This litigation is regarding how it became a fraud in US public health policy that it was scientifically proven moldy buildings do not harm and what the California courts have done to aid it to continue in policy.
In 2002, two toxicologists with PhDs – one from NIOSH, one from Big Tobacco – applied math extrapolations to data taken from a researcher’s single, acute mold exposure, rodent study. Based solely on their calculations, they professed to have proven that all claims of illness or death from “Toxic Mold” were only being made because of “trial lawyers, media and Junk Science”. Their conclusions reached by the use of fuzzy math and limited data have never been duplicated.
Regardless of science, in 2002, the workers’ comp physician trade association of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) legitimized the fraudulent concept by making it their position statement portrayed to be the scientific understanding of thousands of physicians. The false concept was then mass marketed to the physicians of America that serious illness from moldy buildings “could not be”.
In 2003, the US Chamber of Commerce and the Manhattan Institute think-tank paid the two Phds to write a “lay translation” of ACOEM’s mold position statement for the express purpose that it would be shared with judges. Mass marketed to the courts, it has caused much insurer cost shifting onto taxpayers for the cost of illness caused by water damaged buildings. When insurers have a scientific fraud written into public health policy and mass marketed to the courts, it aids insurers to be able to deny their rightful liability. It should be noted that the US Chamber’s Mold Statement for which the two PhD’s were paid cites false, UCLA affiliated physician authorship.
In reality, it was only written by two PhDs who are prolific expert defense witnesses in toxic torts. They are two of the six co-owners of the corporation of VeriTox, Inc., formerly known as GlobalTox, Inc.
The California courts have been practicing politics – not law – while aiding with a malicious, Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation (SLAPP) that has been carried out by criminal means for SIX YEARS. Criminal perjury was used by one of the PhD’s to establish libel law needed reason for malice while strategically litigating over the first public writing to expose how the scientific fraud was mass marketed into policy, for what purpose and who was involved.
The courts’ actions of aiding malicious litigation have aided to keep it on the QT of how the scientific fraud became US public health policy and who was involved in mass marketing the false concept. The judiciaries actions have aided in the continuance of interstate insurer fraud, aided insurer cost shifting onto taxpayers and have caused the sick to be unable to receive proper medical treatment from the misinformed medical community.
The Case Records evidence that Clerk of the Court alterations, falsifications, edits, deletions and manipulations have aided to conceal the judiciaries for whom they clerk, aiding with interstate insurer fraud by facilitating a malicious SLAPP litigation.
On appeal only one owner of VeriTox was disclosed on the Certificate of Interested parties. These certificates are to assure justices have no conflicts of interest involving parties to a litigation. The September 2010 Appellate Opinion issued with plural, “Respondents” awarded costs on appeal. The CCMS was altered and falsified to state GlobalTox’s (VeriTox) name was on the Certificate. The Clerk of the Court then issued a Remittitur in December of 2010 that matched the falsified Appellate Opinion and the falsified CCMS entry to state plural “Respondents”.
On December 23, 2010, the lower court CCMS was then falsified to match the false Appelate Court CCMS (covering for the judicial indescetions), stating a date of entry of judgment that does not exist and falsely deeming GlobalTox to be a prevailing party.
An interest accruing lien was recorded with the County Recorder. An Abstract of Judgment was entered in the lower court, with the Case History and CCMS again falsified and altered to support; based on a date of entry of judgment that is not possible to have occurred with the amount of costs incurred by losing party, GlobalTox, included.
Katy’s Exposure has been threatened with legal action should we continue to write and evidence the California courts aiding and abetting interstate insurer fraud by willfully participating in a malicious litigation over a matter of public health that has carried out by criminal means. We have no intention of being bullied into silence while so many lives remain at stake by the Actions of the compromised California courts.
In reality, this case should be titled:
-
US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INSURANCE INDUSTRY & CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL SYSTEM v. PUBLIC HEALTH, INJURED WORKERS, FLEECED TAXPAYERS & the FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION
California Government Code 6200 states, “Every officer having the custody of any record, map, or book, or of any paper or proceeding of any court, filed or deposited in any public office, or placed in his or her hands for any purpose, is punishable by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170 of the Penal Code for two, three, or four years if, as to the whole or any part of the record, map, book, paper, or proceeding, the officer willfully does or permits any other person to do any of the following:(a) Steal, remove, or secrete.(b) Destroy, mutilate, or deface(c) Alter or falsify.“
Government Code 68150(d) states, “No additions, deletions, or changes shall be made to the content of court records, except as authorized by statute or the California Rules of Court.”
Katy's Exposure 