The connection between the author of ‘The Challenge of Mold’ – CAS – Recap Advisors – Riverstone Residential – and Toxic Jefferson Lakes Apartments

All explained in a few more days but for now please read about the author’s views on illness and mold.   

The Affordable Housing Institute – The Challenge of Mold

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, Mold Litigation, Riverstone Residential, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Texas jury awards $1.2 million to 28 residents of subsidized housing in mold case – Galveston – 2004

This was in 2004 but I have never seen this case.  Of course, 2004 was before I knew what this was all about and would have prefered to keep it that way.  Others decided to ‘expose’ us to all this.  katy

by Harris Martin Publishing – August 24, 2004

GALVESTON, Texas — A unanimous Texas state court jury ended a two-week trial on July 23 by awarding $1,238,000 on property damage claims by 28 residents of subsidized housing. Auzston v. Elder, et al., No. 02CV0305 (Texas 122nd Dist., Galveston City.).

Brian Auzston and 27 other residents of the Bay Colony Apartments in Galveston complained that they began experiencing mold problems in December 2001, shortly after moving into the newly built complex. The complex was built and owned by defendant Vestcor Development Corp., based in Jacksonville, Fla. The subsidy was in the form of tax credits.

Management notified residents by letter six months later that concrete had not properly cured and had allowed excessive moisture into the units. Residents complained they were promised a remedy that was not forthcoming, and were told to use bleach to kill visible mold.

Plaintiffs sued Charlene Elder, doing business as Alpha Barnes Real Estate Services, Vestcor Companies Inc., Vestcor Development Inc., and Bay Colony Limited Partnership.

Plaintiffs did not seek personal injury damages, but asked to recover the value of furniture and personal items that were damaged and thrown away.

Plaintiffs also sought damages for mental anguish, damaged credit, attorneys fees, and alleged violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, alleging that defendants demanded sums not due and threatened plaintiffs with eviction without due process, and reported plaintiffs to credit bureaus when they withheld rental payments.

One plaintiff, William C. Hunt, sought an additional one month’s rent plus a statutory penalty of $100 for what he termed a bad faith Forcible Detainer lawsuit. Hunt complained that he was constructively evicted because of moisture and mold problems and that the lawsuit, which was dismissed, was harassment.

Other plaintiffs alleged that negative information about them was passed to a credit bureau.

Plaintiffs’ only expert witnesses were Ron McKee of McKee Environmental on mold test results and their attorney, Robert Clemens, on attorney fees. Defendants relied on testimony from Elder and another property manager.

Judge John Elisor presided at trial.

Jurors deliberated for six hours, according to counsel, before making the following unanimous findings:

that the Vestcor defendants breached lease agreements with each plaintiff

That all defendants violated the DTPA by committing false, misleading or deceptive acts;

that all defendants failed to comply with written or implied warranties.

That Vestcor entities and the Bay Colony Limited Partnership were 90 percent liable and property manager Charlene Elder (d/b/a Alpha Barnes) was 10 percent liable.

Jurors also found that the DTPA violations were made knowingly and willfully.

Plaintiffs were awarded amounts ranging from $4,000 to $15,000 for personal property losses ($204,500 total), $750 each for damage to credit reputation ($19,500 total), $8,000 for mental anguish($208,000 total) and $25,000 each in exemplary damages ($650,000).

Jurors also awarded$150,000 in attorneys’ fees and $71,000 in prejudgment interest, for a total award of $1,238,000. It was reported that Vestcor’s insurer is Zurich.

Counsel reported that the Auzston plaintiffs demanded $350,00 at mediation, while the Vestcor defendants offered $48,000. Vestcor increased the offer to $75,000 after the jury reached a verdict but before it was announced.

Robert D. Clements Jr. and Paula Welch of Clements & Associates in Alvin, Texas, represent the Auzston plaintiffs.

healthandenergy.com

Posted in Civil Justice, Environmental Health Threats, Mold Litigation, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Most corrupt state – Louisiana ranked higher than Illinois

Blagojevich made U.S. news, but graft is old hat in the Big Easy

By Howard Witt – Tribune correspondent

NEW ORLEANS — A couple of months ago, an obscure New Orleans tax assessor was ticketed for allegedly using flashing blue police lights illegally mounted on his car to weave his way through a traffic jam.

As public corruption allegations in Louisiana go, it was strictly penny-ante stuff. This is, after all, a legendarily crooked state where a former governor has been keeping a federal prison cell warm for more than six years for extortion, racketeering and fraud; a recently defeated congressman is about to go on trial on allegations he stashed $90,000 in loot in his kitchen freezer; and a suburban New Orleans mayor is under scrutiny for receiving gift cards, a hunting bow and a gun cabinet bought with donations to a Toys for Tots Christmas fund.

Yet the minor story of the tax assessor with the police emergency lights was major news here in the newspapers and on radio, television and Internet message boards. And that, local corruption fighters are daring to hope, is a measure of progress.

“We used to say that in Louisiana we like our food spicy and our politicians colorful,” said Rafael Goyeneche, president of the Metropolitan Crime Commission, a corruption watchdog group. “But lately we have noticed a shift in the public’s attitude toward corruption. It’s no longer a spectator sport. People don’t want to tolerate it anymore.”

The beleaguered residents of Illinois may be squirming over their newfound visibility in the pantheon of corrupt states, thanks to the extravagant malefaction allegedly committed by the recently ousted governor, Rod Blagojevich.

But for genuine, savory, infused-in-the-gumbo style public venality, Louisiana still has Illinois, and most of America, beat. Ranked according to corruption convictions per capita from 1998-2007, Louisiana is No. 3, well ahead of Illinois at No. 19. (Only Washington, D.C., and North Dakota ranked higher—and in North Dakota’s case, the results were skewed because of its extremely small population.)

The jobbery here is so much like elevator music—ubiquitous, inevitable and part of the background of daily life—that the state legislature declined to pass a law in the last session that would have cut off state pensions for public officials convicted of corruption. Why, the prudent legislators reasoned, should they have to pay twice if they get caught stealing from the public purse?

Consider just a few of the more spectacular recent corruption cases:

•The former president of the New Orleans City Council is serving a 3-year federal prison sentence for taking $15,000 in bribes and kickbacks for a parking garage contract.

•The former chief executive of the state’s property insurance corporation was indicted in December on charges he stole up to $100,000 in public money.

•The former head of the Louisiana Film Commission is awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty to accepting $60,000 in bribes.

•A former state senator is awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering.

In the last six years, the U.S. attorney for the New Orleans district has issued 236 corruption indictments, and many more may be on the way.

Prominent scandals under investigation by the FBI include a federally financed New Orleans housing agency set up to rehabilitate houses damaged by Hurricane Katrina that allegedly spent millions but did little or no work, and a City Hall contract to install a network of crime-surveillance cameras that the New Orleans inspector general says resulted in $4 million in mysterious overpayments for a system that mostly doesn’t function.

“I am absolutely certain we have increased the paranoia level on the part of those who would abuse the public trust,” said U.S. Atty. Jim Letten, who cemented his reputation as a corruption fighter as the prosecutor who sent former Louisiana Gov. Edwin Edwards to prison. “If you’re a corrupt public official, we want you to be nervous. You will never know if the businessman or woman you are trying to shake down is wearing a wire.”

Law-enforcement officials believe that the devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, when 80 percent of New Orleans flooded after the city’s crumbling levees failed, was a turning point. Residents and businesspeople returned to New Orleans determined to cleanse their hobbled city of the mildew of decades of public corruption.

Suddenly victims started picking up their phones to report attempted shakedowns, or sliding incriminating documents over law-enforcement transoms, officials say.

And in 2007, Louisiana voters elected Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal on a reformist anti-corruption platform—and Jindal promptly pushed through a package of legislative reforms including expanded whistle-blower protections, new limits on lobbyist gifts to lawmakers and prohibitions against state officials taking state contracts.

“The average person out there understands now that public corruption has adversely affected his or her quality of life, whether it’s the crumbling streets they drive on, the dismal state of the public school system, the crime rate or the lack of jobs,” Letten said. “The tolerance of corruption was partly a belief that it was a way of life, that it was so entrenched and endemic that it was untouchable and unreachable. Now the average citizen believes that something can be done about it.”

Of course, not everything has changed.

New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin, who campaigned for office seven years ago as a reformer, has lately been resisting news media requests to release his official city e-mails and refused City Council demands to fire the official who oversaw the crime-camera contract that is now under investigation. Nagin’s office also put up numerous administrative and financial roadblocks as the city’s first inspector general tried to set up his newly created office in 2007.

But the current inspector general, Leonard Odom—who worked as the inspector general for the Chicago Housing Authority from 1996-2002—has not been deterred.

On a wall in his office is a sprawling work-in-progress: an attempt to diagram, with scores of yellow Post-it notes, every arcane, off-the-books board, commission and agency in New Orleans’ tangled city bureaucracy. So far, investigators have found more than 140 agencies that are not included in any city audit.

“Here’s one: something called the Delgado-Albania Plantation Commission,” Odom said, pointing at a random sticky note. “They get about $37,000 a year, but we don’t know what they do. But we’re going to find out.” 

chicagotribune.com

A corruption smackdown between Louisiana and Illiniois

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mold can pose health hazards – remains unregulated

By Aly Van Dyke

March 16, 2009

Patrick Salsbury noticed the dark green mold lining his walls the first day he moved into his Stadium View apartment last August.

After one night in the room, Salsbury and his girlfriend Shelby Lewis, both Kansas University sophomores, woke up with fevers, runny noses and nausea.

Mold grows in humid and poorly ventilated areas. Though mold is often a health hazard, many states, including Kansas, don’t have standards regulating mold in buildings or homes. The lack of regulation has made stories like Lewis and Salsbury’s more common.

Jerry Collier and fiancé Michele Belcher recently lost their home, 1945 Ky., and health to mold. The couple developed asthma — a condition neither had before — two weeks after moving into the home last August. They’ve since moved out and are suing their landlord, Alan Vitt, for negligence. Vitt, who declined to comment for this story, has put the house back up for rent.

Jessica Rose, a single mother from Lawrence, said the mold in her Edgewood apartment contributed to the loss of her job and has caused sustained health problems. She said her employer told her that she had too many sick days, which were needed to care for herself and her 3-year-old son, Jaden. She was moved to a different apartment after months of complaints, but is still unemployed, and continues to experience headaches and sinus problems.

Barbara Huppee, executive director of Lawrence Douglas-County Housing Authority, which manages Edgewood Apartments, said the scientific testing of the apartment was negative for mold and that the authority believes it has done its due diligence in this instance.

Last year, 22 percent of all health complaints to the Lawrence Department of Health dealt with mold, according to Lisa Horn, LDH spokeswoman. But the health department, code enforcement and other agencies are powerless when it comes to mold.

Kansas, like most states, doesn’t have clear standards that define the rights of tenants and the proper procedure of testing and removing mold.

Although a few states, such as Texas and New York, have guidelines for mold testing and removal, the United States hasn’t established federal mold regulations.

Robert Brandys, director of the Indoor Air Quality Association, said the United States is the only industrialized country without a national mold standard.

Mold can be found everywhere in the form of microscopic spores. Once the spores latch onto a surface, they can grow into a multicolored fungus within two days. Exposure to this mold can cause breathing problems and hay-fever-like symptoms.

Lawrence Code Enforcement Manager, Brian Jimenez, said once the spores find the right conditions — moisture, heat and poor ventilation — mold can grow anywhere from the ceiling of a bathroom to the wall behind the couch.

“It’s important to know that most houses will have some type of mold somewhere,” Jimenez said. “That’s just a fact.”

Mold is classified as either toxic or non-toxic. And while non-toxic molds, like penicillin, are more common in homes than the toxic species, Greg Crable, an Environmental Protection Agency architect, said all mold should be treated with caution.

“The EPA’s position is that mold is something that can cause health problems,” Crable said. “It doesn’t matter what type of mold you’re dealing with.”

A section of mold under 10 square feet can be removed without severe reconstruction, said Jeff Goldman, owner of Paul Davis Restoration. Otherwise, he said, a professional company will need to remove the mold. Professional removal can cost anywhere from $2,000 to more than $100,000.

Under Lawrence’s Landlord and Tenant Act, landlords have a responsibility “to provide the tenant a safe, habitable place to live that complies with applicable building and housing codes.”

But there isn’t a code for mold, and proving the home poses a health hazard can be difficult.

To prove the mold has caused a health hazard, the renter can either test the home for mold or get an allergy test. The most accurate mold tests cost between $100 and $400.

Without a mold standard or proof of a health hazard, Jimenez said, code enforcement officers “have their hands tied.”

“It’s really tough for tenants because they truly believe they are in an environment that is not healthy,” he said. “But from a code enforcement viewpoint, there’s nothing on the books.”

This is especially true if the mold isn’t visible. Jimenez said the city code enforcement can respond to a mold complaint only if the mold can be seen. Otherwise, he said, it’s “strictly speculation,” and the office has no jurisdiction.

Should tenants find themselves in this situation, Robert Baker, Housing and Credit Counseling adviser, stressed the need for documentation.

“If the landlord refuses to fix the problem, since nothing is outlined in strict code, it may come down to what a court decides,” Baker said. “And the courts are going to look at who has the best documentation.”

He said tenants need to be their own advocates.

“The tenant has to be dedicated to solving the problem,” Baker said. “They can’t expect to make a call and have someone solve it for them.”

Despite making several maintenance requests to First Management, Salsbury, the KU student, still has the mold in his apartment, and a headache he can’t shake. Lewis said she continues to regularly miss work and school from illness.

First Management, Salsbury and Lewis’ landlord, didn’t respond to Lawrence Journal-World questions.

“It’s two people against an entire company that’s way bigger than us,” Lewis said. “There needs to be some kind of living standard without going through hoops to get someone to do something.”

2.ljworld.com

Note – As far as this statement – “If the landlord refuses to fix the problem, since nothing is outlined in strict code, it may come down to what a court decides,” Baker said. “And the courts are going to look at who has the best documentation.”

That’s if you can get to court – court-transcript-judge-timothy-kelly    katy

Mold complaints

The Lawrence Department of Health reported the following complaints from 2007 and 2008:

2007

Total complaints: 197

Mold complaints: 27

Housing complaints: 17 housing

2008

Total complaints: 244

Mold complaints: 41

Housing complaints: 12

Footnote: Housing complaints mostly consist of issues with mold, according to LDH spokeswoman Lisa Horn.

 

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Latest review of toxic mold infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments – PROCEED WITH CAUTION!!!!

Date posted: 3/19/2009
Years at this apartment: 2008 – 2009

WELL..IT LOOKS NICE ON THE OUTSIDE!!! REEL ‘EM IN!!  BUT WAIT UNTIL YOU HAVE A PROBLEM.  I READ THIS BEFORE I MOVED IN WHILE IN ANOTHER STATE, BUT I GUESS I AM A GLUTEN FOR PUNISHMENT.  I AM CURRENTLY LOOKING FOR ANOTHER PLACE TO LIVE.  I WAS LIED TO AT FIRST AND WAS TOLD I WAS MOVING IN A TOWNHOUSE…TWICE.  SOME OF THE STAFF IS NICE.  WHEN YOU HAVE A PROBLEM, YOU ARE GIVEN A CONFIRMATION NUMBER AND YOU BETTER PRAY YOU GET WHATEVER YOU NEED DONE.  NOW IF THEY CAN FIX UP THE APARTMENTS LIKE THEY RENOVATED THAT BIG BEAUTIFUL LEASING OFFICE, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE ANY COMPLAINTS.  MY APARTMENT WAS FILTHY WHEN I MOVED IN.  YOU CAN TELL THEY RUSHED TO GET IT READY.  YES THEY ARE NICE TO YOU AT FIRST BECAUSE THE LEASING SPECIALIST GET AN INCENTIVE WHEN THEY HELP YOU.  AFTER THE FAKE SMILES, AND THAT LEASE IS SIGNED..GIVE YOUR SOUL TO THE LORD..BECAUSE YOUR ASS BELONGS TO THEM.  MAKE SURE THE APARTMENT YOU SEE AT FIRST, IS THE ONE YOU ARE GOING TO LIVE IN.  DON’T BE FOOLED BY THE OUTSIDE, AND HOW NICE THE LEASING OFFICE LOOKS.

And those are not the worst of the problems there.  katy 

apartmentratings.com

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Louisiana Housing Finance Agency, Mold Litigation, Riverstone Residential | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment