Riverstone – City Hall finds violations at Arboretum

By Melody Hanatani

CITY HALL — One by one they alleged unsatisfactory living conditions, with some claiming mold contamination in their units, others retaliation and discrimination by the management company.

All spoke with slight hesitance.

Almost nine months after a group of working poor and Section 8 residents addressed the City Council about problems at The Plaza at the Arboretum, City Hall has released a report outlining the results of an investigation into the apartment complex, finding violations involving unqualified tenants living in low-income designated units.

City Hall issued a corrective action plan to the Arboretum, outlining several steps that need to be taken before another audit is conducted in about six months, including moving the current tenants who exceed the income qualification to moderate and market rate units and providing the missing documents.

The tenants spoke of a number of issues during the council meeting in late April of 2008, complaining about everything from mold to unattended broken utilities, some alluding to feeling threatened by the management company. A few tenants also claimed that several of the units that were designated for low-to-moderate income residents were occupied by those with higher earning levels.

“The tenants do still have problems regarding the management, how they treat the low and moderate income tenants and some of the business practices they have been engaging there that I don’t think have changed significantly,” Denise McGranahan, an attorney with the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, said.

The nonprofit organization and Bet Tzedek, which works with low-income seniors, have been assisting the Arboretum tenants in their claims against the company, Riverstone Property Management.

The Arboretum, which opened in 2001 at 2200 Colorado Ave., has 350 total units, approximately 97 of which are deed-restricted for low-to-moderate income residents. About 51 of the units are designated for Section 8 tenants, who receive subsidies from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

City Hall requested documentation for tenants of all deed-restricted units, asking for information related to their income eligibility, move-in date, and initial and current rent. City staff then thoroughly audited 15 of the non-Section 8 units, finding that while nine of the households met the income requirement, two went over the threshold and another four lacked sufficient documents. The audit also revealed that three leasing agents employed by Riverstone Property Management, which has been overseeing the complex since November, were sharing one of the designated low-income apartments and exceeded the income requirement. Metric Properties was the previous management company.

The investigation also found that only eight of the 15 sampled tenants received preference for living or working in Santa Monica while only one was found to be selected from City Hall’s affordable housing waiting list. There was no documentation as to whether the tenants from the other units came from the waiting list or if the management company found them on their own.

“It’s not clear how they came to arrive at the Arboretum,” Barbara Collins, the housing manager for City Hall, said.

All Section 8 tenants were appropriately selected from the Housing Authority’s wait list, the report stated.

Inspectors also interviewed 13 tenants about the company’s customer service, all of whom reported that they had no issues and found the manager to be responsive to their requests for maintenance. City Hall also found no health or safety code violations.

Some residents have complained that their units are located in less desirable locations because they are low-income. The report stated that the placement of deed restricted units was determined during the planning approval process, allowing the developer to place the market-rate apartments in more scenic locations.

The staff report also addressed discrimination complaints that were filed by 14 disabled tenants against the Arboretum, finding that only one case actually dealt with discrimination. The remaining complaints pertained to requests denied for reasonable accommodations.

Following a meeting with the City Attorneys’ Office, Riverstone agreed to fulfill nearly all of the requests.

City Hall plans to conduct a follow-up investigation later this year and could pursue enforcement with the City Attorney’s Office if no corrective action is taken.

“We are working with the appropriate agencies to resolve any issues,” Valerie Covarrubias, the spokeswoman for Riverstone, said.

Covarrubias said the company had no further comment.

The Legal Aid Foundation and Bet Tzedek continue to receive cases from residents though Collins said City Hall does not have any outstanding complaints.

McGranahan said tenants are concerned that the property management company will not change unless they are forced by City Hall.

“We are hopeful that whatever remedial plan they came up with will be effective and benefit the tenants who badly need affordable housing in the city,” McGranahan said.

City Hall finds violations at Arboretum

Posted in Mold Litigation | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Video – how mold and mycotoxins form and the serious health effects

A short video on how mold and mycotoxins form and the serious health effects – http://videos.howstuffworks.com/discovery-health/14560-human-atlas-mold-video.htm

blogs.myspace.com

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Here is the truth about MOLD – How does it make us sick?

Mold is everywhere. It grows on anything, including concrete, furniture, clothing, and even jet fuel. When mold gets wet and stays wet for 24 to 48 hours, it begins to grow and releases mold spores (sporulate). These spores carry on them mycotoxins. These mycotoxins are, yes, you guessed it, highly toxic. The most toxic substance known to humans is Aflatoxin which is a mycotoxin released by a mold called Aspergillus.

Let’s look at mold spores first. We have seen in the news and on TV how the mold spore count is up, etc. These outdoor molds can cause breathing and allergy type problems such as asthma. So some say if there are molds everywhere how can a person become sick from this? There is a vast difference between the molds outdoors and molds growing in you home or workplace. How many square feet is you home, or the place where you found mold? Then ask yourself how many square feet is the open air outdoors? What if I put a bag of sugar in the Gulf of Mexico? Will it make Alantic ocean sweet? No! But if I put just a teaspoon of sugar in my glass of iced tea, I will be able to taste it.

When you have an indoor water leak, either from a roof leak, a leak from flashing around the chimney, a damaged pipe, etc. this water will help molds grow and multiply, releasing spores and mycotoxins. It will also help bacteria (both gram positive and negative for you microbiologists out there) grow and these bacteria will release harmful endotoxins. All these toxins combine with what is in their immediate area (dry wall, plastic, glue on the back of wall paper, paint, etc) to produce volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) and these in turn are can be quite toxic.

A toxic soup?

What happens when there is a leak (water intrusion is a better definition) into a home or indoor space or area, the growth of these microorganisms such as molds and bacteria, the release of their toxins and the VOC’s they generate forms a toxic soup. And this is what make people sick, this contaminated indoor environment.

The next question that comes to mind is: if this is cleaned up or if I move away will I get well again? In general, people will feel slightly better once they are removed from this contaminated indoor environment. But it will not reverse the damage done to their health.

Our medical center will review with you your medical records and testing you may have had so that it doesn’t have to be repeated. There are tests to see what molds and what mycotoxins may have affected you. Once we know what parts of you have been damaged and how severely, then we can start treatment.

Mycotoxins

There are many. One mold does not produce one mycotoxin, but a series of mycotoxins. There are studies that show that Stachybotrys produces trichothecenes, a highly toxic mycotoxin. Trichothecenes were used in the ….Vietnam…. conflict and by Saddam Hussein in his Scud missile warhead. Trichothecenes are well known in biological warfare. If you go to the CDC website and type in “trichothecene”, it will tell you how dangerous it is and cites 4 studies for more information. I am one of the authors of the 3rd study cited.

Other mycotoxins include aflatoxins, one of the most toxic substances known to humankind, satratoxins, T-2 toxins, deoxynivalenol which is known to mimic hormones in adults and children, causing endocrine problems. These are usually misdiagnosed by most physicians.

By the way, did you know that many of the drugs used to suppress the immune system are derived from mycotoxins? It should come as no surprise then that mycotoxins do overpower the immune system.

Dr. Andrew Campbell, MD at immunotoxicology.com

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Family Awarded $4.75 Million for Toxic Mold in House

Jan 11, 2009
Tisha Thompson
FOX 5 Reporter

The Meng family spent nearly a million dollars to build what they thought would be their dream home. But, less than two months after moving in, 35 year-old Wendy Meng started to have such severe migraines and dizziness, she ended up in the hospital.

“They thought I had a brain tumor or adrenal gland cancer,” she says. “There were many things they tested. They could see I was so sick, but they couldn’t figure it out.

The family dog suddenly died. Her younger daughter started having uncontrollable nose bleeds while the rest of the family developed asthma. 

Doctors finally diagnosed Wendy with neurotoxicity. The Mengs say her body was full of poison, caused by a potentially-lethal combination of microscopic mold growing behind the walls of their home.

Wendy’s husband Paul says, “The challenge is that it was a new home. It’s the last thing you’re thinking about. You look at the walls, the walls are white. You don’t see any obvious water stains.”

The Meng’s lawyer, David Wise, says The Drees Company didn’t wait for wet timbers in the frame of the house to dry after it rained.

“You want to make sure the wood isn’t still wet,” Wise says. “They put in the drywall and insulation over wet wood and all the experts agree, if you cover up the wet wood, its going to allow the mold to grow.”

The Mengs says the result was worse than a fire because everything they owned became contaminated and had to be destroyed. They sued The Drees Company, which did not respond for a request for comment on this story.

In late December, a judge ordered The Drees Company to pay the Mengs $4.75 million. Wise says he expects the company to appeal the case.  

The family hopes to use the money to buy a new home and pay off their medical bills.

“You know, it’s a huge amount of money,” Wendy says. “We basically want to restart our lives, we lost our home, we lost our health, I’ll never be well again and neither will my daughter.”

myfoxdc.com

VIDEO: Family’s Mold Nightmare – myfoxdc.com video

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold Litigation, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Latest from the Resident Sand Strivers – The Vintage At Bend – Riverstone Residential – Voting Fraud!

Not only does Riverstone fix things to go their way in court – they fix their own voting results too!  katy

Stolen!

There was a recent election at the Vintage At Bend… and it was stolen!

The election was not announced to Residents, it was conducted secretly, ballots were hand delivered to a select group of Residents, but not to all eligible Resident voters, and Residents may never see the results!

The election was a referendum conducted by office staff to establish a Resident’s vote of confidence in staff job performance.

Presumably, the results of the referendum, if positive, will be given to Riverstone Residential management superiors as supportive evidence of the office staff’s “job well done” to offset the spate of recent Resident issues.

A copy of the ballot text was obtained and is reproduced below.

HOW WAS YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH US TODAY?

PLEASE WRITE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW AND PLACE IN THE BOX OUTSIDE THE OFFICE DOOR.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE US TO RESPOND TO YOUR COMMENTS PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR CONTACT INFORMATION.

THIS FORM IS STRICTLY FOR YOUR COMMENTS ON EXPERIENCE WITH THE STAFF.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

THE VINTAGE AT BEND

DATE:______________

TIME:______________

The referendum is not fair and balanced as not all Residents were informed of a referendum nor given ballots nor allowed to vote their experiences with staff, just a favored few. Therefore the results are guaranteed to be those desired by those conceiving and conducting the referendum.

These actions better resemble juvenile immaturity rather than professional property management. But they are serious matters with serious consequences.

Residents who were not informed of the referendum and because of the secrecy did not have the opportunity to express the quality of their experiences with office staff can and should still vote and let their voices be heard!

Email your vote to John, Vintage At Bend Regional Manager.

john.crawford@riverstoneres.com

I am sure he will appreciate hearing from you!

GuyDemaupa@gmail.com

residentsandstriver

Posted in Riverstone Residential | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment