Cal Assemblyman Jones-Sawyer re: Cal Court Corruption

Posted on January 22, 2015 by Sharon Kramer
Since 2010, we at Katy’s have been doing our best to inform the public that the California Judicial Branch is corrupt, and a true hazard to public health, safety and welfare.  We blew a whistle of fraud in public health policy over the mold issue.  Several Cal court leading judges and justices falsified court docs in SLAPP suits to aid the fraud to continue to harm people all across the county.
The fraud was and still is being perpetrating by federal contractors and expert defense witnesses of the United States Department of Justice — namely Bruce J. Kelman and Bryan D. Hardin of Veritox, Inc.  The ten years of fixed litigation and relentless harassment by criminal means in California courts has been a failed attempt to shut us up of not only the scientific fraud over the mold issue, but also of the criminal acts of several Cal jurists who willfully broke the law to aid it to continue to fleece the public — while lives have been devastated.
Did you think we were just kidding or just screaming in the wind?  WE WEREN’T and WE STILL AREN’T!  Here it is in the words of California Assemblyman Reggie Jones Sawyer:
“Last week a mighty ray of sunlight beamed down on an appalling example of government inefficiency and wasteful spending of precious taxpayer dollars. This sunlight came in the form of a state audit, which my office requested, of the Administrative Office of Courts (AOC), a department of California’s judiciary branch.
As co-chair of the Assembly Select Committee on Justice Reinvestment and chair of the Sub-Committee on Public Safety which funds California’s courtrooms, I directed the California State Auditor to investigate potential mismanagement of state funds.
The audit released last week exposed the fact that from 2010 to 2014, the AOC wasted $30 million on lavish compensations and questionable business practices as a result of inadequate Judicial Council oversight.
According to its official responsibilities, the AOC supposedly provides administrative support to trial courts, yet the audit report revealed that wasn’t entirely factual. Through their investigation, the state auditor discovered that the courts requested only 55 percent of the AOC’s services because the office never formally surveyed courts in the first place to determine their basic needs. As a result, the office continuously funded unused services and wasted state resources.
Moreover, the AOC’s employees are paid handsomely even when compared to executive branch employees. The former receive an average salary of approximately $82,000 whereas the latter are paid on average $20,000 less.
Eight of the office’s directors were paid at least $179,000 while managing fewer than 120 employees in fiscal year 2013-14. In comparison, the director of California Department of General Services received $167,000 while managing more than 3,600 employees. Gov. Jerry Brown — an elected official — was paid a hair under $174,000. This wage disparity is staggering and completely unjustified.
The audit also highlighted the fact that the AOC continued utilizing services of contractors, consultants and temporary workers in spite of the Strategic Evaluation Committee’s recommendation to downsize and cut costs. These suggestions were ignored, and the office spent $13.5 million on 55 contractors, although it could have saved $7 million by deploying state employees in similar roles.
Other examples of the office’s blatant disregard for taxpayer money can be seen through its excessive lunch reimbursements. The audit report showed that each Administrative Office staff member was reimbursed up to $40 for business lunch or dinner, and $25 for breakfast. Spending on meals, however, went from $60,000 in 2011-12 and 12-13 fiscal years to $266,000 in 2013-14 — essentially quadrupling. I’d like to know why.
The AOC helps trial courts manage “content strategy, publishing, and metrics evaluation for social media channels including You Tube and Twitter.” The AOC rated this service as critical, yet a total of one trial court has requested this service.
Even worse, all of this irresponsible spending by the AOC coincided with $1.2 billion of budget cuts to the state’s court systems since 2011, forcing the closure of 51 courthouses and more than 200 courtrooms, according to the L.A. Times.
After years of crushing deficits and the slashing of critical funding to important health and human services for disadvantaged communities throughout California, the last thing our state needs is this kind of disregard for state funds and the flat-out waste of millions in precious taxpayer money.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees one’s right to a speedy and fair trial. However, some users experienced hours of waiting at clerk windows after driving more than 100 miles to the nearest courthouse. Is this — people being unable to even file cases because of an understaffed court system — what we consider to be “speedy”?
California families and our children are all bearing the recent costs of state government budget cuts — with prison overcrowding, increasing college tuition, K-12 classrooms overflowing, less services for the poor, crumbling infrastructure, and more.
That’s why I believe strongly that neither the Judicial Council nor the AOC should be exempted from ensuring that every penny of taxpayer money must be spent wisely, efficiently and effectively — especially when it comes to our overcrowded court system.
Yet the AOC and the Judicial Council remain oblivious — indifferent, even — to the sacrifices that nearly every other state department or agency has made. The former continued its trend of excessive spending despite having received numerous recommendations for change from different entities. The office’s responses to criticisms over its allocation of money has been underwhelming at best.
Because of this, we must take a heavy-handed approach given that the AOC has had a long track record in reckless spending and the Judicial Council has clearly abused the autonomy offered by state laws. As such, I plan to work diligently in the Assembly to ensure the courts do not receive funding until the office and the council formulate a comprehensive plan responding to the issues brought forth by this important state audit.”
Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer, D-Los Angeles, represents the 59th District and is chair of the California Legislative Black Caucus.
**********************
So…..when is someone going to file criminal charges?  This is WRONG and DANGEROUS that these people are being allowed to continue on their merry way with barely a slap on the wrist and a promise that they won’t do it again.
History proves that they are going to do it again, and again, and again, until someone stops them.  If they were common folk like the rest of us, many of the leaders of California’s judicial branch and the federal contractors at Veritox, Inc., plus their Cal SLAPP attorney would have been in jail long ago.  Equally at fault for aiding this to continue, Cal Attorney General Kamala Harris should be made to make sure there is jailtime in their future!
Sharon Noonan Kramer
Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The U.S. Government owes water-boarding whistleblower and the world a huge apology

Posted on December 11, 2014 by Sharon Kramer
by Sharon Noonan Kramer, whistleblower of a billion dollar scientific fraud in U.S. policy and courts by government contractors — retaliated against by criminal means in the California courts to aid the fraud to continue.
It seems perfectly clear that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder will not be holding anyone accountable for the torture of prisoners under the Bush Administration.  So is anyone going to be holding Holder accountable for retaliating against the torturers’ whistleblower under the Obama Administration?
Huffington Post, December 10, 2014 “The One Man Jailed For CIA Torture Tried To Expose It“
Why is John Kiriakou, the CIA agent who blew the whistle on water boarding, still in jail? And why isn’t the Senate Judiciary Committee discussing the abuse of court and abuse of prosecutorial power to retaliate against him and his right to free speech for the public good?
It is unsettling that Senator Dianne Feinstein is now being holier-than-thou about the unbridled prisoner torture at Abu Grab — while making it appear it was only a Republican problem that was set right by the Democrats. Via the Senate Intelligence Committee and other sources, she has known what was going on for years. To our knowledge, she did nothing to stop it until it became publicly known as occurring. In her role on the Senate Judiciary Committee, she did nothing to stop Holder’s persecution of John Kiriakou for his valiant efforts to end the crimes against humanity by being the one who publicly exposed the torture.
This is not just a one party problem, folks! John has been persecuted by the Department of Justice during Obama’s term while attempting to cover up for horrifying acts of torture during Bush’s terms. He was falsely accused of exposing the identity of a U.S. spy to the media.  In reality, he exposed the water-boarding torture to the media after none of his superiors would lift a finger to stop it. Its John’s efforts to shed public light on the problem, not the Democrats in DC, that caused the torture to stop.
Yet, to this very day, he sits in a jail cell for stopping crimes against humanity by his former employee, the United States government.  John has five children and had an exemplary career record as a public servant until he exposed the systematic acts of torture by the CIA, et.al.  For his efforts on behalf of his fellowman, Holder’s goons forced him to plead guilty to something he did not do and to accept thirty months incarceration — or face the real possibility of a lifetime in jail while his children grew up without a father.
Why isn’t Feinstein talking about the continued wrongful incarceration of John Kiriakou as she attempts to portray that ethics breaches in U.S. government leadership are now a thing of the past? In light of the new Senate Intelligence Committee CIA Torture Report, why hasn’t John Kiriakou been promptly released from jail and given a full pardon?
This man deserves a Medal of Honor. In addition to his concerns for humane treatment of all people, his primary concern was that our troops would be tortured in retaliation for us torturing prisoners. As he tried to warn would happen, its difficult to point the finger today at those who would behead their enemy, when their enemy has been torturing their allies for years. So who is really culpable for the escalating violence, culminating in beheadings? Seems to me that politicos in Washington, D.C. share much of the responsibility.
And let’s not forget the abuse of law and judicial process used to retaliate against Edward Snowden, Chelsea Manning, Thomas Drake, Aaron Swartz and many other whistleblowers of US government wrongs over the past decade and a half. The orchestrated acts to silence, punish, discredit and destroy their lives under the color of law — simply serves to illuminate that U.S. government leadership is not always what they publicly profess to be — down BOTH sides of the aisle!
Thus far, the early twenty-first century has been a shameful testament of current accepted D.C. practices by both Democrats and Republicans when honest people try to stop unlawful and criminal government acts that are harmful to us all.
Admitting the water boarding was an act of torture while using it in a game of political one-upmanship against the other party; and with no one being punished for the tortuous acts or the retaliation against a U.S. citizen to cover-up the acts — simply establishes that lack of ethics and lack of personal accountability is alive and well in Washington DC.
United States politicians from both parties owe the world a HUGE apology for the inhumane treatment of war prisoners and for the retaliation against a U.S. citizen to cover up the torture — along with retaliation against many other U.S. citizens for exposing governmental wrongs.
President Obama sending Whistleblower John Kiriakou home to his wife and five children for Christmas, would be a good place for them all to start that apology.
Posted in Health - Medical - Science | 1 Comment

Rolling Stone: Blowing the Whistle on the US Department of Justice

Posted on November 11, 2014 by Sharon Kramer
by Sharon Noonan Kramer
On November 6, 2014, Rolling Stone published an excellent article by Matt Taibbi.  The article is titled, “The $9 Billion Witness: Meet JPMorgan Chase’s Worst Nightmare“
The article’s gist is of a Canadian woman who knows how to cause those responsible for the multi-billion dollar mortgage defrauding to finally face criminal charges in the United States; and what has been done by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to keep what she knows concealed in the courts, so that no criminal prosecutions ever occur.
This expose’ really struck a chord with us.  We completely understand Mr. Taibbi’s point that the real story is not the fraud itself.  The real story is the cover-up of how insidious the fraud really is; and how those who have despicably fleeced the public continue to profit from unconscionable under the color of law acts of the DOJ, et.al., as thousands of U.S. citizens continue to suffer from the fallout.
We at Katy’s know and can prove that this is not the only instance in which bad actors at the DOJ and friends have been lying and shielding those who have committed criminal acts to fleece the United States public of billions of dollars.  People have been permanently disabled and some have died from the retalitory criminal acts to conceal what we know from coming to public light.  Not one person has been punished for the collusion to defraud by contractors of the DOJ, et.al., in ten years of lying and falsifying court documents in California, to cover-up scientific fraud in U.S. public health policies and courts all across the nation.
Rolling Stone“Everything that I thought was bad at the time turned out to be a million times worse…I tried to go on with the things I was doing, but I just stopped sleeping and couldn’t eat.”  Whistleblower Alayne Fleischmann
 “Six years after the crisis that cratered the global economy, it’s not exactly news that the country’s biggest banks stole on a grand scale. That’s why the more important part of Fleischmann’s story is in the pains Chase and the Justice Department took to silence her.” Matt Taibbi
Below are key excerpts of Mr. Taibbi’s excellent Rolling Stone article:
Alayne Fleischmann is the central witness in one of the biggest cases of white-collar crime in American history, possessing secrets that JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon late last year paid $9 billion…to keep the public from hearing.
In today’s America, someone like Fleischmann – an honest person caught for a little while in the wrong place at the wrong time – has to be willing to live through an epic ordeal…. And when she finally gets there, she still has to risk everything to take that last step. “The assumption they make is that I won’t blow up my life to do it,” Fleischmann says. “But they’re wrong about that.”
That’s when she decided to break her silence. “I tried to go on with the things I was doing, but I just stopped sleeping and couldn’t eat,” she says. “It felt like I was trying to keep this secret and my body was literally rejecting it.”
“Everything that I thought was bad at the time,” Fleischmann says, “turned out to be a million times worse.”
Fleischmann knew something the rest of the world did not: The criminal investigation was going nowhere.
She’s had to struggle to find work despite some striking skills and qualifications, a common symptom of a not-so-common condition called being a whistle-blower.
 
“I could be sued into bankruptcy,” she says. “I could lose my license to practice law. I could lose everything. But if we don’t start speaking up, then this really is all we’re going to get: the biggest financial cover-up in history.”
 
Back in 2006, as a deal manager at the gigantic bank, Fleischmann first witnessed, then tried to stop, what she describes as “massive criminal securities fraud” in the bank’s mortgage operations.
 “It used to be if you wrote a memo, they had to stop, because now there’s proof that they knew what they were doing,” she says. “But when the Justice Department doesn’t do anything, that stops being a deterrent. I just didn’t know that at the time.”
In February 2008, less than two years after joining the bank, Fleischmann was quietly dismissed in a round of layoffs. A few months later, proof would appear that her bosses knew all along that the boom-era mortgage market was rotten.
She was blocked at every turn: by asleep-on-the-job regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission, by a court system that allowed Chase to use its billions to bury her evidence, and, finally, by officials like outgoing Attorney General Eric Holder, the chief architect of the crazily elaborate government policy of surrender, secrecy and cover-up.
Fleischmann later realized that the government wasn’t interested in having her testify against Chase in court or any other public forum. Instead, the Justice Department’s political wing, led by Holder, appeared to be using her, and her evidence, as a bargaining chip to extract more hush money from Dimon. It worked. Within weeks, Dimon had upped his offer to roughly $9 billion.
The newspapers and the Justice Department described the deal as a “$13 billion settlement,” hailing it as the biggest white-collar regulatory settlement in American history. The deal released Chase from civil liability. And, in what was described by The New York Times as a “major victory for the government,” it left open the possibility that the Justice Department could pursue a further criminal investigation against the bank. But the idea that Holder had cracked down on Chase was a carefully contrived fiction, one that has survived to this day.
“They typically charge only one offense when there are dozens. It would be like charging a serial murderer with a single assault and giving them probation,” says Dennis Kelleher of the financial reform group Better Markets.
Instead of a detailed complaint naming names, Chase was allowed to sign a flimsy, 10-and-a-half-page “statement of facts” that was: (a) so short, a first-year law student could read it in the time it takes to eat a tuna sandwich, and (b) so vague, a halfway intelligent person could read it and not know anyone had done anything wrong. The ink was barely dry on the deal before Chase would have the balls to insinuate its innocence.
Chase was allowed to treat some $7 billion of the settlement as a tax write-off. Couple this with the fact that the bank’s share price soared six percent on news of the settlement, adding more than $12 billion in value to shareholders, and one could argue Chase actually made money from the deal. What’s more, to defray the cost of this and other fines, Chase last year laid off 7,500 lower-level employees. The board awarded a 74 percent raise to the man who oversaw the biggest regulatory penalty ever, upping his compensation package to about $20 million.
In September, at a speech at NYU, Holder defended the lack of prosecutions of top executives on the grounds that, in the corporate context, sometimes bad things just happen without actual people being responsible. “Responsibility remains so diffuse, and top executives so insulated,” Holder said, “that any misconduct could again be considered more a symptom of the institution’s culture than a result of the willful actions of any single individual.”
In other words, people don’t commit crimes, corporate culture commits crimes! It’s probably fortunate that Holder is quitting before he has time to apply the same logic to Mafia or terrorism cases.
Or, as Fleischmann translates it, [Holder said], “I will personally stay on to make sure that no one can undo the cover-up that I’ve accomplished.” Despite it all, Fleischmann still had faith that the Justice Department or some other federal agency would make things right. “I guess I was just a trusting person,” she says. “I wasn’t cynical. I kept hoping.”
Because after all this activity, all these court actions, all these penalties (both real and abortive), even after a fair amount of noise in the press, the target companies remain more ascendant than ever. The people who stole all those billions are still in place. And the bank is more untouchable than ever – former Debevoise & Plimpton hotshots Mary Jo White and Andrew Ceresny, who represented Chase for some of this case, have since been named to the two top jobs at the SEC. As for the bank itself, its stock price has gone up since the settlement and flirts weekly with five-year highs.
Holder or whoever succeeds him can still make the whole thing disappear by negotiating a soft landing for the company. “That’s the thing I’m worried about,”  says Fleischmann. “That they make the whole thing disappear. If they do that, the truth will never come out.”
Truth is one thing, and if the right people fight hard enough, you might get to hear it from time to time.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-9-billion-witness-20141106#ixzz3IlIrWskJ

 

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Fourth District Division One Appellate Court, Health - Medical - Science, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Campaign For Judicial Integrity impact on California judicial elections

Posted on November 9, 2014 by Sharon Kramer
I received the below message from Dr. Richard Fine, Chairman of Campaign For Judicial Integrity (CFJI).  Dr. Fine analyzed the percentages of “No” votes for retention of California justices, by county.  According to the calculations, the percentage of people who voted “No” jumped significantly from the last election cycle.
CFJI is gearing up to do even better in the next cycle; with four years to get the word out of why it is important to remove the stale old guard from California’s broken judicial branch. To all of you who voted “No” and helped to spread the word, Thank You!
Sharon Noonan Kramer
Begin forwarded message:
“Dear Sharon:
We made an impact on the November 4 election! A big thank you for all you have done and to all those who received and shared our messages. Keep up the fight. We will eradicate judicial corruption! Please post and share the following message with everyone.
Regards, Richard
Vote ‘No’ to Justices Campaign Impacted California’s November 4 Judicial Elections
The November 4 percentage of ‘No’ votes to Supreme Court justices may be the highest percentage since three California Supreme Court justices were voted out in 1982 for refusing to enforce the death penalty. The state wide per cent range of “No” votes rose from 20-24% in 2002 and 2006 to 33.3% in 2014. The rising trend of ‘No’ votes indicated that the justices can be Voted Out at the next election.
On a county by county basis the effect of the vote ‘No’ campaign was more dramatic. Only five of California’s fifty eight counties accounted for over 50% of the statewide ‘Yes’ votes. The five counties were Alameda, Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego and Santa Clara. Only another eleven counties exceeded the statewide ‘Yes’ vote percentage. These eleven counties were Alpine, Contra Costa, Marin, Monterey, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Solano, Sonoma, Ventura and Yolo.
The remaining forty counties each had ‘No’ vote percentages in the mid 30% to high 40% range. Most striking, seven counties voted ‘No’ to Justice Cuellar. These were: Glen, Lassen, Mariposa, Modoc, Shasta, Sierra and Tehama. Five counties voted “No” to Justice Liu. These were: Lassen, Modoc, Shasta, Sierra and Tehama.
Also striking, on November 4, 1.67 million less people voted in the judicial election than voted for governor. This refusal to vote may have indicated disgust with the judiciary and judicial corruption. Had these voters, voted “No”, all the Supreme Court justices would have been Voted Out.
The 2014 dramatic increase in the percentage of ‘No’ votes demonstrated the impact of the vote ‘No’ campaign. The Judiciary, Governor, Legislature and county supervisors making illegal payments to judges are on notice that we will end judicial corruption.
The Campaign for Judicial Integrity is a national grassroots movement and organization dedicated to the eradication of judicial corruption in all of its forms. Contact: Richard I. Fine, Ph.D.
Tel: (310) 622-6900; E-mail: richardfine@campaignforjudicialintegrity.org
Links:
http://www.campaignforjudicialintegrity.org“
Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Leave a comment

Treat Californians to No More Tricks. Vote “NO” Re-election of All the State’s Justices

Posted on October 31, 2014 by Sharon Kramer
From ghosties and ghoulies and long-winded beasties and things that go bump in the courts, oh California voters, please protect us!
In four days, on November 4th, Californians will go to the voting booths. They’ll vote on many issues and elections/re-elections to public office.  No votes are more important than how voters vote on the state’s Supreme and Appellate Court justices. This is because if courts are wickedly compromised, then all the elected public officials in the world cannot insure that the laws approved by the voters are upheld.
There are forty-five California justices who are on this year’s ballot and are subject to voter retention or ousting.  This is nearly half of all California justices currently on the bench. Your vote to remove all who are balloted will send the message that court corruption will no longer be tolerated by the public.
Recent history of some great Jack-o-Laterns
The past two weeks alone have shed much light on many areas which spell out how California courts have been jacking-around with justice and the Constitution. The following groups and individuals have served as Jack-o-Laterns, helping to illuminate the massive California court frauds and harm to the public that they cause:
October 25th, Judicial Council Watcher (JCW) made note of its fourth anniversary of exposing long-winded beasties at the helm of the California courts. The website is frequently contributed to by court employees, including judges and staff/ex-staff of the Admin Offices of the Courts. It provides eye-popping and spell-binding evidence of a vast cauldron of lies that have been conjured up by Cal court leaders over the years. If you’ve never visited their blog, you really should before you cast your vote to retain/oust California’s justices.
October 27th, Center for Judicial Excellence (CJE) was granted an audience with the Judicial Council. Approximately sixty people traveled to San Francisco “from Placer county to San Diego county” for the two day Judicial Council meeting. Many shared their true stories of how justice has become a ghost of the past in California, as their families have been ghoulishly shredded by unethical and unlawful acts in the courts. (I was there. I think I saw a wicked witch from the west appear at the end of the meeting. She was offering for Judicial Council members to bite into her poison apple in the hopes that they would stay fast asleep at the wheel – and not grant CJE’s request for future public hearings.)
October 27th, Barbara Kaufman, Esq., presented evidence to the Judicial Council that the CEO of the Marin Superior Court has recently concealed court document falsifications; and that California’s Governor and Attorney General have stated in writing that the Judicial Council has the duty to stop the fraud upon the court. Seems clerks have been ordered to back-date legal documents and electronic records in an effort for a judge to feign that her Marin county court has subject matter jurisdiction – where none any longer exists. Any orders she issues from here on out are fraudulent and void – and a grim reminder of how justice is really for “just us” in the California courts.
October 24th, Divorce Corp and the Family Law Report released their 2nd part of a two-part interview with Dr. Richard Fine of the Campaign for Judicial Integrity (CFJI). The interviews are of how former federal prosecutor, Dr. Fine, attempted to slay a dragon of court corruption; only to be locked away in a Los Angeles dungeon for well over fifteen fortnights by the conjuring of a black robed cat — who was taking bribes from LA county. It is proven that this cat and others have been milking the system and have been aided to continue by court leadership. Everyone knows the practice is illegal and sets the court officers up for bias in their rulings adverse to the public’s best interest. It continues dispite California justices knowledgement that the payments are illegal.
October 19th, Full Disclosure Network (FDN) announced that a Federal court has intervened to determine that the Los Angeles Superior Court should reconsider allowing the filming in their courthouse of the documentary “The Cost of Courage”. A 6 minute Video Report  was released by FDN on October 19th featuring Paul Orfanedes, Judicial Watch Director of Litigation, who describes the recent developments in the case  Dutton v. Wesley, Case No. 12-01888-R-JC (C.D. Cal.).  The video covers the “Reverse and Remand” Order issued by US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals panel that held the US California Central District Judge Manuel Real, shall re-consider the case regarding LA Superior Court’s refusal to issue a permit to the Full Disclosure Network (FDN) for use of an empty court room in Department 86, to record the final scene for their documentary.  According to their website, “The FDN documentary involves the controversial case covering the incarceration of former U. S. Prosecutor Richard I. Fine who was held in “solitary, coercive confinement” for 18 months in L.A. County Central Men’s Jail.  Department 86 was the Court Room where Judge David Yafee ordered Fine taken into custody and held indefinitely without a hearing.”
October 23rd California Coalition for Families and Children (CCFC) filed their appeal in the Federal RICO case against San Diego Superior Court judges et.al. The gist of this matter is that compromised judges and their ghastly friends have abused their power to retaliate against CCFC members for their refusal of silence of the courts’ continued usage of uncredited family court evaluators. Seems they’ve been brewing up ways for years for the courts to make more money by causing divorces to be drawn-out and expensive for families. Oddly, just months ago, a federal judge deemed that CCFC’s RICO case was not frivolous or meant to harass; and at the same time dismissed the case because she claimed she couldn’t understand it.  This begs the question: How does one determine that a case is not without merit if they can’t understand it and thus need to throw it out?
October 28th, Ronald Pierce, a California citizen from Tulare County, filed a motion in the California Supreme Court for them to give him his life back.  The man requires extraordinary relief for this to happen. In 2008, Mr. Pierce filed for divorce from a woman he no longer wished to be wed to.   In 2009 via some slick lawyering aided by the courts and the divorce industry; he was deemed a batterer by the courts with no evidence presented that he ever once hit his wife. (She actually stated that he never did. I’ve reviewed the court documents in detail). Six years later, there is still no property settlement; there is second restraining order against Mr. Pierce (basically for posting of the court corruption on Facebook); and he still has no home for his children to come visit him. While trying to untangle the web of deceit, he was deemed a “vexatious litigant” on appellate court justices own motion. Mr. Pierce, who used to work for the county, is currently homeless, penniless and disabled from the years of abuse and mental torture by multiple officers of the California broken branch. By slick trick, Mrs. Pierce’s new husband is being treated to living in the property that Mr. Pierce still owns, yet cannot even set foot on. Mr. Pierce is justifiably concerned that he will soon be held in contempt of court and will be residing in jail for filing a motion in the California Supreme Court. This is because those who have been deemed vexatious are not allowed to file motions without the court’s permission or by the posting of $25,000.00 – which Mr. Pierce no longer has — thanks to the perverse and pervasive corruption in the California courts.
Could a “NO” Vote for ALL California Justices Save the Judicial Branch? Seems it could!CAMPAIGNFORJUDICIALINTEGRITYblowupofsixflyers-page-001
From ghosties and ghoulies and long-winded beasties and things that go bump in the courts, oh California voters, please protect us!
Have a Happy & Safe Halloween!
Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer — whistleblower of scientific fraud in U.S. public health policy over the Toxic Mold issue that has been aided to continue by mass corruption in the California courts.
Posted in Health - Medical - Science | Leave a comment