Shreveport, Louisiana – Criminal investigation says the city funded a housing scam against the poor, elderly and disabled

City audit confirms results in Shreveport housing probe

By Adam Kealoha Causey – December 24, 2009

A Shreveport audit backs findings from a criminal investigation that says the city funded a housing scam against the poor, elderly and disabled.

Some 81 percent of homes the city inspected after law enforcement stepped into the Community Development department show signs of shoddy work, according to the Shreveport internal auditor’s report. And 30 percent of the residences had incomplete repairs for which construction contractors received payment.

The audit examined Community Development’s Neighborhood Revitalization Program. That includes the Limited Repair Program, which is part of the criminal probe. Noted problems included leaky roofs, improperly anchored commodes and wrongly installed hot water heaters.

“Based on the results of our investigation it is our opinion that some of these actions, if proven in a court of law, could constitute fraud,” the report says. “As a result of the testwork we performed during this investigation, we documented other internal control weaknesses and will be providing an additional report concerning those issues for the Neighborhood Revitalization Program.”

The report found an additional contractor — besides four that were arrested in August — did not have proper credentials. Three Shreveport housing inspectors also were accused and remain banned from work.

Felony charges include filing false public records and contractor fraud. The seven — contractors Alphonso Williams, Santana Brown, Alex James III and James Lester and inspectors Ray Jones, Daniel Lacour and Jackie Mandigo have pleaded not guilty. Cases are pending in Caddo district court. Contractors made at least $315,000 since January 2008 on 25 Community Development projects.

The audit also showed unacceptable work done on homes through unpaid projects. Those include Paint Your Heart Out, which uses local volunteers, and World Changers, a partnership with the Southern Baptist Convention.

Caddo Sheriff Steve Prator, whose office initiated the legal case with the help of state police and the parish district attorney’s office, said his deputies reviewed the audit

“I was not pleased because you can’t be pleased that somebody gets duped out of their money,” Prator said Wednesday about the report’s results. “But it does give us the satisfaction to know that we’re exactly right in our findings.”

Mayor Cedric Glover said he was “disappointed in the number of discrepancies” but feels the city is moving in the right direction.

Besides firing the inspectors, Glover forced the resignation of a supervisor and other workers have been reassigned.

“Unfortunately, these same inspectors, supervisors and contractors were involved in several programs,” Glover said. “Although it appears there may be a couple of other contractors involved, I continue to hold the city inspectors and supervisors who were supposed to review and monitor these projects responsible. If further review indicates other culpable individuals, they will be appropriately disciplined.”

For the audit, the city hired an independent inspector to examine 37 houses out of about 200 homeowners it contacted. That contractor, who was paid $1,950 — $50 per house plus an extra $100 to review and discuss the report — is unnamed in the document, dated Dec. 14.

City Internal Auditor Leanis Graham said late Wednesday she would not release the inspector’s name without his permission.

Shreveport Chief Administrative Officer Dale Sibley identified the inspector as Benton-based Inertia Enterprises.

Prator’s special investigative team for political corruption, misspending and fraud — formed as a result of this investigation — still is examining potential criminal connections between Community Development and the Queensborough Neighborhood Association, the sheriff said. Some money flows from the department to the organization.

But the unit also is looking into other possible cases to hold other governments accountable, Prator said.

shreveporttimes

Information on Riverstone Residential knowingly exposing tenants to extreme amounts of mold toxins at Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments managed by Riverstone Residential

Riverstone Residential Litigation

Mold Inspection Reports

Photos of Mold in Apartment

Attorney Malpractice

A letter to the NAA regarding an email they deleted without reading – please retract your amicus in the Abad case in Arizona – it is fraud by a political action committee, the National Apartment Association, that is furthering another fraud by another political action committee, the US Chamber of Commerce

Political Action Committee – NAA – files Amicus Brief in mold case (two infant deaths in mold filled apt – Wasatch Prop Mgmt) citing US Chamber/ACOEM ‘litigation defense report’ to disclaim health effects of indoor mold & limit financial risk for industry

“Changes in construction methods have caused US buildings to become perfect petri dishes for mold and bacteria to flourish when water is added. Instead of warning the public and teaching physicians that the buildings were causing illness; in 2003 the US Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, a think-tank, and a workers comp physician trade organization mass marketed an unscientific nonsequitor to the courts to disclaim the adverse health effects to stave off liability for financial stakeholders of moldy buildings. Although publicly exposed many times over the years, the deceit lingers in US courts to this very day.” Sharon Noonan Kramer

Posted in Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Riverstone Residential makes the ‘Top 10 Multifamily News Stories of the Decade’

Another exciting list!  And what a coincidence that Hurricane Katrina made this list too since Riverstone Residential managed toxic mold infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments is in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.  This is one apartment complex where the mold infestation can’t be blamed on Katrina, it was already severe and had been spreading for years before katrina hit.

December 23, 2009
By:Chris Wood

Multifamily Executive scoured the headlines of the past decade to reflect on the 10 biggest news stories of the 2000s. Here’s a look back.

1)     Tishman Speyer and BlackRock’s purchase of Stuyvesant Town / Peter Cooper Village. In November 2006, Tishman Speyer and BlackRock Realty paid $5.4 billion for the 11,200-unit 56-building mega-apartment complex in New York City known as Stuyvesant Town / Peter Cooper Village, still the largest single U.S. multifamily property deal in history. The deal has faced problems from the start, not the least of which was the ownership group’s inability to make payments on its $3 billion mortgage, which was transferred to special servicing under CWCapital in November 2009. Mezzanine lenders on the deal purportedly have been wiped out, and on December 15, the New York State Supreme Court approved a deal to return 4,000 StuyTown units back to rent control after previously ruling that Tishman Speyer and BlackRock illegally turned them into market-rate units while still receiving J-51 tax abatements. 

2)     The Federal Takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. On September 7, 2008, Federal Housing Financing Agency director James Lockhart announced that government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were to be placed under FHFA conservatorship, a move supported by U.S. Treasury chief Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernake. One of the more sweeping moves by the federal government during the economic bailout, Fannie and Freddie have nonetheless remained true to the mulitfmaily component of their charters. That was National Multi Housing Council president Doug Bibby’s prediction at the time. Bibby also said, “it will be very much business as usual going forward. They’d be crazy not to make sure the markets function effectively. Those multifamily loans have been profitable for them and help them meet their mission very effectively.”

3)     Trammell Crow exits fee management; Riverstone Residential is born. In October 2005, the Trammell Crow Residential executive property management team of Christy Freeland and Terry Danner spun off the management portfolio of some 55,000 Trammell Crow units to create Riverstone Residential. Now a Consolidated American Services company—with Freeland and Danner still at the helm—Riverstone Residential has developed into a 182,000-unit property management behemoth through successive market acquisitions as well as organic growth, and continues to challenge Pinnacle for the top fee-management spot in the industry. The company has often been rumored to be an eventual IPO play, although Riverstone officials have never commented on their interest in going public. 

4)     Archstone-Smith deploys LRO yield management software. In March 2001, Archstone-Smith became the first in the industry to deploy revenue optimization software across its garden apartment communities. By year’s end, the entire garden portfolio and 75 percent of the newly acquired Charles E. Smith high-rise apartment portfolio had rolled out revenue management software to its leasing offices. Though the industry has been slow to adopt LRO and competing yield management technologies, including Carrolton, Texas-based RealPage’s Yieldstar and a revenue management component available as part of Santa-Barbara, Calif.-based Yardi’s Voyager system, by the end of the decade, the use of revenue management has become commonplace, with adopters experiencing rent uplifts between 2 percent and 5 percent from the “little black box.” 

5)     The Dismantling of JPI. On December 29, 2008, Carrollton, Texas-based multifamily technology products and services provider RealPage announced that it had acquired the JPI Resident Solutions team of multifamily technology advisors, led by industry veteran Henry Pye. Why the Irving, Texas-based owner/operator would choose to divest itself of its entire IT team became clear just a week later, when the company announced it had sole its entire 41,000-unit management portfolio to Charleston, S.C.-based Greystar Real Estate Partners. Although JPI has retained ownership of what it claims is a $2 billion multifamily asset portfolio, the company’s future continues to remain uncertain. In June 2009, Jim Butz, former president of JPI East, and Greg Lamb, former executive vice president of JPI East, announced that they’re leaving the firm to start Jefferson Apartment Group, effectively an asset-less spin-off of the JPI East operational platform. 

6)     The End of Construction. Iconic real estate magnate Donald Trump has always had a way with words, but when the Don announced in September 2008 at a topping-off ceremony for the Trump Tower in Chicago that high-rise construction as we know it was dead, who would have thought he would be right? Trump—like many developers—has since been forced to extend and even default on construction loans. Hamstrung by frozen capital markets and virtually zero construction lending to bridge projects beyond GSE agency financing, major multifamily developers have repositioned staff and mothballed operations. Even the most equity-flush developers are looking at the next 12 to 16 months as a continuation of the current era, devoid of development. 

7)     Archstone-Smith’s Privatization by Tishman Speyer and Lehman Bros. Holdings. On October 5, 2007, a partnership between Tishman Speyer and Lehman Bros. paid $22.2 billion to take Archstone-Smith out of the public markets. At the time, Archstone had a development pipeline approaching $8 billion but has since seen development activity grind to a halt even as its ownership group faces bankruptcy and trouble over other real esate deals due to the collapse of the U.S. economy. Expectations of a portfolio dump have not come to fruition. Indeed, the retention of CEO Scot Sellers and the core Archstone management team continues to add fuel to a rumor fire that says Archstone is quietly repositioning for an eventual IPO that would return the REIT back to the stock market. 

8)     Hurricane Katrina. On the morning of August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina made landfall on the Gulf Coast as the sixth-strongest Atlantic hurricane in recorded history, leaving in its wake hundreds of deaths and the destruction of more than 200,000 housing units. Major regional multifamily players were quick to assist in the disaster: Companies such as the Lynd Cos. and the Domain Cos. have done much since then to assist in the rebuilding effort of both hearth and heart. Since the hurricane, New Orleans alone has issued 4,803 commercial work permits for work valued at $3.1 billion, and the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act (or GO Zone Act) continues to encourage private investment into the Gulf Coast Rebuild. 

9)     September 11, 2001. The terrorist attacks on the United States at the dawning of the decade continue to define the society, politics, and economics of the country and its industries, and multifamily has not been immune. “I think 9/11 was a shocker for us,” says Rockrose Development Corp. president K. Thomas Elghanayan. “It really knocked the wind out of our sails. I think that’s true for all New York City developers. Everything was going great. There were some worrisome things on the radar screen, but, by and large, the office market was strong, the residential market was strong, and the future seemed so bright for New York that you could be optimistic.” Buildings not destroyed in lower Manhattan were mostly evacuated in the devastation ensuing form the collapse of the World Trade Center, and clean up efforts as well as hard-felt memories persist to this day. 

10) Changing of the Guard at HUD. On March 31, 2008, amidst charges of favoritism, retaliation, and inappropriate conduct, Alphonso Jackson announced his resignation as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). “He broke every business rule to keep his allegiance of social elites happy,” said one-time associate turned critic and Philadelphia Housing Authority Chief Carl Greene, who refused to participate in shady land deals to benefit Jackson’s friends and business partners. “He had a total collapse of his sense of morality and judgment. People are losing their houses everyday while he is riding around with a full security detail and chefs and jets, living the life of a king. Hopefully, he is the last king of HUD.” Little more was expected from interim chief Steve Preston, but the multifamily industry seemed to finally get what it was asking for when longtime industry veteran and affordable housing advocate Shaun Donovan was nominated to the HUD Secretary post by President Barack Obama.

multifamilyexecutive.com

Information on Riverstone Residential knowingly exposing tenants to extreme amounts of mold toxins at Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments managed by Riverstone Residential

Riverstone Residential Litigation

Mold Inspection Reports

Photos of Mold in Apartment

Attorney Malpractice

A letter to the NAA regarding an email they deleted without reading – please retract your amicus in the Abad case in Arizona – it is fraud by a political action committee, the National Apartment Association, that is furthering another fraud by another political action committee, the US Chamber of Commerce

Political Action Committee – NAA – files Amicus Brief in mold case (two infant deaths in mold filled apt – Wasatch Prop Mgmt) citing US Chamber/ACOEM ‘litigation defense report’ to disclaim health effects of indoor mold & limit financial risk for industry

“Changes in construction methods have caused US buildings to become perfect petri dishes for mold and bacteria to flourish when water is added. Instead of warning the public and teaching physicians that the buildings were causing illness; in 2003 the US Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, a think-tank, and a workers comp physician trade organization mass marketed an unscientific nonsequitor to the courts to disclaim the adverse health effects to stave off liability for financial stakeholders of moldy buildings. Although publicly exposed many times over the years, the deceit lingers in US courts to this very day.” Sharon Noonan Kramer

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Riverstone Residential, Toxic Mold, Whatever | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Toxic Tort Lawsuits Now Easier to Win in Michigan – The court left it to the DEFENDANT to DISPROVE that the mold exposure did not cause the alleged illnesses

By Saulius Mikalonis

December 22, 2009

The Michigan Court of Appeals in a case called Genna v Jackson recently ruled that plaintiffs alleging injury from exposure to mold did not have to present an expert witness to prove that they had suffered physical ailments as a result of exposure to mold.  According to the court, it was enough that mold was present and that the plaintiffs had physical ailments that could be attributed to mold exposure, even though they did not present a witness that could make a causal connection between the exposure and the injuries that the plaintiffs allegedly suffered.  The court left it to the defendant to disprove that the mold exposure did not cause the alleged illnesses.

One of the classes any first year law student must take is one called “torts.”  Torts is the area of law that describes lawsuits for things like personal injury or property damage outside the realm of contract law.  To maintain a cause of action for a tort, the plaintiff has the burden of proving (1) that the defendant owed a particular duty to the plaintiff, (2) that the defendant breached that duty, (3) the breach of that duty was the cause of an injury to the plaintiff, and (4) that the plaintiff suffered damages as a result.  Without any one of these elements, there is no cause of action against a particular defendant.  If the plaintiff is able to present a prima facie case (there is enough evidence to present to a jury according to a judge), then the burden to disprove any of these elements falls upon the defendant, but not before.  This is basic tort law every first-year student learns.

Of course, tort law is not as simple as all that, but I’ve described the bare bones of it.  The devil is in the details of each of the required elements.  The element that the Jenna v Jackson case deals with is number three, the plaintiffs’ burden to establish causation.  Normally, when dealing with complex scientific and medical detail, it is necessary to rely on expert witnesses to provide the necessary detail to juries, who likely do not have the necessary expertise in complex cases.

The Genna Court, however, decided that it was not necessary to use expert testimony to tie the plaintiffs’ claims of illness to the type of exposure, although often such a determination would need medical testimony that can connect the exposure to a specific illness that the plaintiff has suffered.  The medical doctors who treated the Genna plaintiffs could not state with a scientific medical certainty that the plaintiffs suffered a direct harm as a result of mold exposure, but the court determined that a lay jury could.  It then required the defendants to disprove the medical conclusion without it ever being introduced by the plaintiffs in the first place.

As it stands now, the law in the State of Michigan is that in toxic tort lawsuits, plaintiffs need not necessarily establish medical causation with respect to their claimed injuries.  It is enough that they can prove that an exposure occurred and that their symptoms are consistent with exposure to that type of toxic substance.  This would presumably hold true for mold exposures, as well as exposure to any sort of substance or cause, even electromagnetic fields.  This eases the plaintiffs’ burdens in such suits and makes them easier to win.

mlive.com

Political Action Committee – NAA – files Amicus Brief in mold case (two infant deaths in mold filled apt – Wasatch Prop Mgmt) citing US Chamber/ACOEM ‘litigation defense report’ to disclaim health effects of indoor mold & limit financial risk for industry

“Changes in construction methods have caused US buildings to become perfect petri dishes for mold and bacteria to flourish when water is added. Instead of warning the public and teaching physicians that the buildings were causing illness; in 2003 the US Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, a think-tank, and a workers comp physician trade organization mass marketed an unscientific nonsequitor to the courts to disclaim the adverse health effects to stave off liability for financial stakeholders of moldy buildings. Although publicly exposed many times over the years, the deceit lingers in US courts to this very day.” Sharon Noonan Kramer

Information on Riverstone Residential knowingly exposing tenants to extreme amounts of mold toxins at Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments managed by Riverstone Residential

Riverstone Residential Litigation

Mold Inspection Reports

Photos of Mold in Apartment

Attorney Malpractice

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Report finds poor ethics policing at CDC

By MIKE STOBBE (AP) – 2 days ago

ATLANTA — The government’s top public health agency frequently failed to police its outside experts for conflicts of interest, according to a new government report released Friday.

The report looked at how well the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention looked for and dealt with conflicts among about 250 scientific experts who served on 17 advisory panels in 2007.

Panel members are supposed to disclose whether they have been paid by — or own stock in — drug companies or other entities that might have an interest in the panel’s decisions. The panels provide advice to the CDC on topics such as how many people should get vaccinated and guidelines for cancer screenings.

Almost none of the 250 advisers that year properly or completely filled out forms in which they were required to state potential conflicts of interest, according to the report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the Inspector General.

The report concluded that the CDC failed to follow-up with some of the experts who disclosed potential conflicts: 85 because of jobs or grants, 28 with stock ownership and 13 who received consulting fees.

CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden, who took over the agency in June, filed a response that said the agency has improved its monitoring for conflicts of interest. CDC also is taking other steps to simplify reporting of conflicts and to develop new ways of finding out about experts’ grants, he wrote.

Conflicts of interest are not unusual. Many science experts have links to companies that sell medical products, or work for universities that seek government grants. In some cases, experts avoid conflicts by not voting on certain issues, or by selling off their stock. The CDC can also work out an agreement with an expert — called a waiver — spelling out when they can cast votes.

But even in those cases, the rules were sometimes disregarded. Seven people — all of them on the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health — voted on matters barred on their waivers, the report found.

CDC officials disputed that finding. It may have appeared from meeting minutes that the experts voted inappropriately, but a review found nothing inappropriate actually occurred, said CDC spokesman Tom Skinner.

The Office of the Inspector General has been examining conflicts of interest at several federal health agencies, including the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration.

One member of Congress, Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., said the findings were concerning.

“The work of the CDC is too important to be tainted in any way,” DeLauro said in a statement. She sits on the appropriations subcommittee that has sway over the budgets of the CDC and other health agencies.

google.com/hostednews

Political Action Committee – NAA – files Amicus Brief in mold case (two infant deaths in mold filled apt – Wasatch Prop Mgmt) citing US Chamber/ACOEM ‘litigation defense report’ to disclaim health effects of indoor mold & limit financial risk for industry

“Changes in construction methods have caused US buildings to become perfect petri dishes for mold and bacteria to flourish when water is added. Instead of warning the public and teaching physicians that the buildings were causing illness; in 2003 the US Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, a think-tank, and a workers comp physician trade organization mass marketed an unscientific nonsequitor to the courts to disclaim the adverse health effects to stave off liability for financial stakeholders of moldy buildings. Although publicly exposed many times over the years, the deceit lingers in US courts to this very day.” Sharon Noonan Kramer

Information on Riverstone Residential knowingly exposing tenants to extreme amounts of mold toxins at Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments managed by Riverstone Residential

Riverstone Residential Litigation

Mold Inspection Reports

Photos of Mold in Apartment

Attorney Malpractice

Posted in Health - Medical - Science, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Highbridge tenants prepare for court battle – suing landlord for failing to make repairs – mold

By Daniel Beekman

A Highbridge Avenue apartment building is headed for a battle royal in court. On Tuesday, November 17, tenants at 1380 University Avenue announced a lawsuit against landlord Martin Carlin, who has allegedly failed to repair apartments and keep elevators in order.

Months ago, tenant leaders at the building discovered that Carlin had allegedly accepted millions of dollars in Mitchell-Lama tax credits although 1380 University Avenue is no longer a Mitchell-Lama development. Tenant leaders also believe that Carlin has breached rent regulation rules.“There are still rats,” tenant leader Victoria Lassiter said. “There is mold. There are broken terraces. The elevators are out of order more often than not.”

There are 278 open city Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) violations at 1380 University Avenue, a 17-story, 139-unit building. The violations range from mold to broken locks on the building’s front door, broken windows and doors, damaged walls, leaks and vermin.

Lassiter and tenant leader Barbara Williamson began to organize at 1380 University Avenue in the spring. In May, tenants bused to City Hall to protest conditions at the building. In June, representatives for Councilwoman Helen Diane Foster and Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr. toured 1380 University Avenue.

Meanwhile, Carlin had sued Lassiter and Williamson for back rent, and in a June interview with the Bronx Times, blamed tenant leaders for the trouble. Lassiter, Williamson and a handful of other tenants are still in court, as Carlin has sued for back rent; the Legal Aid Society helped persuade a judge to try the tenants’ cases together. Carlin and his lawyer, Eric Wughalter, chose not to comment for this story.

The dispute at 1380 University Avenue eventually attracted lawyers from the Urban Justice Center and advocates from the Community Association for Safe Apartments (CASA), who helped Lassiter, Williamson and 55 additional tenants sue Carlin for repairs. The first court date is Monday, January 4, Tamara Czyzyk of CASA said.

Carlin opted out of the Mitchell-Lama affordable housing program in 1997 but continued to accept Mitchell-Lama tax breaks and failed to re-register the building as rent-regulated, Czyzyk alleged. The landlord has completed a number of illegal apartment conversions at 1380 University Avenue, Lassiter said. Her apartment was converted from a two to a three bedroom, she stated.

Lawyers are in the process of computing the appropriate rent for tenants at the building.

HPD agents offered Carlin 90 days to explain the Mitchell-Lama tax breaks but the landlord failed to respond, Williamson alleged. She hopes the Department of Finance goes after Carlin. In June, an HPD spokesman stated that the city had never encountered a situation like Carlin’s before.

yournabe.com

Political Action Committee – NAA – files Amicus Brief in mold case (two infant deaths in mold filled apt – Wasatch Prop Mgmt) citing US Chamber/ACOEM ‘litigation defense report’ to disclaim health effects of indoor mold & limit financial risk for industry

“Changes in construction methods have caused US buildings to become perfect petri dishes for mold and bacteria to flourish when water is added. Instead of warning the public and teaching physicians that the buildings were causing illness; in 2003 the US Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, a think-tank, and a workers comp physician trade organization mass marketed an unscientific nonsequitor to the courts to disclaim the adverse health effects to stave off liability for financial stakeholders of moldy buildings. Although publicly exposed many times over the years, the deceit lingers in US courts to this very day.” Sharon Noonan Kramer

Information on Riverstone Residential knowingly exposing tenants to extreme amounts of mold toxins at Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments managed by Riverstone Residential

Riverstone Residential Litigation

Mold Inspection Reports

Photos of Mold in Apartment

Attorney Malpractice

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment