Dr. James Craners letter of the ACOEM’s Deceit On Mold – a litigation “defense report”

A Critique of the ACOEM Statement on Mold: Undisclosed Conflicts of Interest in the Creation of an “Evidence-based” Statement

JAMES CRANER, MD, MPH, FACOEM, FACP

Abstact
 
In 2003, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) published its evidence-based statement, “Adverse Human Health Effects Associated with Molds in the Indoor Environment,” in its Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (JOEM). ACOEM’s author selection, development, peer review, and publication of its mold position paper involved a series of seemingly biased and ethically dubious decisions and ad hoc methods. The resulting position which omitted or inadequately acknowledged research validating the association between mold and building-related symptoms. ACOEM nonetheless released the paper as an “evidence-based” statement and then published it in JOEM without any further changes or conflict disclosure. The Mold Statement has been relied upon by attorneys and expert witnesses representing defendants in mold litigation to disclaim and invalidate individuals’, families’, and workers’ claims of building related health effects from indoor mold exposure.
 
A Critique of the ACOEM Statement on Mold – PDF

International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, Vol 14, No 4 (2008)

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Riverstone Residential, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mold Lady Leaves Long Trail Of Questions (Linda May)

by Paul C. Clark – Staff Writer
September 03, 2009

Two women have come forward questioning Linda K. May, the woman who in May and June made herself the centerpiece of the Oak Ridge Elementary School environmental mystery, for her dealings in workers’ compensation cases in California and Michigan.

Until now, the focus on May has been the medical tests she is offering to sell to Oak Ridge parents and to ailing veterans – tests for which the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can find no approval, despite May’s claim at a public meeting in Kernersville on June 10 that the test was FDA approved, and for which the US Patent and Trademark Office lists no patent in May’s name, despite May’s claims that she holds one.

Each woman said she paid May $1,500 to act in a relative’s workers’ compensation case, then, as far as each could tell, May did nothing to earn that money. Each provided a copy of a cancelled check written to LKM Health and Safety, and endorsed with May’s name when they were cashed.

In both cases, the women said they had written about their problems on internet sites and that May contacted them. The women said May stopped taking their calls after she got the money.

Sandra Trend, a 62-year-old Sacramento, California, woman, said that May accepted the $1,500 to represent her son in a workers’ compensation case. Phyllis Foster, also 62, of Wayne, Michigan, said that May accepted the $1,500 to act as an expert witness in her deceased husband’s case – something the head of the Michigan Workers’ Compensation Agency said May, as a registered nurse, is not well qualified to do.

May has claimed to have connections with the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), as well as to have written OSHA’s regulations governing chemical and mold exposure in the workplace. OSHA, as a federal regulatory agency, creates its regulations under a complex rulemaking process governed by the federal Administrative Procedures Act, which involves hearings, the gathering of an in-depth evidentiary record and intense lobbying by corporations, associations and interest groups. An OSHA spokeswoman said the agency has no record of May being involved in any rulemaking.

May also claimed to have two OSHA certifications, neither of which OSHA officials have confirmed, and neither of which, if they did exist, would qualify her to sell medical tests, act as an expert witness or represent people in workers’ compensation cases. May also claimed to be certified as an OSHA mold expert, a certification OSHA said does not exist.

Trend said May contacted her in August 2006, after Trend had posted a notice on the legal website Toxlaw.com, describing the case of her son, David Bell, who has severe health problems and attributes them to exposure to biotoxins at a California biotechnology firm. Trend said her son has had several operations and is disabled.

Trend said that May used the claimed OSHA connections in selling herself.

“When she was trying to hook me in, she said she was the one who wrote the safety regulations for OSHA, the chemical regulations, and so on,” Trend said. “She was like a bulldog. She was relentless.”

Trend said May offered to represent her son directly in the courtroom.

“She wasn’t going to be an expert witness,” Trend said. “She was going to be the one to defend David to try to win his workman’s compensation case. She said, ‘I am God in the courtroom.’ That was kind of a flag there, but I just kind of ignored it because I was desperate.”

Trend said she sent May a $1,500 check on Nov. 9, 2006, and May cashed it on Nov. 15, 2006. Trend said she also agreed to pay for May’s airline flights to California and her lodging in California while representing Trend’s son. She said May asked for the visit to be extended so May could go to the beach.

Trend provided a copy of the check – a bank check drawn on Wells Fargo Bank – which is made out to LKM Health and Safety, and is marked with the name of Bell’s case.

According to Trend, May asked her to send her son’s medical records to an address in Urbana – the address of May’s patent attorney, Michael Berns. Trend said she spent $246 preparing and shipping the medical records. She said May responded with a couple of emails asking questions about the case, then stopped taking her calls without acting in the case.

Trend provided a series of emails from May that she said documented May’s approach to her. The emails come from the same America Online account May used to contact this newspaper in May 2009.

The emails are also written in the same style May used in her emails to this paper.

On Oct. 30, 2006, May wrote, “I am the woman who wrote the chem exposure safety regs and can help you Linda”.

On Nov. 1, 2006, May wrote, “Cal OSHA laws cover your son’s exposure the state must has a law as strong as the federal or stronger so he is covered but as I told you he must have an expert and that is me no one else testifies as to the health issues of the exposures Linda”.

On Dec. 19, 2003, May wrote Trend, asking her to call a woman in Sacramento, California, a potential client of May’s, and verify May’s credibility. Trend said, “This I could not and would not do, as I could not give her a recommendation for May because May had done nothing at this point.”

Compare those emails with the one from the same address with which May made her unsolicited approach to this paper on May 28, 2009, shortly after the Oak Ridge story broke: “I am the international expert in health effects of the toxic black mold I have some very important urgent information for you can you please call me asap you can call anytime 24 hours a day LInda K May BS,RN,BSN, OSHA Instit Accredit, EPA Accredit thanks Linda”. That email bore the subject line “urgent.”

Trend said she sent May several follow-up emails, but that May did nothing on the case and never came to California to see her.

Trend provided a letter from her attorney, John Overton, to May, dated March 8, 2007. In that letter, Overton asked May to return the $1,500 and Bell’s medical records. Overton said that doing so would avoid “conflict with the federal court system relating to any perceived deceptive business practices and/or possible mail fraud.” Trend said May has returned neither.

In the Michigan case, Foster said her husband, Mack, died in 2003 of a heart attack on the floor of the Ford Motor Company truck plant where he worked as an inspector. She said that, after getting advice from friends that she should seek legal counsel, she posted a question on a website for attorneys, and was later contacted by May, who offered to act as an expert witness to testify that the death of Foster’s husband was work-related. Foster, too, said she sent May records and never heard from her again.

“She said to mail her $1,500, and that she was going to write a report and testify in the trial,” Foster said. “She said she’d get us big money, and she did nothing.” Foster said May wanted another $2,100 to testify.

Foster provided a copy of the check, dated Jan. 5, 2005, and drawn on Bank One of Michigan. The “for” line of the check reads, “Retainer Fee for Mack J. Foster Work Comp Cases.”

Jack Nolish, director of the Michigan Workers’ Compensation Agency, said that he knows of no case in which a person with May’s nursing and bachelor’s degrees has acted as an expert witness in a workers’ compensation case. He called those degrees “woefully lacking” for an expert witness or for reviewing medical records.

“That testimony wouldn’t stand,” he said. “In Michigan, a registered nurse wouldn’t do the trick.”

Nolish confirmed the existence of the case, the cause of death and the withdrawal of the case on March 31, 2005. He said the case never went to trial and that no testimony, briefs or deposition transcripts were filed in the case, since there was no trial or hearing.

There are similarities between the California and Michigan cases.

In both the women already had what they said were competent representatives, who they said May, after becoming involved, disparaged and tried to get them to fire.

“She just really tried to discredit him,” Trend said. Trend added that May said her attorney “was a phony; he didn’t know what he was doing.”

Foster said that May complained about Foster’s attorney, and when Foster forwarded her attorney emails in which May disparaged him, the attorney pulled out of the case. Neither Trend’s nor Foster’s attorneys could be reached for comment.

“When I sent the emails to my lawyer, he ended up not wanting to work on the case from her running her mouth,” Foster said.

In both cases, the women said May gave them a hard-luck story about her living situation, leading them to feel sorry for her at first.

Trend said that May explained the necessity of mailing the documents to Berns’ office by referring to a housing problem. Trend said, “She gave me this B.S. story about how there was a fire in her house, and her fax machine was burnt.”

Foster said that May cited a burglary at her house as the reason it was necessary for Foster to overnight the $1,500 check to her. “She worried about getting that check,” Foster said. “She gave me a sob story that her house had been broken into. She claimed that, after her house was supposedly gotten into, she was homeless and was living in this lawyer’s office at nighttime.”

Berns, an Illinois patent attorney, said that May did have a housing problem, but that it was because of a financial deal with a family friend over the sale of her house. He said she was living in another lawyer’s office, not his.

“She didn’t have a place to stay,” Berns said. “She had a problem with her home where she lost her home. It was a complicated financial problem.”

Berns acknowledged receiving medical records addressed to May, but said that he had not solicited them.

“I did receive some medical records packages for her,” he said. “I don’t know what was in them. She didn’t have an office and she was moving. I don’t even know if she even asked me if I would take them. That’s the way she does things sometimes.”

Berns, who is listed with the Illinois Secretary of State’s Office as the contact for May’s company, Warbler of Illinois, was also able to shed some light on the issues of the patents that May claims to hold. In June, May said she held two patents: one for the urine test she is selling and one for a wall unit she said would detect “black mold” before anyone could see or smell it.

“I hold the patent, and I turn it over to a company to produce,” May said.

Of the urine test, May said, “I’m the patent holder. As the patent holder, my name went on it, but I don’t make a dime off of it.”

Searches of the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database turn up no patents with May listed as the inventor or assignee of a patent or the legal representative of a patent holder. The database lists two patents under the name “Linda May,” one by an Oklahoma woman for a livestock restraining gate and one by a California woman for a face pillow. The database has no records under the name Warbler of Illinois.

Berns said that May holds no patents, but that he has worked with her on applying for a patent. Patents are not listed in the USPTO database until approved.

“She’s been working on patents,” he said. “None are issued. I don’t know if she just doesn’t understand the terminology of patent applied for, patent pending, or working on the patents.”

Berns said that the patent application he was preparing for May was not for a urine test. May said the test kit she is selling is both a urine test for human exposure and an environmental test for the home. A photograph of it shows both a urine-sample bottle and a Petri dish.

Berns said that, to his knowledge, May planned to contract out the testing for her products to an outside laboratory. But May has made repeated claims that Warbler of Illinois has a laboratory, or is preparing to open one.

In Kernersville in June, she said that the lab would be operated in conjunction with St. Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital and would open within nine days.

In an interview shortly afterward, May dropped the St. Jude’s claim and said the company was running the lab.

On August 11, May appeared on Veterans for Veteran Connection, an internet radio program selling test kits, this time as tests for Agent Orange exposure. Agent Orange is a pesticide chemically unrelated to mold and was used as a defoliant during the Vietnam War. May said veterans have won veterans benefits for Agent Orange exposure using her test.

Asked about that claim later, Terry Jemison, a spokesman for the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in Washington, said the VA presumes exposure for any veteran who was in Vietnam and has one of a list of diseases linked to the defoliant by the Institute of Medicine. He said a test wouldn’t make any difference to benefits.

Jemison said, “Whether or not they can actually prove that they were exposed is irrelevant, if they can show that they have one of the diseases that have been shown to be linked to Agent Orange.”

On the radio, show, May said that the lab is in Pontiac, Illinois. “We don’t give you the location of the lab, it’s just within Livingston County, Pontiac, Illinois,” she said. May said the lab had been in Maryland. “It’s not been in Pontiac until recently,” she said.

The mayor of Pontiac, Bob Russell, appeared on the radio show with May and a group of veterans from the Pontiac town hall, saying the town had been working with May for months to try to get her to locate a lab there. But Russell spoke as if the lab did not yet exist, at least in Pontiac.

On Tuesday, Sept. 1, Pontiac City Administrator Robert Karls said that Warbler of Illinois does not have an operating lab in Pontiac. He said the city has not yet had a chance to verify any of the claims May has made for the company.

According to the FDA and other federal officials, whether Warbler of Illinois had a laboratory, or was contracting the test out to another lab, the lab doing the test would have to be registered, inspected and monitored under the federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), a registration that is required for labs offering medical tests in the United States. Each lab registered under CLIA is given a CLIA number, which is not secret. The CLIA database contains no registration for a lab run by Warbler of Illinois, either in Illinois or in Maryland. May has not identified any other lab as doing the testing.

May did not return calls or emails for comment. Two of her attorneys said they would pass on requests for an interview to her.

greensboro.rhinotimes.com

Posted in Toxic Mold, Veterans | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

ToxLaw.com – Record Penalty In Improper Marketing Case – Washington Post

Posted on ToxLaw.com by Sharon Kramer on 9/03/09

Well there is a real shocker! You mean to tell me that improper marketing has played a key role in US health policies and physicians’ practices in recent years?

I have a letter from Kathleen Sebelius, June 2009, complimenting me on my understanding of this concept after I explained to her in detail about ACOEM, the US Chamber, the mold issue and the dark side of “evidence based” medicine in US health policy.

I would propose that the following article about drug company fraudulent marketing is NOT about the biggest fraud in marketing over medical science in the US. It is the third biggest that is trumped by the mold issue and the tobacco issue.

If they can do this for the third biggest, they also need to act on the mold issue. But…how do they handle it when the Department of Justice has been itself involved in romoting fraud in healthcare for the purpose of limiting the government’s own financial liability? Where is the integrity of this new administration if it is only a pot calling a kettle black?

The DOJ has used the ACOEM authors as expert defense witnesses to defeat claims of mold induced illness in children made ill in military housing. Between 2004 and 2007, they have paid these expert defense witnesses approximately $800,000 for their services.

Guess the Department of Justice does not read the Wall Street Journal about the matter, or GAO audit stipulating that the US gov needs to send consistent messaging, or World Health Org about it… or the hundreds if not thousands of letters sent to officials by tax paying citizens asking they get off their asses and DO SOMETHING about the deceit harming MANY.

Nope. They are willing to rely on extrapolations applied to single rodent studies performed by an old Tobacco scientist and his business partner and then mass promoted by the US Chamber and a think-tank to establish health policy when it serves the DOJ’s own $$$$ purpose.

fedspending.org company name veritox

I think the DOJ needs to put its money where it mouth is and fine itself for actively participating in an even bigger fraud in health policy/health care.

Otherwise, it is just an illustration of more hypocricy at its finest coming out of Washington, DC – where insurance and Chamber of Commerce lobbying money flows like molten lava of gold.

Below is the video deposition of Bruce J. Kelman discussing the DOJ using the ACOEM BS to defeat claims of liability for illnesses in sick little military children living in moldy housing (aka the children of the men and women who live their lives for our country):

blip.tv/file

Today’s Washington Post article of the DOJ “doing its job”:

washingtonpost.com

In Settlement, A Warning To Drugmakers Pfizer to Pay Record Penalty In Improper-Marketing Case

By Carrie Johnson

Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 3, 2009

“The Obama administration intensified its public campaignagainst health-care fraud Wednesday, putting drugmakers on notice that they will be forced to atone for improper marketing practices as prosecutors unveiled a record $2.3 billion settlement with Pfizer.

Officials at the departments of Justice and Health and human Services called the agreement with Pfizer and one of its subsidiaries a cautionary example of their strategy to team up with states to police errant health-care businesses.

The Pfizer unit Pharmacia & Upjohn pleaded guilty to a single felony charge that accused the company of marketing its anti-inflammatory drug Bextra for broader uses and higher dosages than those approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

The company allegedly enticed doctors to prescribe the drug or pain relief by taking them on lavish trips, created sham requests for medical information as an excuse to send unsolicited advertising materials to physicians, and drafted articles promoting the pills without disclosing its role in preparing the stories.

In connection with the settlement, Pharmacia & Upjohn consented to pay $1.3 billion in fines and forfeiture, the biggest criminal penalty ever imposed in the United States, prosecutors said. Pfizer paid an additional $1 billion to state and federal authorities to resolve civil illegations of improper marketing over Bextra and three more drugs: Geodon, an antipsychotic medicine; Zyvox, an antibiotic; and Lyrica, an epilepsy medicine….The settlement comes as federal agencies pursue a wider strategy to target wrongdoing in the deep-pocketed health-care industry.

Earlier this year, Justice and HHS deployed a task force of prosecutors and federal agents to bring criminal charges against the ringleaders of small groups… The Justice Department’s civil division, led by Tony West, also has pledged to devote more attention to whistleblowers at drug companies and insurance firms who flag improper payments and marketing schemes.

The department is on track this fiscal year to collect more than $3 billion in False Claims Act cases; most of the money will go back to the U.S. Treasury.

The announcement yesterday came amid the escalating political debate on health-care reform,…

Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli called the Pfizer  case “an example of the department’s ongoing and intensive efforts to protect the American public” from fraud and abuse, which costs the Treasury billions of dollars a year…..Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said her department’s inspector general will heighten scrutiny of the company to make sure it does not run afoul of the law……”

Sharon Noonan Kramer

Dr. James Craners letter of the ACOEM’s Deceit On Mold – a litigation “defense report” – PDF

WSJ – Court of Opinion – Amid Suits Over Mold, Experts Wear Two Hats

Public Comment for Senate HELP Committee Meeting of 06.11.09

6.23.09 Letter from Kathleen Sebilius

ToxLaw.com

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Politics, Toxic Mold, US Chamber of Commerce | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Toxic Indoor Mold Central – National Apartment Association (NAA) Files Amicus Brief in Mold Case – LETS GET OUR FACTS STRAIGHT

A few comments.  As far as “faulty science” and no “causal link”, this is absurd.  I possess several peer-reviewed papers that conclusively show that mold and the mycotoxins it produces cause a wide variety of health issues some of which are very serious.  As far as junk science, then the Sanford & Son’s must be Dr. Jack Thrasher, Dr. Ritchie Shoemaker, Dr. Gray, Dr. Schaller, Dr. Kilburn, Dr. Hooper, Dr. Yang, Dr. Campbell, and the others who have dedicated themselves to come to our rescue.  With prominent and well-respected individuals as this, the only junk is what the NAA is shoveling.

It is quite simple to remedy this.  Just take the NAA leadership, have them live in a mold filled structure like we were forced to, and they will see more clearly. The truth is, they know and we know.  If ethics and morals was the basis for their reasoning, then there would be no argument.  It is not.  Their fight all stems from money and the need to spend little and make as much as they can.  That is what drives these corrupt actions and statements.  No compassion or caring of others.  You got to wonder.  Who is really diseased?  Them or us.  At least we care about others and even while sick, reach out to help our fellow brothers and sisters.

Toxic Indoor Mold Central

Dr. James Craners letter of the ACOEM’s Deceit On Mold – a litigation “defense report” – PDF

WSJ – Court of Opinion – Amid Suits Over Mold, Experts Wear Two Hats

NAA Files Amicus Brief in Mold Case

W. Michael Semko – Vice President, National Lease Program, National Apartment Association
9/1/2009

On Aug. 31 NAA filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief in an Arizona state appellate court. The brief sets forth legal and public policy arguments that address litigation arising out of a resident’s exposure to mold at an apartment community – specifically, the dearth of scientific evidence supporting a causal link between mold exposure and adverse health effects. Claims of physical injuries attributed to the presence of mold in housing have been the basis for an explosion of litigation over the past twenty years. In 2003, the Insurance Information Institute estimated that 10,000 mold-related suits were pending nationwide; a 300 percent increase since 1999. Mold litigation represents significant risks to providers of rental housing as evidenced by a recent jury award of $3.3 million to a plaintiff who blamed her illnesses on her exposure to mold in her rental home. Litigation and judgment awards based on junk science harm the apartment industry, and greatly increase the cost of housing for residents.

The scientific studies, described in the amicus brief, debunk the notion of a causative effect between the presence of mold and the wide ranging health-related damages claimed in these cases. In its brief, NAA argues that because the plaintiffs base their claims on faulty science, and it is generally accepted in the scientific community that no causal link between mold and poor health can be demonstrated, the decision of the trial court dismissing the case should be affirmed on legal and public policy grounds.

The case is Mason v. Eastside Apartments, Inc., et al. 1 CA-CV 09-155 and the appeal is pending before the Court of Appeals for the State of Arizona, Division One. For more information on this case, mold litigation or how to apply for NAA amicus assistance, please contact Michael Semko at 703.518.6141 ext. 111.

naahq.org/blog 

Note – Information on Riverstone Residential knowingly exposing tenants to extreme amounts of mold toxins at Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.  katy

Toxic Mold Infested Jefferson Lakes Apartments managed by Riverstone Residential

Riverstone Residential Litigation

Mold Inspection Reports

Photos of Mold in Apartment

 
Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The VALIDITY of the environmental neurotoxic effects of toxigenic molds and mycotoxins

Ebere C. Anyanwu
St Peter’s Middle College House 
Birmingham United Kingdom

Citation: E. C. Anyanwu : The validity of the environmental neurotoxic effects of toxigenic molds and mycotoxins . The Internet Journal of Toxicology. 2008 Volume 5 Number 2

Keywords: Toxigenic molds | health effects | controversies | validity

Abstract

The problems and controversies about the validity of environmental neurotoxic health effects of toxigenic mold and mycotoxin exposures have taken a center stage in scientific, legal, social, and political discourse to which important basic scientific truth has been misrepresented by subjective “double talk” in recent years. Fortunately, the scientific truth is characterized by objectivity and systematic organization based on compelling pieces of evidence. This paper reviews the relevant, most recent peer reviewed literatures that support the validity of the environmental risks and adverse neurotoxic health effects of chronic exposures to toxigenic molds and mycotoxins. The structures of typical mycotoxins are cited to show the relevance of functional groups, and how their biochemical activities may contribute to adverse health effects in relation to signs, symptoms, and mechanisms. The proven interactions between the biological system and the molecular functional groups of mycotoxins are evaluated to explain how they may lead to neurotoxic health effects in terms of carcinogenic, biochemical, immunological, neurophysiological and behavioral properties. Based on all the relevant affect factors, there are huge compelling pieces of evidence derived by exposure conditions, clinical presentations, scientific laboratory investigations, and the development of science of nanotoxicology, that support the validity of adverse environmental neurotoxic health effects of toxigenic mold and mycotoxins.

Introduction

Adverse health effects of toxigenic molds and mycotoxins have been recognized for centuries following environmental exposures and ingestion of contaminated foods. It is no longer arguable that normal building materials and furnishings are susceptible to, and provide ample sources of nutrition for many species of molds. It is accepted that under favorable conditions, toxigenic molds can grow luxuriantly, and amplify indoors especially, when there is an adequate supply of moisture. Occupationally, toxigenic mold infections have been reported are known to cause diseases in industrial or agricultural settings after inhalation exposure to toxigenic molds 1.

Globally, disproportionate growths of toxigenic molds are serious public environmental health problems that are misunderstood mostly, because of the complexity in their natural mode of life and duality of functions. Under favorable conditions, toxigenic molds can develop rapidly, to produce metabolites to which are either broad-spectrum antibiotics, or mycotoxins that are cytotoxic to human health2. Mycotoxins are highly stable compounds, and the toxigenic molds producing them are ubiquitous in the environment 3. These two properties of toxigenic molds account for their survival and persistence in the environment. The most common routes of exposure to toxigenic molds and mycotoxins are by spores ingestion of contaminated foods, dermal, respiratory, and parenteral routes, the last being associated with drug abuse 4.

The most frequent toxigenic molds in Europe are Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Fusarium species 5. They produce aflatoxin B1 transformed into aflatoxin M1 found in the milk, as well as Ochratoxins and Zearalenone, Fumonisin B1, T-2 toxin, HT-2 toxin, and deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin), which are of increasing concern in human health everywhere in the world. In the USA, the predominant toxigenic molds that have been identified and vastly documented are the Alternaria, Cladosporium, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Stachybotrys, Curvularia, Basidiomycetes, Myxomycetes, smuts, Epicoccus, Fusarium, Bipolaris, and Rhizopus 6,7,8. Hence, these molds and their mycotoxins are under continuous survey in Europe, albeit, with unstandardized effective regulatory apparatus at European level [7]. Based on available evidence however, it is accepted in Europe and elsewhere, that the mycotoxins produced by these toxigenic molds are particularly a risk for human health 2,9,10].

The Structure of Mycotoxins

The structural and functional properties of mycotoxins and their intracellular activities and mechanisms are the fundamental basis for their pathophysiological, and neurodevelopmental mycotoxic effects [11]. A partial list of known mycotoxins is shown in Table 1. What makes most of these mycotoxins toxicologically unique is their possession of similar chemical architecture, varying molecular weights, and identical reactive functional groups.

Table 1: A Partial List of Known Mycotoxins (N. Carolina Coop. Extension).
Table 1: A Partial List of Known Mycotoxins (N. Carolina Coop. Extension).

Aflatoxin M1 and satratoxin H mycotoxins, for example, are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Aflatoxin M1 with a molecular formula C17H12O7, and a relative molecular mass of 328 Da, is the 4-hydroxy derivative of aflatoxin B1 (Fig. 1), and is secreted in the milk of exposed mammals. Satratoxin H produced by Stachybytris is extremely toxic and abortogenic properties in animals, and in high doses, or chronic low doses, it can be lethal. No safe dose level of mycotoxin in humans has been effectively determined as to establish the suggestion put forward by Hardin et al.1.

Figure 1: The chemical structure of aflatoxin M1 (Relative molecular mass of 328 Da and has the molecular formula C17H12O7).
Figure 1: The chemical structure of aflatoxin M1 (Relative molecular mass of 328 Da and has the molecular formula C17H12O7).

Hence, the safety regulations in place now remain inconclusive, precautionary, and arbitrary. Since some of the antifungal drugs are derived from molds, and since they have structural and functional groups similar to those of mycotoxins, the knowledge of their interactions are important in enhancing preventive measures [11].

Figure 2: Satratoxin H., molecular formula C29H6O9
Figure 2: Satratoxin H., molecular formula C29H6O9

Toxicity of mycotoxins

Production of mycotoxins is dependent upon the type of producing fungus and environmental conditions, such as the substrate, water activity (moisture and relative humidity), and duration of exposure to stressful conditions, and microbial ecological interactions. The toxicity of the mycotoxins varies considerably with the toxin, the animal species exposed to them, and the extent of exposure, age, and nutritional status. Several Aspergillus species are associated with mycotoxin production: A. ochraceus with ochratoxin A, A. fumigatus with fumitremorgins, gliotoxin, and verrucologen; A. versicolor with sterigmatocystin, and A. flavus and A. parasiticus with aflatoxins. Sterigmatocystin may also be produced by A. flavus, A. nidulans, A. rugulosus, and A. unguis 12.

Penicillium on the other hand, produces sterigmatocystin, fumagillin, verruculogen, penitrem A, and roquefortine C, which cause serious toxic effects. Sterigmatocystin is known to cause a 80-fold higher toxicity in lung cells indicating supporting involvement in the etiology of lung diseases due to the inhalation of organic dust 13. In addition, exposure to mycotoxin may occur via enteric, inhalation, or direct contact to skin and mucosa. Acute and chronic disorders, irritation, systemic reactions, and even cancer may develop after the exposure to these toxins. Some mycotoxins have the propensity to act as immunosuppressants, which may be in association with an increased prevalence of repeated infections found among the exposed inhabitants of buildings with flooding and moisture problems.

Symptomology, and Mechanisms of adverse health effects

Symptoms include respiratory complaints that involve the nose and lungs; eye symptoms, and mucous membrane irritation. Actively growing fungal colonies can release volatile substances that have an unpleasant smell, leading to psychological responses in the occupants such as fatigue and nausea. For almost all allergic individuals, the reactions may be limited to rhinitis or asthma, and sinusitis may occur secondarily due to obstruction 1. The major presentations are headache, general debilitating pains, nose bleeding, fevers with body temperatures up to 40 degrees C (104 degrees F), cough, memory loss, depression, mood swings, sleep disturbances, anxiety, chronic fatigue, vertigo/dizziness, and in some cases, seizures [10].

Although sleep is commonly considered a restorative process that is important for the proper functioning of the immune system, it could be disturbed by mycotoxins. A study by Rea et al. [7], found that respiratory signs (e.g., rhinorrhea, sinus tenderness, and wheezing) in 64% of all patients. Physical signs and symptoms of neurological dysfunction (e.g., inability to stand on the toes or to walk a straight line with eyes closed, as well as short-term memory loss) were also identified in 70% of all patients [7].

Pediatric exposure to molds may constitute a health threat to children resulting in respiratory symptoms in both the upper and lower airways, increased incidence of infections, and skin manifestations. At chronic exposure levels, nose bleeding, hemoptysis, and pulmonary hemorrhage may occur 14. These adverse health effects can occur through various mechanisms, including immunological IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, infection, and irritant reaction to spores or mycotoxic metabolites 15. Mycotoxins can cause acute and chronic respiratory diseases after inhalation of organic dust containing toxigenic molds and mycotoxins, respectively. Molds have been implicated in the induction of asthma and allergic rhinitis through IgE-mediated mechanisms, to cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis through other immune mechanisms, and to cause life-threatening primary and secondary infections in immunocompromised patients 16.

Controversies of toxic health effects

There is a continuous debate as to the causal association of environmental exposure health effects of toxigenic molds and mycotoxins. Stachybotrys chartarum for example, is blamed for a diverse array of toxic effects on exposed individuals. Some studies 1 argue that despite toxigenic molds’ well-known ability to produce mycotoxins under appropriate growth conditions, years of intensive study have failed to establish exposure to S. chartarum in home, school, or office environments as a cause of adverse human health effects. They argue that the levels of exposure in the indoor environment, dose-response data in animals, and dose-rate considerations suggest that delivery by the inhalation route of a toxic dose of mycotoxins in the indoor environment is highly unlikely at best, even for the hypothetically most vulnerable subpopulations. It is further claimed that except for persons with severely impaired immune systems, indoor mold is not a source of fungal infections [17. These arguments are unfortunately subjective and have since been disabused by significant volumes of evidence and the emergence of modern technological developments, including nanotoxicology.

It is becoming much clearer that the emergence of this new scientific developments will provide sufficient evidence in support of adverse effects of chronic inhalation of mycotoxins in home, school, or office environments. Already, there is general agreement that active mold growth in indoor environments is unsanitary [17. It must be emphasized that “sanitary” is a function of contamination and a platform for infection. Several pieces of evidence are also found of a relationship between high levels of inhalation exposure or direct contact to mycotoxin-containing molds or mycotoxins, and demonstrable effects in animals and humans 8,10,11,17.

Carcinogenic properties

Volumes of evidence in peer-reviewed literature believe and support the fact that the induction of cancer by a majority of mycotoxins is a major public health concern especially, at chronic levels of exposure 18. The most documented and important mycotoxins in this regard, are aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, fumonisins, trichothecenes, and zearalenone. Aflatoxins are potent carcinogens, which in association with hepatitis B virus, are claimed to be responsible for many thousands of human deaths per annum, mostly in non-industrialized tropical countries. Ochratoxin A is a probable carcinogen, and may cause urinary tract cancer and kidney damage in people from northern and eastern Europe. Fumonisins appear to be the cause of oesophageal cancer in southern Africa, parts of China and elsewhere. Trichothecenes are highly immunosuppressive and zearalenone causes estrogenic effects in animals and man 18.

Immunological Effects

Chronic indoor environmental exposure to toxigenic molds leads to various adverse neuroimmunologic and behavioral consequences to which allergy, asthma, hypersensitivity, pneumonitis, and mucus membrane irritation are manifested 19,20. Abnormalities in T and B cells, and subsets, were found in more than 80% of the patients [7]. Vojdani et al. 19] investigated the antibodies against seven different molds antigens and two mycotoxins using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the blood of 40 controls and 40 mold-exposed patients. They found abnormal immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies), in mold-exposed patients compared to the control. Most patients with high levels of antibodies against various mold antigens, also exhibited elevated antibodies against purified mycotoxins, indicating that the patients had been exposed to mold spores and mycotoxins. Detection of high levels (colony-forming units per cubic meter) of molds and a significant elevation in IgG, IgM, or IgA antibodies against molds and mycotoxins, strongly suggests a reservoir of spores in the indoor environment of the patients 19].

Mycotoxin-induced abnormal NKC activity

One of the immune system disorders usually found in patients presenting with toxigenic mold exposure is an abnormal natural killer cell activity. It is possible that mycotoxins exert some effects on the circadian rhythmic processes resulting in sleep deprivation to which an acute and transient increase in NKC activity could be observed 21]. At very low physiological concentrations, mycotoxin-induced abnormal NKC activity could lead to depression, psychological stress, tissue injuries, malignancies, carcinogenesis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. In the light of these observations, it is evident that chronic exposures to toxigenic mold could lead to abnormal NKC activity with a wide range of debilitating neurological consequences 21].

Neurophysiological effects

Myconeurotoxicity refers to any adverse effects of exposure to mycotoxins or byproducts of primary and secondary mold metabolism, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the structural or functional integrity of the developing or adult nervous system 21]. Neuromycotoxic effects may involve a spectrum of biochemical, morphological, behavioral, and physiological abnormalities whose onset can vary from immediate to delayed actions, following exposure to a mycotoxins. The duration of effects may be transient, or persistent, and result in disability in some individuals, while some may have life-threatening consequences.

Mycotoxins may act directly on the elements of the nervous, or other biological systems, which then induce adverse systemic response. Although, neuromycotoxic disorders can be established using clinical electrophysiological techniques, there is always the possibility of false positive and false negative results in some patients, which may be due to a multi-factorial etiopathogenesis of neuromycotoxicity. However, detection of nervous system toxicity and other measures of toxicity could be achieved using a combination of neurodiagnostic techniques [11].

Demyelinating optic neuritis

Mycotic demyelinating optic neuritis is a neurological disorder of the visual system caused by mycotoxins released by indoor toxic molds. The health effect of indoor toxic mold on the population worldwide could be regarded as one of the “emerging diseases”. Most of the neurological and immunologic abnormalities associated with toxic mold mycotoxins are very difficult to treat successfully, especially neural demyelination of the central and peripheral nervous systems 22. However, Campbell et al. [23 successfully treated some patients with a combination of intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and itraconozole (Sporanox) when all other treatment modalities failed.

Neuropsychological and behavioral effects

Recent studies carried out by Crago et al. 24 on patients (N = 182) with confirmed mold-exposure showed high levels of physical, cognitive, and emotional symptoms. Most of the patients were found to suffer from acute stress, adjustment disorder, or post-traumatic stress. Neuropsychological testing also, revealed predominance of impaired functioning on multiple cognitive tasks. A dose-response relationship between measures of mold exposure and abnormal neuropsychological test results and QEEG measures suggested that toxic mold caused significant problems in exposed individuals 24. In another objective neuropsychological study of 46 of the patients [7], the patients exhibited abnormalities in short-term memory, executive function/judgment, concentration, and hand/eye coordination.

Other neurobehavioral manifestations in the mold-exposed individuals are abnormal decrease in steady balance, reaction time, blink-reflex latency, color discrimination, visual fields, and grip, compared to control [20. Hence, most exposed patients have reduced cognitive functioning in multiple domains, with memory and executive functions the most commonly affected areas. 25,26,27,28.

Respiratory manifestations

Upper respiratory exposure to different environmental antigens results first in the activation of mucosal immunity and production of IgA antibodies in different secretions including saliva. Vojdani et al. 29 studied the saliva IgA antibody levels against seven different molds in 40 patients exposed to molds and in 40 control subjects. Mold-exposed patients showed significantly higher levels of salivary IgA antibodies against one or more mold species. A majority of patients with high IgA antibodies against molds exhibited elevation in salivary IgA against mycotoxins, as well. These IgA antibodies against molds and mycotoxins are specific, since using molds and mycotoxins in immune absorption could reduce antibody levels, significantly.

Detection of high counts of molds in water-damaged buildings, strongly suggests the existence of a reservoir of mold spores in the environment. Whether mold and mycotoxin specific IgA antibodies detected in saliva are indicative of the role of IgA antibodies in the late phase of type-1 hypersensitivity reaction or in type-2 and type-3 delayed sensitivities was not immediately established. Upper respiratory tract, lower respiratory tract, systemic, and neurocognitive symptoms were reported in 80%, 94%, 74%, and 84% of patients, respectively 29. The clinical presentation of patients with perceived mold-induced toxic effects is characterized by a disparate constellation of symptoms. Toxic mold syndrome represents the furtive evolution of aeroirritation from a transient to permanent symptom complex in patients with a psychogenic predisposition. In this respect, the core symptoms of toxic mold syndrome and their gradual transition to chronic symptoms related to nonspecific environmental fragrances and irritants appear to mimic what has been observed with other pseudodiagnostic categories, such as sick building syndrome and idiopathic chemical intolerance 30.

Biochemical abnormalities

Anyanwu et al. (2003)31 analyzed and present the biochemical abnormalities in the sera of patients presenting with chronic mycosis in order to investigate the relationship with the risks of multiple renal disorders. Blood samples from both the patients and the controls and found biochemical abnormal concentrations in creatinine, uric acid, phosphorus, alkaline phosphotase, cholesterol, HDH, SGOT/AST, segmented neutrophils, lymphocytes, total T3, IgG and IgA immunoglobulins with significant differences between patients and controls. These abnormalities were consistent with multiple renal disorders and depictive of a strong association of chronic mycosis with abnormal renal indicators.

Vitamin B12 deficiency in mycotoxicity

The overall functions of vitamin B12 as a source of coenzymes, in intracellular recycling of methionine, in methionine synthase reaction, in the prevention of chromosome breakage, in methylation, and in maintaining a one-carbon metabolic balance are well established. Signs, symptoms, and clinical neurological indications of vitamin B12 deficiency are also been known [28. Consistent vitamin B12 deficiency in chronic toxigenic mold exposures has been observed in patients exposed to chronic toxigenic molds and mycotoxins [11]. It is possible that the synergistic mycotoxic effects on one-carbon metabolism will lead to the manifestations of clinical neuropathological symptomology. Since patients with chronic exposures to toxigenic molds manifest vitamin B12 deficiencies, the role of mycotoxins in vitamin B12 metabolism is recognized. Since vitamin B12 plays important biochemical roles in one-carbon metabolism, the synergistic effects with mycotoxins on humans are apparently possible. By implication and derivation, it is likely that the interruption of the structure and function of vitamin B12 would in turn interfere with the one-carbon metabolism leading to the neurological manifestations [28.

Conclusions

The validity of the health effects of chronic toxigenic mold and mycotoxin exposures has been reviewed. The exposures to mixed molds and mycotoxins are confirmed to lead to CNS and the immune system, have pulmonary, and allergic effects preceded by inflammatory processes 25]. Subsequently, these events lead to the observed neurobehavioral abnormalities in exposed individuals 21,23. In the light of recent compelling pieces of evidence available in peer-reviewed literature and the emergence of the science of nanotoxicology, it is almost imperative that most of the controversies concerning the validity of the adverse health effects of chronic environmental toxigenic and mycotoxic exposures can at least in parts, be resolved. Further researches in this area are highly recommended.

References

1. Hardin BD, Kelman BJ, Saxon A. Adverse human health effects associated with molds in the indoor environment. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 May;45(5):470-8. (s)

2. Anyanwu EC, Mycotoxins and antifungal drug interactions: implications in the treatment of illnesses due to indoor chronic toxigenic mold exposures. ScientificWorldJournal. 2004a Mar 12;4:167-77. (s)

3. Jarvis BB, Miller JD. Mycotoxins as harmful indoor air contaminants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005 Jan;66(4):367-72. Epub 2004 Nov 23. (s)

4. Peraica M, Domijan AM. Contamination of food with mycotoxins and human health. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2001 Mar;52(1):23-35 (s)

5. Creppy EE. Update of survey, regulation and toxic effects of mycotoxins in Europe. Toxicol Lett. 2002 Feb 28;127(1-3):19-28 (s)

6. Hussein HS, Brasel JM. Toxicity, metabolism, and impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. Toxicology. 2001 Oct 15;167(2):101-34. (s)

7. Rea WJ, Didriksen N, Simon TR, Pan Y, Fenyves EJ, Griffiths B. (s)

Effects of toxic exposure to molds and mycotoxins in building-related illnesses. Arch Environ Health. 2003 Jul;58(7):399-405. (s)

8. Anyanwu, E C., Kanu, I, Nwachukwu, N C; Saleh, M A. Chronic Environmental exposure to Alternaria tenuis may manifest symptoms of neuropsychological illnesses: A study of 12 Cases. Journal of Applied Sciences & Environmental Management, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2005, pp. 45-51 (s)

9. Jarvis BB. Chemistry and toxicology of molds isolated from water-damaged buildings. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;504:43-52. (s)

10. Anyanwu E, Campbell AW, Vojdani A, Ehiri JE, Akpan AI. Biochemical changes in the serum of patients with chronic toxigenic mold exposures: a risk factor for multiple renal dysfunctions. ScientificWorldJournal. 2003 Nov 3;3:1058-64. (s)

11. Anyanwu E, Ehiri J, Akpan AI. Application, effectiveness, and limitations of the electrophysiological diagnosis of neurotoxic effects of chronic environmental mycotoxins in humans. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2004 Apr-Jun;16(2):107-18. (s)

12. Reijula K, Tuomi T. Mycotoxins of aspergilli: exposure and health effects. Front Biosci. 2003 May 1;8:s232-5. (s)

13. Bunger J, Westphal G, Monnich A, Hinnendahl B, Hallier E, Muller M. Cytotoxicity of occupationally and environmentally relevant mycotoxins. Toxicology. 2004 Oct 1;202(3):199-211. (s)

14. Rylander R, Etzel R. Introduction and summary: workshop on children’s health and indoor mold exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107 Suppl 3:465-8. (s)

15. Portnoy JM, Kwak K, Dowling P, VanOsdol T, Barnes C. Health effects of indoor fungi. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Mar;94(3):313-9; quiz 319-22, 390. (s)

16. Edmondson DA, Nordness ME, Zacharisen MC, Kurup VP, Fink JN. Allergy and “toxic mold syndrome”. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Feb;94(2):234-9. (s)

17. Robbins CA, Swenson LJ, Nealley ML, Gots RE, Kelman BJ. Health effects of mycotoxins in indoor air: a critical review. Appl Occup Environ. Hyg. 2000 Oct;15(10):773-84 (s)

18. Pitt JI. Toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins. Br Med Bull. 2000;56(1):184-92. (s)

19. Vojdani A, Campbell AW, Kashanian A, Vojdani E. Antibodies against molds and mycotoxins following exposure to toxigenic fungi in a water-damaged building. Arch Environ Health. 2003 Jun;58(6):324-36. (s)

20. Kilburn KH. Indoor mold exposure associated with neurobehavioral and pulmonary impairment: a preliminary report. Arch Environ Health. 2003 Jul;58(7):390-8. (s)

21. Anyanwu E, Campbell AW, Jones J, Ehiri JE, Akpan AI. The neurological significance of abnormal natural killer cell activity in chronic toxigenic mold exposures. ScientificWorldJournal. 2003 Nov 13;3:1128-37. (s)

22. Gray MR, Thrasher JD, Crago R, Madison RA, Arnold L, Campbell AW, Vojdani A. Mixed mold mycotoxicosis: immunological changes in humans following exposure in water-damaged buildings. Arch Environ Health. 2003 Jul;58(7):410-20. (s)

23. Campbell AW, Anyanwu EC, Vojdani A. Combination of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins and itraconozole in treating chronic mycotic demyelinating optic neuritis. ScientificWorldJournal. 2003 Aug 2;3:640-6. (s)

24. Crago BR, Gray MR, Nelson LA, Davis M, Arnold L, Thrasher JD. Psychological, neuropsychological, and electrocortical effects of mixed mold exposure. Arch Environ Health. 2003 Aug;58(8):452-63. (s)

25. Vojdani A, Thrasher JD, Madison RA, Gray MR, Heuser G, Campbell AW. Antibodies to molds and satratoxin in individuals exposed in water-damaged buildings. Arch Environ Health. 2003 Jul;58(7):421-32. (s)

26. Campbell AW, Thrasher JD, Madison RA, Vojdani A, Gray MR, Johnson A. Neural autoantibodies and neurophysiologic abnormalities in patients exposed to molds in water-damaged buildings. Arch Environ Health. 2003 Aug; 58(8): 464-74. (s)

27. Gordon WA, Cantor JB, Johanning E, Charatz HJ, Ashman TA, Breeze JL, Haddad L, Abramowitz S. Cognitive impairment associated with toxigenic fungal exposure: a replication and extension of previous findings. Appl Neuropsychol. 2004;11(2):65-74. (s)

28. Anyanwu EC, Morad M, Campbell AW. Metabolism of mycotoxins, intracellular functions of vitamin B12, and neurological manifestations in patients with chronic toxigenic mold exposures. A review. ScientificWorldJournal. 2004 Aug 26;4:736-45. (s)

29. Vojdani A, Kashanian A, Vojdani E, Campbell AW. Saliva secretory IgA antibodies against molds and mycotoxins in patients exposed to toxigenic fungi. : Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2003 Nov;25(4):595-614. (s)

30. Khalili B, Montanaro MT, Bardana EJ Jr. Inhalational mold toxicity: fact or fiction? A clinical review of 50 cases. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Sep;95(3):239-46. (s)

ispub.com

Posted in Environmental Health Threats, Health - Medical - Science, Mold and Politics, Mold Litigation, Toxic Mold | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment