officers of the courts and the plaintiffs knowingly used one, coram non judice, to harass me for telling the truth in America for five years….
2.         The December 20, 2010 Remittitur in Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Appellate Case No. D054496, concealing that a retired US Asst Surgeon General is a party and has been known to the appellate justices to be improperly undisclosed since June of 2006. It awards costs against me to undisclosed “Respondents” when only one “Respondent”, Mr. Kelman, was disclosed as a party on appeal on the plaintiff/respondent’s 10/10/09 Certificate of Interested Persons submitted by Mr. Scheuer…. 
…..To reiterate the evidence that you already have, of how they concealed Mr. Hardin’s involvement and the implications of the US DOJ employing criminals’ services as expert defense witnesses.[1] Mr. Hardin was also a Deputy Director of CDC NIOSH prior to his retirement from the federal government in 2001. Like Mr. Kelman, he is not a physician and has ZERO research background of mold and its toxins. He is an undisclosed owner of Veritox in this eight years of malicious litigation. Veritox is reported by FedSpending.org to have over $1.3M in federal contracts, over $900K with the US DOJ for expert defense witnessing in toxic torts.
….Officers of the 4th/1st framed me for libel in the 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion and suppressed the evidence that Mr. Kelman, who is Mr. Hardin’s co-owner of Veritox, committed criminal perjury to manufacture reasonfor personal malice in SLAPP (See fn 8, 10, 11 & 16 for direct evidence that you already know this). At this same time, Veritox principals, including Mr. Kelman, were serving as federal expert defense witnesses in mold litigation. Their client was the US DOJ and the plaintiffs were a sick military family living in moldy military housing.  
 Mr. Kelman was using his and Mr. Hardin’s bogus extrapolations to claim that the individual family members could not have been harmed by mold toxins, even though science holds that extrapolations cannot be used alone as proof of lack of causation of individual’s illnesses. He was being paid by the federal government for his “expert” opinion. He was simultaneously committing criminal perjury as a plaintiff in CA SLAPP over my writing of how his expert opinion for the US DOJ is based on his scientific fraud that was mass marketed into policy and to courts by federal contractors ACOEM; and by U.S. Chamber ILR lobbyists and the Manhattan Institute CLP….   
 …..Additionally, Mr. Kelman provided the direct evidence in the SLAPP suit of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer, Case No. GIN044539, that he and Mr. Hardin forged University of California physician co-authorship on the ILR/CLP “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold”.  The proof came in the form of the CLP contract with Veritox[1]; billable hours for only Mr. Kelman and Mr. Hardin [2]; cancelled CLP checks for only the duos’ billable hours[3]; and Mr. Kelman’s direct statements in deposition testimony, July 2008, claiming Dr. Andrew Saxon of UCLA co-authored the scientific fraud for the CLP/ILR.[4] Yet in 2006, CLP/ILR listed co-author, Dr. Andrew Saxon of UCLA, stated under oath that he did not author the ILR/CLP’s unscientific “Scientific View”.             
To quote Dr. Saxon three years after the U.S Chamber ILR’s “Scientific View” was published with him named as co-authoring it, I’ve never seen that version. I’ll call it an unscientific piece that has my name on it.”[5]  Mr. Kelman also stated under oath in July of 2008, that he and Mr. Hardin were paid by the CLP (while forging physician co-authorship on the CLP/ILR policy paper) because the ILR/CLP wanted “something judges could understand”.[6]
 Had Dr. Saxon also contracted to co-author the CLP/ILR “Scientific View”, the Regents of the University of California would have received payment for their employee’s work.  All involved state that no one was paid for Dr. Saxon to co-author this paper — because he did not – or someone is lying about the contracts with the CLP and payments.  His name is forged on it to make it appear to have university affiliation and thus to give false credibility to Veritox’s scientific fraud written to mislead the courts.  This alone proves scientific fraud that they were trying to stop from coming to public light via these malicious SLAPP suits aided by your severely compromised AOC subordinates and JC member peers.  Justices Huffman, Benke and Irion, had and suppressed this evidence when issuing the 2010 Appellate Opinion; and of how the “Scientific View” was being used to lend false credibility to Mr. Kelman’s expert opinion in a mold case in Arizona involving two deceased infants. Forging authorship and university affiliation on science papers to lend false credibility is also a legal matter of fraud. UC Legal Counsel on name usage, Mary MacDonald, Esq., along with the Regents and former UC President have had this information since 2010. [35]. You may want to contact Ms. MacDonald regarding all the evidence she has of forged authorship, etc……
 …….As you know, under California law a judgment, void on its face, cannot be used for any purpose and Certificates of Interested Parties are to assure that appellate justices have no conflicts of interest in the cases they are reviewing. Glaring concealment of parties on appeal; the framing of me for libel with actual malice; suborning plaintiff and plaintiff counsel perjury on the malice prong of SLAPP; and the continued court officer usage of the AOC employee voided Judgment; with the US DOJ needing me discredited to protect their own toxic tort defenses; provides glaring direct evidence of appellate and lower court judiciaries having collusive conflicted interests, not in the public’s best interest — but in the federal government’s interest to avoid liability for causation of environmental injury of military families living in moldy military housing and to defraud the public. (Moldy military housing. Many lawsuits. Veritox’s nonsense cited often.)……
……At the time of U.S. Senate HELP’s 2007 deletion from federal audit of looking into conflicts of interest over the mold issue; I was not aware of the USDOJ using Veritox and their bogus science for defense in mold cases. I believed in my government and the courts enough to think that Justice McConnell’s November 2006 anti-SLAPP opinion must have just been a grave mistake — one that accidentally framed me for libel by deleting 14 key lines from the middle of a court transcript making it appear that I failed to investigate; concealed Mr. Kelman’s perjury and Mr. Scheuer’s suborning of it to manufacture reason for malice; concealed retired Asst. Surgeon General Hardin’s involvement; and stated false reason for suppressing the evidence of Veritox’s bogus science being thrown out of a 2006 Sacramento case — while her “misstakes” aided the scientific fraud of Veritox to continue.
I’ve learned much in the recent years of just how deeply seeded the fraud really is. Sadly, I no longer believe in the integrity of those who govern this country I love, the U.S.A – another thing stolen from me by the compromised in the California courts and complicit politicians. In relevant parts, my July 11, 2013 cover letter to U.S. Senators of HELP, Senator Feinstein, Senator Boxer, et.al. states,
“In October of 2006, the late Senator Edward Kennedy was the Democrat chairman of Senate HELP. He ordered a Federal Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit of the mold issue at my urging.[1] This is because I and others had sounded the alarm to Senate HELP of the mass marketing of scientific fraud in policy and courts claiming false scientific proof that these environmental illnesses were not occurring, and the harm it was doing to the public.[2]
As I am sure you can imagine, it was no small feat for a Plain Jane average citizen to walk into DC armed only with proof of scientific fraud marketed into policy, be able to moderate a Senate Staff Briefing with a panel of true scientists on the subject, and walk out of DC with a federal GAO audit. 
Unfortunately, in February of 2007 [less than three months after Justice McConnell framed me for libel in her November 2006 anti-SLAPP Opinion] the following was deleted from the scope of the GAO audit by Senate HELP which gutted the possibility of anyone being punished for their role in the mass marketed scientific fraud or it being shut down completely from policy and courts any time soon. 
“What medical and scientific standards are used in determining the admissibility of evidence of both acute and persistent health consequences resulting from exposure to mold?  Which individuals and organizations have promulgated these standards and what, if any, conflicts of interest exist regarding these standards?”
This deletion also left me vulnerable for horrific, relentless, politically motivated retaliation for exposing the mass fraud and its usage in U.S policy and courts.  For my efforts to shed light upon and try to stop what must be one of the dirtiest tricks ever played on the American public, I have been framed for libel in California for the 100% accurate words, “altered his under oath statements” in the first public writing, mine in 2005, of how the scientific fraud became policy; driven to the brink of poverty; jailed for refusing to sign a false confession of being guilty of libel; caused bodily harm; terrorized with threat of more jailing and more bodily harm; character assassinated; given a false FBI record; and court ordered to commit criminal perjury on the Internet by publishing a false confession of libel for a sentence I never even wrote — by a judge whose court had no subject matter jurisdiction. I was also court ordered to choose between signing a paper which contains the sentence “I do not believe Dr. Kelman committed perjury” or go to jail. I went to jail rather than betray my fellow Americans….
I currently have tens of thousands of dollars of fraudulent and interest accruing liens on my property by those who “promulgated these standards” but were spared investigation in a federal GAO audit, USDOJ contractors Mr. Kelman, Mr. Hardin and their four co-principals of Veritox, Inc. The California courts have provably falsified documents to continue to harass me. I am unable to work in my profession as a Rancho Santa Fe, CA, real estate agent as this profession requires a reputation of solid integrity.  Being falsely deemed a malicious liar by the courts has ruined my career and livelihood. This, while I am forced to watch lives continue to be devastated to this very day from the “Lies Behind The Toxic Mold Issue” I first exposed in 2005 to Senate HELP and to Senator Barbara Boxer, remaining in policy and courts — in large part because Senate HELP took direct measure to stop the GAO from shutting it down. 
 At the time of deleting the aspect from the GAO investigation, “Which individuals and organizations have promulgated these standards and what, if any, conflicts of interest exist regarding these standards?” Senate HELP knew of the SLAPP in California and that Mr. Kelman, an individual who “promulgated these standards”, committed perjury to manufacture a reason for my alleged personal malice. Check your files.  One month before the deletion from federal audit, Mr. Kelman, Mr. Hardin and ACOEM [also federal contractors] were the subject of a front page, above the fold Wall Street Journal article titled, “Court of Opinion. Amid Suits Over Mold Experts Wear Two Hats, Authors of Science Papers Also Work For the Defense in Mold Litigation.”[1]
No one denies the above is true or provides refuting evidence.  They just proceed on like Emperors and Empresses with New Black Robes – while the science fraud of Veritox plays on to harm many.”
 …..And if not able to provide refuting evidence, surely not less than one of you [the Ninety-Nine Persons sent this letter] could cause the Chief Justice of California, Tani Cantil-Sayauke; and Director of the Administrative Offices of the Courts, Judge Jahr, to stop the continuing damage to the U.S. public and to me, via their admission of concealment of AOC employee falsified court documents in SLAPP.  In reality, the JC/AOC heads and their counsel, only have to admit the falsification of one legal document to stop Veritox’s massive fleecing of the public. The 2008 Void Judgment from Bruce J. Kelman and GlobalTox, Inc. v. Sharon Kramer Case No. GIN044539, North San Diego Superior Court, Department 31, the Hon. Lisa Schall presiding.
In mulitiple violations of Penal Code 134, the Void Judgment was ante-dated twice by her clerk, AOC employee Michael Garland, and continued to be used by numerous court officers, the plaintiffs/US DOJ expert defense witnesses Veritox & Buce J. Kelman, and their “legal” counsel Mr. Keith Scheuer to harass a United States whistleblower – without courts having subject matter jurisdiction.
 Should no one in government from California to Washington DC choose to act to shut down this fraud while U.S. citizens are losing everything, some are being disabled and some are dying; this letter is to serve as notice of intent to sue the Chair of the Judicial Council Tani Cantil-Sayauke; the Administrative Director of the Courts Stephen Jahr; Judicial Council/Administrative Offices Chief Legal Counsel Mary Roberts; and Chair of the Judicial Council and Administrative Offices of the Courts Committee on Litigation Management, Ira Kaufmann; et.al. I will be filing suit for obstruction of justice, concealment of evidence and conspiring to defraud.   
NO ONE is above the law. SOMEONE needs to explain to the United States public and to my husband and me, why I was able to be so horrifically targeted for telling the truth of a massive fraud in America; with the matter sinking to new unconstitutional lows of felony concealment of legal document falsifications by judicial branch employees and federal contractors; along with why I was able to be falsely imprisoned in the USA, coram non judice, for refusing to be coerced into perjury –  long after I first exposed the fraudulent health marketing scheme and its proliferation of the deadly scientific fraud, to U.S. Senators…
Shame on everyone in the know, if you still remain mum and force me, a lone U.S. citizen, into a David & Goliath federal lawsuit; while the public is greatly harmed by your silence…
Good men and women who make mistakes of this magnitude, no longer make the mistakes or they are no longer good men and women. If you are good men and women, kindly let me know as soon as possible how you intend to proceed to rectify the damage and to timely bring this matter to lawful resolution for the health and safety of the United States public; and for the promotion of future integrity in the California judicial branch and its Administrative Offices of the Courts. The fleeced taxpayer; the environmentally disabled; and my devastated husband and I would sincerely appreciate your prompt, earnest attention to this gravely serious matter.
NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE FEDERAL LAWSUIT in its entirety with working links to corroborate statements made. Pdf may take a few seconds to open.  
Please tell the Chairwoman of the California Judicial Council (JC) Chief Justice Cantil-Sayauke and the Director of the Administrative Offices of the Courts Judge Jahr, “TOXIC MOLD!  I want to know if the U.S. Public is Being Fleeced by Extrinsic Fraud” (link to 16 word MoveOn.Org Petition & White House email address)
Please visit our sister blog, Just Answer The Damn Question!
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer says the public is being fleeced by extrinsic fraud and that the following question has been posed in a NOTICE mailed on October 12, 2013 “JC Chair Cantil-Sayauke & AOC Director Jahr, If Sharon Noonan Kramer is lying about the AOC employee material document falsifications; then why don’t you just provide the direct evidence they a valid, and prove her wrong?” It may be read online at: Just Answer The Damn Question!



About Sharon Kramer

Hi, I'm an advocate for integrity in health marketing and in the courts.
This entry was posted in Health - Medical - Science. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s