7 May (NaturalNews) – “If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.
For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safet y research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted — but never has — for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism.”
Read more at Office of Medical and Scientific Justice:
The United States government and private sector industries who have been generating substantial income from over vaccinating America’s children need to fess up.� The reality is that they do monotoxicity mechanistic research studies – meaning they apply vaccines to rodents one vaccine at a time to determine a “safe” dose�- and profess this means multiple vaccines are safe without taking into account the toxic overload from too many vaccines in too short of period of time.
Autism in the United States has increased over the past 15 plus years at an alarming rate while government feigns ignorance and innocence�of their contributing to the problem by not doing proper research of how many vaccines a child can tolerate in a short period of time before symptoms indicative of toxiticy, aka autism, manifest in the children.
Instead, they deem those who have voiced concerns of vaccines being a cause of autism as unscientific, kook alarmists.� All this accomplishes is for parents to become more wary of government information as the body of evidence grows that vaccines are indeed adding to the problem of increased autism in the US.� As a result of warrented distrust of the government downplaying the probability of the cause of the�problem, many children who should be vaccinated to stop the spread of disease – but not overloaded with too many in too short of period of time – are not being vaccinated at all.
Add to this, there is research that suggests development of autism may begin to occur in the first trimester of pregnancy.� Is there something new in the environment/food supply/supplements that�US mothers are ingesting or breathing that would alter the embrio in this early stage of development?
Thanks for catching that. I had a bad link. The blog is now correct with access to the rest of the article.
katy, the “READ MORE” link might be to a private wordpress email or something that requires I log in. Is that right? Isn’t there a direct link to a website related to the research, where I need not go through a wordpress login?
I think it’s common belief that vaccines revolutionized public health (though I don’t follow the science and am not old enough to be able to judge from personal experience). It’s one thing for there to be a problem in giving too many vaccines in too short of a timespan or with quality problems or to every single kid without further tests. It’s another, Dana, to say vaccines are useless or less than a help generally to public health. I don’t think the science over the decades supports that pessimistic view.
That sounds like the need for a whole new thread on this subject! So you see no value in vaccines?
Good article but vaccines do not stop the spread of disease & just because someone is vaccinated doesn’t mean they will be immune to disease!